scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP AHLI WARIS ATAS UANG PERTANGGUNGAN ASURANSI JIWA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam Nomor : 10/Pdt.G/2015/PN Lbp)

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Alusianto Hamonangan ◽  
Ria Sintha Devi ◽  
Melky Saro Bulyan Zebua
Keyword(s):  
Life Insurance ◽  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Insurance Policy ◽  
The Status ◽  
Insured Person ◽  
The Right

Life insurance is an insurance, whereby an insurer binds himself to an insured person, by receiving a premium, to provide reimbursement due to a death event. Study and analyze the heirs whose names do not recommend as beneficiaries in a life insurance policy to which the heirs have responded as heirs. Indication of wishes to the insured party's wishes submitted in the SPAJ and agreed upon in an agreement document called an Insurance Policy. In this study raised the title Legal Protection Against Inheritance Who Is Not Designated in Life Insurance Policy (Study District Court Decision Number: 10 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN Lbp). The formulation of the problem in this research, first how are the beneficiaries in life insurance after the insured dies (District Court Decision Number: 10 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN Lbp)? Second, how are the legal efforts of the heirs appointed to get the right to money? life insurance coverage as inheritance (District Court Decision Number: 10 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN Lbp)?, three, how is the legal protection in the decision that decides the inheritance rights to life insurance coverage money (District Court Decision Number: 10 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN Lbp)?. This type of research is a normative legal approach method, the nature of this research is descriptive in accordance with the problem and research objectives.The results of the study investigated the consideration that the judge's consideration in making the decision number: 10 / Pdt.G / 2015.PN Lbp, based on several considerations, the judge examined arguments, letters, certificates and decided that the sum insured was an inheritance that the panel of judges ordered and passed guided by arguments, evidence and evidence submitted in the trial. The judge's decision obtains a stipulation regarding the legal heir for the party who wins the case, obtains legal certainty regarding the status of inheritance ownership in the form of compensation from life insurance. As a recipient of life insurance funds, they have an administration because the heirs are actually the heirs regulated in the Civil Code and determined by a judge's decision. The judge's decision obtains a stipulation regarding the legal heir for the winning party in the case, obtains legal certainty regarding the status of inheritance ownership in the form of compensation from life insurance to the legal heir.

scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGASUHAN ANAK MUMAYIZ PASCA PERCERAIAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Mansari Mansari ◽  
Reza Maulana
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Research ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Straight Line ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Banda Aceh

ABSTRAKAnak yang telah mumayiz diberikan kebebasan memilih tinggal bersama ibu atau ayahnya. Kesempatan untuk memilih harus dinyatakan secara eksplisit dalam putusan untuk menghindari konflik di kemudian hari antara kedua orang tuanya. Berbeda dalam Putusan Nomor 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA yang tidak langsung menetapkan anak yang telah mumayiz diasuh oleh ibu atau ayahnya. Hal ini dikhawatirkan akan menimbulkan persoalan hukum di kemudian hari demi memperebutkan anak tersebut. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana aspek kepastian hukum terhadap pemeliharaan anak mumayiz dalam Putusan Nomor 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA, dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi anak mumayiz yang belum menentukan pilihannya? Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian empiris dan datanya diperoleh melalui wawancara hakim dan putusan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Nomor 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA tidak mencerminkan kepastian hukum bagi anak yang telah mumayiz. Hal ini dikarenakan anak yang berumur 14 dan 18 tahun tidak jelas berada di bawah pengasuhan ibu atau ayahnya. Perlindungan hukum bagi anak mumayiz yang belum menentukan sikap/pilihan menjadi kewajiban bersama kedua orang tua untuk mengasuh dan memeliharanya. Jika anak sudah menentukan pilihan dan memilih ibu sebagai pengasuhnya, maka ia wajib memelihara dan mengasuhnya hingga dewasa dan ayah berkewajiban memberikan nafkah kepadanya. Sebaliknya, jika ayah menjadi pilihannya, kewajiban mengasuh, merawat, dan menafkahi menjadi kewajibannya.Kata kunci: kepastian hukum, pengasuhan, perceraian, anak mumayiz. ABSTRACTA Minor who has been mumayiz is given freedom to choose to live either with the mother or father. The decision should be explicitly stated in court decision to avoid future conflicts between the parents. In contrast, Court Decision Number 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA did not in a straight line determine the status of a minor who has been mumayiz to be raised by either the mother or father. This could lead to legal dispute of fighting over the minor in the future. The question is how the legal certainty in the custody of minors with mumayyiz status in Court Decision Number 175/PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA and how the law provide protection for them who have not made their choice yet? This study is done by empirical research and the data collected through interviews of judges and the ruling of Syar’iyah Court of Banda Aceh. The results show that the Court Decision Number 175/ PDT.G/2011/MS-BNA does not reflect legal certainty for the minors with the status of mumayiz. This is because the law does not set off that minors aged of 14 and 18 are in care of their mother or father. While the law has set for minors who have not mumayiz because of the existence of parenting to the mother has been confirmed in the verdict. Legal protection for undecided custody of mumayiz minors will be obliged to their both parents to nurture and raise. If the child has made a choice and chooses the mother as the caregiver, then she is obliged to care and nurture the child to adulthood, and the father is obliged to provide a livelihood for the child. On the other hand, if the father becomes the child’s choice, the obligation to care, nurture, and provide a livelihood becomes his duty.Keywords: legal certainty, custody, divorce, mumayiz minors.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NEGERI MENGELUARKAN SALINAN AKTA DARI PROTOKOL NOTARIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Ratna Dewi Nirwana Sari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Right

 Ada kewenangan Pengadilan Negeri untuk mengeluarkan salinan akta dari protokol notaris yang minuta aktanya telah berumur 25 tahun dan perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris serta para pihak/ahli waris terkait minuta akta yang masih disimpan di Pengadilan Negeri. Sejak berlakunya Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN), Pengadilan Negeri tidak mempunyai wewenang untuk mengeluarkan salinan akta dari protokol notaris yang minuta aktanya sudah berumur 25 tahun. Adapun bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi notaris sudah diatur dalam UUJN yang antara lain: memiliki hak ingkar dan cara pemanggilan notaris oleh penegak hukum terkait akta yang dibuatnya. Sedangkan perkindungan hukum bagi para pihak/ahli warisnya belum tercapai karena tidak adanya kepastian hukum terkait pihak yang berwenang mengeluarkan Salinan akta dari minuta kata yang berumur 25 tahun dan masih disimpan di Pengadilan Negeri.Kata Kunci: kewenangan, akta, pengadilan, notaris, perlindungan There is the authority of the District Court to issue a copy of the deed from the notary protocol whose actuality is 25 years old and legal protection of the notary and parties / heirs related to the document deed that is still kept in the District Court. Since the entry into force of the Notary Position Act (UUJN), the District Court has no authority to issue a copy of the deed from the notary protocol whose the deed of a 25 years old. The form of legal protection for notaries has been regulated in UUJN, which among others: has the right to deny and how to summon a notary by law enforcers related to the deed he made. While legal protection for the parties / heirs has not been reached because there is no legal certainty related to the party authorized to issue a copy of the deed of a 25-year-old and still kept in the District Court.Keywords: authority, deed, court, notary, protection

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Tanah dalam Akta Jual Beli Tanah PPAT yang Batal Demi Hukum oleh Putusan Pengadilan

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 888
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizky ◽  
Muzakkir Abubakar ◽  
Teuku Muttaqin Mansur
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Research Results ◽  
The Law ◽  
Land Sale

PPAT's authority in making a land sale and purchase deeds must take into account the provisions of Article 22 PP No. 37 of 1998 that: the PPAT deed must be read/enforced to the party in the presence of at least two witnesses before being signed immediately by the parties, witnesses and PPAT. In practice, in the decision of the Ungaran District Court No.80 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Unr, the PPAT land sale and purchase certificate was never signed by the landowner and in the decision of the Tanjung Karang District Court No.35 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN. Tjk, the legal owner of the land certificate for joint assets does not have the wife's consent letter that is entitled to the land sale and purchase certificate. On this basis, the related parties submitted a cancellation of the issuance of the land sale and purchase certificate, so that the agreement was null and void. The purpose of this research is to analyze the responsibilities of PPAT, how to protect the law for landowners as a result of the issuance of the PPAT land sale and purchase certificate. This type of research is normative juridical with an inviting approach and a case approach. The source of legal material used is secondary data which is analyzed qualitatively and comes from deductive. The research results reveal that whether the legal protection for landowners in the PPAT land sale and purchase deed is null and void by a court decision has provided protection and legal certainty. Kewenangan PPAT dalam membuat akta jual beli tanah harus memperhatikan ketentuan Pasal 22 PP No. 37 Tahun 1998 bahwa : akta PPAT harus dibacakan/dijelaskan kepada para pihak dengan dihadiri oleh sekurang-kurangnya dua orang saksi sebelum ditandatangani seketika itu juga oleh para pihak, saksi-saksi dan PPAT. Prakteknya dalam  putusan Pengadilan Negeri Ungaran  No.80/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Unr, akta jual beli tanah PPAT tidak pernah ditandatangani oleh pemilik tanah dan dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Karang No.35/Pdt.G/2015/PN.Tjk, pemilik sah sertifikat tanah atas harta bersama tidak terdapat surat persetujuan istri yang berhak dalam akta jual beli tanah. Atas dasar tersebut, para pihak terkait mengajukan pembatalan atas lahirnya akta jual beli tanah, agar perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis bagaimana tanggung jawab PPAT, bagaimana perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik tanah akibat dari lahirnya akta jual beli tanah PPAT. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus.  Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif dan ditarik kesimpulan secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa apakah perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik tanah dalam akta jual beli tanah PPAT yang batal demi hukum oleh putusan pengadilan sudah memberikan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK EIGENDOM VERPONDING SEBAGAI JAMINAN KEBENDAAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
Irman Widi Kurniawan ◽  
Etty Mulyati ◽  
Betty Rubiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

ABSTRAKDi dalam bagian kedua UUPA mengatur tentang pelaksanaan konversi hak atas tanah menjadi wujud kepastian hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Namun kepastian hukum terhadap konversi Hak atas tanah barat terutama sertifikat Hak Eigendom Verponding masih menjadi problematika tersendiri bagi masyarakat yang memiliki bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah barat tersebut apabila dijadikan sebuah jaminan guna memperoleh fasilitas kredit. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif dengan kajian bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Berdasarkan pembahasan tersebut bahwa Kepastian Hukum terkait konversi hak Eigendom Verponding telah memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan ketentuan diperlukan konversi sehingga dapat dijadikan objek jaminan namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat objek jaminan dengan tidak memperhatikan asal mula objek jaminan tersebut serta akibat hukum terhadap konversi hak atas tanah tersebut adalah pemberlakuan UUPA menjadi dasar bahwasanya prinsip status quo hak atas tanah terdahulu memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dengan ketentuan hak-hak lama menjadi tidak diakui keberadaannya. Kata Kunci: hak atas tanah; hak barat; kepastian hukum jaminan; konversi ABSTRACTIn the second section of the UUPA regulates the conversion of land rights into a form of legal certainty as stipulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. But the legal certainty of the conversion of the Right to western land, especially the Eigendom Verponding Rights certificate, remains a problem for people who have proof of ownership of the western land if it is used as a guarantee to obtain credit facilities. The research method used is normative juridical with the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the discussion that legal certainty related to the conversion of rights Eigendom Verponding has had a binding legal force with the necessary provisions of conversion so that it can be used as an object of guarantee but in practice there is still an object of guarantee by not taking into account the origin of the object of the guarantee and the legal consequences of the conversion of the right to land is the enactment of the UUPA being the basis that the principle of the status quo of the former land rights provides a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of old rights to be unclaimed civility. Keywords: conversion; guarantee legal certainty; land rights; western rights

scholarly journals RIGHTS OWNERSHIP TO CERTIFIED LAND CONFRONTED WITH THE CUSTOMARY LAW IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saim Aksnudin
Keyword(s):  
National Development ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Status ◽  
Need For Support ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In the national development the role of land for the fulfillment of various purposes will increase, either as a place to live or for business activities. In relation to that will also increase the need for support in the form of guarantee of legal certainty in the field of land. The result of the research is the conception of the state of Indonesia is a state law, which contains the meaning in the administration of government and the state based on the law, the protection of the law is a universal concept of the rule of law. The legal certainty on land rights as intended by the UUPA encompasses three things, namely the certainty of the object of land rights, certainty on the subject of land rights and certainty about the status of landrights. Legal conception of land title certificate is a proof that issued by authorized legal institution, containing juridical data and physical data which isused as evidence of ownership of land rights in order to provide assurance of legal certainty and certainty of rights to a plot of land owned or possessed by a person or legal entity. With the certificate of rights, it is expected that the juridical can guarantee the legal certainty and the right by the state for the holder of the right to the land. This country's guarantee is granted to the owner or the holder of the certificate may be granted because the land is already registered in the state land administration system.

scholarly journals The Basics of Good Faith and Good Intention in Land Purchase System in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaldi Pratama Bagus Putra
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Good Intention ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Procedures

The legal consequences of the issuance of the land title certificate whose application is made by a party who is not the right holder / owner is legally flawed. Issuance of a legally invalid certificate and no binding force and cancellation by the court. The defendant obtains a parcel of land through an auction, the auction is proven by photocopies of the auction object certificate, according to Article 21 of the 2016 Bidding Guidelines that the registered land auction must include an original certificate, so The Defendant did not go through the correct legal procedures. For the issuance of a double certificate for the same land field, the buyer of the land field loses the ownership certificate that is purchased by another party as a buyer with good intentions, because it has been carried out in accordance with the correct legal procedure, which means that the purchaser's certificate is guaranteed legal certainty. Legal protection for the purchaser of good land rights, that the buyer as a buyer has good intentions, with the issuance of the HGB certificate Number 181 Village / Cicau Village covering an area of ​​26,700 m2 in the name of the Defendant, is impaired, so that legal protection provided to the Plaintiff is filing an objection to the issuance HGB certificate to the Land Office as a preventive legal protection. 

scholarly journals The Certainty And Legal Protection To The Buyer's Auction Of The Mortgage Right Object On Online Auctions At The Service Of Wealth State Office And Auction (KPKNL)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Arif Budi Pamungkas ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Online Auctions ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Office ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Way

An auction is an activity of selling of goods in public by means of a verbal-bid to get the higher price or to get lower prices and the price quote can be done in a closed and written. This is done by the way of collecting the prospective buyers of the auction led by officials of the auction. In this case, the intended auction was the sale of goods that are held publicly. The auction, according to the regulations of security right, is when the debtor made a breach, the holder of the security rights have the right to sell the security rights’ objects over its own power through a public auction as well as taking payment of account receivable from the sale proceeds. An auction is an alternative to the sale of an undertaken asset by way of inviting prospective buyers at a particular time and place in which the last highest bidder in writing or orally is determined as the winner. The author used socio-legal research as his research method. To meet the forth standards set by the law, the auction should be widely announced to the public, either through printed file, electronic or visual. A legal certainty as a basis which concerned with propriety and justice is very closely related to the principle of auction sales in another. As the formulation of the problem of the form of identification of the problem, namely how the legal protection of the auction buyers encountered the obstacles as well as the solution.Keywords: Auction; Legal Protection; Mortgage Right

scholarly journals The partial waiver of the rights and partial invalidation of rights to the invention

2021 ◽  
pp. 51-59
Author(s):  
Petro Borovyk
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Patent Owner ◽  
The Third ◽  
Utility Models ◽  
The Law ◽  
State Registration ◽  
The Right

Borovyk P. The partial waiver of the rights and partial invalidation of rights to the invention. In view of changes in the Law of Ukraine «About protection of rights for inventions and utility models» introduced according to the Law No. 816-IX as of 21.07.2020, it is implied that a patent owner can waive rights provided by a state registration of an invention (utility model) fully or partially, and a court can render the rights for the invention (utility model) invalid fully or partially. The partial waiver of the rights or rendering the rights invalid causes a number of issues on a rather frequent basis, in particular, regarding a certain procedure of defining the entire scope of rights according to the patent and a portion of these rights. Since the scope of rights is defined by claims, the partial waiver of the rights or the partial rendering the rights invalid substantially represents a change of the scope of rights, which are defined by the claims as published. The patent may be granted for a group of inventions. In such case, the scope of rights shall be defined by the claims that comprise several independent claims. Here, the partial waiver of the rights for the invention may be carried out by waiving one or several independent claims at the discretion of the patent owner or by rendering one or several independent claims invalid by the court. Therewith, the scope of rights that is defined during conduction of an examination for another invention of the group of inventions, which are mentioned in a single protection document (patent), is not changed. The partial waiver or the partial rendering the rights for the invention invalid for the claims having one independent claim is a more problematic case. A key aspect of this problem is an influence of the proposed amendments of the claims onto the scope of rights for the invention and its correspondence with the requirements for granting a legal protection. More specifically, it is an establishment of a fact of reduction of the scope of rights when introducing the proposed amendments into the independent claim and examination of a new version of the independent claim for compliance with the requirements of patentability. An important aspect also lies in establishment of a balance of interests of the patent owner and third parties. The patent owner will receive a mechanism of implementation of the right for protection of allowable embodiments of the invention, while the third parties will receive a right for a legal certainty by means of an analysis of the scope of rights of the new version of the claims. The article discloses grounds for waiving the rights for the invention and the mechanism for implementation of the waiver under the legislation in force both for the case of the group of inventions and for the partial waiver or the partial rendering the rights for the invention invalid with the claims having one independent claim. Keywords: scope of rights, independent and dependent claims, amendment to claims, proceedings

scholarly journals Authorities and Officials of the Prosecutor’s Office as Subjects of Protection and Subjects of Violation of the Constitutional Right of Citizens to Petition

Lex Russica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 33-43
Author(s):  
I. V. Timoshenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Public Power ◽  
The Status ◽  
Effective Instrument ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Administrative Code ◽  
The Right

The paper analyzes the status of bodies and officials of the prosecutor’s office as subjects of protection and subjects of violation of the constitutional right of citizens of Russia to petition as bodies exercising public power, whereas the very norm-principle of the basic Russian law on the right of citizens to petition is considered both as a constitutional right and as a constitutional safeguard. The author identifies the main practical problems, legal gaps and conflicts of law when citizens implement their constitutional right to petition and their reasons. The author proposes options for their elimination at the law-making and law-enforcement levels. It is noted that article 5.59 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences from 2011 providing administrative liability for violation of established procedure of consideration of citizens’ petitions, despite being a very effective instrument for the legal protection of the right under consideration, needs to be adjusted because its discretionary part contains only general language and does not reveal the objective side of this administrative offence. At the same time, prosecutor’s offices have long developed a certain practice concerning the application of Art. 5.59 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation as a means of public and legal protection of the violated right of citizens to petition. However, what should be done if the right of citizens to petition is violated by the prosecutors themselves with their special status as subjects of the offense, whereas it is the exclusive competence of prosecutors by operation of law to initiate cases under Art. 5.59 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation? The paper is devoted to the search for the answer to this question.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 11-017/PUU-I/2003 TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK DIPILIH

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Ketut Ngastawa
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
The Body ◽  
State System ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Right

Paper that had the title: "Juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the Legal Protection for the Rights to be Eelected." This explores two issues: 1) how the legal protection of the settings selected in the state system of Indonesia ; 2) what are juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected. To solve both problems, this paper uses normative legal research methods. Approach being used is the statute approach, case approach, and a conceptual approach. Further legal materials collected were identified and analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. Legal protection for the right to be elected in the state system of Indonesia can be traced from the 1945 opening, the articles in the body of the 1945 Constitution, Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D (1) and paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (3) 1945 Second Amendment, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998, Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 25 of the International Covenant  on Civil and Political Rights. Discussion of the juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected have been included: a) only on the juridical implications of representative institutions no longer marked with specified requirements as stipulated in Article 60 letter g of Law Number 12 Year 2003 in Law Number 10 Year 2008; b) juridical implications of the political field for the right to be elected is the absence of any discriminatory treatment in legislative product formed by the House of Representatives and the President as well as products of other legislation forward.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document