scholarly journals Evaluasi Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Sakip) Di Biro Hukum Pemprov Kepri

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Dwi Septi Haryani
Keyword(s):  
Government Agency ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Government Performance ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Knowing How ◽  
Accountability System ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
Performance Report ◽  
The Government ◽  
Working Plan

All Government Agencies have to arrange the Performance Report every year. That is a form of the affirmation of the Performance Accountability has been done by the application of accountability system of the government agency performance (SAKIP). SAKIP is one of program to Bureaucrat Reformation. For knowing how far the government instances to implement the SAKIP and also to support that there is the raising of government performance, so it is important to do the evaluation of Implementation of SAKIP. This research is for knowing how the evaluation of the implementation of accountability system of the government agency performance (SAKIP) at Law Government Office, Kepri Province. The method of this research uses literature study by journal, book, article and also interview the resource directly. The result of the research is to show that SAKIP has a function to make easier in monitoring and making working plan, reporting and evaluating the performance. SAKIP is done by Law Government Office, Kepri Province has done as the expectation. So, it can help the Government to create the region development.

scholarly journals ANALISIS SISTEM DAN PROSEDUR PENYUSUNAN LAPORAN AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAHAN PADA DINAS PARIWISATA KOTA MANADO

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuuki Jonas John Assa ◽  
Harijanto Sabijono ◽  
Sintje Rondonuwu
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
City Government ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Accountability System ◽  
Performance Reporting ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
The Government ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The City

In order to encourage the creation of performance accountability, government agencies need an accountability system so that they can operate efficiently and effectively to realize the transparency of government agencies and maintain public trust in the government, especially the City Government of Manado. This study aims to investigate and describe the System Manado City Government Especially at the Tourism Office. The research method used is descriptive analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the Implementation of the Performance Accountability System of the Manado City Government Agency can improve better transparency where this system is an integration of the planning system, budgeting system, and performance reporting system that is in line with the implementation of the financial accountability system. In this case, each agency, both the leader and the work device, is obliged to record and report on the use of state finances and their suitability with the applicable rules, but in the implementation there are still several obstacles, namely Human Resources that are less understanding and lacking in coordination between providers and trustee / budget users in the institution so that there are differences in the report documents obtained.

Incredibly Good Performance

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver James ◽  
Gregg G. Van Ryzin
Keyword(s):  
Government Agency ◽  
Federal Agencies ◽  
Good News ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Government Performance ◽  
Random Allocation ◽  
Performance Information ◽  
Satisfaction Index ◽  
The Government ◽  
Independent Rating

Initiatives to boost public trust of government often rely on better reporting of the efforts and accomplishments of government agencies. But if citizens disbelieve the performance reports of agencies, especially information about good performance, then these initiatives may be do little to enhance trust. We ask the following questions: Do citizens find performance information from government agencies to be credible, or do they trust more in independent sources? Do they believe some agencies more than others? And does credibility of the agency itself as a source depend on the level of performance that is being reported? To address these questions, we designed an experiment to test the credibility of a customer satisfaction index for two U.S. federal agencies, with random allocation of the specific agency (one politically less attractive, the other more so), the source of the index (the federal agency itself or an independent rating firm), as well as the level of performance reported in the index. Results from an online sample of nearly 600 U.S. adults show that credibility is lower for the politically less attractive agency and that citizens are especially doubtful about good performance reported by the government agency itself (as opposed to the independent rating firm). These results suggest that independent sources can boost credibility when reporting good news about government performance.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Pada Politeknik Negeri Padang

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Wiwik Andriani ◽  
Irda Rosita ◽  
Hidayatul Ihsan
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Government Agency ◽  
Administrative Reform ◽  
Government Performance ◽  
Performance Achievement ◽  
Accountability System ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Bureaucratic Reform

Government Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) as a part of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) has an important role in good governance implementation in every government agency. This study aims to observe the implementation of SAKIP in oreder to achieve good governance in Padang State of Polytechnic (PNP). Based on LAKIP review by Directorate General of Higher Education in 2011, PNP got “Adequate” result. The LAKIP review result increased in 2012 and 2013. Data was collected through questionnaires based on government agency performance accountability woking paper relesed in Regulation of the Minister of State for Administrative Reform and Bureaucratic Reform Number 13/2010. Items to be evaluated are (1) performance planning (Strategic Plan/Renstra), Annual Performace Plan/Renja, and Performance Establisment), (2) performance meaurement, (3) performance repoting, (4) performance evaluation, and (5) performance achievement.

scholarly journals ANALISIS LAPORAN AKUNTANBILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH PADA BADAN PENGELOLAAN PENDAPATAN DAERAH KABUPATEN CIANJUR

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Indra Muhammad Syarief Hidayat ◽  
Della Nurseptiani ◽  
Faisal Faisal
Keyword(s):  
Revenue Management ◽  
Government Agency ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Government Accountability ◽  
Management Agency ◽  
Performance Reporting ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Many ◽  
Descriptive Method

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini dilakukan dengan latar belakang banyaknya kejadian korupsi, kolusi dan nepotisme yang semakin merajalela di lingkungan instansi pemerintahan, sehingga banyak realisasi pekerjaan yang tidak mencapai target yang telah ditentukan pada periode tertentu. Hal ini juga mengakibatkan banyaknya pihak yang menyoroti terhadap akuntabilitas pemerintahan. Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP) yang disajikan apakah telah memenuhi fungsinya sebagai alat penatausahaan, pelaporan dan pertanggungjawaban serta sesuai dengan PERMENPAN & RB Nomor 53 Tahun 2014 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Perjanjian Kinerja, Pelaporan Kinerja dan Tata Cara Reviu Atas Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Metoda yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif dalam pemaparan dari setiap indikator yang didapat dari laporan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Instansi Pemerintah  Kabupaten Cianjur. Adapun data yang digunakan oleh penulis adalah data kualitatif yang diperoleh dari website Badan Pengelolaan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Cianjur. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah yang disajikan oleh Badan Pengelolaan Pendapatan Daerah Kabupaten Cianjur bersifat informatif dan telah sesuai dengan yang diamanatkan oleh PERMENPAN & RB Nomor 53 Tahun 2014. ABSTRACTThis research was conducted against the background of the many incidents of corruption, collusion and nepotism that are increasingly rampant in government agencies, so that many work realizations do not reach the predetermined targets in a certain period. This has also resulted in many parties highlighting government accountability. The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the Government Agency Performance Accountability Report (LAKIP) presented whether it has fulfilled its function as an administrative, reporting and accountability tool and is in accordance with PERMENPAN & RB Number 53 of 2014 concerning Technical Guidelines for Performance Agreements, Performance Reporting and Governance How to Review Government Agency Performance Reports. The method used in this study is a descriptive method in the exposure of each indicator obtained from the Financial Accountability Report of the Cianjur Regency Government Agencies. The data used by the author is qualitative data obtained from the website of the Regional Revenue Management Agency of Cianjur Regency. The results of this study indicate that the Performance Accountability Reportof Government Agencies presented by the Regional Revenue Management Agency of Cianjur Regency is informative and has been in accordance with the mandate of PERMENPAN & RB Number 53 of 2014.

Penyusunan Anggaran Per Unit Kerja Asosiatif Dengan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja?

Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
Andilo Tohom
Keyword(s):  
Government Agency ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Process Performance ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
State Budget ◽  
Proper Understanding ◽  
Work Plan ◽  
The Government ◽  
Budgeting Process

The process of preparing government agency budget can not be separated from the proposed work plan and budget of the division in government agencies based on its duties and functions. Each proposed activities, outputs and budget required then compiled into the budget of upper unit up to the level of Ministries/Agencies/Government. Nevertheless, it should be referred to objectives to be achieved by the government. A proper understanding of the principle of 'money follow function "is inherent in the notion of performance based budgeting should be owned by the parties involved in the budgeting process. Performance-based budgeting is governed by different provisions of the budget in our country, stressing the importance of the alignment of the activities/programs funded from the state budget with government targets. The literature study presented in this paper is aimed to provide important insight for government entities when preparing the budget.

scholarly journals Implementation of the performance accountability system for government agencies (SAKIP) in realizing good governance at the Kediri city health office

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-179
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizal ◽  
Eka Askafi ◽  
Supriyono Supriyono
Keyword(s):  
Good Governance ◽  
Performance Orientation ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Accountability System ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
Problems And Solutions ◽  
Performance Report ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Government ◽  
Descriptive Method

In the implementation of SAKIP at the Kediri City Health Office, there were obstacles in making reports and implementing policies. This study used a qualitative descriptive method with a purposive sampling method. The result is a determinant of decision or policy-making by looking at the existing problems to produce an accurate strategy to improve performance. The priority scale of the program that is carried out then becomes very important in the sustainability of SAKIP in the coming year. This study is based on the results or performance orientation shown in the Government Agency Performance Report (LKjIP) and the implementation of SAKIP itself. The purpose of this research is to identify problems and solutions to problems faced in governance. Agency Performance Accountability System.

scholarly journals AN EVALUATION OF A GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM INDONESIAN DISTRICT GOVERNMENTS 2010

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
Toni Triyulianto
Keyword(s):  
Research Question ◽  
Government Performance ◽  
Logical Thinking ◽  
Poverty Level ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Government Employee ◽  
Accountability System ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
Score Result ◽  
Score Evaluation

The goal of this paper is to provide better information of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) implementation in Indonesian District Governments to policy makers. This study utilizes the evaluation result of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) 2010 to analyze the effort of 273 District governments in Indonesia in implementing the SAKIP.The research question of this paper is:  do auditor’s opinion and number of population have significant different to the SAKIP score?  To investigate what factors that determine the score of Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP), several theories as well as a logical thinking were taken to figure out the research question.  Those theories as well as logical thinking reveal that revenue and spending, seize of population, area, poverty level, human development index, auditor’s opinion, number of government employee and education level government employee tend to correlate the SAKIP score.Two hypotheses have been chosen in this paper: 1) higher level in Auditor’s Opinion more likely will increase the SAKIP score evaluation, and 2) size of Population has significant different to the SAKIP score.  Result shows we have to reject all the null hypotheses.

scholarly journals Kinerja Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Klungkung berdasarkan Metode Balance Scorecard

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 997
Author(s):  
Komang Ayu Triska Prabandari ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Made Asri Dwija Putri
Keyword(s):  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Government Agency ◽  
Value For Money ◽  
Balance Scorecard ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Satisfaction Index ◽  
Performance Report ◽  
The Government ◽  
Cycle Efficiency ◽  
Productivity Ratio

The purpose of this research to assess the performance of the Disdukcapil Klungkung using four prescriptive balance scorecard. This research used data from the government agency performance report (LKjIP) and the dissemination of questionnaires. The data analysis techniques in research in using descriptive analysis by analyzing the data of the four-perspective balance scorecard. The results of this study show results of financial performance based on value for money categorized reasonably well. The performance of the customer is assessed by the customers satisfaction index categorized as well because the community is satisfied with the service provided. The performance of the internal process is assessed by Service Cycle Efficiency (SCE) and the perspective of growth and learning assessed by the employee's productivity ratio is good. Keywords : Performance; Balance Scorecard; Prespective; Value For Money

Credibility of Sources of Communication on Products' Safety Hazards

1986 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney I. Lirtzman ◽  
Avichai Shuv-Ami
Keyword(s):  
Attitude Change ◽  
Source Credibility ◽  
Government Agency ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Safety Hazards ◽  
Message Source ◽  
Potential Safety ◽  
Risk Research ◽  
The Government ◽  
Industrial Buying

Fear-inducing communications about actual or potential safety hazards of products, are increasingly encountered. These emanate mainly from government agencies and reflect the belief that rational consumers will act to minimize potential risk. Research has shown that credibility of a message source is directly related to effectiveness and persuasion of one message. Although observers have assumed that use of government sources would maximize source credibility in the case of communications about products' safety hazards, recent analyses suggest that this may not be the case. The present research tests two hypotheses with respect to communications of hazard, that government agencies will not necessarily achieve the source with highest credibility among consumers, and that attitude change will be greater among consumers perceiving a source other than the government to be the most credible. Findings are repotted for three studies of different samples of consumers. One involved an experiment in which consumers were exposed to safety warnings supposedly issued by a government agency about a common product. Two involved surveys, the first in the wake of the Tylenol poisonings and the second in the context of industrial buying practices in industrial settings. Results support the hypotheses. Theoretical bases for such findings are offered, and implications for public policy ate discussed.

scholarly journals MERETAS URGENSI AUDIT KINERJA DALAM MENCIPTAKAN AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH KOTA/KABUPATEN

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sugimin Sugimin
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Internal Auditor ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
The Public ◽  
Performance Accountability ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
The Government ◽  
And Control ◽  
Basic Standards

This article explains the urgency of an audits performance (value for money audits) in creating of performance accountability at cityor district government instance. This study was conducted by literature study with reference to a number of previous study and related regulations. The results of the study indicate that performance is a formal evaluation instrument for the government program. It helps to increase the public accountability by providing information concerning the government performance that may not be accessible to the public. The understanding of this concept and its implementation will enable to achieve optimal accountability for the public sector. It is concerned about performance audits centered on economic achievement, efficiency, and effectiveness depend on the existence of regulation, planning, assessment, authorization and control over the use of its resources. It is the responsibility of the public policy makers to establish the arrangements and to ensure that they are functioning appropriately. The responsibility of the internal auditor is to independently verify that execution of activities by policymakers have complied with the basic standards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document