scholarly journals AB0779 DOES DACTYLITIS/ENTESITIS PREDICT THE RESPONSE TO A SPECIFIC BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1687.2-1688
Author(s):  
C. Guillén-Astete ◽  
P. Zurita-Prada ◽  
C. Urrego-Laurín
Keyword(s):  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
First Line ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Patient Association ◽  
Alpha Therapy

Background:Spondylarthritis are diseases with a pathophysiological focus in enthesis with a different extent of synovial component. In the event of therapeutic failure with DMARDs, the clinician may consider biological therapy with anti-TNF drugs or other targets such as IL23 Despite this, most patients receive first-line anti-TNFs. Given that IL19 and IL23 activity is recognized at the level of the enthesis.Objectives:To evaluate whether the presence of dactylitis/entesitis could be useful in the choice of a particular biological therapy.Methods:A secondary analysis of a previous study was performed based on an electronic survey completed by patients with PsoA and distributed among members of the patient association “Acción Psoriasis”. Records from 191 respondents who had received at least one biological therapy were included. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of dactylitis or enthesitis. The rate of need to progress to the next therapeutic biologic line was compared.Results:61 patients reported dactylitis and 155 enthesitis. Distribution of treatments in patients with dactylitis: 33 patients received an anti-TNF-alpha, 11 Secukinumab and 12 Ustekinumab. 15 patients in the group receiving an anti-TNF-alpha had to substitute another treatment within 2 years (45.4%). 3 patients in each of the remaining groups had to substitute treatment within 2 years (27.2% and 25%, respectively). Compared to those receiving anti-TNF-alpha therapy, patients treated with Secukinumab or Ustekinumab had greater therapeutic persistence at 2 years (P<0.001, in both cases). Distribution of treatments in patients with enthesitis (not including dactylitis): 115 received an antiTNF-alpha, 25 received Secukinumab and 18 received Ustekinumab. 38 patients who received an anti-TNF-alpha had to substitute it within 2 years (24.5%). 4 patients who received Secukinumab and 3 who received Ustekinumab had to substitute their treatments in less than 2 years (16% and 16.6%, respectively). Compared to patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha therapy, patients treated with Secukinumab and Ustekinumab had a higher proportion of therapeutic persistence at 2 years (P<0.05 for both cases).Conclusion:The presence of dactylitis more than enthesitis, is associated with a higher proportion of therapeutic persistence in those patients treated with anti-IL17 or anti-IL23 therapies. Although there are multiple factors that condition the choice of biological therapies in patients with PsoA, the presence of enthesitis and dactilitis (understood as polyenthesitis) should be considered among the most important ones.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Neurological Complications of Biological Treatment of Psoriasis

Life ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Mateusz Kamil Ożóg ◽  
Beniamin Oskar Grabarek ◽  
Magdalena Wierzbik-Strońska ◽  
Magdalena Świder
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Neurological Complications ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
Biological Drugs ◽  
Discontinuation Of Treatment ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Alpha Therapy

In the available literature, little attention has been paid to the assessment of psoriasis and the biological therapy used for it and the nervous system. The purpose of this article is to discuss the relationship between psoriasis and the nervous system as well as to analyze the mechanisms that lead to neurological complications during anticytokine therapies in psoriasis. However, this connection requires further analysis. The use of biological drugs in psoriasis, although it yields positive therapeutic results, is not without numerous side effects. Serious neurological side effects of the therapy are most often visible with the use of anti-TNF-alpha, which is why patients should be monitored for their potential occurrence. Early detection of complications and rapid discontinuation of treatment with the drug may potentially increase the patient’s chances of a full recovery or improvement of his/her neurological condition. It also seems reasonable that, in the case of complications occurring during anti-TNF-alpha therapy, some of the drugs from other groups should be included in the therapy.

Biological therapies in the treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Lupus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J K Presto ◽  
E Z Hejazi ◽  
V P Werth
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Quality ◽  
High Quality Evidence ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Quality Evidence ◽  
Cutaneous Lupus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune skin disease occurring in association with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although antimalarials are widely used as the first-line systemic agent, refractory cases may benefit from additional immunomodulators, immunosuppressives, and biologics. An interest in biological therapies for CLE has emerged in recent years due to novel insight into the pathogenesis of CLE. These targets include B cells, T cells, and cytokines that are involved in immune system pathways. Currently belimumab is the only biological therapy approved for SLE and no biologic has been approved for CLE. While there is a paucity of high quality evidence with regard to biologics in CLE management, trials are currently being performed to determine their role.

scholarly journals AB0984 BIOLOGICAL THERAPIES IN JUVENILE IDIOPHATIC ARTHRITIS: ARE THERE ANY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CATEGORIES?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1785.3-1786
Author(s):  
A. García Fernández ◽  
A. Briones-Figueroa ◽  
L. Calvo Sanz ◽  
Á. Andreu-Suárez ◽  
J. Bachiller-Corral ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
First Line ◽  
Disease Subtype ◽  
Pediatric Diseases ◽  
Secondary Failure ◽  
Different Response

Background:Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of pediatric diseases. Different response to biological treatment (BT) has been reported according to disease subtype.Objectives:To analyze the prescription and withdrawal of BT in JIA patients with focus on JIA category.Methods:A retrospective observational study was conducted on JIA patients followed in a referal hospital and who had received at least one BT between 1999 and 2019.Results:130 JIA patients were analyzed: 29 (22,4%) were Oligoarticular Persistent (OligP), 22 (16,9%) Enthesitis related Arthritis (ERA), 20 (15,4%) Systemic (sJIA), 19 (14,6%) Polyarticular RF- (PolyRF-), 14 (10,8%) Polyarticular RF+(PolyRF+), 13 (10%) Oligoarticular-Extended (OligE), 11 (8,4%) Psoriatic Arthritis (APso) and 2 (1,5%) Undifferentiated (Und).The main characteristics are summarized in table 1.The first line BT most frequently indicated was Etanercept up to 40% in all the categories except for ERA, where the most frequent BT was Adalimumab and sJIA, where the most frequent BT was Anakinra. The time between diagnosis and start of BT was different among the categories (p=0,007). In the Und category, the time until BT was the shortest (median: 1 month), since both patients had coxitis, followed by APso [median: 9 months IQR(1-57)] and sJIA [median: 17,5 months IQR(0,3-146,8)].The survival of the first BT was different among the categories (p=0,006): 94,7% of the ERA continue receiving the first BT, followed by 76,2% of OligP and 50% of PolyRF+ and APso. Only 42% of sJIA continue on the first BT prescribed [up to 53,3% were TNF inhibitors (TNFi)]. The categories with less retention of the first BT were: OligE (25%); PolyRF- (27,3%) and Und (0%). The most frequent cause of discontinuation, among these categories, was secondary failure.In the survival analysis between categories, there were differences on OligP (p=0,004), OligE (p=0,042) and PolyRF- (p=0,017). Tocilizumab and Adalimumab were the BT with highest survival with regards to Infliximab, Etanercept, Rituximab (OligE, PolyRF-), Abatacept (OligE, PolyRF-) and Certolizumab (OligP). The survival rate of IL1 inhibitiors and IL6 inhibitiors was higher regarding to TNFi in sJIA patients (p=0,013).Conclusion:Taking into account JIA category is mandatory to choose BT and to understand the response and discontinuation of BT. OligE and PolyRF - showed a high rate of change of the first BT related to secondary failure of Etanercept and Infliximab when compared to Adalimumab and Tocilizumab, as described in the survival analysis. The category with the highest retention of the first BT was ERA. UND patients started sooner BT due to the presence of coxitis. In sJIA, IL1 inhibitors and IL6 inhibitors were superior to TNFi in the survival analysis, as reported in existing literature.Table:Disclosure of Interests:None declared

ДИАГНОСТИКА ХРОНИЧЕСКИХ ИНДУЦИРОВАННЫХ КРАПИВНИЦ

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.Yu. Borzova
Keyword(s):  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
The Novel ◽  
First Line ◽  
Systemic Reactions ◽  
Significant Impairment ◽  
Challenge Tests ◽  
First Line Treatment

Хронические индуцированные крапивницы имеют важное социально-экономическое значение вследствие риска развития системных реакций и значительного снижения качества жизни пациентов. Диагностика хронических индуцированных крапивниц основывается на анамнестических данных и проведении провокационных тестов. Современный протокол ведения больных хронической крапивницей включает применение неседативных антигистаминных препаратов. Международные согласительные документы по лечению крапивницы рекомендуют 4-кратное увеличение суточной дозы неседативных антигистаминных препаратов при их неэффективности в стандартных дозах. Данные мета-анализа указывают на эффективность омализумаба при хронических индуцированных крапивницах. В перспективе ожидается расширение арсенала генно-инженерной биологической терапии хронических индуцированных крапивниц.Chronic inducible urticarias are characterized by the risks of systemic reactions and a significant impairment of patients quality of life. The diagnosis of chronic inducible urticarias relies on the patients history and the challenge tests. A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic inducible urticarias includes nonsedating antihistamines as a first-line treatment. The international guidelines for the management of chronic inducible urticarias recommend updosing of nonsedating antihistamines up to four fold if standard doses are not effective. The meta-analysis suggests the efficacy of omalizumab in chronic inducible urticarias. In the prospect, the novel options of biological therapy for chronic inducible urticarias are expected.

Biological therapy of allergic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-120
Author(s):  
Elena S. Fedenko ◽  
Olga G. Elisyutina ◽  
Natalia I. Il`ina
Keyword(s):  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Treatment Approach ◽  
Allergic Diseases ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Active Infection ◽  
The Past ◽  
Type 2 Immune Response ◽  
Antiviral Medications

The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2-induced Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, continued to spread across the globe and spanned 188 countries. Under the new circumstances treatment approach for T2 allergic diseases such as asthma, chronic hives, atopic dermatitis, and sinusitis with polyps has been changed. In the past years, new biological therapies monoclonal antibodies for these diseases have been developed targeting different aspects of the type 2 immune response. New knowledge on the COVID-19 disease course raises many issues around the safety of biologicals in patients with active infection, as well as their interactions with antiviral medications. In Russia new biological therapies entered clinical practice but its effectiveness and safety still are not known. This newsletter is based on Considerations on Biologicals for Patients with allergic disease in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: an EAACI Statement and the latest scientific data.

scholarly journals AB0287 HEMATOLOGICAL SIDE EFFECTS OF BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN RHEUMATOLOGY: DATA FROM THE TUNISIAN REGISTER

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1442.2-1442
Author(s):  
H. Bettaieb ◽  
S. Boussaid ◽  
S. Jemmali ◽  
S. Rekik ◽  
E. Cheour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Biological Treatment ◽  
Blood Count ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Therapy Initiation ◽  
Male Female Ratio ◽  
The Mean

Background:During the last decade, the treatment of chronic inflammatory rheumatism (CIR) has been greatly improved with the advent of biotherapy.However, the use of biological treatment can lead to a number of side effects including abnormalities in the blood count.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the different hematological side effects of biological treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthitis (SA).Methods:This study included patients with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010) and SA (ASAS 2009) registred with the Tunisian Biologic National Registry (BINAR).Patients were followed and treated with biologics for 2 years of less. Clinical data relative to biological treatment, including haematological side effects, have been collected.Results:Two hundred and ninety-eight patients (178 women and 111 men) were included in the study.The mean age was 49.2 ± 14.1 years. The male/female ratio was 0.6. The mean diseases durations for RA and SA were respectively 6.7 ± 3.5 years and 6.5 ±3.6 years.Anti-TNFα agents were prescribed in 87.9% of patients (n = 263) with respectively: Infliximab (20.4%) Etanercept (23.1%), Adalimumab (24.6%) and Certolizumab (26.5%).Tocilizumab and Rituximab were prescribed in 10.4% and 5% of the patients, respectively.Blood count abnormalities were noted in 15.4 % of patients (n=46).Neutropenia was the most frequently anomaly met on the hemogram (9.1%) followed by anemia (3.4%) and thrombocytopenia (3%). Pancytopenia was found in 11.4% of patients (n=34).The median time between biological therapy initiation and the onset of hematologic manifestations was 4.8 months [1-12]. Biological treatment was interrupted in two patients.In the other cases, the biological treatment was maintained with close monitoring of blood cell count. No case of death related to these hematological disturbances has been reported.Conclusion:In our registry, hematological side effects of biological treatment were found in 15.4% of cases and were noted with a median delay of 4.8 [1-12] months after the treatment initiation. Further studies are needed to confirm our preliminary results.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0635 HOW ARE NON STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAID) PRESCRIBED IN AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1613.1-1613
Author(s):  
K. Ben Abdelghani ◽  
Y. Gzam ◽  
A. Fazaa ◽  
S. Miladi ◽  
K. Ouenniche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Maximum Dose ◽  
Tnf Alpha ◽  
First Line ◽  
Peripheral Arthritis ◽  
Biological Treatments ◽  
Synthetic Dmards ◽  
Nsaid Prescription ◽  
Axial Form ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs

Background:For decades, NSAID have been used as the first-line drugs to treat axial spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA). However, the NSAID prescription strategy is not clearly detailed and it varies from one clinician to another.Objectives:The aim of this study was to assess the NSAID prescription modalities adopted in ax-SpA and the differences between these modalities.Methods:This is a descriptive study including 200 cases of ax-SpA fulfilling the ASAS 2009 criteria and diagnosed between January 2000 and October 2019. The demographic and clinical features of the ax-SpA were collected and the modalities of prescription of NSAID were retrospectively assessed.Results:Our population consists of 138 men and 62 women with a mean age of 43,3 ± 11,2 years. The HLA B-27 antigen was present in 50,8% of cases. The ax-SpA was a pure axial form in 67% of patients, associated with peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis in 19%, 21,5% and 1,5% respectively.One hundred eighty patients (90%) had been treated with NSAIDs. The NSAIDs used were: the Diclofenac (57.5%), Indomethacin (37.5%), Piroxicam (36%), clecoxib (34%), Naproxen (29.5%) and ketoprofen (13%). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) had used at least 3 NSAIDs.Among the 180 patients treated with NSAID, 88 patients (48,8%) were treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) in association with NSAID: Salazopyrine (43,3%) and Methotrexate (13,3%). Seventy-one patients (39,4%) had necessitated the use of anti-TNF alpha.NSAIDs were used continuously in 115 patients (63.8%) and the maximum dose of NSAIDs was used in 78 patients (43.3%). By comparing patients who used maximum doses of NSAIDs and those who used NSAID continuously with other patients, we noticed that the use of biological treatments was more frequent in those groups (p = 0,01 and p=0,004 respectively).In addition, while comparing the group of patients co-treated with csDMARDs with other patients treated with NSAID on monotherapy, we noted that this group of patients had more arthritis (p<0,0001), enthesitis (p=0,02), psoriasis (p=0,04) and necessitated more biological treatments (p=0,01).Conclusion:Our results suggest that maximal doses and/or continuous prescription of NSAID were mainly used if there was no response to that treatment. The csDMARDs were more prescribed if there were peripheral manifestations or psoriatic arthritis and those forms were also more candidates to biological treatments.References:[1]Wang R, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2019;Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Management of Patients under Treatment with Monoclonal Antibodies and New Biological Therapies

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 4865
Author(s):  
Marta Amigo-Basilio ◽  
Covadonga Álvarez-González ◽  
Carlos Cobo-Vázquez ◽  
Isabel Leco-Berrocal ◽  
Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Biological Therapy ◽  
Design Analysis ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Analysis Of Cases

Objective: The aim of this study is to know the biological therapy drugs that are related to adverse events, what dental treatments are associated with the appearance of these events, their severity, and how they are resolved. Study design: Analysis of cases described in the literature on patients undergoing treatment with biological therapies who have developed adverse effects associated with these drugs. Results: Of the 62 articles reviewed, 49 describe 68 cases of MRONJ, most of which appeared in the jaw and received surgical and/or conservative treatment. Conclusions: Biological therapies can potentially develop adverse effects in the oral cavity, so strict monitoring by the dentist is necessary.

scholarly journals 306 The Changing Face of Stroke in the DOAC Era

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Recie Davern ◽  
Helena Hobbs ◽  
Hannah Murugan ◽  
Paul Cotter
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
P Value ◽  
Stroke Management ◽  
Medicines Management ◽  
First Line ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Multiple Factors ◽  
Direct Acting ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

Abstract Background Patients prescribed oral anticoagulants (OAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can still present with stroke. The mechanism for stroke in these patients can be due to multiple factors including subtherapeutic dosing and non-compliance. With the increasing use of direct-acting OACs (DOACs) in favour of warfarin, it is unclear if the incidence of stroke in those already taking OAC has reduced. Methods Data was extracted from our unit’s stroke registry, a prospectively maintained database, for patients who presented with stroke while receiving OAC for AF from 2013 to 2017. Type of OAC, type of stroke, OAC dosing at time of event including non-compliance, stroke management and outcome were recorded. Results 67 patients were included for analysis, with 55 ischaemic and 12 haemorrhagic strokes. 52 patients were receiving warfarin at the time of their stroke vs. 15 receiving DOACs. 33/55 (60%) of ischaemic strokes occurred in patients taking warfarin with a sub-therapeutic INR. In 3/55 (5%) of ischaemic strokes, the OAC was held for a procedure while in 6/55 cases (11%) the OAC had been stopped for another reasons e.g. bleeding. 5/55 (7%) were due to non-compliance. 1 ischaemic stroke was due to under-dosing of a DOAC (dabigatran). 16 strokes were recorded in 2013 for patients prescribed OAC vs. 3 in 2017. Overall the number of ischaemic strokes due to subtherapeutic OAC decreased from 14 in 2013 to 1 in 2017 (p value 0.06). Conclusion The majority of strokes occurring in anticoagulated patients are related to warfarin use. We observed an almost significant reduction in the proportion of ischaemic strokes due to under-dosing of OAC over the study period. Warfarin continues to be recommended as the first line anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation by the HSE Medicines Management Programme, a decision which we would argue warrants review.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document