О МЕТОДИ ДУБИНСКОГ ИНТЕРВЈУА
This paper represents an attempt to position the in-depth interview through the description of its main characteristics in relation to the existing classifications of the interview and the history of its use. Therefore, the argumentation begins with the description of the in-depth interview, and continues with systematic comparison in relation to the most widespread classification of interviews into structured, semistructured and unstructured. After relational determination, it goes deeper into the analysis of the specificity of the in-depth interview method, through its analytical advantages, theoretical grounding and general connection with the ethical dilemmas which researchers must be aware of. Key words: in-depth interview, social context, personal interpretations and knowledge, phenomenology, constructionism, ethical issues