Comparison of Open and Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy: Are Results From Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) Applicable to the “Real World”?

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 507
Author(s):  
E.M. Duggan ◽  
J.C. Gay ◽  
L.S. Kao ◽  
N.M. Novotny ◽  
J. Tice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
The Real ◽  
Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy

Survival among metastatic colorectal patients in clinical trials compared to the real world.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 673-673
Author(s):  
Ziwei Wang ◽  
Lindsay Hwang ◽  
James Don Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
The Real ◽  
Clinical Trial Results

673 Background: Randomized clinical trials play a central role in clinical research though only a small fraction of patients partake in clinical studies. Questions thus arise regarding the generalizability of clinical trial results to the remainder of the population. This study evaluated whether patient survival from randomized clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer reflects real world outcomes. Methods: A Pubmed search was used to identify randomized phase III clinical trials of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer published between 2005 and 2010. We excluded secondary or pooled analyses, second-line treatments, non-metastatic patients, non-English language, and non-randomized studies. Thirty-one clinical trials met these criteria, comprised of 79 distinct clinical trial arms. Overall survival among clinical trial patients was compared to metastatic colorectal cancer patients within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Within SEER, we restricted the analysis time-period and age of patients to match the enrollment period and age of patients within each individual clinical trial. Results: The clinical trials enrolled a total of 16,614 patients. Among all clinical trial arms the median survival ranged from 6.7-62 months, 1-year survival ranged from 30-97%, and 2-year survival ranged from 6-88%. Compared to SEER, the median survival was higher in 95% of the individual clinical trial arms by an average of 5.4 months (p<0.0001). The 1-year survival was higher in 94% of the clinical trial arms by an average of 16.7% (p<0.0001). The 2-year survival was higher in 71% of the clinical trial arms by an average of 7.2% (p<0.0001). Conclusions: This study found substantially improved survival among clinical trial participants compared to patients in the SEER database suggesting that survival estimates from clinical trials may not generalize to the “real world.” Potential patient factors such as differences in underlying comorbidity, performance status, disease burden, as well as variation in treatment could not be addressed in this study, though these factors likely explain some of the observed survival differences.

scholarly journals The real-world outcomes of multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0258487
Author(s):  
Agoston Gyula Szabo ◽  
Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen ◽  
Mette Bøegh Levring ◽  
Birgitte Preiss ◽  
Carsten Helleberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Median Number ◽  
The Real ◽  
Treatment Timing ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk

Most patients cannot be included in randomized clinical trials. We report real-world outcomes of all Danish patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated with daratumumab-based regimens until 1 January 2019. Methods Information of 635 patients treated with daratumumab was collected retrospectively and included lines of therapy (LOT), hematologic responses according to the International Myeloma Working Group recommendations, time to next treatment (TNT) and the cause of discontinuation of treatment. Baseline characteristics were acquired from the validated Danish Multiple Myeloma Registry (DMMR). Results Daratumumab was administrated as monotherapy (Da-mono) in 27.7%, in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (Da-IMiD) in 57.3%, in combination with proteasome inhibitors (Da-PI) in 11.2% and in other combinations (Da-other) in 3.8% of patients. The median number of lines of therapy given before daratumumab was 5 for Da-mono, 3 for Da-IMiD, 4 for Da-PI, and 2 for Da-other. In Da-mono, overall response rate (ORR) was 44.9% and median time to next treatment (mTNT) was 4.9 months. In Da-IMiD, ORR was 80.5%, and mTNT was 16.1 months. In Da-PI, OOR was 60.6% and mTNT was 5.3 months. In patients treated with Da-other, OOR was 54,2% and mTNT was 5.6 months. The use of daratumumab in early LOT was associated with longer TNT (p<0.0001). Patients with amplification 1q had outcome comparable to standard risk patients, while patients with t(4;14), t(14;16) or del17p had worse outcome (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that timing of treatment (timing of daratumumab in the sequence of all LOT that the patients received throughout the course of their disease) was the most important factor for outcome (p<0.0001). Conclusion The real-world outcomes of multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab are worse than the results of clinical trials. Outcomes achieved with daratumumab were best when daratumumab was used in combination with IMIDs and in early LOT. Patients with high-risk CA had worse outcomes, but patients with amp1q had similar outcomes to standard-risk patients.

scholarly journals Effects of low-dose pirfenidone on survival and lung function decline in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): Results from a real-world study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261684
Author(s):  
Eung Gu Lee ◽  
Tae-Hee Lee ◽  
Yujin Hong ◽  
Jiwon Ryoo ◽  
Jung Won Heo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Pulmonary Function ◽  
Real World ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Unknown Etiology ◽  
The Real

Background Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown etiology. In several randomized clinical trials, and in the clinical practice, pirfenidone is used to effectively and safely treat IPF. However, sometimes it is difficult to use the dose of pirfenidone used in clinical trials. This study evaluated the effects of low-dose pirfenidone on IPF disease progression and patient survival in the real-world. Methods This retrospective, observational study enrolled IPF patients seen at the time of diagnosis at a single center from 2008 to 2018. Longitudinal clinical and laboratory data were prospectively collected. We compared the clinical characteristics, survival, and pulmonary function decline between patients treated and untreated with various dose of pirfenidone. Results Of 295 IPF patients, 100 (33.9%) received pirfenidone and 195 (66.1%) received no antifibrotic agent. Of the 100 patients who received pirfenidone, 24 (24%), 50 (50%), and 26 (26%), respectively, were given 600, 1200, and 1800 mg pirfenidone daily. The mean survival time was 57.03 ± 3.90 months in the no-antifibrotic drug group and 73.26 ± 7.87 months in the pirfenidone-treated group (p = 0.027). In the unadjusted analysis, the survival of the patients given pirfenidone was significantly better (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48–0.99, p = 0.04). After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, and the GAP score [based on gender (G), age (A), and two physiological lung parameters (P)], survival remained better in the patients given pirfenidone (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37–0.85, p = 0.006). In terms of pulmonary function, the decreases in forced vital capacity (%), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (%) and the diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (%) were significantly smaller (p = 0.000, p = 0.001, and p = 0.007, respectively) in patients given pirfenidone. Conclusions Low-dose pirfenidone provided beneficial effects on survival and pulmonary function decline in the real-world practice.

Abstract 261: Applying Clinical Trial Data to Real-World: Apixaban, Dabigatran, and Rivaroxaban

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh Amin ◽  
Michael Stokes ◽  
Ning Wu ◽  
Elyse Gatt ◽  
Dinara Makenbaeva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
The Real

BACKGROUND: Data from randomized controlled trials and a real-world sample of non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients were combined to estimate the absolute effect of each new oral anticoagulant (NOAC, apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) versus warfarin on stroke and major bleeding rates in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: Non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients were selected from Medco healthplans during 2007-2010. Reference rates for stroke and major bleeding excluding intracranial hemorrhage (to avoid double counting) were calculated for real-world Medco patients during warfarin use. Real-world event rates for NOACs were estimated by multiplying the corresponding relative risk from the randomized clinical trials by each reference rate. Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to treat (NNT) or numbers needed to harm (NNH) for each NOAC vs. warfarin were then estimated. Reduction in net clinical outcome was calculated by summing the absolute risk reductions for stroke and major bleeding excluding intracranial hemorrhage for each NOAC versus warfarin. RESULTS: Each NOAC resulted in a reduction in stroke events compared with warfarin in the real-world (TABLE). Apixaban was the only NOAC to reduce the rate of major bleeding excluding intracranial hemorrhage compared with warfarin. The NNT to avoid one net clinical outcome (stroke plus major bleeding excluding intracranial hemorrhage) per year was 32 and 84 for apixaban and dabigatran, respectively. Rivaroxaban resulted in an increase in net clinical outcome (NNH=166). CONCLUSIONS: If relative risk reductions from randomized clinical trials persist in the real-world, apixaban would result in the greatest clinical benefit versus warfarin of all NOACs in terms of stroke and major bleeding excluding intracranial hemorrhage events avoided.

scholarly journals A Large Gap in Patients’ Characteristics and Outcomes between the Real-World and Clinical Trial Settings in Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Asai ◽  
Yuichi Shibata ◽  
Daisuke Sakanashi ◽  
Hideo Kato ◽  
Mao Hagihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
The Real ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Healthcare Associated ◽  
Based Medicine

(1) Introduction: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is necessary to standardize treatments for infections because EBM has been established based on the results of clinical trials. Since entry criteria for clinical trials are very strict, it may cause skepticism or questions on whether the results of clinical trials reflect the real world of medical practice. (2) Methods: To examine how many patients could join any randomized clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). We reviewed all the pneumonia patients in our institute during 2014–2017. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who were eligible for clinical trials (participation-possible group), and those who were not (participation-impossible group). Exclusion criteria for clinical trials were set based on previous clinical trials. (3) Results: A total of 406 patients were enrolled in the present study. Fifty-seven (14%) patients were categorized into the participation-possible group, while 86% of patients belonged to the participation-impossible group. Patients in the participation-possible group had less comorbidities and more favorable outcomes than those with the participation-impossible group. As for the outcomes, there were significant differences in the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates between the two groups. In addition, the participation-possible group showed a longer overall survival time than the participation-impossible group (p < 0.001 by Log-Rank test). (4) Conclusion: There is a difference in patients’ profile and outcomes between clinical trials and the real world. Though EBM is essential to advance medicine, we should acknowledge the facts and the limits of the clinical trials.

scholarly journals To What Degree Could Clinical Trials in Evidence Based Medicine Reflect The Real World in The Treatment of Pneumonia?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhiro Asai ◽  
Yuichi Shibata ◽  
Daisuke Sakanashi ◽  
Arufumi Shiota ◽  
Hideo Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
The Real ◽  
Evidenced Based ◽  
Based Medicine ◽  
Community Onset ◽  
Evidenced Based Medicine

Abstract BackgroundEvidenced based medicine (EBM) is necessary to standardize treatments for infections because EBM　has been established based on the results of clinical trials. Since entry criteria for clinical trials are　very strict, it ​may cause skepticism or question whether the results of clinical trials　reflect the real world ​of medical practice.MethodsTo examine how many patients could join any randomized clinical trials for the　treatment of community-onset pneumonia, we reviewed all the pneumonia patients in our institute　during 2014-2017. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who were eligible for clinical　trials (participation possible group), and those who were not (participation impossible group).　Exclusion criteria for clinical trials were set based on previous clinical trials.ResultsA total of 406 patients were enrolled in the present study. Fifty-seven (14%) patients were categorized into the participation possible group, while 86% ​of patients belonged to the participation impossible group. Patients in the participation possible group had less comorbidities and ​more favorable outcomes than those with the participation impossible group. As for the outcomes, there were significant differences in the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates between the two groups. In addition, the participation possible group showed a longer overall survival time than the participation impossible group (p<0.001 by Log-Rank test).ConclusionThere is a difference in patients’ profile and outcomes between clinical trials and the real world. Though EBM is essential to advance ​medicine, we should acknowledge the fact​s and the limit​s of the clinical trial.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Community Hematologists/Oncologists on Barriers to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2198-2198
Author(s):  
Ajeet Gajra ◽  
Richard Sweat ◽  
Yolaine Jeune-Smith ◽  
Jonathan K. Kish ◽  
Bruce A Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
Real World ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Car T

Introduction The ASH Annual Meeting is a venue for presentation of outcomes data from key clinical trials in hematologic malignancies and novel drug classes used to treat them. The approval of two CAR-T therapies, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tis-cel), in the treatment of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), including diffuse LBCL (DLBCL), has ushered in a new class of drugs, i.e. cellular therapy. At ASH 2018, Nastoupil et al. presented data from a retrospective analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL, including DLBCL, treated with commercially available axi-cel CAR-T therapy at academic centers in the United States (Nastoupil LJ, et al. Blood. 2018;132[Suppl 1]:91). The authors found that early outcomes of real-world patients receiving axi-cel therapy were comparable to those observed in the clinical trial population, despite >40% of these patients failing to meet the clinical trial eligibility criteria. At a live meeting in February 2019, we sought the perceptions of community hematologists and oncologists (H/O) regarding their use of, referrals for and barriers to CAR-T therapy as well their perception of the value of the real-world evidence (RWE) presented. Methods A live meeting in February 2019 convened H/O with geographic representation from across the United States. The participants were shown data from selected oral and/or poster presentations from the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting and responded to questions regarding their perceptions of the data and its potential impact on current practice. Participants submitted their demographic responses via a web-based survey prior to the meeting and data impression responses via an audience response system at the live meeting. Results Among the 59 H/O who participated in this live market research program on February 22-23, 2019, 61% identified their primary specialty as hematology/oncology and 34% medical oncology. Only 27% of H/O had attended the 60th ASH Annual Meeting in December 2018. The participants were mostly community-based physicians, 50% in private community and 45% in community practices owned by a hospital or academic center. One-third have been in practice for over 20 years, one-third for 11-20 years and one-third for 10 or fewer years. This group sees an average of 20+ patients per day and reported B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma as one of the three most common hematologic malignancy they managed. 28% of H/O indicated that they have referred one patient and 24% have referred 2-5 patients for CAR-T therapy since the first approval on August 30, 2017. Of those H/O who had referred patients for CAR-T therapy, 45% indicated that none of their patients had yet received the infusion. The top two barriers to prescribing/recommending CAR-T therapy, as reported by the H/O, were the cumbersome logistics of administering therapy and following patients (52%), and the cost of the therapy (46%). Other concerns included high toxicity (24%) and lack of long-term survival data (19%), but not lack of knowledge of CAR-T therapy (2%). Furthermore, 87% of H/O agreed with the assertion that due to the limitations of randomized clinical trials, RWE is necessary to inform clinical practice. After review of the information presented on the real-world use of axi-cel, 73% of H/O indicated that this information is likely to cause them to recommend CAR-T therapy for more of their patients with DLBCL. Conclusions There is significant interest in adopting and using CAR-T therapies in LBCL amongst community H/O. This group does not perceive itself as lacking in knowledge regarding CAR-T therapy. The significant barriers of logistics and cost are potential deterrents to appropriate use. These results can inform stakeholders (manufacturers, payers, hospitals and practices) regarding the need to improve processes and develop payment models to address cost in order to facilitate access of these agents to the appropriate patients. RWE is viewed favorably by the vast majority of community H/O to inform clinical practice, due to the limitations of randomized clinical trials. Disclosures Gajra: Cardinal Health: Employment. Sweat:Cardinal Health: Employment. Jeune-Smith:Cardinal Health: Employment. Kish:Cardinal Health: Employment. Feinberg:Cardinal Health: Employment.

scholarly journals SAT-418 Finding the Needles in the Haystack: Harnessing the Electronic Health Record to Find Thyroid Immune Related Adverse Events

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Quandt ◽  
Laura Trupin ◽  
Michael Evans ◽  
Gabriela Schmajuk ◽  
Mark Stuart Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Real World ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Thyroid Disease ◽  
Thyroid Dysfunction ◽  
Health Record ◽  
The Real ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are being used to effectively treat a growing number of cancers but can cause immune related adverse events (irAE). Thyroid dysfunction is the most common endocrine irAE. A meta-analysis of clinical trials estimated that following CPI exposure, 6.6% will become hypothyroid and 2.9% will have hyperthyroidism1. It is unclear if this reflects the real-world incidence of these irAEs. We used electronic health record (EHR) data to identify patients who developed thyroid dysfunction after CPI to estimate the real-world incidence of these irAEs. Methods: Data were derived from the EHR of a large U.S. academic center. We identified subjects treated with CPIs between 2012 and 2018 and excluded those with thyroid cancer or pre-existing thyroid disease. Thyroid dysfunction was identified as either a TSH &gt; 10, an abnormal free T4 or a prescription for thyroid hormone replacement or anti-thyroid medication. Those with thyroid dysfunction were then categorized as having pre-existing disease or a new-onset thyroid irAE based on the timing of CPI initiation. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of thyroid irAE with age, gender, CPI and type of cancer. Results: In total, 1146 individuals without pre-existing thyroid disease that received CPIs were assessed. Pembrolizumab was the most common treatment (45%), followed by nivolumab (20%). Less than 10% of subjects received atezolizumab, durvalumab, ipilimumab monotherapy, combined ipilimumab/nivolumab, or other combinations of CPIs. Melanoma was the most common cancer treated (32%), followed by non-small cell lung cancer (13%). The prevalence of any other cancer was &lt; 10% each. Overall, 19% developed thyroid irAEs. After adjustment for gender and age, the type of cancer was significantly associated with new onset thyroid dysfunction (p=0.01). The rates of thyroid irAEs ranged from 10% in glioblastoma to 40% in renal cell cancer. Although there was no significant association between irAEs and specific CPIs in the overall analysis, thyroid irAEs were more common in subjects who received combined ipilimumab/ nivolumab (31%) compared to pembrolizumab (18%, p=0.03), nivolumab (18%, p&lt;0.01) and ipilimumab (15%, p=0.02). Conclusion: Thyroid irAEs are much more common in real world practice than in clinical trials and there is emerging evidence that certain cancer types incur a higher risk of thyroid irAEs even after adjustment for CPI exposure. Clinicians and patients should be educated about these risks. Future work should focus on exploring the reasons underlying the differing rates of thyroid irAEs among different cancers including effect on cancer outcomes. 1Barroso-Sousa et al. Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction Following the Use of Different Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Regimens. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 02215: 1–10.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document