A small but significantly greater incidence of inflammatory heart disease identified after vaccination for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2)

Background SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are being administered on an unprecedented scale. Assessing the risks of side effects is needed to aid clinicians in early detection and treatment. This study examined the risk of inflammatory heart disease, including pericarditis and myocarditis, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods Intermountain Healthcare patients with inflammatory heart disease from December 15, 2020, to June 15, 2021, and with or without preceding SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations were studied. Relative rates of inflammatory heart disease were examined for vaccinated patients compared to unvaccinated patients. Results Of 67 identified inflammatory heart disease patients, 21 (31.3%) had a SARS-Cov-2 vaccination within the previous 60 days. Overall, 914,611 Intermountain Healthcare patients received a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, resulting in an inflammatory heart disease rate of 2.30 per 100,000 vaccinated patients. The relative risk of inflammatory heart disease for the vaccinated patients compared to the unvaccinated patients was 2.05 times higher rate within the 30-day window (p=0.01) and had a trend toward increase in the 60-day window (relative rate=1.63; p=0.07). All vaccinated patients with inflammatory heart disease were treated successfully with one death related to a pre-existing condition. Conclusions Though rare, the rate of inflammatory heart disease was greater in a SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated population than the unvaccinated population. This risk is eclipsed by the risk of contracting COVID-19 and its associated, commonly severe outcomes. Nevertheless, clinicians and patients should be informed of this risk to facilitate earlier recognition and treatment.

394 Incidence and prevalence of acute myocarditis and pericarditis prior to and during COVID-19 pandemic

Aims Myocarditis and pericarditis have been proposed to account for a proportion of cardiac injury during SARS-CoV-2 infection. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it is reasonable to expect an increasing trend in incidence of this acute inflammatory cardiac diseases. To examine the incidence and prevalence of inflammatory heart disorders prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods and results This is a retrospective cohort study examining the incidence and prevalence of acute inflammatory heart diseases (myocarditis, pericarditis) in provinces of Pisa, Lucca and Livorno (total population of 11421285 inhabitants) in two time-intervals: (i) prior to (PRECOVID, from 1 June 2018 to 31 May 2019) and (ii) during the COVID-19 pandemic (COVID, from 1 June 2020 to May 2021). Overall 259 cases of inflammatory heart disease (myocarditis and/or pericarditis) occurred in the areas of interest. The annual incidence was of 11.3 cases per 100 000 inhabitants. Particularly, 138 cases occurred in the PRECOVID, and 121 in the COVID period. The annual incidence of inflammatory heart disease was not significantly different (12.1/100 000 in PRECOVID vs. 10.3/100 000 in COVID; P = 0.22). The annual incidence of acute myocarditis was significantly higher in PRECOVID than in the COVID: respectively, 8.1/100 000/year vs. 5.9/100 000 year (P = 0.047), consisting in a net reduction of 27% of cases. Particularly the incidence of myocarditis was significantly lower in COVID than in PRECOVID in the class of age 18–24 (P = 0.048) (Figure). The annual incidence of pericarditis was not significantly different (4.03/100 000 vs. 4.47/100 000; P = 0.61). Conclusions Despite a possible etiologic role of SARS-CoV-2 and an expectable increased incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis, data suggest a decrease of acute myocarditis and a stable incidence pericarditis and both diseases.

COVID-19 Induced Cardiovascular Complications and Recent Therapeutic Advances

A global pandemic instigated by SARS-CoV-2 virus has been going strongly for almost two years. There have been almost 240 million cases with almost 5 million fatalities all over the world so far. COVID has affected almost every aspect of people’s lives halting the world in immeasurable ways. Although COVID-19 is mostly affecting the respiratory system, it is also responsible for a significant amount of cardiovascular system involvement. On one hand, it deteriorates any pre-existing cardiovascular condition, on another hand, it triggers other inflammation-facilitated acute events. They comprise of inflammatory heart disease, severe pericardial effusion, ventricular arrhythmias, endothelial dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, and many more. In this article, we summarize the features, management, and treatment of several important COVID-19 induced cardiovascular complications. Recent advances in the treatment of these diseases along with the justification and concerns of specific therapeutic measures are also discussed.

Initial COVID-19 symptoms are not predictive of post-COVID recovery inflammatory heart disease detected by cardiac MRI

Introduction Intuitively, severity of symptoms usually correlates with severity of disease process or disease progression. In this regard, the ACC Sports and Exercise Cardiology Section proposed an algorithm for competitive athletes to assess and manage cardiac injury after COVID-19 infection based on initial symptoms. However, there are no published, evidence-based data to substantiate this approach. Purpose This study was designed to assess the correlation between symptoms at the time of initial diagnosis to post-COVID recovery cardiac symptoms and findings on a cardiac MRI study (CMR). It is hypothesized that the initial symptoms at the time of a positive COVID-19 test may not be reliable or sufficient in predicting the severity of post-COVID recovery symptoms or findings on CMR. Methods An institutional cardiac imaging database was queried for all patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR test, who subsequently underwent a CMR for post-COVID recovery cardiac symptoms. Severity of COVID-19 symptoms were assessed using a checklist of mild symptoms and more severe symptoms as defined by the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta GA. Mild symptoms included: fever/chills, cough, fatigue, body aches, headache, loss of taste/smell, sore throat, congestion, and nausea vomiting diarrhea. More severe symptoms included: shortness of breath, chest pain, and confusion. For each patient, prevalence of these symptoms was assessed at the time of initial diagnosis, and then again post-COVID recovery, just prior to the time of CMR. Inflammatory heart disease (IHD) was defined as pericarditis and/or myocarditis using the recently modified Lake Louise criteria, including T1 and T2 relaxation mapping. Results 58 patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR test were identified, who subsequently underwent a CMR study for evaluation of cardiac symptoms. 36 patients (62%) had no symptoms at the time of initial diagnosis, while 7 patients (12%) had mild symptoms. Lastly, 15 patients (26%) had more severe symptoms at the time of initial diagnosis. All CMR studies were prompted by the subsequent development of shortness of breath or chest pain. Detection rates of IHD in these 3 groups of patients is delineated in Figure 1. A chi-squared test was used to assess any statistically significant differences in the CMR detection rate of IHD based on initial symptoms. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of IHD based on initial COVID symptoms (p-value=0.856). Conclusion Forty-three of 58 patients (74%) with no/mild symptoms at the time of initial COVID-19 diagnosis developed more severe post-COVID symptoms requiring CMR. In contrast, 15 of 58 patients (26%) with more severe symptoms at the time of initial COVID-19 diagnosis had persistence of these symptoms requiring CMR. These data suggest that the severity of symptoms on initial presentation with COVID-19 does not predict post-COVID recovery symptoms or CMR findings of inflammatory heart disease. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

The correlation of anti-heart antibodies levels with clinical manifestations and outcomes in patients with COVID-19

Purpose To evaluate the blood level of anti-heart antibodies (AHA) and its correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with severe and moderate COVID-19. Methods The study included 34 patients (11 females and 23 males, mean age 58.3±17.6 years, from 20 to 87 years) who underwent treatment for moderate and severe COVID-19 at the Sechenov University hospital in April-June 2020. The diagnosis was confirmed by 50% using nasopharyngeal smears. In other cases, the diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on the following criteria: contact with a serologically confirmed COVID-19 patient, persistent fever of at least 38 degrees Celsius, typical CT findings of viral pneumonia, typical changes in blood tests in the absence of evidence for other diseases. Besides standard medical examination the AHA blood levels by immunoassay were observed, including antinuclear antibodies (ANA), antiendothelial cell antibodies (AECA), anti-cardiomyocyte antibodies (AbC), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMA) and cardiac conducting tissue antibodies (CCTA). Median hospital length of stay was 14 [13; 18] days. Results AHA levels were increased in 25 (73.5%) patients. The patients were divided into the five groups: 1.Patients with previous chronic myocarditis who had already been receiving immunosuppressive therapy at the admission (n=4). Moderate titer increase was noted only in one patient. 2.Patients with severe COVID-19 and high inflammatory activity, in whom the degree of AHA increase matched the general disease activity. 3. Patients with severe COVID-19 and high inflammatory activity without AHA increase. 4. Patients with moderate COVID-19, in whom high AHA titers may reflect chronic latent myocarditis not associated with SARS-Cov2. 5. Patients with moderate COVID-19 and nearly normal / normal AHA titers. Significant correlation (p<0.05) of AHA levels with cardiovascular manifestations (r=0.459) was found. AbC levels correlated significantly with pneumonia severity (r=0.472), respiratory failure (r=0.387), need for invasive ventilation (r=0.469), chest pain (r=0.374), low QRS voltage (r=0.415) and high levels of CRP (r=0.360) and LDH (r=0.360). ASMA levels were found to correlate significantly with atrial fibrillation (r=0.414, p<0.05). ANA and AbC levels correlated significantly with pericardial effusion (r=0.721 and r=0.745 respectively, p<0.05). The lethality rate was 8.8%. AbC and ASMA levels correlated significantly with lethality (r=0.363, and r=0.426 respectively, p<0.05) and were prognostically important. Conclusion Elevated titres of AHA were found in 73.5% of patients. AHA correlated with lethality, in most cases reflecting the overall activity and severity of the disease and may be considered within the systemic immune and inflammatory response in COVID-19. At the same time, the correlation with signs of myocardial injury and pericardial effusion, confirms the direct role of AHA in the inflammatory heart disease (myopericarditis). FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Preponderance of right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients with inflammatory heart disease

Introduction Recently published data suggests that inflammatory heart disease (IHD) is far more prevalent in COVID-19 patients than initially expected. Specifically, there have been reports of greater than expected right ventricular (RV) involvement in the post COVID-19 recovery period. However, there are no published data comparing RV dysfunction in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patient cohorts with IHD. Purpose This study was designed to assess and compare the prevalence of RV hypokinesis in 2 patient cohorts: patients with COVID-19 related IHD and patients with non-COVID-19 related IHD, based on cardiac MRI findings (CMR). Methods An institutional cardiac imaging database was queried for all patients with IHD documented by CMR. Inflammatory heart disease was defined as pericarditis and/or myocarditis using the recently modified Lake Louise criteria, including T1 and T2 relaxation mapping. The prevalence of IHD was evaluated in 2 separate patient cohorts, subjects with COVID-19 related IHD and subjects with non-COVID-19 related IHD. Further assessment of these 2 patients cohorts included the presence of RV hypokinesis. A two-tailed Z-test was used for statistical comparison of the presence of IHD and the presence of RV hypokinesis in these 2 patient cohorts. Results 62 COVID patients and 6782 non-COVID patients were identified in the imaging database. 53 of the 62 COVID patients (85.5%) had evidence of IHD on CMR study. In contrast, 1273 of the 6782 patients (18.8%) had documented IHD detected by CMR. There was a statistically significant difference between the incidence of IHD in the 2 patient groups (p-value <0.ehab724.01391). Furthermore, of the 53 COVID patients with IHD, 30 (56.6%) showed evidence of RV hypokinesis on CMR. Of the 1273 non-COVID patients with IHD, only 126 (9.9%) showed evidence of RV hypokinesis on CMR. There was a statistically significant difference between the incidence of RV hypokinesis among the 2 groups (p-value <0.ehab724.01391). Details are provided in Figure 1. Conclusion These data suggest that the prevalence of IHD in COVID-19 patients is 4 times greater than in patients with a non-COVID etiology, based on CMR imaging findings. Furthermore, the occurrence of RV hypokinesis is 5 times greater in COVID-19 patients than in IHD patients with a non-COVID etiology, also based on CMR findings. These data suggest that CMR imaging is of value in detecting both IHD and RV dysfunction, which are often difficult to detect with other imaging modalities. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Myocarditis Incidence, Complications and Mortality in Sweden: A Retrospective Registry Study From 2000-2014

Objectives: Investigate trends in incidence and prognosis of myocarditis in Sweden during 2000-2014.Background: Myocarditis is an inflammatory heart disease, with scarce data concerning incidence and prognosis.Methods: Linking Swedish National Patient and Cause of Death Register, we identified individuals ≥16 years with first-time diagnosis of myocarditis during 2000-2014. Reference population, matched for age and birth year (n=16 622) was selected from the Swedish Total Population Register. Results: Among the 8 679 cases, (75% men, 64% <50 years), incidence rate/100 000 inhabitants rose from 6.3 to 8.6, mostly in men and those <50 years. Incident heart failure/dilated cardiomyopathy occurred in 6.2% within 1 year after index hospitalization and in 10.2% during 2000-2014, predominantly in those ≥50 years (12.1% within 1 year, 20.8% during 2000-2014). In all, 8.1% died within 1 year, 0.9% (<50 years) and 20.8% (≥50 years). Hazard ratios (adjusted for age, sex) for 1-year mortality comparing cases and controls were 4.00 (95% confidence interval 1.37-11.70), 4.48 (2.57-7.82), 4.57 (3.31-6.31) and 3.93 (3.39-4.57) for individuals aged <30, 30-<50, 50-<70, and ≥70 years, respectively. Conclusion: The incidence of myocarditis during 2000-2014 increased, predominantly in younger men. One-year mortality in the young was low, but fourfold higher compared with reference population.

Diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis

The recommendations are dedicated to contemporary aspects of epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, etiology-based, pathogenetic and symptomatic treatment of myocarditis. Various pathogenetic mechanisms that cause the development and progression of inflammatory heart disease and cause dilatation and systolic dysfunction, lead to heart failure and the development of other complications of myocarditis are described in detail. These recommendations present the modern classification of myocarditis, approved in Ukraine, and modern algorithms for diagnosis and clinical management of patients, in particular the algorithm that justifies the appointment of glucocorticoids for patients with myocarditis. The characteristics of different variants of myocarditis are also presented with clarifications concerning diagnosis and treatment. Much attention is paid to various approaches to the etiotropic and pathogenetic treatment of myocarditis and their possible prospects. It is obvious that in order to standardize approaches to the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic myocarditis, it is necessary to conduct large-scale multicenter studies and create special registries. In addition, in the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the pathological effects of SARS-Cov-2 as a trigger of myocarditis need further study, in particular in terms of impact on the prognosis and approaches to pathogenetic therapy in such patients. Unification of terminology and approaches to diagnosis and clinical monitoring of patients with myocarditis can improve management tactics and increase the survival rate of such patients. To identify high-risk patients (with arrhythmias, high probability of recurrence or transformation of myocarditis into dilated cardiomyopathy) and candidates for heart transplantation, the most promising is the creation of special databases of such patients