scholarly journals Anti-seizure medication is not associated with an increased risk to develop cancer in epilepsy patients

Author(s):  
Jenny Stritzelberger ◽  
Johannes D. Lang ◽  
Tamara M. Mueller ◽  
Caroline Reindl ◽  
Vivien Westermayer ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Whether anti-seizure medication (ASM) increases the risk for cancer has been debated for decades. While for some ASM, a carcinoma-promoting effect has been suspected, carcinoma-protective effects have been shown for other ASM. However, the issue remains unresolved as data from preclinical and clinical studies have been inconsistent and contradictory. Methods We collected anonymous patient data from practice neurologists throughout Germany between 2009 and 2018 using the IMS Disease Analyzer database (QuintilesIMS, Frankfurt, Germany). People with epilepsy (PWE) with an initial cancer diagnosis and antiepileptic therapy prior to the index date were 1:1 matched with a control group of PWE without cancer according to age, gender, index year, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and treating physician. For both groups, the risk to develop cancer under treatment with different ASMs was analyzed using three different models (ever use vs. never use (I), effect per one (II) and per five therapy years (III). Results A total of 3152 PWE were included (each group, n = 1,576; age = 67.3 ± 14.0 years). The risk to develop cancer was not significantly elevated for any ASM. Carbamazepine was associated with a decreased cancer risk (OR Model I: 0.699, p < .0001, OR Model II: 0.952, p = .4878, OR Model III: 0.758, p < .0004). Significance Our findings suggest that ASM use does not increase the risk of cancer in epilepsy patients.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiqing Liu ◽  
Shumin Ma ◽  
Lei Liang ◽  
Zhiyong Kou ◽  
Hongbin Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies on the XRCC3 rs1799794 polymorphism show that this polymorphism is involved in a variety of cancers, but its specific relationships or effects are not consistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the association between rs1799794 polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer. Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies through June 11, 2019. All analyses were performed with Stata 14.0. Subgroup analyses were performed by cancer type, ethnicity, source of control, and detection method. A total of 37 studies with 23,537 cases and 30,649 controls were included in this meta-analysis. Results XRCC3 rs1799794 increased cancer risk in the dominant model and heterozygous model (GG + AG vs. AA: odds ratio [OR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.08, P = 0.051; AG vs. AA: OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.01, P = 0.015). The existence of rs1799794 increased the risk of breast cancer and thyroid cancer, but reduced the risk of ovarian cancer. In addition, rs1799794 increased the risk of cancer in the Caucasian population. Conclusion This meta-analysis confirms that XRCC3 rs1799794 is related to cancer risk, especially increased risk for breast cancer and thyroid cancer and reduced risk for ovarian cancer. However, well-designed large-scale studies are required to further evaluate the results.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Youn An ◽  
So Young Kim ◽  
Dong Jun Oh ◽  
Chanyang Min ◽  
Songyoung Sim ◽  
...  

Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships of smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity with thyroid cancer in Korean residents. The Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort includes individuals ≥ 40 years who were assessed from 2002 to 2013. In total, 4977 thyroid cancer participants were matched with respect to age, sex, income, and region of residence with 19,908 controls at a ratio of 1:4. Crude and adjusted (for the Charlson comorbidity index, smoking status, frequency of alcohol consumption, and obesity) odds ratios (ORs) were analyzed using conditional logistic regression analyses. Additionally, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The adjusted OR of smoking for thyroid cancer was 0.62 (95% CI 0.54–0.72, P < 0.001), and that of alcohol consumption was 0.83 (95% CI 0.75–0.92, P < 0.001). The adjusted ORs of the BMI categories were 1.13 (95% CI 1.05–1.22, P = 0.002) for obese I, and 1.24 (95% CI 1.04–1.47, P = 0.014) for obese II. The ORs of smoking and alcohol consumption were lower, and those of overweight and obesity were higher in thyroid cancer patients than in individuals in the control group.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nupur Mukherjee ◽  
Nilanjana Bhattacharya ◽  
Satyabrata Sinha ◽  
Neyaz Alam ◽  
Runu Chakravarti ◽  
...  

The adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and mutated in colorectal cancer (MCC) genes are key regulatory genes of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which are independently involved in maintaining low levels of β-catenin in the cell. In addition to genetic and epigenetic alterations, some genetic polymorphisms in the genes associated with the Wnt signaling pathway have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of cancer, including breast cancer. In the present study we analyzed the association of genotype and haplotype status of two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs2229992 and rs11283943, in the APC and MCC genes, respectively, with an increased risk of breast carcinogenesis in a breast cancer and control population from eastern India. We observed a significant association of the rs11283943 SNP with increased breast cancer risk. Two specific haplotypes involving the minor allele of rs11283943 were found to be associated with an increased breast cancer risk. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant association of the 2–2 genotype (genotype homozygous for the rs11283943 minor allele) with decreased survival (p=0.045) of the breast cancer patients in our study, in particular patients with early-onset BC.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5654
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Barańska ◽  
Agata Błaszczuk ◽  
Wiesław Kanadys ◽  
Maria Malm ◽  
Katarzyna Drop ◽  
...  

To perform a meta-analysis of case-control studies that addressed the association between oral contraceptive pills (OC) use and breast cancer (BrCa), PubMED (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify case-control studies of OC and BrCa published between 2009 and 2020. We used the DerSimonian–Laird method to compute pooled odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs), and the Mantel–Haenszel test to assess the association between OC use and cancer. Forty-two studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and we included a total of 110,580 women (30,778 into the BrCa group and 79,802 into the control group, of which 15,722 and 38,334 were using OC, respectively). The conducted meta-analysis showed that the use of OC was associated with a significantly increased risk of BrCa in general, OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.31, p = 0.0358. Regarding other risk factors for BrCa, we found that increased risk was associated significantly with early menarche, nulliparous, non-breastfeeding, older age at first parity, postmenopause, obesity, smoking, and family history of BrCa. Despite our conclusion that birth control pills increase the cancer risk being supported by extensive previous studies and meta-analyzes, further confirmation is required.


2020 ◽  
pp. bjophthalmol-2020-316947
Author(s):  
Min Seok Kim ◽  
Joon Hee Cho ◽  
Seong Jun Byun ◽  
Chang-Mo Oh ◽  
Kyu Hyung Park ◽  
...  

AimsTo investigate the association between incident retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and the subsequent development of cancer.MethodsIn this nationwide population-based retrospective study using 2002–2013 National Health Insurance Service database which covers the entire South Korean population, 186 701 incident RVO patients and their 1:1 propensity-score matched controls were included. We defined the fixed cohort from January 1st, 2004 to December 31st, 2013; the cohort included patients who suffered incident RVO after entering the cohort and their matched controls, and excluded patients having any cancer history before entering the cohort. The association of RVO and cancer was assessed by time-varying covariate Cox regression models; Model 1 included RVO as a time-varying covariate, Model 2 included Model 1 plus demographic information and Model 3 included Model 2 and comorbidities.ResultsRVO was associated with an increased risk of subsequent cancer (HR=1.29; 95% CI, 1.26–1.31 in Model 1), which was consistent in Models 2 and 3. The incidence rate of overall cancer during the study period was 25.55 (95% CI, 25.19–25.91) per 1000 person-years in the RVO group and 18.62 (95% CI, 18.46–18.79) per 1000 person-years in the control group. In the subgroup analysis, haematological malignancies showed the highest association with RVO (HR=1.65; 95% CI, 1.49–1.83).ConclusionPatients with RVO have an increased risk of subsequent cancer development even after adjusting for demographic factors and comorbidities. Further study is warranted to elucidate these associations to provide proper recommendations for RVO patients regarding the cancer screening.


J ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-448
Author(s):  
Manuela Chiavarini ◽  
Andrea Ostorero ◽  
Giulia Naldini ◽  
Roberto Fabiani

Many studies have investigated the relationship between medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and health outcomes, particularly cancer, in the offspring. This meta-analysis investigated the association between MAR and childhood cancer. Data sources were PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up until June 2018. From the selected studies, we extracted the cancer risk estimates of the exposure of interest (MAR, assisted reproductive technology—ART, and in fitro fertilization—IVF). We conducted the meta-analysis using a random effects model. The outcomes of interest were childhood cancers, classified according to the international classification of childhood cancer (ICCC-3). In our meta-analysis (18 cohort and 15 case-control studies) the overall cancer risk was significantly increased in children conceived by MAR, ART, or IVF. MAR and ART significantly increased the risk for hematological tumors, hepatic tumors, and sarcomas (odds ratio (OR) 1.54; 95% CI 1.18–2.02 and OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.34–2.74, respectively). MAR increased acute myeloid leukemia risk (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.02–1.95) and ART increased neural cancer risk (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.01–1.46). Our results suggest an increased risk of cancer in children conceived by MAR. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of fertility treatments, parental subfertility status, and their association on health outcomes in the offspring.


Author(s):  
Steven A. Narod ◽  
Tomasz Huzarski ◽  
Anna Jakubowska ◽  
Jacek Gronwald ◽  
Cezary Cybulski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated a relationship between selenium status and cancer risk among those with low selenium levels. It is of interest to prospectively evaluate the relationship between selenium and cancer among women who reside in a region with ubiquitously low selenium levels. Methods We performed a nested case-control study of baseline serum selenium levels and cancer risk using data and biological samples from 19,573 females that were participants in a biobanking initiative between 2010 and 2014 in Szczecin Poland. Cases included women with any incident cancer (n = 97) and controls (n = 184) were women with no cancer at baseline or follow-up. Serum selenium was quantified using mass spectroscopy. Results The odds ratio associated being below the cutoff of 70.0 μg/L compared to a level above 70.0 μg/L was 2.29 (95% CI 1.26–4.19; P = 0.007). The risks for women in the two middle categories were similar and suggests that the normal range be between 70 μg/L and 90 μg/L. There was evidence for an increased risk of cancer among women in the highest category of selenium levels (i.e., > 90 μg/L), but this association did not achieve statistical significance (OR = 1.63; 95%CI 0.63–4.19; P = 0.31). Conclusions Results from this study suggest that suggest that the optimum serum level of selenium in women living in Poland should be between 70 μg/L and 90 μg/L.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2074-2074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Frydecka ◽  
Katarzyna Suwalska ◽  
Edyta Pawlak ◽  
Lidia Karabon ◽  
Anna Tomkiewicz ◽  
...  

Abstract There are strong evidences that altered immunological function entails an increased risk of cancer. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), CD28, and Inducible co-stimulator (ICOS) are costimulatory molecules provide regulatory signals for T-cell activation. CD28 and ICOS potently enhance T-cell functions, while activation of T-cells is subsequently downregulated by CTLA-4. The abnormal expression of costimulatory molecules may be caused by polymorphisms of genes encoding these molecules. The extended study was undertaken to evaluate the association between the polymorphisms: CTLA-4+49A/G, CTLA-4-319C/T, CTLA-4(AT)n, CD28+17C/T, ICOS(GT)n and susceptibility to B-CLL in a Polish population. All together 124 B-CLL patients and 202 controls were studied. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were typed by minisequencing. The microsatellite polymorphisms were studied by PCR and fuorescence based technique. The distribution of -319T/C alleles and genotypes differed significantly between groups. The frequency of T allele and T phenotype was increased in patients with respect to controls (p=0.01, OR=1.74, 1.13∼95%CI∼2.68; p=0.01, OR =1.85, 1.13∼95%CI∼3.04, respectively). CTLA-4+49A/G and CTLA-4 (AT)n did not correlate with B-CLL. The analysis of the CD28+17C/T showed that the presence of C allele and C phenotype increased the OR of B-CLL by 1.97 and 2.07, respectively (p=0.002, 1.28∼95%CI ∼3.03; p=0.003, 1.27∼95%CI ∼3.38). For ICOS(GT)n gene polymorphism analysis we combined the alleles into 3 groups: (s)- short-alleles with 8 and 9 repeats, (m) -middle- with 10 and 11 and (l)- long- 12 and more repeats. The global distribution of alleles and genotypes was significantly different in patients and controls (p=0.00008 and p=0.00006, respectively). Individuals possessing (s) alleles were 2.75 times more prone to B-CLL than others (p=0.0000, OR=2.75, 1.67∼95%CI∼4.55), while carrying (l) alleles were protected to B-CLL (p=0.004, OR=0.47, 0.29∼95%CI∼0.79). The genotype (s)/(m) was overrepresented in patients (p=0.004, OR=2.29, 1.28∼95%CI∼2.09), but (l)/(l) individuals appeared more frequently in controls (p=0.002, OR=0.07, 0.00 ∼95%CI∼0.44). The haplotype association study of three polymorphic sites: CTLA-4-319C/T and CD28+17C/T and ICOS (s)/(m)/(l), which correlated with B-PBL in univariante analysis, showed that the distribution of haplotypes was different in cases and control, global p value was p= 3 ×108. Remarkable, the haplotypes T/C/(s) and T/T/(s) were presented only in B-CLL (p=0.0004, OR=62072, 3540∼95%CI∼1088238; p=0.00003, OR=3447, 203∼95%CI∼58334, respectively) while the haplotype C/T/(l) was significantly more frequent in control group as compared to B-CLL (p=0.000003, OR=0.3, 0.18∼95%CI∼0.51). B-CLL patients and controls polymorphic features for CTLA-4-319C/T, CD28IVS3+17C/T, ICOS (GT)n were subjected to multivariate forward stepwise logistic regression analysis. It appeared that C phenotype at CD28 T17int3C site increased twice risk of B-CLL (p=0.004, OR=2.09; 1.26∼95%CI∼3.48), while genotype (m)/(l) or (l)/(l) for ICOS gene protected from disease (p=0,0009, OR=0,41; 0,24∼95%CI∼0,69). We reported for the first time that the gene polymorphism of costimulatory molecules: CTLA-4/CD28/ICOS contribute to susceptibility to B-CLL.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1559-1559
Author(s):  
Lisa Burns ◽  
Ursula Kenny ◽  
Laura Healy ◽  
Samantha Cushen ◽  
Seamus O'Reilly ◽  
...  

1559 Background: The public’s knowledge of cancer risk factors has rarely been studied in Ireland. An understanding of this can help inform cancer prevention programs. Methods: An online surveywas used to assess the public’s perception of cancer risk. Results: 525 people completed the survey. Mean age was 40yrs (range:18-74), 82% were female and 36% had college degrees. 81% were concerned about developing cancer, however 20% believed if cancer was in their family there was nothing they could do about personal cancer risk. 20% did not know that cancer risk increased with age, 27% believed that >50% of cancers are inherited, and 54% believed 10-20% of cancers are inherited. The top 5 risk factors listed by respondents were: smoking 85%, diet 74%, alcohol 44%, genetics 38%, and environment 31%. Only 32% were aware that obesity is a risk factor for cancer and 33% did not think the location of fat was important for cancer prevention. When given a list of potential behaviours relevant to cancer risk 33% believed wearing a tight bra and 49% believed a blow to the breast could increase cancer risk. 87% believed genetics ‘strongly’ increased risk, 85% stress, and 86% believed cell phones increased risk. 12% believed ‘luck’ was important in avoiding cancer, 35% thought ‘detox’ diets and 61% believed organic food reduced risk. Only 33% agreed with the statement that ‘frozen vegetables/fruit are as good as fresh’, 40% were unaware of the link between red meat and cancer. The following foods were thought to increase risk: cheese (29%), soy (9%), milk chocolate (30%), red wine (25%), and eggs (11%). Aerosol use (71%), cleaning agents (73%), smoking (99%), cooking methods (68%), processed meat (86%), food irradiation (77%), and genetically modified foods (81%) were believed to increased risk. The majority were aware that berries, green tea, garlic, brassica vegetables and physical activity of 30 minutes a day can reduce cancer risk. Conclusions: There is a sizable portion of the population who are misinformed about cancer risk. Most are aware of classic risk factors (e.g. smoking, poor diet). Many overestimate risk attributable to genetics, environment, stress, and underestimate age, obesity and sunlight. One in 5 believes lifetime risk of cancer is non-modifiable.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12018-e12018
Author(s):  
Bruno Gustavo Muzzi Carvalho Carneiro ◽  
Andy Petroianu ◽  
Rafael Augusto Ribeiro Carvalho ◽  
Thiago Neto Ribeiro ◽  
Ana Maria Santos Rodrigues

e12018 Background: Many studies have suggested an inverse association between allergies and cancer, while others have found no relation between them, and still others have shown an increased risk of cancer in allergy patients. The conflicting findings from prior studies are partially due to the chosen research method, such as different definitions and measures for atopy, in addition to variations in the control of confusion factors, such as smoking and obesity. Objectives: Verify if there is a relation between certain types of cancer and allergies; investigate if there is a difference between individuals with and without cancer in relation to allergies. Methods: Case-control study carried out at the Alberto Cavalcanti Hospital of the Hospital Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais (FHEMIG), Brazil, from 2009 to 2011. The study included patients over 18 years of age, from both genders, who presented a diagnosis of cancer, as compared to healthy individuals, paired by gender and age. An anamnesis was gathered considering the medical history of the allergy, as diagnosed by a doctor, as well as the patients’ habits, associated illnesses, and the use of medications. For cancer patients, data concerning the tumor were recorded. Subsequently, an allergy percutaneous test was performed in each group to detect allergic hyperreactivity toward common inhalable, bacterial, and food antigens within our everyday environment. A blood sample was collected to quantitatively evaluate the eosinophils. Results: Both groups were paired according to interest variables, and eventual deviations were adjusted by means of multivariate analysis. Reports of allergies occurred in 30% of the patients in the cancer group, as compared to 53% in the control group (p<0.05), whereas in the cutaneous tests, a greater positivity occurred in the cancer group (69%) than in the control group (51%, p<0.05). No difference in the eosinophil values could be observed within the groups. Conclusions: Cancer patients present fewer allergies. By contrast, in cancer patients, positive cutaneous tests detected allergies which did not correspond to the clinical findings. Therefore, in cancer patients, the positive cutaneous test for allergies does not present a direct relation to the presence of clinically detectable allergies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document