Design of the recombinant influenza neuraminidase antigen is crucial for protective efficacy
Supplementing influenza vaccines with recombinant neuraminidase (rNA) remains a promising approach for improving the suboptimal efficacy. However, correlations among rNA designs, properties, and protection have not been systematically investigated. Here, we performed a comparative analysis of several rNAs produced from different construct designs using the baculovirus/insect cell system. The rNAs were designed with different tetramerization motifs and NA domains from a recent H1N1 vaccine strain (A/Brisbane/02/2018) and were analyzed for enzymatic properties, antigenicity, thermal and size stability, and protection in mice. We found that rNAs containing the NA head-domain versus the full-ectodomain possess distinct enzymatic properties and that the molecular size stability is tetramerization domain-dependent, whereas protection is more contingent on the combination of the tetramerization and NA domains. Following single-dose immunizations, a rNA possessing the full-ectodomain, non-native enzymatic activity, and the tetramerization motif from the human vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein provided substantially higher protection than a rNA possessing the head-domain, native activity and the same tetramerization motif. In contrast, these two rNAs provided comparable protection when the tetramerization motif was exchanged with the one from the tetrabrachion protein. These findings demonstrate that the rNA design is crucial for the protective efficacy and should be thoroughly evaluated for vaccine development, as the unpredictable nature of the heterologous domain combination can result in rNAs with similar key attributes but vastly differ in protection.