Development of wafer level hybrid bonding process using photosensitive adhesive and Cu pillar bump

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingjun Yao ◽  
Daquan Yu ◽  
Ning Zhao ◽  
Jun Fan ◽  
Zhiyi Xiao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bonding Process ◽  
Wafer Level ◽  
Cu Pillar ◽  
Cu Pillar Bump

Deformation Behavior of Various Interconnection Structures Using Fine Pitch Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) Vertical Probe

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 2949-2958
Author(s):  
Xuan Luc Le ◽  
Han Eul Lee ◽  
Sung-Hoon Choa
Keyword(s):  
Deformation Behavior ◽  
Solder Ball ◽  
Microelectromechanical Systems ◽  
Wafer Level ◽  
Silicon Oxide Layer ◽  
Cu Pillar ◽  
Fine Pitch ◽  
Cu Pillar Bump ◽  
Vertical Probe ◽  
Interconnection Structure

Recently, fine pitch wafer level packaging (WLP) technologies have drawn a great attention in the semiconductor industries. WLP technology uses various interconnection structures including microbumps and through-silicon-vias (TSVs). To increase yield and reduce cost, there is an increasing demand for wafer level testing. Contact behavior between probe and interconnection structure is a very important factor affecting the reliability and performance of wafer testing. In this study, with a MEMS vertical probe, we performed systematic numerical analysis of the deformation behavior of various interconnection structures, including solder bump, copper (Cu) pillar bump, solder capper Cu bump, and TSV. During probing, the solder ball showed the largest deformation. The Cu pillar bump also exhibited relatively large deformation. The Cu bump began to deform at OD of 10 μm. At OD of 20 μm, bump pillar was compressed, and the height of the bump decreased by 8.3%. The deformation behavior of the solder capped Cu bump was similar to that of the solder ball. At OD of 20 μm, the solder and Cu bumps were largely deformed, and the total height was reduced by 11%. The TSV structure showed the lowest deformation, but exerted the largest stress on the probe. In particular, copper protrusion at the outer edge of the via was observed, and very large shear stress was generated between the via and the silicon oxide layer. In summary, when probing various interconnection structures, the probe stress is less than that when using an aluminum pad. On the other hand, deformation of the structure is a critical issue. In order to minimize damage to the interconnection structure, smaller size probes or less overdrive should be used. This study will provide important guidelines for performing wafer-level testing and minimizing damage of probes and interconnection structures.

Effects of α-Fe2O3 Additions on Assembly Reliability of Electroplated Sn-Based Solder Cap on Cu Pillar Bump During Thermal Cycling

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 1079-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Liu ◽  
Xiuchen Zhao ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Cu Pillar ◽  
Cu Pillar Bump

Cu Pillar Bump Design Parameters for Flip Chip Integration

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengmin Wen ◽  
Jason Goodelle ◽  
VanDee Moua ◽  
Kenny Huang ◽  
Chris Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Flip Chip ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Cu Pillar ◽  
Cu Pillar Bump

Development of High Density RDL Technologies for Panel Level Processing

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 000284-000313
Author(s):  
Lars Böttcher ◽  
S. Karaszkiewicz ◽  
F. Schein ◽  
R. Kahle ◽  
A. Ostmann
Keyword(s):  
Coefficient Of Thermal Expansion ◽  
High Density ◽  
Organic Films ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Wafer Level ◽  
Final Size ◽  
Process Yield ◽  
Cu Pillar ◽  
Thin Organic Films ◽  
Advanced Packaging

Advanced packaging technologies like wafer-level fan-out and 3D System-in-Packages (SIPs) are rapidly penetrating the market of electronic components. A recent trend to reduce cost is the extension of processes to large manufacturing formats, called Panel Level Packaging (PLP). In a consortium of German partners from industry and research advanced technologies for PLP are developed. The project aims for an integrated process flow for SIPs with chips embedded into an organic laminate matrix. At first dies with Cu pillar structures are placed into openings of a laminate frame layer with very low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). They are embedded by vacuum lamination of thin organic films, filling the very small gap down to 15 μm between chips and frame. The frame provides alignment marks for a local registration of following processes. The ridged frame limits die shift during embedding and gives a remarkable handling robustness. Developments are initially performed on a 305×256mm2 panel format, aiming for a final size of 610×615 mm2. On the top side of embedded chips, a 20μm dielectric film is applied. The goal is to avoid additional via formation and to realize a direct connection between the Cu pillar of the die and the RDL The RDL formation is based on semi-additive processing. Therefore a Ti or TiW barrier and Cu seed layer is sputtered. Subsequently a 7μm photoresist is applied and exposed by a newly developed Direct Imaging (DI) system. Lines and spaces of 4μm were achieved with high yield. In the following, Cu is simultaneously electroplated for the via contacts and interconnects traces. Finally, the photo resist is stripped and the TiW barrier and Cu seed layers are etched. The goal of the development is to provide a technology for a high-density RDL formation on large panel sizes. The paper will discuss the new developments in detail, e.g. the influence of most significant process parameters, like lithographical resolution, minimum via diameter and the placement and alignment accuracy on overall process yield.

Temporary and permanent bonding enables 3D integration of ultrathin wafers

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 001118-001144
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Brandl ◽  
Thomas Uhrmann ◽  
Mariana Pires ◽  
Stefan Jung ◽  
Jürgen Burggraf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Stability ◽  
Bonding Process ◽  
Total Thickness ◽  
Wafer Level ◽  
3D Integration ◽  
Process Flow ◽  
Wafer Thickness ◽  
Temporary Bonding ◽  
Carrier Wafer ◽  
On Chip

Rising demand in memory is just one example how 3D integration is still gaining momentum. Not only the form factor but also performance is improved for several 3D integration applications by reducing the wafer thickness. Two competing process flows using thin wafers are to carry out for 3D integration today. Firstly, two wafers can be bonded face-to-face with subsequent thinning without the need to handle a thin wafer. However, some chip designs require a face-to-back stacking of thin wafers, where temporary bonding becomes an inevitable process step. In this case, the challenge of the temporary bonding process is different to traditional stacking on chip level, where usually the wafers are diced after debonding and then stacked on chip level, which means die thicknesses are typically in the range of 50 μm. The goal of wafer level transfer is a massive reduction of the wafer thickness. Therefore temporary and permanent bonding has to be combined to enable stacking on wafer level with very thin wafers. The first step is temporary bonding of the device wafer with the temporary carrier through an adhesive interlayer, followed by thinning and other backside processes. Afterwards the thinned wafer is permanently bonded to the target wafer before debonding from the carrier wafer. This can be repeated several times to be suitable for example a high bandwidth memory, where several layers of DRAM are stacked on top of each other. Another application is the memory integration on processors, or die segmentation processes. The temporary bonding process flow has to be very well controlled in terms of total thickness variations (TTV) of the intermediate adhesive between device and carrier wafer. The requirements for the temporary bonding adhesive include offering sufficient adhesion between device and carrier wafer for the subsequent processes. The choice of the material class for this study is the Brewer Science dual layer material comprising of a curable layer which offers high mechanical stability to enable low TTV during the thinning process and a release layer for mechanical debond process. The release layer must lead to a successful debond but prevent spontaneous debonding during grinding and other processes. Total thickness variation values of the adhesive will be analyzed in dependence of the adhesive layer thickness as this is a key criterion for a successful implementation at the manufactures. Besides the TTV the mechanical stability during grinding will be evaluated by CSAM to make sure no delamination has happened. For feasibility of the total process flow it is important that the mechanical debonding requires less force compared to the separation of the permanent bonded wafers. Other process parameters such as edge trimming of the device wafer as well as edge removal of the mechanical debond release layer are investigated.

Characterization of Wafer Level Metal Thermo-Compression Bonding

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 002326-002360
Author(s):  
Erkan Cakmak ◽  
Bioh Kim ◽  
Viorel Dragoi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Metal Surface ◽  
Bonding Temperature ◽  
Transient Liquid Phase ◽  
Bonding Process ◽  
Bending Test ◽  
Strength Analysis ◽  
Mems Devices ◽  
Wafer Level ◽  
Bond Quality

The process of wafer-level bonding is being successfully used to form MEMS devices. Wafer level bonding may be realized by different methods such as thermo compression, transient liquid phase, anodic, glass frit, or polymer bonding. These methods have different requirements and the choice of wafer level bonding method is defined by the application type. Metal TCB has a wide variety of applications with materials of choice including Au, Cu and Al. 3D electrical connections are created by the use of Cu-Cu TCB; while CMOS MEMS devices may be realized by Al-Al TCB. In this study the wafer level bonding process of Cu-Cu and Al-Al TCB are characterized. The effects and significance of various bonding process parameters and surface treatment methods are reported on the final bond interfaces integrity and strength. Analysis methods include SAM, SEM, AFM, and four point bending test. Al-Al TCB samples were investigated on the interfacial adhesion energy and bond quality. IAE and bond quality were found to be positively correlated with bonding temperature. A bonding temperature of 500 °C or greater is necessary to obtain bond strengths of 8–10 J/m2. A positive relation between IAE and bonding temperature was observed for Cu-Cu TCB. IAE's of greater then 10 J/m2 were obtained on bonded samples that do not show a post bond residual seam on the bonding interface. An acid based pre treatment was shown to impact the surface properties of the initial metal surface hence affecting the IAE. Post bond annealing processes showed the most significant impact on the IAE of the Cu-Cu TCB system. To obtain comparable IAE values the Al-Al TCB method requires a higher bonding temperature. However the Cu-Cu TCB is sensitive to the initial metal surface condition and requires surface treatment processes prior to bonding to obtain high quality bonding results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document