scholarly journals PERBEDAAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF STAD DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KONVENSIONAL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

Author(s):  
Danang Fafiliyanto

The low learning outcomes of students, it is due to the learning process that is dominated by traditional learning. At this learning atmosphere tends to teacher-centered classroom so that students become passive, therefore it is necessary to implement a learning strategy that can help students to understand the teaching material and its application in everyday life. Based on this, in this study it will be discussed whether there are differences in mathematics achievement subject matter sub gradient between students who are taught by STAD cooperative learning model and the conventional model of learning in class XI SMA Kartika IV-3 Surabaya. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in mathematics achievement between students who are taught by STAD cooperative learning model and conventional learning models. This study uses quantitative research. As the population is students in class XI MIA Kartika IV-3 Surabaya The sample consisted of students of class XI MIA 1, amounting to 25 students as the experimental class and the students of class XI MIA 2, amounting to 25 students as the control class.  Data collection method used is to use the test method. Data in the form of student test results done once the post-test is to determine the value of learning mathematics achievement of students in each sample after treatments or treatments performed. From the analysis we found differences in mathematics achievement between students who are taught by STAD cooperative learning model and conventional learning models, in this case increased learning achievement in cooperative learning model STAD. With the calculation of the t-test is greater than the table or 4.98> 1.98 then H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted. The conclusion from this study is that there are differences in mathematics achievement subject matter sub gradient between students who are taught by STAD cooperative learning model and conventional learning models, characterized by differences in mathematics achievement. Keywords: Type STAD Cooperative Learning Model, Model Conventional Learning, Math Learning Achievement.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Ermawati Zulikhatin Nuroh ◽  
Vidya Mandarani

One of the learning models based on student activities (Students Centered Learning) is by using cooperative learning of TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) on the learning process in the classroom. This research is intended to know the improving reading comprehension through cooperative learning model of TAI (Team Assisted Individualization). This research used quantitative research using experimental design type one group pretest-posttest design with the sample student of semester 1 Diploma III Midwifery Program of Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo. The result of the research shows that there is a significant improvement toward the first semester students of Diploma III Midwifery Program by using cooperative learning model of TAI type (Team Assisted Individualization). This can be seen from some calculations such as pre-test average X = 44,32 and average post- Test Y = 66.56 from the average pre-test and post-test posttest is higher than the pre-test. (Compare) with 5% significant level of degree of freedom (df) = (n-1) = 28, whether t value> t table. There is improvement in reading comprehension through cooperative learning model type TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) toward the first semester students of Diploma III Midwifery Program of 0.07> 0.14. This research is expected to contribute to the learning model of reading comprehension to improve students' ability. 


Author(s):  
Nurul Farida

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models (STAD by problem solving method, STAD, and conventional) on mathematics achievement viewed from student creative attitude. The type of the research was a quasi experimental research. The population was the students in grade VIII junior high school in Central Lampung Regency. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional (2) For students who middle and low creative attitude, students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD by problem solving method type give better mathematics learning achievement than STAD type and conventional and then students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type give better mathematics learning achievement than conventional. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Herlina Herlina

The purpose of this study was to compare the learning achievement using cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions with cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modification of guided discovery in terms of verbal abality. Based on the results of the study concluded that (1) based on a model of learning, the mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions as good with mathematics achievement of students who use cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifications guided discovery, both onstudents who have the high verbal skills, medium and low, (2) base on terms of verbal skills, mathematics achievement of students who have high verbal ability is better than mathematics achievement of students who have medium and low verbal ability, and mathematics achievement of students have medium verbal skillsbetter than mathematics achievement of students have the ability low verbal skills. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbandingan prestasi belajar yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing ditinjau dari kemamuan verbal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa (1) berdasarkan model pembelajaran, prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions sama baiknya dengan prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang dikenai model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Divisions modifikasi penemuan terbimbing,baik pada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi, sedang dan rendah, (2) ditinjau dari kemampuan verbal, peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal tinggi lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang dan rendah, dan peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal sedang lebih baik daripada peserta didik yang memiliki kemampuan verbal rendah.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Putu Deli Januartini ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
I Gede Partha Sindu

 AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) pengaruh signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square dan Think Pair Share terhadap hasil belajar siswa, (2) hasil belajar yang lebih baik antara model pembelajaran Think Pair Square  atau  Think Pair Share, (3) motivasi belajar siswa, (4) respon siswa.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only Control Group Design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas X1 dengan model Think Pair Square, kelas X3 dengan model Think Pair Share dan X5 dengan model Direct Instruction.Data hasil belajar dianalisis melalui uji prasyarat dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen serta uji hipotesis menggunakan Anova Satu Jalur dengan hasil terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Kemudian uji lanjut t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar penggunaan model pembelajaran Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share dan Direct Instruction. Dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar maka disimpulkan model Think Pair Square lebih baik dengan hasil belajar lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis angket Think Pair Square diketahui respon sangat positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi, Think Pair Share diketahui respon positif dan tingkat motivasi belajar sangat tinggi. Kata kunci:  Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, hasil belajar, motivasi belajar, dan respon siswa. AbstractThe purpose of this study were to determine (1) the significant influence of the application of think pair square and think pair share learning model on student’s learning achievement, (2) better learning achievement between think pair square and think pair share learning model, (3) student’s motivation, (4) the student’s responses.The research was a quasi-experimental design experiment with post test only control group design. The population of study was all the students in grade X. The sample were as X1 class with the application of Think Pair Square learning model, X3 class with the application of Think Pair Share learning model, and X5 class with the application of Direct Instruction learning model.The data was collected by cognitive and psychomotor tests. The student’s learning achievement were analyzed by the prerequisite test with the results of the three groups at normal distribution and homogenous, and the hypothesis tested by One Way Anova which means there is a significant effect on the application of think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. Then it was conducted a further test t-Scheffe with the results there are differences in the learning achievement between think pair square, think pair share, and direct instruction learning models. According to the average result we made a conclusion that Think Pair Square was better learning models with higher student’s learning achievement. The questionnaires results shows that Think Pair Square was very high positiveresponse and very high learning motivation, Think Pair Share was high positive response and very high learning motivation. Keywords :   Think Pair Square, Think Pair Share, Direct Instruction, learning achievement, learning motivation, and student response. 


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Faqihi

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, GI, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X1 higher Secondary School in Lombok East on academic year of  2014/2015. The size of the sample was 282 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach. (2) the student with the high, medium, and ow independent learning levels have equal learning achievement. (3) in each of the learning models, the high, medium, and, low independent learning levels, result in the equal learning achievement. (4) in each of the independent learning levels, the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach.


Author(s):  
A. Muhajir Nasir ◽  
Hadijah Hadijah

This research was an experimental research that aimmed to know and measure the effectiveness of the application of Problem Based Learning model (PBL) with the assistance of animation media on tetragon material. This research type was quantitative research with one group pretest-posttest design. The population in this study was the students of class VII SMP Negeri 5 Mandai with a random sample of 28 students in an experimental class. Data collection using a test of learning achievement that has been validated by the expert. The data of this research were analyzed descriptively and inferential with normality test as prerequisite analysis test. The results of the data analysis showed that the average pre-test was 45,57 while the average post-test was 84,32. Average gain scores normalized 0,72 in the high category and normally distributed for learning achievement data. Based on the t-test obtained 0,000 < α = 0,025 we could conclud that there was a significant increase. The post-test also showed that 26 out of 28 students (92,86%) have reached KKM score in mathematics in SMP Negeri 5 Mandai. The results of this study indicate that there was a significant improvement on the mathematics learning achievement of students after being taught with PBL model with the assistance of animation media on tetragon material.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-144
Author(s):  
Nazirin Nazirin

The research analyses the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw type and learning motivation on student’s understanding on citizenship subject. The research method uses quasi experimental design with post test only control design. The subject of research was 44 students which constitutes two classes, experiment and control classes. The data collection employs test and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Two-way Anova test. The results show that cooperative learning model Jigsaw type hasa significant effect on student’s conceptual understanding. The ANOVA test produce significant level below 0.05, which indicates there is significant effect of the Jigsaw model and learning motivation on student achievement. It can be concluded that the cooperative learning model contributes better to learning achievement than conventional learning model, and a high learning motivation contributes better to students learning achievement in citizentship subject than a low learning motivation.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan motivasi terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan post test only control design. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 44 siswa yang terdiri dari 22 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 22 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Anova 2 jalur. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw yang positif dan signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa berupa pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa. Siswa dengan tingkat motivasi yang tinggi lebih baik dalam hal penggunaan model Jigsaw dan hasil belajar, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi rendah. Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran ceramah untuk mencapai  hasil belajar yang lebih baik, dan bahwa siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang rendah dalam penggunaan atau pemanfaatan model pembelajaran Jigsaw dan hasil belajarnya.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Nazirin Nazirin

The research analyses the effect of cooperative learning model Jigsaw type and learning motivation on student’s understanding on citizenship subject. The research method uses quasi experimental design with post test only control design. The subject of research was 44 students which constitutes two classes, experiment and control classes. The data collection employs test and questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Two-way Anova test. The results show that cooperative learning model Jigsaw type hasa significant effect on student’s conceptual understanding. The ANOVA test produce significant level below 0.05, which indicates there is significant effect of the Jigsaw model and learning motivation on student achievement. It can be concluded that the cooperative learning model contributes better to learning achievement than conventional learning model, and a high learning motivation contributes better to students learning achievement in citizentship subject than a low learning motivation. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dan motivasi terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa sekolah dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi eksperimen dengan post test only control design. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 44 siswa yang terdiri dari 22 siswa sebagai kelas eksperimen dan 22 siswa sebagai kelas kontrol. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Anova 2 jalur. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw yang positif dan signifikan terhadap hasil belajar siswa berupa pemahaman konsep PPKn siswa. Siswa dengan tingkat motivasi yang tinggi lebih baik dalam hal penggunaan model Jigsaw dan hasil belajar, dibandingkan dengan siswa yang mempunyai motivasi rendah. Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep PPKn. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran ceramah untuk mencapai  hasil belajar yang lebih baik, dan bahwa siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa dengan motivasi belajar yang rendah dalam penggunaan atau pemanfaatan model pembelajaran Jigsaw dan hasil belajarnya.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-163
Author(s):  
Erlina Erlina Erlina ◽  
Rona Rona Rona ◽  
Efni Efridah ◽  
Rohazmy Rizki

Penelitian tentang penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif Word Square untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar kimia siswa pada pokok bahasan koloid di kelas XI SMASCerdas Murrni yang telah dilaksanakan pada bulan Mei 2015.Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif Word Square dapat meningkatkan prestasi belajar kimia siswa pada pokok bahasan koloid.Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas XI IPA 1 dan kelas XI IPA 2 T.A 2015/2016yang telah diuji kehomogenannya.Kelas XI IPA 1 diambil secara acak sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI IPA 2 sebgai kelas kontrol.Pembelajaran kooperatif Word Square diterapkan di kelas XI IPA 1.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembelajaran kooperatif Word Square dapat meningkatkan prestasi belajar kimia siswa pada pokok bahasan koloid. Peningkatan prestasi belajarkimia siswa di kelas eksperimen didukung oleh skor gain ternormalisasi (N-Gain) sebesar 0,83.   The study of the application of the Word Square cooperative learning model to improve students' chemistry learning achievement on the subject of colloids in XI grade of SMAS Cerdas Murni had been conducted in May 2015. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the application of Word Square cooperative learning models could improve student chemistry learning achievement on the subject of colloid. The samples were XI IPA 1 and XI IPA 2 classes in 2015/2016 which had been tested for their homogeneity. XI IPA 1 was taken randomly as experimental class and XI IPA 2 as control class. Word Square cooperative learning was applied in XI IPA 1 class. The results of the study showed that Word Square cooperative learning could improve students' chemistry learning achievement on colloidal topics. The increase of chemistry learning achievement of students in the experimental class was supported by a normalized gain score (N-Gain) of 0.83.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document