Informed Evaluation of Pathology Residency Programs

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 853-858
Author(s):  
Rebecca F. Yorke
Keyword(s):  
Web Sites ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Pathology Training ◽  
Pathology Education

Abstract Objectives.—To identify resources and summarize important issues in anatomic and clinical pathology training and to assist the pathology resident candidate in evaluating potential training programs. Data Sources.—Published guides for medical residency applicants, recent literature discussing pathology education, and World Wide Web sites. Study Selection.—Resources perceived by the author as valuable for the pathology resident candidate. Data Extraction.—Key issues in pathology education are identified. Data Synthesis.—Issues are discussed from the perspective of a pathology resident candidate, and resources for further information are provided. Conclusions.—The pathology residency candidate faces unique challenges in the residency search process because of the breadth of pathology training and the limited exposure to the practice of pathology in medical school. General guides for residency applicants include little discussion of pathology-specific issues. Recent literature discussing pathology education is fragmented but provides invaluable insights for resident candidates. This review seeks to identify a wide variety of issues and resources as a starting point for evaluating potential training programs.

Fellowship Trends of Pathology Residents

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (9) ◽  
pp. 1431-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaj Lagwinski ◽  
Jennifer L. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
Residency Education ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Gastrointestinal Pathology ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Fellowship Programs ◽  
Pathology Training

Abstract Context.—Recent changes in pathology residency education have included a decrease in the program length (from 5 years to 4 years for combined anatomic and clinical pathology training) and a national mandate for programs to assess 6 general competencies of trainees. These have undoubtedly led to changes in program curricula and in residents' desires to seek fellowship training. Objective.—This study was designed to gather information about what residents are seeking from fellowship training programs. Design.—This study used an online survey to assess attitudes of residents in training programs toward fellowship training. The survey instrument had 26 questions pertaining to fellowship choices, motivations for pursuing fellowships, expectations of the fellowships, and postresidency concerns. Results.—There were 213 respondents from a mix of program types and representing each postgraduate year. Most residents will seek at least 1 or 2 fellowships after residency training. The most popular first-choice fellowship was surgical pathology (26%), followed by cytopathology (16%), hematopathology (15%), gastrointestinal pathology (10%), dermatopathology (8%), and forensic pathology (5%). The most common reasons for pursuing fellowship training were to “increase marketability” (43%) or to “become an expert in a particular area” (33%). Most trainees got their information about fellowship training programs from Internet sources. Conclusions.—Fellowship programs will benefit from an optimally designed Web site because residents seek information predominantly from the Internet. Residents seeking fellowships are particularly concerned with selecting programs that provide job connections, an increase in their marketability, and the opportunity to develop diagnostic expertise.

Predicting Inhibitory Drug—Drug Interactions and Evaluating Drug Interaction Reports Using Inhibition Constants

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1064-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A Bachmann ◽  
Jeffrey D Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Cytochrome P450 ◽  
Drug Interaction ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Web Sites ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Inhibitory Drug

OBJECTIVE: To review the use of inhibitory constants (Ki) determined from in vitro experiments in the prediction of the significance of inhibitory drug—drug interactions (DDIs). DATA SOURCES: Searches of MEDLINE (1966—August 2004) and manual review of journals, conference proceedings, reference textbooks, and Web sites were performed using the key search terms cytochrome P450, drug—drug interaction, inhibition constant, and Ki. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and information deemed relevant was included for this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: The cytochrome P450 isoenzymes factor prominently in the explanation of numerous DDIs. Although the regulation of these enzymes by one drug can affect the pharmacokinetics of other drugs, the consequences may not necessarily be significant either in terms of pharmacokinetic or clinical outcomes. Yet, many DDI monographs originate as unconfirmed case reports that implicate the influence of one drug on the CYP-mediated metabolism of another, and these often uncorroborated mechanisms can eventually become regarded as dogma. One consequence of this process is the overprediction of potentially important DDIs. The pharmaceutical industry, Food and Drug Administration, and pharmaceutical scientists have developed a strategy for predicting the significance of inhibitory DDIs at the earliest possible stages of drug development based on a new chemical entity's Ki value, determined in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the use of Ki values of drugs purported to behave as CYP inhibitors be incorporated in the assessment of case reports that ascribe DDIs to inhibition of metabolism of one drug by another.

scholarly journals Leveraging Technology for Remote Learning in the Era of COVID-19 and Social Distancing

2020 ◽  
Vol 144 (9) ◽  
pp. 1027-1036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Adam L. Booth ◽  
Sarah M. Calkins ◽  
Erika E. Doxtader ◽  
Samson W. Fine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Web Sites ◽  
Personal Experience ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Tips And Tricks ◽  
Whole Slide Imaging ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Online Educational Resources ◽  
Pathology Education

The ongoing global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly disrupted traditional modes of operation in health care and education. In March 2020, institutions in the United States began to implement a range of policies to discourage direct contact and encourage social distancing. These measures have placed us in an unprecedented position where education can no longer occur at close quarters—most notably, around a multiheaded microscope—but must instead continue at a distance. This guide is intended to be a resource for pathologists and pathologists-in-training who wish to leverage technology to continue collaboration, teaching, and education in this era. The article is focused mainly on anatomic pathology; however, the technologies easily lend themselves to clinical pathology education as well. Our aim is to provide curated lists of various online resources that can be used for virtual learning in pathology, provide tips and tricks, and share our personal experience with these technologies. The lists include videoconferencing platforms; pathology Web sites; free online educational resources, including social media; and whole slide imaging collections. We are currently living through a unique situation without a precedent or guidebook, and we hope that this guide will enable the community of pathology educators worldwide to embrace the opportunities that 21st century technology provides.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of hepatitis E virus infection in animals in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdou Fatawou Modiyinji ◽  
Jean Joel Bigna ◽  
Sebastien Kenmoe ◽  
Fredy Brice N. Simo ◽  
Marie A. Amougou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hepatitis E Virus ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hepatitis E ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Language Restriction

Abstract Background Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a major cause of acute hepatitis in humans worldwide and have high burden in the resource-limited countries. Better knowledge of the epidemiology of hepatitis in animals in Africa can help to understand the epidemiology among humans. The objective of this study was to summarize the prevalence of HEV infection and distribution of HEV genotypes among animals in Africa. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, African Journals Online, and Africa Index Medicus from January 1st, 2000 to March 22th, 2020 without any language restriction. We considered cross-sectional studies of HEV infection in animals in Africa. Study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality of included studies were done independently by two investigators. Prevalence data were pooled using the random-effects meta-analysis. This review was registered in PROSPERO, CRD42018087684. Results Twenty-five studies (13 species and 6983 animals) were included. The prevalence (antibodies or ribonucleic acid [RNA]) of HEV infection in animals varied widely depending on biological markers of HEV infection measured: 23.4% (95% confidence interval; 12.0–37.2) for anti-HEV immunoglobulins G, 13.1% (3.1–28.3) for anti-HEV immunoglobulins M, and 1.8% (0.2–4.3) for RNA; with substantial heterogeneity. In subgroup analysis, the immunoglobulins G seroprevalence was higher among pigs 37.8% (13.9–65.4). The following HEV genotypes were reported in animals: Rat-HEV genotype 1 (rats and horses), HEV-3 (pigs), HEV-7 (dromedaries), and Bat hepeviruses (bats). Conclusions We found a high prevalence of HEV infection in animals in Africa and HEV genotypes close to that of humans. Some animals in Africa could be the reservoir of HEV, highlighting the need of molecular epidemiological studies for investigating zoonotic transmission.

Lead in Mineral or Multivitamin-Multimineral Products

2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802110233
Author(s):  
C. Michael White
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
The United States ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Reference Level ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Zinc Supplements ◽  
Average Lead ◽  
Year 2000

Objective Assess the current daily interim reference level of lead and the amount contained in current mineral and multivitamin-multimineral (MVM) products. Data Sources PubMed search from 1980 to May 15, 2021, limited to the English language, via the search strategy ((mineral OR multivitamin OR calcium OR iron OR magnesium OR copper OR zinc OR chromium OR selenium) AND (heavy metals OR Pb OR lead)). Study Selection and Data Extraction Narrative review of studies assessing lead content in mineral or MVM products. Data Synthesis Products containing different calcium forms (dolomite, bone meal, natural carbonate) have historically had higher lead levels than others (refined carbonate, lactate, gluconate, acetate, sevelamer), but the gap has closed considerably since the year 2000. Although only limited assessments of magnesium and zinc supplements have been conducted, no alarming average lead amounts were found. MVM products assessed since 2007 had low median or mean lead concentrations. However, large interproduct differences exist, with many products having very little lead and some products having concerning amounts. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice It is difficult for pharmacists and consumers to know the amount of lead in an actual product unless it is tested in an independent third-party lab. The United States Pharmacopeia and NSF International will provide a seal on the products stating that the products have a low level of lead, but even so, children could receive more lead than the Food and Drug Administration’s Interim Reference Level. Conclusions The threat from lead exposure in mineral and MVM products have diminsihed considerably over time but some products can still have excessive amounts. Without third-party testing, it is difficult for clinicians and consumers to know which outlier products to avoid.

scholarly journals Clinical pathology resident education during the COVID-19 pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2020-207103
Author(s):  
Lisa Senzel ◽  
Tahmeena Ahmed ◽  
Rebecca Batiste
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Resident Education ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Test Interpretation ◽  
Laboratory Methods ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Antigen Testing ◽  
Pathology Education

COVID-19 arrived at our medical centre in March 2020 with substantial force. Clinical pathology concepts began to have a new, direct relevance to our residents’ lives. As we wondered ‘Have I been exposed? Do I need to self-isolate? Are the tests reliable? Am I protecting myself adequately while handling specimens?’, these questions drew new interest in laboratory methods, test interpretation and limitations, supply chain issues, safety and quality. By incorporating SARS-CoV-2 teaching points into laboratory medicine lectures, we enlivened concepts of sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and methodologic issues in serologic, molecular and antigen testing for pathology residents. We drew from the emerging literature on SARS-CoV-2 to create lectures and added details from our own institutional experience with COVID-19. When the pandemic fades from memory, clinical pathology education can still benefit from mnemonics, analogies, anecdotes and creative efforts that capture the attention of the audience.

scholarly journals Prioritising recommendations following analyses of adverse events in healthcare: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e000843
Author(s):  
Kelly Bos ◽  
Maarten J van der Laan ◽  
Dave A Dongelmans
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Personal Opinion ◽  
User Friendly

PurposeThe purpose of this systematic review was to identify an appropriate method—a user-friendly and validated method—that prioritises recommendations following analyses of adverse events (AEs) based on objective features.Data sourcesThe electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (Ovid) and ERIC (Ovid) were searched.Study selectionStudies were considered eligible when reporting on methods to prioritise recommendations.Data extractionTwo teams of reviewers performed the data extraction which was defined prior to this phase.Results of data synthesisEleven methods were identified that are designed to prioritise recommendations. After completing the data extraction, none of the methods met all the predefined criteria. Nine methods were considered user-friendly. One study validated the developed method. Five methods prioritised recommendations based on objective features, not affected by personal opinion or knowledge and expected to be reproducible by different users.ConclusionThere are several methods available to prioritise recommendations following analyses of AEs. All these methods can be used to discuss and select recommendations for implementation. None of the methods is a user-friendly and validated method that prioritises recommendations based on objective features. Although there are possibilities to further improve their features, the ‘Typology of safety functions’ by de Dianous and Fiévez, and the ‘Hierarchy of hazard controls’ by McCaughan have the most potential to select high-quality recommendations as they have only a few clearly defined categories in a well-arranged ordinal sequence.

scholarly journals Pharmacological Management of Steroid-Induced Psychosis: A Review of Patient Cases

2020 ◽  
pp. 875512252097853
Author(s):  
Grace Huynh ◽  
Justin P. Reinert
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Pharmacological Intervention ◽  
Symptom Presentation ◽  
Pharmacological Management ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Male Patients

Objective: To review the efficacy and safety of medications used in the management of steroid-induced psychosis. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, ProQuest, and Scopus between May and October 2020 using the following search terminology: “steroid-induced psychosis” OR “corticosteroid-induced psychosis.” Study Selection and Data Extraction: Definitive cases, as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, were included in this review. Geriatric patients >65 years of age, those with a confounding neurological condition such as a traumatic brain or spinal cord injury, or those with active malignancy were excluded. Data Synthesis: A total of 13 patient cases were included in this review, representing 8 male patients and 5 female patients. The mean age at symptom presentation was 42.5 years. Six patients presented with delusions, 5 presented with hallucinations, and 2 presented with both manifestations; 12 patients were managed with an antipsychotic, with haloperidol being the most commonly prescribed, followed by risperidone. One patient was managed with lithium and clonazepam alone. All patients returned to their psychological baseline upon the discontinuation or decreased dose of steroids in combination with Pharmacological intervention, though the time to resolution of symptoms varied significantly. No notable adverse drug events associated with treatments were reported. Conclusions: Steroid-induced psychosis is a serious adverse effect of corticosteroid therapy; however, management strategies that combine a dose reduction or elimination of steroids, in combination with an antipsychotic medication, are effective in resolving this syndrome.

Recent Advances: Antiinfectives

1995 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie L Briceland ◽  
John D Cleary ◽  
Courtney V Fletcher ◽  
Daniel P Healy ◽  
Charles A Peloquin
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
English Language ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Information Service ◽  
Ulcer Disease ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Enterococcus Spp ◽  
Scientific Meetings ◽  
Clinically Significant

Objective: To update readers on the significant changes in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy. Data Sources: An Index Medians and Iowa Drug Information Service search (1993–1994) of English-language literature pertaining to the selected topic areas was performed. Additional information from abstracts presented at scientific meetings were identified by the authors. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All identified studies were screened and those judged relevant to the update were evaluated. Data Synthesis: New or clinically significant data since 1992 that related to peptic ulcer disease, microbial resistance (e.g., Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Candida albicans), immunomodulators, and AIDS were evaluated and compared with previous data. Conclusions: There have been several exciting and significant changes in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy evident from this review.

Ongoing Incidents Involving Fentanyl Patches are Alarming!; Insulin CONCENTRATE U-500; WHO: Dilute Vincristine in a Minibag

2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 884-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R. Cohen ◽  
Judy L. Smetzer
Keyword(s):  
Medication Errors ◽  
Web Sites ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Health Care Facilities ◽  
Level Of Detail ◽  
Inservice Training ◽  
Safe Medication ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Fail Safe ◽  
E Mail

These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them in your inservice training programs. Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the USP Medication Errors Reporting Program (MERP), which is presented in cooperation with the Institute for Safe Medication Practices. If you have encountered medication errors and would like to report them, you may call USP toll-free, 24 hours a day, at 800-233-7767 (800-23-ERROR). Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below. Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported through the ISMP ( www.ismp.org ) or USP ( www.usp.org ) Web sites or communicated directly to ISMP by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE or via e-mail at [email protected] . ISMP guarantees the confidentiality and security of the information received and respects reporters' wishes as to the level of detail included in publications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document