scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN KEEFEKTIFAN PEMBELAJARAN PENDEKATAN METODE STUDENT CENTER LEARNING TIPE COOPERATIVE LEARNING DENGAN METODE CERAMAH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MAHASISWA DIV KEPERAWATAN ANESTESIOLOGI ITS PKU MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Ratih Prananingrum
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Student Center

Pendahuluan: Salah satu komponen yang penting dalam pelajaran adalah metode mengajar, yang merupakan suatu cara untuk mencapai tujuan pengajaran. Metode mengajar adalah suatu pengetahuan tentang cara-cara mengajar dipergunakan oleh seorang guru atau instruktur. Cara memberdayakan peserta didik tidak hanya dengan menggunakan strategi atau metode ceramah saja, Salah satu metode yang terdapat pada student center learning adalah metode cooperative learning.Tujuan: Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis perbandingkan antara keefektifan penerapan metode student center learning model cooperative learning dengan metode ceramah terhadap hasil belajar mata kuliah Komunikasi pada mahasiswa D IV Semester 2 di ITS PKU Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Metode: Eksperimen dengan rancangan quasi eksperimen (Pre and Post test group). Subjek penelitian mahasiswa keperawatan anestesiologi Semester 2. Subjek berjumlah 62 responden.Hasil: Rata-rata nilai pretest metode ceramah adalah sebesar 60,42 (± 7,14) dan rata-rata nilai pretest metode cooperative learning sebesar 60,60 (± 7,15) dan rata-rata nilai pretest metode ceramah 60,42 (± 7,14) sedangkan rata-rata nilai posttest metode ceramah 96,28 (± 3,89). Selisih rata-rata nilai posttest dan pretest 35,86 dan rata-rata nilai pretest metode cooperative learning adalah sebesar 60,60 (± 7,15) sedangkan rata-rata nilai posttest metode cooperative learning 86,88 (± 6,23). Selisih rata-rata nilai posttest dan pretest 26,28 dan rata-rata nilai posttest metode pembelajaran ceramah sebesar 96,28 (± 3,89) dan rata-rata nilai posttest metode pembelajaran cooperative learning sebesar 86,88 (± 6,23). Pada saat penerapan metode ceramah, dari 35 mahasiswa, kesemuanya aktif, terlihat dengan banyak mahasiswa yang bertanya tentang materi yang disampaikan, serta mampu menjawab pertanyaan yang diberikan oleh dosen ataupun pertanyaan yang berasal dari teman. Saat penerapan metode cooperative learning mahasiswa kurang aktif dalam kegiatan diskusi. mahasiswa kurang memahami perannya, serta kurang mampu untuk bertukar pendapat.Kesimpulan: Dari hasil penelitian disimpulkan, terdapat keefektifan penerapan metode student center learning model cooperative learning dengan metode ceramah terhadap hasil belajar mata kuliah Komunikasi pada mahasiswa D IV Semester 2 di ITS PKU Muhammadiyah Surakarta.Kata Kunci: Metode Student center learning, cooperative learning, metode ceramah, keefektifan

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MOTOR BENSIN SISWA JURUSAN TKR SMK NEGERI 1 MOTOLING

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukkar
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Educational Media ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

ABSTRAK. Media pendidikan sebagai salah satu sarana meningkatkan mutu pendidikan sangat penting dalam proses PBM. Penggunaan media pendidikan dapat memperbaiki PBM siswa yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar yang dicapainya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling. Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization.   ABSTRACT. Educational media as a means of improving the quality of education is very important in the PBM process. The use of educational media can improve students' PBM which in turn can improve the learning outcomes they achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling. Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MOTOR BENSIN SISWA JURUSAN TKR SMK NEGERI 1 MOTOLING

2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
I. Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukar
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling.     Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling.           Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.

scholarly journals Implementation of Cooperative Learning Model Learning Through The STAD Method in Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Ability

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 09
Author(s):  
Iin Khairunnisa ◽  
Muhammad Thariq Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Learning Interest

This study is about the application of Cooperative Learning models through the STAD method to improving students' critical thinking. The problem in this study was the low critical thinking of students about eleven-class economic subjects in the social studies program at one of the secondary schools in Sukabumi City. The research method used was a quasi experiment with research design The Pre-Equivalent Pre-test - Post Design Control-Test Group. Based on the test for normality, homogenies, and t-test from the pre-test post-test data, the students understood the concept of the experimental class and the control class. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. Data collection uses tests and assignments. The results of this study were tested with one-way Anava. The results of the study are as follows. 1) Cooperative learning model STAD method is effective for increasing interest and learning outcomes (Critical Thinking) Economic Subjects, 2) STAD learning model in class XI IPS A is more effective in increasing student learning interest compared to STAD method in class XI IPS B, while Method STAD in class XI IPS B is more effective to improve student learning outcomes compared to Class XI IPS A.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODELS OF INVESTIGATION GROUP TYPE ON SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDES

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Anggita Putri, N.K ◽  
Citra Wibawa ◽  
Widiana. I.W
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Scientific Attitude ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Scientific Attitudes

The aim of this study is to find out the significant differences of scientific attitude between a group of students who is taught by cooperative learning in type of group investigation and a group of students who is taught by conventional learning. This study is quasi experiment with nonequivalent control group design and post test only design. The population of this study is the whole V grade students Gugus I in Buleleng Sub-district which is involving 149 students. The sample is taken randomly by using random sampling. The sample is 60 students from V grade students of SDN 3 Banyuning and SDN 2 Banyuning. Validation on scientific attitude instrument of content validity with Greogory test, grain validity using product moment and reliability with Alpha Cronbach.The data is taken by using questionnaire and analyze using descriptive statistics and inferential statistics analysis (T-test) with polled variant formula. The finding shows that the average score of post test group is 83,71 which belong to high category. Meanwhile, the average score of conventional group is 68,47 which belong to moderate category. The obtain result of T test is tcount = 9,99 belong to 5% significant from ttable = 2,000. In conclusion, tcount>ttable, with a result that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted.It means that there was a significant difference in scientific attitudes between classes that were taught by cooperative learning model of group investigation type and classes that were taught by conventional learning model. Thus, cooperative learning model of group investigation type had a positive effect on students' scientific attitude.

scholarly journals Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Facilitator And Explaining terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Yufitri Yanto ◽  
Ratna Juwita
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Model Type ◽  
Applied Model ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Class Viii

This research aims to determine the completeness of the results of learning mathematics students VIII SMP Negeri B.Srikaton academic year 2017/2018 after applied model of cooperative learning type Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFaE). This type of research is experimental, with the design used is pre-test and post-test group design. The population in this study is all students of class VIII SMP Negeri B.Srikaton which amounted to 258 students. One class was taken randomly, that is class VIII.6 was 37 students as experiment class. The result of the research is the final score of the analysis using the t-test. The average score on mathematics learning outcomes is 81.57. Based on the results of data analysis with significant level α = 0.05 obtained tcount = 6.41 and ttable = 1.69 because tcount > ttable, then obtained the conclusion that the Application of Cooperative Learning Model Type Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFaE) on Student Learning Outcomes Mathematics Class VIII SMP Negeri B.Srikaton Lesson Year 2017/2018 completed significantly. Keywords: Cooperative Learning Model Type Student Facilitator and Explaining (SFaE), Learning Outcomes.

scholarly journals Spatial Intelligence and Students’ Achievement to Support Creativity on Visuospatial-Based Learning

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Suprapto ◽  
M. Z. Bin Ahmad ◽  
D. M. Chaidir ◽  
R. Ardiansyah ◽  
D. Diella
Keyword(s):  
Student Teachers ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Biology Education ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Plant Anatomy ◽  
Spatial Intelligence ◽  
Inductive Approach ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Correlation Tests ◽  
The Relationship

This research intended to know how the spatial intelligence and students' achievement support the creativity of prospective student teachers. This study was conducted on the subject of plant anatomy with visuospatial-based learning. The visuospatial-based learning model used in this study is called the wimba learning model. The method of this research was a quantitative /quasi-experiment with the pre- and post-test group design. The population was fourth-semester students in four classes of Biology Education who took Plant Anatomy course in 2017 in a university situated a small town, West Java, Indonesia. The sample of this research was two classes picked using the purposive sampling regarding their homogenous sampling of having the same relative ability. The treatments for each class was that the use of the deductive and inductive approach. The variables measured were spatial intelligence, students’ achievement and creativity of TCIA (Test of Creative Imagery Abilities). The data processing adopting multiple correlation tests with SPSS was to see the relationship between the variables. The results showed that spatial intelligence and students’ achievement could support creativity at a moderate level, indicated by the value of Rdeductive = 0,451 and Rinductive = 0,474, Rinductive > Rdeductive, which meant that the inductive approach was better to support creativity. In conclusion, spatial intelligence and students’ achievement could support creativity, especially the inductive approach. The results of this study could be useful to improve the creativity of prospective biology teachers.

KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model

scholarly journals The Effect of Quantum Teaching Learning Model on the Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-48
Author(s):  
Wita Romita Ayu ◽  
Tri Ariani ◽  
Wahyu Arini
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Average Score ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Student Test ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Academic Year

The purpose of this study was to determine "The Effect of Quantum Teaching Learning Model on Physics Learning Outcomes of Class X Students of SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau in 2018/2019 Academic Year". This research is motivated by the low student physics learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the pre-test post-test group design model. The population in this study were all grade X class of SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau in the 2018/2019 academic year. Two classes were chosen by random sampling, namely class X TKJ II as an experimental class and class X TKJ I as a control class. Data collection techniques using test techniques. Student test score data were analyzed using the t test. Based on the results of post-test data analysis of the experimental class and the control class with a 0.5% confidence level obtained tcount = 6.9 and ttable= 2.00 because tcount>ttable, means the average score of the experimental class is greater than the control class, then it was concluded that there was a significant effect of the Quantum Teaching learning model on physics learning outcomes of class X students of SMK Negeri 3 Lubuklinggau in the 2018/2019 academic year.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN DASAR KELISTRIKAN DAN ELEKTRONIKA KELAS X TAV DI SMKN 1 PADANG

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Mawinda ◽  
Zulkifli Naansah ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Design Learning ◽  
Post Test ◽  
And Control

The problem in this study is the low learning outcomes achieved by students on the subjects of Basic Electrical and Electronics which is below the minimum completeness criteria (KKM) set a school that is 75 This is presumably because they are learning is often used during the learning model is applied directly proven yet effective. The purpose of this research is to reveal how much influence the Jigsaw cooperative learning model to study the results of class X students on subjects TAV Basic Electricity and Electronics. This research is an experimental study with a draft Post-test only control group design. The sample were students of class X TAV at SMK 1 Padang Academic Year 2014 / 2015. Class experiment is treated using Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model and the control group is a class that uses the direct teaching model. The data is taken from the test results in the form of learning about the objective as many as 31 items. Data were analyzed manually to test for normality, homogeneity testing, and hypothesis testing. The result of the calculation hypothesis at significance level α = 0.05 was found that t count> t table is 3.35> 1.670. The results of these tests give an interpretation that H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, this means that on average significantly experimental class learning outcomes greater than the average control class learning outcomes.  Key words :   Models of Learning, Jigsaw, Learning Direct, Post-test only control group design, Learning outcomes, Experimental, and Control.

scholarly journals MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERPIKIR INDUKTIF UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MENERAPKAN VOKAL É, E, DAN EU DALAM MENULIS PENGALAMAN

LOKABASA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Elsa Nurlia
Keyword(s):  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Writing Students ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Year 2013

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kurangnya kemampuan siswa menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman. Penelitan ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan: 1) kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014 sebelum menggunakan model pembelajaran berpikir induktif; 2) kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014 setelah menggunakan model pembelajaran berpikir induktif; 3) perbedaan kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014 sebelum dan setelah menggunakan model pembelajaran berpikir induktif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen, serta desain penelitiannya adalah pre-test and post-test group. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa: 1) kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014 sebelum menggunakan model pembelajaran berpikir induktif dikatagorikanC (cukup), dengan rata-rata 66,38%; 2) kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014 setelah menggunakan model pembelajaran berpikir induktif dikatagorikan B (baik), dengan rata-rata 77,83%; serta 3) ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014 sebelum dan setelah menggunakan model pembelajaran berpikir induktif yang terlihat dari hasil gainnya yaitu 11,45%. Hasil uji hipotesis pun menunjukan > , yaitu4,60 > 2,76 yang artinya hipotesis kerja ( ) diterima dan hipotesis nol ( ) ditolak. Jadi, model pembelajaran berpikir induktif dapat meningkatkan kemampuan menerapkan vokal é, e, dan eu dalam menulis pengalaman siswa kelas VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung tahun ajaran 2013/2014. AbstractThis research is triggered by lack of student ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing experience. This research aims to describe: 1) the ability to apply the vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014 before using the learning modelof inductive thinking; 2) the ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014 after using the learning model of inductive thinking; 3) The differences of ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014 before and after using the learning model of inductive thinking. The method used in this research is an experiment quasi and then this research design is the pre-test and the post-test group. Based on the results, it can be concluded that: 1) the ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014 before using the learning model of inductive thinking is categorized C (enough), with an average 66,38%; 2) the ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014 after using the learning model of inductive thinking is categorized B (good), with an average 77,83%, and 3) there is a significant difference between the ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014 before and after using the learning model of inductive thinking that can be seen from its gain result is 11,45%. The result of the hypothesis test represents the value >  is 4,60 > 2,76 which means that the working hypothesis ( ) is accepted and the null hypothesis ( ) is rejected. Therefore, thelearning model of inductive thinking can improve the ability to apply vocal é, e, and eu in the writing students experience at class VII-I SMP Negeri 29 Bandung academic year 2013/2014.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document