The Unevenness of Construction Market Development and Regional Infrastructure Development in Russia

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (9) ◽  
pp. 697-707
Author(s):  
S. N. Kotlyarova

Aim. The presented study aims to address the issues of the unevenness of construction market development and regional infrastructure development in the Russian Federation.Tasks. The authors analyze the scale of the construction markets in Russian regions and compare it with the level of infrastructure development.Methods. This study uses statistical methods of information processing, including the index method, ranking, and expert assessment. Input data for the analysis include official statistical reports of the Federal State Statistics Service (major socio-economic indicators and indicators of construction activity development in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation), analytical reviews of InfraOne Research — Russian infrastructure: development index 2020, and data from the SPARK service.Results. The study examines the specific features of regional construction market development and divides regions into five groups based on the scale of construction markets. The authors assess the relationship between the volume of construction works and the scale of the contractor market with the values of the infrastructure development index and the volume of housing commissioning. It is concluded that there is a mutual influence between the scale of the construction market and the level of infrastructure development. The results of the study can be used in the development (updating) of strategies for the development of the construction complex and infrastructure, as well as in the implementation of government policy in this area.Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the volume of construction works, Russian regions are divided into five groups depending on the scale of the construction market. The scale is assessed based on the extent of the region’s contribution to the total volume of construction works performed in the Russian Federation. Assessment of the relationship between the volume of construction works and the scale of the contractor market with the values of the infrastructure development index indicates that regions with a large volume of construction works have a higher infrastructure development index. The volume of construction works and the number of construction companies do not always have an effect the infrastructure development index.

Author(s):  
D.V. Aleshin ◽  
D.V. Aleshin ◽  
D.V. Aleshin

В статье представлены результаты проведенного анализа структуры и динамики доходов региональных бюджетов в Российской Федерации с выявлением доминирующих факторов, повлиявших на их формирование. На основе авторского подхода осуществлена классификация российских регионов с учетом рисков по отношению к устойчивому развитию субъектов РФ. Дано обоснование использования теории вероятностей при бюджетном планировании и прогнозировании. Исследование базируется на большом количестве собранных эмпирических данных Федерального казначейства, Министерства финансов РФ, Федеральной службы государственной статистики.The article presents the results of the analysis of the structure and dynamics of regional budget revenues in the Russian Federation with the identification of the dominant factors that influenced their formation. Based on the authors approach, the classification of Russian regions was carried out taking into account risks in relation to the sustainable development of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The rationale for using theory of chances in budget planning and forecasting is given. The study is based on a large amount of empirical data collected by the Federal Treasury, the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, and the Federal State Statistics Service.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marat R. Safiullin ◽  
Azat R. Kadyrov ◽  
Gulnaz M. Galeeva

This article considers the problems of infrastructure financing, which is necessary for the successful development of regional economic systems. To identify the current problems in the development of investment attractiveness of the Russian regions, we selected the following factors: availability and level of provision of industrial, social, transport, and other infrastructure with facilities, government expenses on the creation and development of regional infrastructure. The study consists of several stages and is based on data published on the official websites of the World Bank, Gazprombank, the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, and the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation. The study shows that the absolute leaders in terms of infrastructure investments are such countries as China, the United States, and India. In the total amount of infrastructure investments, transport infrastructure and telecommunications have an absolute advantage. In recent years, one of the development priorities of the Russian regions has been investing in physical culture and sports infrastructure facilities. This is due to major international sporting events and increasing the investment attractiveness of the regions. An important trend in the development of infrastructural support for the development of regional economic systems has been the conclusion of international investment transactions (IIT) and regional agreements. Most countries and regions, leading in the inflow of foreign direct investment, are the leaders in terms of infrastructure development at the same time.


2021 ◽  
pp. 87-93
Author(s):  
S. S. Krasnykh

The article examines the import activities of the subjects of the Russian Federation in the context of the coronavirus infection spread, analyses the import dynamics for 2019–2021, and constructs a regression model of panel data confirming the relationship between imports and the number of COVID-19 cases. It has been found that the number of cases of COVID-19 is directly impact on the import. Import volumes, in value terms, for the period 2019–2021, show a steady increase, which can be explained by an increase in mortality in the Russia, socio-economic consequences associated with the spread of COVID-19, and anticovidal sanitary and epidemiological restrictions.


Author(s):  
Sergey KAPELYUK ◽  
◽  
Elena LISHCHUK ◽  

This article examines the relationship between indicators of poverty and inequality and the electoral behavior of the population. For the purpose of the study we use the results of elections of governors of Russian regions and the results of elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation. The analysis was carried out on the basis of regional data for 2015–2019. Methods of cross-sectional regression analysis were used to reveal causal relationships. Based on the results of the analysis, it was revealed that the results of the election campaigns of the regional governors do not depend both on the level of poverty in the region and on the scale of socioeconomic inequality. At the same time, the scale of regional inequality had a significant impact on the regionallevel results of elections to the State Duma of the Russian Federation in 2016. Subsequently, the results of the election campaign in some regions turned out to be unpredictable.


Author(s):  
M. S. Egorova ◽  

This article discusses the role of social infrastructure in the framework of integrated development of territories. Analytical data is provided on the volume of the construction market, both in the Russian Federation and within the limits of St. Petersburg. In addition, methods for solving the problem of the need to increase residential development in the context of a shortage of territories for the integrated construction of residential premises are considered. Examples are given illustrating the implementation of various programs for the construction of social infrastructure in various regions of the Russian Federation, and possible ways of interaction between developers and state authorities are outlined.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-159
Author(s):  
Marina Yu. Malkina

The purpose of this study is to assess the resilience of the development of the Russian regions using the Mahalanobis distance methodology. I test a number of hypotheses about the relationship between resilient development and its level, rate, and the degrees of economic openness and sectoral diversification of the economy. The study relies on the data provided by the Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation on 83 Russian regions from 2000 to 2017. The level of economic resilience was determined using five particular indicators per capita: the revenue of the consolidated budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the actual final consumption of households, the investments of firms in fixed assets, exports and imports. Bringing partial indicators of development to a single indicator was carried out by calculating the Mahalanobis distances, demonstrating the average normalized distance of the region to a particular center. The construction of temporal regressions of the Mahalanobis distances for each region made it possible to separate the stable trend of their development from the cyclical component. To assess the absolute and relative levels of the instability of regional development, I used the standard deviation of the residuals of these regressions and its ratio to the time-average Mahalanobis distance of each region. To test the hypotheses, I constructed multivariate regressions based on spatial samples of regions. As a result of the study, I obtain assessments of the level and rate of development, as well as the levels of absolute and relative stability, both for 5 particular indicators and for a composite indicator in all Russian regions. A positive and rather high correlation was found between the level of regional development and its absolute instability. Among the least stable, I found a number of dynamically developing mining regions of the Russian Federation, such as the Tyumen and Sakhalin regions, the Yamalo-Nenets and Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, but also the Kaluga region with a developed manufacturing industry. Some of the less developed regions of the European part of Russia with a fairly diversified economy (Chuvash Republic, Ulyanovsk, Penza and Kirov regions) turned out to be the most stable. The study confirmed the hypotheses about a positive relationship between the degree of development instability and its level and rate, as well as the degree of openness of the economy, and about the negative relationship between the instability and the level of sectoral diversification of the economy. The results of the study can be useful in managing the resilient development of Russian regions.


10.12737/5280 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 84-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Оксана Пименова ◽  
Oksana Pimenova

The execution and protection of Russian regions’ prerogative legislative powers is the most significant element of their jurisdictional independence, and legal regulation of this area is crucial for ongoing federative reforms. The purpose of this article is to clarify possibilities of adaptation of the European Union’s experience in implementation of the subsidiarity principle to the Russian Federation’s system of regulation and execution of federal legislative powers in the area of joint jurisdiction which is considered to be the main institute of the vertically integrated government system in a federal state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Alexander E. Chistyakov ◽  
Alexander V. Shustov

The article deals with the problem of the influence of the level of socio-economic development of Russian regions on demographic and migration processes. The relationship between economic indicators, the total population growth in the regions and its components-natural and migration growth during 2000-2017 are analyzed. The authors reveals the relationship between the dynamics of the gross regional product (GRP) and the population of the regions, as well as the factors that determine these processes. For the purposes of the study, a sample of “typical” regions was formed. In the process of its formation, national autonomies and remote territories with a more severe climate were excluded from the total number of subjects of the Russian Federation, where the development of demographic and migration processes may be determined by "atypical" factors for other regions of the Russian Federation (national-cultural, climatic, etc.). The article analyzes the causes of internal migration and features of socio-demographic development of subjects of the Russian Federation. The role of the Moscow region as an object of migration attraction is investigated, and the factors that deter and stimulate internal migration are considered. The official data of the Federal state statistics service for 2000-2017 were used as an information base for the study.


Author(s):  
Nadezhda Igorevna Goncharova ◽  
Elena Borisovna Dvoryadkina ◽  
Ekaterina Igorevna Kaibicheva

The problem of spatial development of the entities of the Russian Federation remain one of the most essential issues of the regional economy, despite a thorough scientific elaboration. The spatial development of the entity of the Russian Federation should be based on scientific approaches to the conduct of regional policy and take into account the patterns of development of its central and peripheral territories. The purpose of the study is to identify and justify the strategic directions for managing the spatial development of the region (the entity of the Russian Federation). The theoretic basis of the research is composed of the "core-periphery" theory, the works of Russian scientists devoted to the study of economic space. To characterize center-periphery polarization there were used the coefficient of center-periphery variation and the methods of statistical analysis. The research materials were the official statistical collections and bulletins published by the Federal State Statistics Service, factual evidence in the monographs of Russian and foreign scientists, the results of authors’ proper research. The theoretical aspects of the study of spatial development management in the region have been considered and the participants of this process have been identified. It is substantiated that the spatial development of the region can be divided in three aspects: the location of productive forces in the regional space; system of settlement in the regional space; the relationship between the various elements of the space ("north-south", "center-periphery", etc.). The experience of management of spatial development of the region has been investigated in terms of: socialist economics of planning; transition from the economy of planning to the market economy; modern conditions (the Sverdlovsk region was taken as an example). In the conditions of growing agglomerative processes the priority prospects of the government policy in management of spatial development of the region in the direction "center-periphery" should be management of spatial development of agglomerations as a whole, creating alternative centers in the economic space of the region and stimulating economic activity in the periphery. These research results can be applied for developing a regional policy aimed at reducing the center-periphery differences and polarization of the regional economic space.


2019 ◽  
pp. 134-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Borshchevskiy

The article examines the institutional process in a regional economy connected with the infrastructure development. We use the neoinstitutional approach to study factors that influence the behavior of government and business in their interaction in the economy. We also use statistical methods to analyze the dynamics of socio-economic development indicators of the subjects of the Russian Federation as well as the results of measures to attract private investment into infrastructure, including the PPP. We chose the city of Moscow and the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District as two empirical case studies which differ in economic and geographic conditions, but both demonstrate success in attracting private investment and implementing infrastructure projects. Our conclusions are consistent with a theory that asserts the primacy of institutional environment in relation to project implementation. We make also some practical recommendations for the development of the institutional environment which are acceptable for all regions solving similar problems of infrastructure development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document