Correlation of education, age, and health insurance status with attitudes about and preferences for direct-to-consumer BRCA testing
e22116 Background: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) cancer genetic testing is increasingly common. However, little is know about peoples' attitudes about or preferences for DTC testing as compared to clinic-based genetic testing. Methods: We surveyed a convenience sample of 257 women without prior BRCA testing/counseling experience about their attitudes about and intentions to get online BRCA testing (90% participation rate). Subjects completed baseline interviews, viewed a modified commercial DTC website and completed an online survey. Results: Sample characteristics: mean age 37 (range 19–71), 80% white, mean education 3 years college, 45% with a household income <$50,000, 3% with a history of breast/ovarian cancer and mean Frank risk 4.7%. 64% of women expressed interest in BRCA testing at baseline and 24% intended to get tested in the next year. After viewing the website, 22% of women said that they would prefer DTC testing, 60% said that they would prefer clinic-based testing and 18% were indifferent. Overall, women believed that DTC testing would be more convenient (p <0.001), offer greater privacy (p <0.01), and be less likely to lead to discrimination (p <0.001) while clinic testing would provide more information (p <0.001) and counseling (p <0.001). After adjusting for confounders, older and less highly educated women had more positive attitudes about DTC BRCA testing (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.20, p= 0.02 and OR 10.3, p=0.03 high school (HS) vs. college and OR 16.1, p=0.02 HS vs. graduate school). Women with no health insurance and more positive attitudes about DTC genetic testing were more likely to prefer DTC genetic testing over clinic testing (adjusted OR 3.1, p=0.03 and OR 3.7, p<0.01). There were no associations between race and outcomes. Conclusions: A substantial minority of women expressed a preference for DTC BRCA testing after viewing a modified commercial website. Preferential interest in DTC testing by less educated and uninsured populations makes it especially critical that these sites provide high quality services. Without high quality service, the availability of DTC testing may only exacerbate disparities in genetic services and prevention. No significant financial relationships to disclose.