scholarly journals Characteristics of 1270 Chinese sibling pairs with cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Liu ◽  
Jian Yin ◽  
Yiwei Liu ◽  
Zhijian Xu ◽  
Kai Zhang

Abstract Background Previous research found that the cancer history of an individual’s sibling may be a better indicator than that of the parents. We aim to provide recommendations for opportunistic screening for individuals whose sibling had been diagnosed with cancer. Methods During the physical examination in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 43,300 people were asked if they have at least two siblings who developed cancer. Results A total of 1270 sibling-pairs from 766 families developed cancer, including 367 pairs of brothers (Bro-pairs), 368 pairs of sisters (Sis-pairs), and 535 pairs of brother-and-sister (BroSis-pairs). The mean ages at diagnosis of cancer for the three groups were from 58 to 62 years. More than half of Bro-pairs (55.3%) or Sis-pairs (51.1%) had cancer from the same systemic origin, and more than a quarter of Bro-pairs (28.1%) and Sis-pairs (37.2%) developed the same type of cancer. However, only 36.0% of BroSis-pairs developed cancers from the same systemic origin, and 18.9% developed the same type of cancer. In Bro-pairs and BroSis-pairs, lung cancer and digestive system cancer were the most common cancers, while in Sis-pairs, breast cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer, liver cancer and thyroid cancer were the most common ones. Conclusions If an individual’s sibling is diagnosed with cancer, the individual should consider participating in opportunistic screening annually, especially for lung cancer and digestive system cancers for both sexes. For sisters, breast cancer, cervical cancer and thyroid cancer should be screened early. Additionally, genetic services are essential for individuals who have siblings with cancer.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju Liu ◽  
Jian Yin ◽  
Yiwei Liu ◽  
Zhijian Xu ◽  
Kai Zhang

Abstract Background: Previous research found that the cancer history of an individual’s sibling may be a better indicator than that of the parents. We aim to provide recommendations for early screening for individuals whose sibling had been diagnosed with cancer. Methods: During the physical examination in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 43,300 people were asked if they have at least two siblings who developed cancer. Eligible participants were asked to fill out a survey and participate in interviews. Results: A total of 1270 sibling-pairs from 766 families developed cancer, including 367 pairs of brothers (Bro-pairs), 368 pairs of sisters (Sis-pairs), and 535 pairs of brother-and-sister (BroSis-pairs). The mean ages at diagnosis of cancer for the three groups were from 58 to 62 years. More than half of Bro-pairs (55.3%) or Sis-pairs (51.1%) had cancer from the same systemic origin, and more than a quarter of Bro-pairs (28.1%) and Sis-pairs (37.2%) developed the same type of cancer. However, only 36.0% of BroSis-pairs developed cancers from the same systemic origin, and 18.9% developed the same type of cancer. In Bro-pairs and BroSis-pairs, lung cancer and digestive system cancer were the most common cancers, while in Sis-pairs, breast cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer, liver cancer and thyroid cancer the most common ones. Conclusions: If an individual’s sibling is diagnosed with cancer, the individual should be screened as soon as possible, especially for lung cancer and digestive system cancers for both sexes. For sisters, breast cancer, cervical cancer and thyroid cancer should be screened early. Additionally, genetic services are essential for individuals who have siblings with cancer.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanglin Yu ◽  
Rendong Xiao ◽  
Xu Li ◽  
Zhijian Hu ◽  
Lin Cai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for lung cancer, the incidence rate of lung cancer among non-smokers is notable. The etiology and potential mechanism of non-smoker lung cancer are worthy of further research. This study was designed to explore the collective effects of environmental factors and the relationship between environmental exposure index (EEI) and lung cancer among non-smokers by evaluating the joint effects among lung disease history, environmental factors, and family history of lung cancer without smoking confounders.Methods: A total of 767 never-smoked lung cancer cases and 767 sex- and age-matched controls were selected from the department of Thoracic Surgery and Respiratory Medicine of three hospitals in Fujian, China. We used two methods to develop the EEI according to 12 statistically significant environmental risk factors. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was applied to analyze the non-linear relationship between EEI and lung cancer in non-smokers. Combined effects, additive interaction, and multiplicative interaction were assessed among lung disease history, EEI, and family history of lung cancer to estimate susceptibility to develop lung cancer.Results: Lung disease history, especially asthma, was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer with an odds ratio (OR) for asthma history of 14.720 (95% CI: 1.877–115.449). Family history of lung cancer was related to susceptibility of lung cancer (OR = 3.347, 95% CI: 1.930–5.806). According to type of relatives and cancer, a parental or children’s history and a sibling’s history of lung cancer were significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. The positive association between EEI and lung cancer was apparently stronger in those with lung disease history or family lung cancer history. Furthermore, there was a addictive interaction between EEI and lung disease history, and a possibly addictive interaction between EEI and family lung cancer history on development of lung cancer.Conclusions: There were combined effects among lung disease history, environmental exposures, and family history of lung cancer toward susceptibility to lung cancer in Chinese non-smokers. Non-smokers who had a family history of lung cancer were at higher risk of lung cancer than non-smokers who had lung disease history. Non-smokers with family cancer history may obtain benefits from removal of environmental exposures and active treatment of lung disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 232470961984723
Author(s):  
Leila Moosavi ◽  
Phyllis Kim ◽  
An Uche ◽  
Everardo Cobos

In this article, we present a patient diagnosed synchronously with metastatic male breast cancer and prostate cancer. This is a 63-year-old male and recent immigrant from Nigeria, who sought medical attention for progressively worsening of shortness of breath and acute progression of a chronic right breast mass. An invasive breast carcinoma was diagnosed by the core biopsy of the right breast mass. Within 2 months of his breast cancer diagnosis, the patient also was diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma after being worked up for urinary retention. By presenting this patient with a synchronous diagnosis with metastatic male breast cancer and prostate cancer, history of chronic right breast mass, and gynecomastia, we speculate on possible cancer etiologies and risk factors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S649-S650
Author(s):  
Giancarlo Pasquini ◽  
Brent J Small ◽  
Jacqueline Mogle ◽  
Martin Sliwinski ◽  
Stacey B Scott

Abstract Breast cancer survivors may experience accelerated decline in cognitive functioning compared to same-aged peers with no cancer history (Small et al., 2015). Survivors may show important differences in mean-level performance or variability in cognitive functioning compared to those without a history of cancer (Yao et al., 2016). This study compared ambulatory cognitive functioning in a sample of breast cancer survivors and an age-matched community sample without a history of cancer (n_cancer=47, n_non-cancer=105, age range: 40-64 years, M=52.13 years). Participants completed three cognitive tasks measuring working memory, executive functioning, and processing speed up to five times per day for 14 days. Results indicated no mean-level differences in cognitive performance on the three tasks between cancer survivors and those without cancer history (p’s>.05). Unexpectedly, women without cancer history showed more variability than survivors on working memory but not on the other two tasks. Across both groups, those without a college education performed worse on executive functioning (B=-0.05, SE=0.03, p<.05) and working memory (B=0.94, SE=0.36, p<.05) compared to those that completed college. Additionally, older age was associated with slower processing speed (B=31.67, SE=7.44, p<.001). In sum, this study did not find mean-level group differences in cognitive functioning between cancer survivors and age-matched women without a history of cancer. Contrary to hypotheses, those without a history of cancer were more variable on working memory. Results suggested similarities in cognitive functioning in the two samples and that education and age are important predictors of cognitive functioning independent of cancer history.


2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Widschwendter ◽  
Thomas Brunhuber ◽  
Annemarie Wiedemair ◽  
Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner ◽  
Christian Marth

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 621-621
Author(s):  
Mengyang Di ◽  
Adam J Olszewski

Abstract Background: Adjuvant therapy is an essential component of treatment for many early-stage (stage I-III) breast, colon, or lung cancers after curative surgery. Patients newly diagnosed with these cancers who also have a history of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have typically undergone anthracycline-based chemotherapy to treat their lymphoma, and may be less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for subsequent solid cancers because of prior toxicities or limits on cumulative doses. Some studies suggested lower use of adjuvant chemotherapy in HL survivors with breast cancer (Elkin et al., JCO 2011), and worse overall survival (OS) outcomes in lymphoma survivors with solid tumors (Sanna et al., Ann Oncol 2007). Our objective was to examine the use of adjuvant chemotherapy and OS among DLBCL/HL survivors compared with the general population of patients with three common cancers: breast, colon, and lung. Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified patients aged 20-79 diagnosed with breast (stage I-III), colon (stage II-III), or lung (stage II-IIIA) cancers in 2004-2015, who underwent surgery and were thus candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy by virtue of age and stage. Among them we distinguished "cases" of DLBCL or HL survivors (diagnosed with lymphoma >1 year before the index cancer), treating other patients as "controls". We compared administration of chemotherapy (versus no or unknown administration status, as recorded by SEER) and OS in each cancer, in multivariable robust Poisson regression or Cox models, respectively, reporting relative risk (RR) or hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). All models were adjusted for age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, stage of the index cancer, lymph node involvement, type of surgery (e.g. breast conservation or mastectomy, partial or total colectomy, lobectomy or pneumonectomy), and endocrine receptor status for breast cancer. Results: Among patients with breast cancer (n=532,686), we identified 360 DLBCL and 349 HL survivors (with median latency between lymphoma and cancer diagnoses of 79 and 222 months, respectively). Among patients with colon cancer (n=149,993), there were 165 DLBCL and 88 HL survivors (median latency 71 and 156 months, respectively). Among patients with lung cancer (n=23,396) there were 37 DLBCL and 25 HL survivors (medial latency 60 and 147 months, respectively). In breast and colon cancers, DLBCL survivors were significantly older, and HL survivors younger than controls, but this difference was absent in lung cancer (Table). HL survivors were diagnosed with breast cancer at an earlier stage than controls (P=.006), but in all other studied scenarios we observed no significant difference in stage or extent of nodal spread between DLBCL/HL survivors and controls. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, we observed no significant difference between patients with and without a history of lymphoma in the rates of chemotherapy administration (adjusted RR, 0.87 to 1.04), except HL survivors with colon cancer, who had a 20% lower rate than controls (RR, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.64-1.00). OS was significantly worse for patients with prior HL lymphoma in all 3 cancers, but for DLBCL survivors only in breast cancer. Consistent results were observed in the subpopulation of patients who actually received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: In most studied scenarios, despite prior exposure to intensive chemotherapy, survivors of DLBCL or HL received adjuvant chemotherapy for common cancers at similar rates relative to patients with no history of lymphoma. Therefore, contrary to prior suggestions, differences in application of chemotherapy cannot explain survival disparities between lymphoma survivors and other patients with the same cancers. HL survivors had consistently worse OS even in the subpopulation receiving chemotherapy, suggesting that other (e.g. cardiovascular) sources of mortality related to late toxicities of HL treatment may be contributing, rather than differences in treatment. Unique survival patterns among DLBCL survivors suggest that limits on anthracycline-based chemotherapy due to cumulative lifetime dosing may impair outcomes in breast cancer, but not in cancers like colon or lung, which are treated with non-overlapping taxane- or fluorouracil-based adjuvant regimens. Disclosures Olszewski: Genentech: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A861-A861
Author(s):  
Chukwuka Akamnonu ◽  
David A Cohen

Abstract Introduction: Current guidelines from the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis recommend limited screenings for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) with no identifiable precipitating factor (termed unprovoked). There is paucity of data with regards to thyroid cancer screening in the setting of an unprovoked VTE. Studies from Europe have shown an association between VTE and thyroid cancer; however, these studies do not account for differences in iodine availability, thus the need for studies in the United States. Understanding the risk of thyroid cancer as a provocative factor in developing a deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) may be able to facilitate case detection of disease and prevent future morbidity and mortality from thyroid cancer and/or VTE. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to understand the risk of developing VTE in the setting of thyroid cancer. Methods: In this retrospective chart review study, we reviewed electronic medical records of patients with a history of DVT or PE between ages 18-99, presenting to all outpatient clinics at a single academic medical center in New Jersey between October 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2018. We screened for coexistent cancer history among this group, and from this sample we further isolated cases of thyroid cancer. Results: 345 patients were found to have a history of VTE. 187 were female (54%) and 113 (29%) had a history of malignancy. The most common cancers were breast (19%), colorectal (9%), leukemia (9%), prostate (8%), and lymphoma (8%). Thyroid cancer accounted for 2% of all discovered cases. Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, 2% of all patients with VTE and cancer carried a diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Although this suggests a relatively low risk, given the medical burden of a venous thromboembolism and the comparable proportion of thyroid cancer in all new cancer cases, thyroid cancer should be considered a provoking factor in unprovoked VTE.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Foster ◽  
Veronica Diedrich ◽  
Talayna Leonard ◽  
Mahmood Shahlapour ◽  
Mohamad Hosam Horani

Abstract Introduction: We present a very rare case of a variant of anaplastic carcinoma, a high-grade thyroid carcinoma with rhabdoid features. Less than 15 cases have been reported in English literature over the last 20 years. The prognosis of thyroid cancer with this variant phenotype is unfortunately very poor with a mean survival time of only 6 months after diagnosis. Treatment includes surgery, often a total thyroidectomy due to the rapid rate of growth of this tumor type. The benefits of chemotherapy and radiation are not yet apparent. Case presentation: A 49 year old female with history of breast cancer status-post recent chemoradiation therapy presented to the emergency department for a rapidly enlarging, right-sided neck mass. The mass had been present for approximately one month, but it was estimated to have grown from 3cm to 5cm within the two weeks prior. The patient was being followed by her ENT specialist and had a recent outpatient CT scan done. The results of the CT revealed a large thyroid tumor partially obstructing the esophagus and given the rapid progression of symptoms, she was instructed to go straight to the ED for emergent admission. Upon arrival, the patient reported not having consumed any solids or liquids for the past day due to concerns of aspiration and increasing neck pain. She had complaints of worsening dysphagia. Initial lab work revealed low thyroglobulin (1.4 ng/mL), elevated T4 (15.42 nmol/L) presumably due to Tamoxifen exposure, and elevated PTH (96.9 pg/mL), likely primary hyperparathyroidism. She was admitted and endocrine was consulted for further evaluation. The patient underwent a fine-needle aspiration biopsy showing high-grade anaplastic carcinoma with extensive necrosis and rhabdoid features. The tumor was eventually classified as stage 4B with gross extra thyroidal extension to the adventitial layers of the esophagus, thus it was determined to be unresectable. It was recommended at that time she have a percutaneous tracheostomy and feeding tube to protect her airway. However, the patient requested to be discharged so that she could obtain a second opinion regarding treatment options and prognosis. She subsequently underwent a total thyroidectomy at another hospital. Conclusion: It remains unclear whether this patient’s history of breast cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy played a role in the development of this rare thyroid carcinoma. Some cases of the rhabdoid phenotype are documented to have transformed from papillary thyroid carcinoma, for which radiation therapy is a well-known risk factor. Future studies should use molecular markers, such as BRAF V600E mutations common to papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas, to help differentiate between types of thyroid cancers and avoid delayed treatment options for rapidly metastasizing thyroid tumors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Garima Singh ◽  
Pankaja Raghav

Abstract Background Cancer is the second leading cause of death in India accounting for nearly 9.6 million deaths in 2018. Crude annual incidence rate of all cancers together in Rajasthan has increased from 1990 to 2016 from 58.8 to 72.6 per lakh population. Few studies done are based on hospitals and pathology centres, but the data is limited. Community based study is required to know the true burden and trend of cancer prevalent in the region. Methods A sampling frame was prepared from all the blocks in rural Jodhpur, one block was selected by simple random sampling. Then another sampling frame was prepared by enlisting the villages in the selected block, one third villages were selected by simple random sampling. Results Based on interim analysis, 25 villages have been surveyed till date, with the population of 57,856. We found 91 (0.16%) cancer patients, out of which burden of Oral cancer (19,20.87%) was highest followed by Breast cancer (17,19.31%), Laryngeal cancer (10,10.98%), Primary brain tumours (6,6.59%) respectively. Other cancers were Oesophageal cancer (5) Colorectal cancer (5) Cervical cancer (4) Leukemia (4) Bone tumours (4) Stomach cancer (4) Intestinal cancer (3) Pharyngeal cancer (3) Urinary bladder cancer (1) Thyroid cancer (1) Uterus cancer (1) Lung cancer (1) Renal cell carcinoma (1) Hepatocellular carcinoma (1) and Skin Cancer (1).Tobacco and Opium consumption were found to be associated with Oral and Laryngeal cancer. Conclusions According to the World Cancer Report 2020, Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality followed by Breast cancer Colorectal cancer, Prostate cancer, Stomach cancer and Cervical cancer which is different from the pattern of Western India. Key messages This study highlights the common cancers and the need to have a public health approach to identify or create awareness for quick treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document