scholarly journals Lamin A/C sustains PcG protein architecture, maintaining transcriptional repression at target genes

2015 ◽  
Vol 211 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Cesarini ◽  
Chiara Mozzetta ◽  
Fabrizia Marullo ◽  
Francesco Gregoretti ◽  
Annagiusi Gargiulo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Talk ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Myogenic Differentiation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Lamin A ◽  
Epigenetic Factors ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Development And Differentiation ◽  
Myogenic Program

Beyond its role in providing structure to the nuclear envelope, lamin A/C is involved in transcriptional regulation. However, its cross talk with epigenetic factors—and how this cross talk influences physiological processes—is still unexplored. Key epigenetic regulators of development and differentiation are the Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins, organized in the nucleus as microscopically visible foci. Here, we show that lamin A/C is evolutionarily required for correct PcG protein nuclear compartmentalization. Confocal microscopy supported by new algorithms for image analysis reveals that lamin A/C knock-down leads to PcG protein foci disassembly and PcG protein dispersion. This causes detachment from chromatin and defects in PcG protein–mediated higher-order structures, thereby leading to impaired PcG protein repressive functions. Using myogenic differentiation as a model, we found that reduced levels of lamin A/C at the onset of differentiation led to an anticipation of the myogenic program because of an alteration of PcG protein–mediated transcriptional repression. Collectively, our results indicate that lamin A/C can modulate transcription through the regulation of PcG protein epigenetic factors.

scholarly journals Histone H2AK119 Mono-Ubiquitination is Essential for Polycomb-Mediated Transcriptional Repression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Tamburri ◽  
Elisa Lavarone ◽  
Daniel Fernández-Pérez ◽  
Marika Zanotti ◽  
Daria Manganaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Talk ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Human Tumors ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Group Proteins ◽  
Major Function ◽  
Cellular Identity

ABSTRACTThe major function of Polycomb group proteins (PcG) is to maintain transcriptional repression to preserve cellular identity. This is exerted by two distinct repressive complexes, PRC1 and PRC2, that modify histones by depositing H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3, respectively. Both complexes are essential for development and are deregulated in several types of human tumors. PRC1 and PRC2 exist in different variants and show a complex regulatory cross-talk. However, the contribution that H2AK119ub1 plays in mediating PcG repressive functions remains largely controversial. Coupling an inducible system with the expression of a fully catalytic inactive RING1B mutant, we demonstrated that H2AK119ub1 deposition is essential to maintain PcG-target genes repressed in ESC. Loss of H2AK119ub1 induced a rapid displacement of PRC2 activity and a loss of H3K27me3 deposition. This affected both PRC2.1 and PRC2.2 variants and further correlated with a strong displacement and destabilization of canonical PRC1. Finally, we find that variant PRC1 forms can sense H2AK119ub1 deposition, which contributes to their stabilization specifically at sites where this modification is highly enriched. Overall our data place H2AK119ub1 deposition as central hub that mount PcG repressive machineries to preserve cell transcriptional identity.

scholarly journals Role of co-regulators in metabolic and transcriptional actions of thyroid hormone

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. R73-R97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inna Astapova
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Receptor ◽  
Retinoic Acid Receptor ◽  
Specific Response ◽  
Physiological Processes ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
And Function

Thyroid hormone (TH) controls a wide range of physiological processes through TH receptor (TR) isoforms. Classically, TRs are proposed to function as tri-iodothyronine (T3)-dependent transcription factors: on positively regulated target genes, unliganded TRs mediate transcriptional repression through recruitment of co-repressor complexes, while T3binding leads to dismissal of co-repressors and recruitment of co-activators to activate transcription. Co-repressors and co-activators were proposed to play opposite roles in the regulation of negative T3target genes and hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis, but exact mechanisms of the negative regulation by TH have remained elusive. Important insights into the roles of co-repressors and co-activators in different physiological processes have been obtained using animal models with disrupted co-regulator function. At the same time, recent studies interrogating genome-wide TR binding have generated compelling new data regarding effects of T3, local chromatin structure, and specific response element configuration on TR recruitment and function leading to the proposal of new models of transcriptional regulation by TRs. This review discusses data obtained in various mouse models with manipulated function of nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR or NCOR1) and silencing mediator of retinoic acid receptor and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT or NCOR2), and family of steroid receptor co-activators (SRCs also known as NCOAs) in the context of TH action, as well as insights into the function of co-regulators that may emerge from the genome-wide TR recruitment analysis.

scholarly journals Polycomb-group recruitment to a Drosophila target gene is the default state that is inhibited by a transcriptional activator

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (29) ◽  
pp. eabg1556
Author(s):  
Elnaz Ghotbi ◽  
Piao Ye ◽  
Taylor Ervin ◽  
Anni Kum ◽  
Judith Benes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 ◽  
Repressive Chromatin ◽  
Group Recruitment ◽  
Default State ◽  
Present Experimental Evidence

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins are epigenetic regulators that maintain the transcriptional repression of target genes following their initial repression by transcription factors. PcG target genes are repressed in some cells, but active in others. Therefore, a mechanism must exist by which PcG proteins distinguish between the repressed and active states and only assemble repressive chromatin environments at target genes that are repressed. Here, we present experimental evidence that the repressed state of a Drosophila PcG target gene, giant (gt), is not identified by the presence of a repressor. Rather, de novo establishment of PcG-mediated silencing at gt is the default state that is prevented by the presence of an activator or coactivator, which may inhibit the catalytic activity of Polycomb-repressive complex 2 (PRC2).

scholarly journals Differential Contributions of DNA-Binding Proteins to Polycomb Response Element Activity at the Drosophila giant Gene

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 214 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-634
Author(s):  
Elnaz Ghotbi ◽  
Kristina Lackey ◽  
Vicki Wong ◽  
Katie T. Thompson ◽  
Evan G. Caston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Element Activity

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins are evolutionarily conserved epigenetic regulators whose primary function is to maintain the transcriptional repression of target genes. Recruitment of Drosophila melanogaster PcG proteins to target genes requires the presence of one or more Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). The functions or necessity for more than one PRE at a gene are not clear and individual PREs at some loci may have distinct regulatory roles. Various combinations of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins are present at a given PRE, but only Pleiohomeotic (Pho) is present at all strong PREs. The giant (gt) locus has two PREs, a proximal PRE1 and a distal PRE2. During early embryonic development, Pho binds to PRE1 ∼30-min prior to stable binding to PRE2. This observation indicated a possible dependence of PRE2 on PRE1 for PcG recruitment; however, we find here that PRE2 recruits PcG proteins and maintains transcriptional repression independently of Pho binding to PRE1. Pho-like (Phol) is partially redundant with Pho during larval development and binds to the same DNA sequences in vitro. Although binding of Pho to PRE1 is dependent on the presence of consensus Pho-Phol-binding sites, Phol binding is less so and appears to play a minimal role in recruiting other PcG proteins to gt. Another PRE-binding protein, Sp1/Kruppel-like factor, is dependent on the presence of Pho for PRE1 binding. Further, we show that, in addition to silencing gene expression, PcG proteins dampen transcription of an active gene.

scholarly journals Mel-18, a Polycomb Group Protein, Regulates Cell Proliferation and Senescence via Transcriptional Repression of Bmi-1 and c-Myc Oncoproteins

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Jian Guo ◽  
Sonal Datta ◽  
Vimla Band ◽  
Goberdhan P. Dimri
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Ring Finger ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Polycomb Group Protein ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Group Protein ◽  
Bona Fide

Polycomb group (PcG) protein Bmi-1 is an important regulator of cell proliferation. It regulates cellular senescence and proliferation of cells via the transcriptional repression of INK4a/ARF locus and other target genes. Here, we report that Mel-18, a PcG ring finger protein (PCGF) transcriptionally down-regulates Bmi-1. Furthermore, the expression of Bmi-1 and Mel-18 inversely correlates in proliferating and senescent human fibroblasts. Bmi-1 down-regulation by Mel-18 results in accelerated senescence and shortening of the replicative life span in normal human cells. Importantly, using promoter-reporter, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and quantitative real-time primary transcript RT-PCR assays, and an RNA interference approach, we demonstrate that Bmi-1 is a bona fide target of c-Myc oncoprotein. Finally, our data suggest that Mel-18 regulates Bmi-1 expression during senescence via down-regulation of c-Myc. These studies link c-Myc and polycomb function in cell proliferation and senescence.

scholarly journals SUMOylation of the polycomb group protein L3MBTL2 facilitates repression of its target genes

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 3044-3058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Stielow ◽  
Bastian Stielow ◽  
Florian Finkernagel ◽  
Maren Scharfe ◽  
Michael Jarek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Polycomb Group Protein ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Group Protein

Abstract Lethal(3) malignant brain tumour like 2 (L3MBTL2) is an integral component of the polycomb repressive complex 1.6 (PRC1.6) and has been implicated in transcriptional repression and chromatin compaction. Here, we show that L3MBTL2 is modified by SUMO2/3 at lysine residues 675 and 700 close to the C-terminus. SUMOylation of L3MBTL2 neither affected its repressive activity in reporter gene assays nor it’s binding to histone tails in vitro. In order to analyse whether SUMOylation affects binding of L3MBTL2 to chromatin, we performed ChIP-Seq analysis with chromatin of wild-type HEK293 cells and with chromatin of HEK293 cells stably expressing either FLAG-tagged SUMOylation-competent or SUMOylation-defective L3MBTL2. Wild-type FLAG-L3MBTL2 and the SUMOylation-defective FLAG-L3MBTL2 K675/700R mutant essentially occupied the same sites as endogenous L3MBTL2 suggesting that SUMOylation of L3MBTL2 does not affect chromatin binding. However, a subset of L3MBTL2-target genes, particularly those with low L3MBTL2 occupancy including pro-inflammatory genes, was de-repressed in cells expressing the FLAG-L3MBTL2 K675/700R mutant. Finally, we provide evidence that SUMOylation of L3MBTL2 facilitates repression of these PRC1.6-target genes by balancing the local H2Aub1 levels established by the ubiquitinating enzyme RING2 and the de-ubiquitinating PR–DUB complex.

scholarly journals BAF complexes drive proliferation and block myogenic differentiation in fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Laubscher ◽  
Berkley E. Gryder ◽  
Benjamin D. Sunkel ◽  
Thorkell Andresson ◽  
Marco Wachtel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Myogenic Differentiation ◽  
Complex Function ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Myogenic Program

AbstractRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a pediatric malignancy of skeletal muscle lineage. The aggressive alveolar subtype is characterized by t(2;13) or t(1;13) translocations encoding for PAX3- or PAX7-FOXO1 chimeric transcription factors, respectively, and are referred to as fusion positive RMS (FP-RMS). The fusion gene alters the myogenic program and maintains the proliferative state while blocking terminal differentiation. Here, we investigated the contributions of chromatin regulatory complexes to FP-RMS tumor maintenance. We define the mSWI/SNF functional repertoire in FP-RMS. We find that SMARCA4 (encoding BRG1) is overexpressed in this malignancy compared to skeletal muscle and is essential for cell proliferation. Proteomic studies suggest proximity between PAX3-FOXO1 and BAF complexes, which is further supported by genome-wide binding profiles revealing enhancer colocalization of BAF with core regulatory transcription factors. Further, mSWI/SNF complexes localize to sites of de novo histone acetylation. Phenotypically, interference with mSWI/SNF complex function induces transcriptional activation of the skeletal muscle differentiation program associated with MYCN enhancer invasion at myogenic target genes, which is recapitulated by BRG1 targeting compounds. We conclude that inhibition of BRG1 overcomes the differentiation blockade of FP-RMS cells and may provide a therapeutic strategy for this lethal childhood tumor.

scholarly journals TheTrithorax-mimicAllele ofEnhancer of zesteRenders Active Domains of Target Genes Accessible toPolycomb-Group-Dependent Silencing inDrosophila melanogaster

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 1135-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izabella Bajusz ◽  
László Sipos ◽  
Zoltán Györgypál ◽  
Elizabeth A Carrington ◽  
Richard S Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Single Amino Acid ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Chromatin Domains ◽  
Trithorax Group ◽  
Inactive Chromatin

AbstractTwo antagonistic groups of genes, the trithorax- and the Polycomb-group, are proposed to maintain the appropriate active or inactive state of homeotic genes set up earlier by transiently expressed segmentation genes. Although some details about the mechanism of maintenance are available, it is still unclear how the initially active or inactive chromatin domains are recognized by either the trithorax-group or the Polycomb-group proteins. We describe an unusual dominant allele of a Polycomb-group gene, Enhancer of zeste, which mimics the phenotype of loss-of-function mutations in trithorax-group genes. This mutation, named E(z)Trithorax mimic [E(z)Trm], contains a single-amino-acid substitution in the conserved SET domain. The strong dominant trithorax-like phenotypes elicited by this E(z) allele suggest that the mutated arginine-741 plays a critical role in distinguishing between active and inactive chromatin domains of the homeotic gene complexes. We have examined the modification of E(z)Trm phenotypes by mutant alleles of PcG and trxG genes and other mutations that alter the phosphorylation of nuclear proteins, covalent modifications of histones, or histone dosage. These data implicate some trxG genes in transcriptional repression as well as activation and provide genetic evidence for involvement of histone modifications in PcG/trxG-dependent transcriptional regulation.

scholarly journals BAF complexes drive proliferation and block myogenic differentiation in fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Laubscher ◽  
Berkley Gryder ◽  
Benjamin Sunkel ◽  
Thorkell Andresson ◽  
Sudipto Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Myogenic Differentiation ◽  
Complex Function ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Myogenic Program

Abstract Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a pediatric malignancy of skeletal muscle lineage. The aggressive alveolar subtype is characterized by t(2;13) or t(1;13) translocations encoding for PAX3- or PAX7-FOXO1 chimeric transcription factors, respectively, and are referred to as fusion positive RMS (FP-RMS). The fusion gene alters the myogenic program and maintains the proliferative state wile blocking terminal differentiation. Here we investigated the contributions of chromatin regulatory complexes to FP-RMS tumor maintenance. We define, for the first time, the mSWI/SNF repertoire in FP-RMS. We find that SMARCA4 (encoding BRG1) is overexpressed in this malignancy compared to skeletal muscle and is essential for cell proliferation. Proteomic studies suggest proximity between PAX3-FOXO1 and BAF complexes, which is further supported by genome-wide binding profiles revealing enhancer colocalization of BAF with core regulatory transcription factors. Further, mSWI/SNF complexes act as sensors of chromatin state and are recruited to sites of de novo histone acetylation. Phenotypically, interference with mSWI/SNF complex function induces transcriptional activation of the skeletal muscle differentiation program associated with MYCN enhancer invasion at myogenic target genes which is reproduced by BRG1 targeting compounds. We conclude that inhibition of BRG1 overcomes the differentiation blockade of FP-RMS cells and may provide a therapeutic strategy for this lethal childhood tumor.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Repression by XPc1, a New Polycomb Homolog in Xenopus laevis Embryos, Is Independent of Histone Deacetylase

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 3958-3968 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Strouboulis ◽  
Sashko Damjanovski ◽  
Danielle Vermaak ◽  
Funda Meric ◽  
Alan P. Wolffe
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Trichostatin A ◽  
Histone Deacetylation ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Blastula Stage ◽  
Xenopus Laevis Embryos

ABSTRACT The Polycomb group (Pc-G) genes encode proteins that assemble into complexes implicated in the epigenetic maintenance of heritable patterns of expression of developmental genes, a function largely conserved from Drosophila to mammals and plants. The Pc-G is thought to act at the chromatin level to silence expression of target genes; however, little is known about the molecular basis of this repression. In keeping with the evidence that Pc-G homologs in higher vertebrates exist in related pairs, we report here the isolation of XPc1, a second Polycomb homolog in Xenopus laevis. We show that XPc1 message is maternally deposited in a translationally masked form in Xenopus oocytes, with XPc1 protein first appearing in embryonic nuclei shortly after the blastula stage. XPc1 acts as a transcriptional repressor in vivo when tethered to a promoter in Xenopus embryos. We find that XPc1-mediated repression can be only partially alleviated by an increase in transcription factor dosage and that inhibition of deacetylase activity by trichostatin A treatment has no effect on XPc1 repression, suggesting that histone deacetylation does not form the basis for Pc-G-mediated repression in our assay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document