scholarly journals Kontribusi pendapatan usahatani terhadap ekonomi rumah tangga petani di daerah pedesaan : review

Agromix ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Mohammad Shoimus Sholeh ◽  
Luluk Mublihatin ◽  
Nur Laila ◽  
Siti Maimunah

The majority of people in rural areas in their daily life work as farmers and rely on agricultural products to meet their daily needs. The problem is that the income from farming is not sufficient to meet daily needs. Therefore, it is necessary to study the contribution of farm income to total household income. The method used in this research is the literature review method. The results of several studies indicate that the characteristics of farmers in rural areas have an average primary school education (more than 50%), while the average age of farmers is still in the productive age. The average contribution value of rice farming from several studies with different areas from several research results is more than 50%, meaning that farmers depend on rice farming days to fulfill all their daily needs rather than relying on side jobs, while the contribution of tobacco farming from several research results from less than 50%. In calculating the contribution of many researchers who have not included time susceptibility, either yearly, seasonally, or monthly, this will affect the tabulation of the calculation of non-farm income.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Chica Anditia Pratiwi ◽  
Dyah Setyorini Gunawan ◽  
Istiqomah Istiqomah

This study aims to analyze the economic efficiency of rice farming and to measure the contribution of rice farming to total household income and to analyze the living standard of farm households in Sambeng Kulon Village, Kembaran Sub-district, Banyumas Regency. The study was conducted in Sambeng Kulon Village, Kembaran Sub-district, Banyumas District. There were 71 farm households selected by stratified random sampling. The analysis used to calculate the economic efficiency of rice farming is R/C ratio. The contribution of paddy farming to farm household income is obtained by dividing the income earned from rice farming by the total household income multiplied by 100 percent. The living standard is measured by calculating the farm household income divided by the number of dependents in order to get percapita income. This figure is then compared to the regency’s current decent living standard. The results of this study indicate that 1) rice farming in Sambeng Kulon village with an area of ​​≤ 0.5 Ha has a smaller profit (IDR2.718.580) compared with respondents who have land area> 0.5 Ha (IDR7.892.904), 2) the average contribution of rice farming income to farm households with landholding of  ​​≤ 0.5 Ha (54,96 percent) is lower than the contribution of rice farming income obtained by respondents with landholding of > 0.5 Ha (77,43 percent), 3) the average income earned by respondents from rice farming (IDR1.624.961,00) is sufficient to meet the average household consumption of IDR 1,379,441.00, and 4) of 71 respondents in Sambeng Kulon Village, 63 respondents live below the decent living standard; after being added with nonfarm income, this figure decreased to 55 respondents. The implication of this research is that the respondents are expected to increase the landholding to increase income earned from rice farming or earn additional nonfarm income so that they can meet household consumption.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Chica Anditia Pratiwi ◽  
Dyah Setyorini Gunawan ◽  
Istiqomah Istiqomah

This study aims to analyze the economic efficiency of rice farming and to measure the contribution of rice farming to total household income and to analyze the living standard of farm households in Sambeng Kulon Village, Kembaran Sub-district, Banyumas Regency. The study was conducted in Sambeng Kulon Village, Kembaran Sub-district, Banyumas District. There were 71 farm households selected by stratified random sampling. The analysis used to calculate the economic efficiency of rice farming is R/C ratio. The contribution of paddy farming to farm household income is obtained by dividing the income earned from rice farming by the total household income multiplied by 100 percent. The living standard is measured by calculating the farm household income divided by the number of dependents in order to get percapita income. This figure is then compared to the regency’s current decent living standard. The results of this study indicate that 1) rice farming in Sambeng Kulon village with an area of ​​≤ 0.5 Ha has a smaller profit (IDR2.718.580) compared with respondents who have land area> 0.5 Ha (IDR7.892.904), 2) the average contribution of rice farming income to farm households with landholding of  ​​≤ 0.5 Ha (54,96 percent) is lower than the contribution of rice farming income obtained by respondents with landholding of > 0.5 Ha (77,43 percent), 3) the average income earned by respondents from rice farming (IDR1.624.961,00) is sufficient to meet the average household consumption of IDR 1,379,441.00, and 4) of 71 respondents in Sambeng Kulon Village, 63 respondents live below the decent living standard; after being added with nonfarm income, this figure decreased to 55 respondents. The implication of this research is that the respondents are expected to increase the landholding to increase income earned from rice farming or earn additional nonfarm income so that they can meet household consumption.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya R. Khanal ◽  
Ashok K. Mishra

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of internet usage on financial performance of small farm business households in the USA. In particular, the authors want to assess the impact of internet usage on small farm businesses, where the owner’s main occupation is farming. Using a nationwide farm-level data in the USA and a non-parametric matching estimator, the study finds a significant positive impact of internet usage on gross cash income, total household income, off-farm income. The study further suggests that small farm businesses receive benefits from internet usage as it facilitates reduction in income risk through off-farm income sources, as well as a reduction in marketing and storage costs; households’ non-farm transportation and vehicle leasing expenses. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the authors use the “nearest neighbors” matching method in treatment evaluation, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2002). In this method, a weighting index is applied to all observations and “nearest neighbors” are identified (Abadie et al., 2004). Although matching estimation through the nearest neighbor method does not require probit or logit model estimation per se, the authors have estimated a probit model because it allows the authors to check the balancing property and to analyze the association of included variables with the likelihood of internet use. Findings The study suggests that small farm business households using the internet are better off in terms of total household income and off-farm income. As compared to the control group (which is counterfactual, representation of small farm businesses not using the internet), small farm businesses using the internet earn about $24,000-$26,000 more in total household income and about $27,000-$28,000 more in off-farm income. Also, small farm businesses using the internet earn about $4,100-$4,900 more in gross cash farm income compared to their counterpart. The estimate of ATT for NFI is not different from zero. However, gross cash farm revenue increased significantly. Practical implications To this end internet can provide an important role in information gathering. Internet is one of the convenient means to access and exchange information. Information and communication facilitation through internet have opened up new areas of commerce, social networking, information gathering, and recreational activities beyond a geographical bound. Producers and consumers can take advantages of internet in both collaborative and competitive aspects in economic activities as it can reduce the information asymmetries among economic agents. Social implications Farmers will seek assistance in interpreting data and applying information to their farming operations, via the internet. Therefore, it is essential that land grant universities continue to improve the delivery of electronic extension and provide information in a clear and concise manner. Originality/value Studies in farm households have mainly investigated factors influencing internet adoption, purchasing patterns through internet, internet use, and applications. In most cases, impact analyses of communication and information technologies such as internet in agricultural businesses are discussed with references to large scale farm businesses. Thus, the authors know very little about access to the internet when it comes to small farm businesses and small farm households and about how it impacts well-being of small farm households.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3A) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Gogen Klif N. Kumaat ◽  
Theodora M. Katiandagho ◽  
Mex L. Sondakh

This study aims to find out how much farm income clove and clove farming contribution to total household income of farmers in the New Raanan 2 Village. The study was conducted from March to June 2015. Samples size was 30 respondents using purposive sampling method. Results from this study indicate clove farm income is a source of income which contributes most of all sources of income of farming families. However, in terms of farm income cloves there are several indicators that show the need for increased production and expenditure savings, given harvest once a year and selling prices are volatile. Farmers need to maintain the indicators that have been rated excellent for this, such as vacant devote time to other farms and use clove farm income to education, such as sending children to school.


Agro Ekonomi ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rusli Burhansyah ◽  
Azri Azri

Bengkayang district is a district in the province of West Kalimantan have enough upland for agriculture. The village of Sinar Tebudak is dry land potential for the development of food crops, vegetables, crops and livestock. To find out the feasibility of each farm and contribution to the household income required of a research. This study aims to determine the feasibility of the business of commodities grown village Sinar Tebudak and know the sources of income and multiformity contributing to the household income of farmers village Sinar Tebudak. Sinar Research conducted the survey with the method / interviews and PRA. Sampling in take with strata ownership of land. To determine the extentto which each strata in the population represented in the sample used proposional, so the methods used method stratified proportional random sampling. The number of respondents as much as 40 farmers. Collecting data is done by direct interviews with the questionnaire. Results of research show that all the farming system is feasible grown with the value RIC> 1. The agricultural sector still has a major contribution in the household contribute income farmers. Income per capita village Sinar Tebudak already above U.S. $ 1000. Non agricultural sector and other sectors in rural areas is expected to grow well. Development of agro-industries in rural areas will create the market, and production facilities for primary agricultural products.


2021 ◽  
Vol 905 (1) ◽  
pp. 012078
Author(s):  
Suswadi ◽  
A S Vinolia ◽  
A Prasetyo ◽  
R D Kartikasari ◽  
Mahananto

Abstract This study was aimed to determine the income of organic rice farming in Andong Village, Boyolali Regency, and find out how much organic rice farming contributes to household income. The location was determined purposively and sampling was done by random method. Data were analyzed on farm income, non-farming income, and the contribution of organic rice farming to family income. The result of this study shows that the contribution of organic rice farming to farmer householf income is 65.45%, while income generated from other job is only contribute to 34.55%. According to the analysis, it can be concluded that rice organic farming is feasible to be applied and resulting better income to the farmer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
Dwi Novitasari ◽  
Sudarma Widjaya ◽  
Eka Kasymir

This study aims to analyze income of rice farming and duck diversification, contribution of income from duck farming to farmers’ household, and identify the factors that influence the production of duck livestock. The research was conducted in Pringsewu District in January - February 2018. The sample was selected using a snowball sampling method and consisted of farmers who cultivated rice farming and ducks. The data were analyzed using farm income analysis and Cobb Douglas analysis. The results showed that income of farmers from farming diversification of rice and duck was profitable. Contribution of income from duck farming to farmers’ household income was higher than that from other sources. Three factors influencing duck production were bran feed, concentrate feed, and mortality rate.Key words : diversification, duck livestock, farm income, rice farming


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 819-827
Author(s):  
Tri Agustina ◽  
◽  
Siswanto Santoso ◽  
Mukson Mukson

This research is motivated by the condition of Katekan Village, Ngadirejo District, Temanggung Regency, when the dry season always plant tobacco. Tobacco farming becomes the main livelihood for farmers in Katekan Village so it is necessary to know how much the contribution of tobacco farming to the household income of farmers. The purpose of this study was to determine the income and profitability of tobacco farming, to analyze the differences in income between tobacco farming and non-tobacco farming income, and to determine the value of the contribution of tobacco farming income to the total household income of farmers in Katekan Village. Survey method was used in this research. Sampling is done by simple random sampling method. The number of samples taken was 40 respondents. Respondent characteristic data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, while the calculation of tobacco farming income data was analyzed using farm analysis. Hypothesis testing is done by one sample t-test and paired sample t-test. The results showed that tobacco farming income per planting season was Rp. 16,035,123 or around Rp. 2.672.520 per month. Income outside of tobacco farming per season is IDR 7,217,509 or IDR 1,202,918 per month. The total household income of farmers per planting season is Rp. 23,252,632. Tobacco farming has a profitability value of 66.10% which means profitable. There is a difference between tobacco farming income and non-tobacco farming income. Tobacco farming contributes 69% of farmer's household income and non-tobacco farm income contributes 31%.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-372
Author(s):  
E. Prasetyo ◽  
T. Ekowati ◽  
S. Gayatri

Beef cattle fattening is raised by farmers in Central Java, but not yet profit oriented. The aims of this research were to analyze the farmer income of beef cattle fattening farm and its contribution to the total household income and to analyze the influence of production costs and farm size toward beef cattle farm income. Survey was used among 150 beef cattle farmers, while multi stage cluster quota sampling was used as sampling method. Income analysis, paired t test, and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis. Research result showed that the farmer’s income from beef cattle farm is IDR 6,736,824.21 per 6.32 month fattening period on an average farm scale was 2.31 heads (equal to IDR 1,065,953.20/month). While, average income of farm households from non-beef cattle farm was IDR 3,516,080.95/month. The contribution of beef cattle farm to household farmer’s income was 30.32%. Based on the paired t test, beef cattle farm income is significantly different and smaller than the income from non-beef cattle farm. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that variable cost and number of beef cattle had a significant effect on beef cattle farm income, while the fixed cost had no significant effect.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Susanto Susanto ◽  
Yaktiworo Indriani ◽  
Maya Riantini

This research aims to calculate the income and welfare of rice farmers who processsmoked fish and who do not process. The research was carried out in Kebon Damar Village from July to August 2019 using a survey method. The determination of the sample was done in stage (multistage sampling). The sample in this research amounted to 57 rice farmers. The data were analyzed using income analysis, R-C ratio, and household welfare according to the 1997 Sajogyo’s criteria. The results showed that the largest contribution of household income of nonsmoked fish processing ricefarmers came from rice farming or 71.45 percent of the total household income. Whereas, the largest contribution of household income of smoked fish processing rice farmers came from the smoked fish processing business or 54.43 percent of the total household income. Smoked fish processing rice farmers weremore prosperous than nonsmoked fish processing rice farmers.Keywords: Household income, household welfare, rice farmers, smoked fish.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document