scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL TEACHING METHOD AND LEARNING STYLE ON CLINICAL NURSING LEARNING OUTCOMES

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-114
Author(s):  
Ida Zuhroidah ◽  
Nurul Huda ◽  
Bagus Dwi Cahyono

Background: Nursing Academy of Pasuruan has used problem solving method for learning clinical nursing practice. However, there is obstacle in the implementation of the method due to wide variation in implementing the method among field instructors. Theoretically, bedside teaching method can be used for learning activities to improve learning outcomes. Theoretically, students' learning style is associated with learning outcomes.Objective: This study aimed to examine the effect of clinical bedside teaching method and learning style of students on clinical practice outcome among nursing students at the Academy of Nursing.Method: The research method used Quasi-Experimental. The population source was students at the Academy of Nursing, Pasuruan. A sample of 80 students were selected by simple random sampling. Problem solving was used as a comparison method. The data were collected using standard questionnaires, and analyzed by multiple linear regression model.Result: Results indicated that bedside teaching resulted in higher clinical nursing learning outcome than problem solving method (b = 3.5, p < 0.001, CI 95% 2.6 to 4.4). There was no statistically significant effect of learning styles on learning outcomes of nursing clinical practice (p > 0.05).Conclusion: This study concludes that bedside teaching method results in better clinical nursing learning outcome than problem solving method. It is recommended that all faculty members use bedside teaching as the learning strategy to improve learning outcomes in clinical practice. Key words: Bedside Teaching, Problem Solving, Learning Styles, Clinical Practical Learning Outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Syifa’un Nufus ◽  
Gito Hadiprayitno ◽  
A Wahab Jufri

Learning style is one of the important elements in the learning process of students. Information about student learning styles will help teachers design appropriate learning so that students can more easily absorb, organize, and process information during the learning process. Learning in accordance with the character of students in the class will create joyful learning and influences student learning outcomes and abilities, including scientific literacy. This study aims to investigate the relationship between learning styles with student learning outcomes and scientific literacy. This research is descriptive-experimental research. The population of this study was MTs students in Mataram and the subjects of this study were 55 students. In order to determine the tendency of student learning styles, the VARK learning style questionnaire (Visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic) was developed. In order to assess the scientific literacy that consisted of scientific literacy multiple-choice test and to assess the learning outcome, the final score was employed. Analysis of the relationship between learning styles and the scientific literacy using bivariate correlation, while the effect analysis of learning styles on learning outcomes and scientific literacy using MANOVA and effect analysis of students' scientific literacy on learning outcomes using ANACOVA. The results of the study indicated that the trend of auditory and kinesthetic learning styles correlated significantly with students' scientific literacy (p <0.05), whereas visual and reading/writing learning styles did not significantly correlate (p> 0.05). The type of learning styles does not have a different effect on student learning outcomes and scientific literacy, but scientific literacy has a significant influence on learning outcomes (p <0.05).


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Saiful Amin

<p>This study aims to 1) determine the effect of the Group Investigation model on geography learning outcomes; 2) knowing the effect of learning styles on geography learning outcomes; and 3) knowing the interaction between the Group Investigation model and learning styles towards geography learning outcomes. The study design used quasi-experimental with a simple 2x3 factorial design, which refers to the pretest-posttest control group design. Analysis of learning outcome data using the Two Path Analysis of Variance ANOVA technique at a significance level of 5%. The results of the study show that 1) the Group Investigation model influences the geography learning outcomes of PIPS students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang; 2) learning styles influence the geography learning outcomes of PIPS students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang; 3) GI models and learning styles do not interact significantly influence the geography learning outcomes of PIPS students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang.</p><p><strong><em>Keywords: group investigation; learning style; geography learning outcomes</em></strong></p>


Abjadia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Luthfiya Fathi Pusposari

The research aims to identify factors influencing the learning outcome on microeconomics theories of social education students of UIN Malang. Theoretically, factors influencing learning outcomes are varied. Therefore, the researcher collaborates some opinions on factors influencing learning outcomes, and the process generates 25 subfactors. The research employs a quantitative descriptive method. The data was collected using questionnaires of the Likert scale and distributed to all research subjects. The researcher employed a confirmatory analysis model to analyze the data. The result showed that there are seven factors influencing learning outcomes on the economy subject: 1). The ability of students and lecturer related to the element on background knowledge, teaching method, course interest, learning manner, lecturer’s explanation; 2). The Learning method about student learning style, learning the habit, and determining intensity; 3). The Students’ initial modal formed by factors such as previous experience, talent, benefit, and intelligence;  4). The variable of sex and age creates the readiness factor;  5). The facility factor formed by the variable of classroom facilities and the financial situation;  6). The moral condition and family support create the psychology factor; 7). The last element is learning drive is formed by the variable of recitation and motivation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-222
Author(s):  
Lamsihar Gandauli Ritonga ◽  
Kms. Muhammad Amin Fauzi ◽  
Tian Abdul Aziz

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Problem Solving and Inquiry learning strategies and Visual Auditorial Learning Styles on the learning outcomes of fourth grade students of SDN 112238 Sepadan Jaya. The research method used was an experimental method using pre-test and post-test control group design. Hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA test. The results of this study indicate that the sig. for the effect of the learning strategy is 0.00 so that Sig. <0.05. Then the results of the Fcount value 16.425> Ftable value 3.13, it can be concluded that there is an effect of Problem Solving and Inquiry learning strategies on student learning outcomes. For the sig. for the influence of learning styles amounted to 0,000; (0.000 <0.05) so that the Sig. <0.05; and the results of the value of Fcount 16,425 <Ftable96,654 so it can be concluded that there is an effect of learning styles on student learning outcomes. However, for the learning strategy * learning style, it can be seen that the value of F = 0.000 and the value of Sig. = 0.990. While the F-table value is 3,13; (0,000 <3,13) then Fcount <Ftable. Next look at the Sig. = 0.990; (0.990> 0.05). From the results of the F test and the Sig. It is concluded that H0 is accepted, that is, there is no simultaneous influence between learning strategies and student learning styles on student learning outcomes.


1986 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 1135-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny Armstrong ◽  
Ernest McDaniel

A computerized problem-solving task was employed to study the relationships among problem-solving behaviors and learning styles. College students made choices to find their way home in a simulated “lost in the woods” task and wrote their. reasons at each choice point. Time to read relevant information and time to make decisions were measured by the computer clock. These variables were correlated with learning style variables from Schmeck's (1977) questionnaire. The findings indicated that subjects who perceived themselves as competent learners take more time on the problem-solving task, use more information and make fewer wrong choices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-63
Author(s):  
Hadis Sourinejad ◽  
◽  
Fariba Haghani ◽  
Marjan Beigi ◽  
Elham Adibmoghaddam ◽  
...  

Background: Identifying the factors that contribute to learning is one of the most important research goals. Learning style is one of these important and effective factors. The predominant learning styles of students in different universities of Iran are different. Objective: This study aimed to review the learning styles of midwifery students in Iran based on Kolb’s learning theory. Materials and Methods: In this review study, a search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, SID, and MagIran databases on articles published during 2000-2020 by using the keywords: Learning styles, midwifery students, and Kolb’s theory in Persian and English. Out of 28 eligible articles, 9 articles were finally reviewed. Results: Learning in midwifery students is usually done by using different styles, the most common of which was convergent style followed by assimilative style. Conclusion: The predominant learning styles of midwifery students in Iran are convergent and assimilative styles. While considering individual differences, educational planning and selection of teaching method should be done in a way that is appropriate for different learning styles of midwifery students and a variety of new and innovative teaching methods should be used.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-143
Author(s):  
Albert Lumbu ◽  
Bonefasius Y Boy ◽  
Muhamad Akbar

This study aims to determine whether there are: 1) the influence of learning styles on physics learning outcomes, 2) the influence of interest in learning on physics learning outcomes, 3) the influence of learning styles and interest in learning together on physics learning outcomes in class X SMA Negeri 1 Nimboran . This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Nimboran in April - May 2021. The subjects in this study were all 52 students of class X majoring in science and the objects of research were learning styles, interest in learning and physics learning outcomes. The instruments used are questionnaires and documentation. Data analysis was carried out using the Pearson correlation test with a significance level of 0.05 and a regression test which resulted in conclusions as a result of the study. The results showed that, 1) there was a significant influence of learning style on physics learning outcomes with a contribution of 50.8%, 2) there was a significant influence of interest in learning on physics learning outcomes with a contribution of 60.9%, 3) there were significant influence of learning style and interest in learning, together on the learning outcomes of physics with a contribution of 64.3% influence


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-26
Author(s):  
Jing Hu ◽  
Silva Maria Do Carmo Vieira

Problem and goal. With the advent of the information age, Internet-based online learning has also become one of the learning methods chosen by many learners. They can use these online learning platforms to complete knowledge construction while learning offline. Methodology. Most studies of learning behaviors focus on the discovery of the best learning model and disregard the possible impact of different learning behaviors on knowledge construction. Therefore, based on the Felder - Silverman learning style model, this article uses the Solomon learning style scale to improve the design of the questionnaire and collect four-dimensional differential learning behaviors data. In order to further understand the influence of learning styles on the effectiveness of online learning, we also use online learning data on the Small Private Online Course platform and general cognitive intelligence knowledge integration theory to clarify the relation between learning modes and individuals differences. Results. This study observes and analyzes the learning behavior data of 46 students of Nankai University in the SPOC learning platform, also analyzes the differences in learning styles and knowledge construction of students in the SPOC environment. Compared with the traditional Basic Portuguese teaching method, the blended teaching model based on the Chaoxing Learning platform has unparalleled advantages. Interactions inside and outside the classroom, improving student participation and promoting teaching diagnosis. Conclusion. Through a comprehensive analysis of questionnaire data and online data, we found that some learning styles have different effects on the effectiveness of online learning, ignoring the individual differences of learners will still cause problems in knowledge construction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142
Author(s):  
Muhammad Miftah Farid

This study aims to analyze the influence of learning motivation, learning styles and learning environments on learning outcomes economy partially or simultaneously. The population in this study is IPS students a total of 314 people and a total sample of 153 students in SMA Negeri 1 Wringinanom Gresik. The data collection techniques used were questionnaires and documentation. Analysis method using multiple linear regression techniques. The results showed that the learning motivation, learning style and learning environment partially positive significant effect on learning outcomes. Learning motivation, learning style and the learning environment simultaneously positive significant effect on learning outcomes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document