scholarly journals Evaluation of micro-RNA in extracellular vesicles from blood of patients with prostate cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0262017
Author(s):  
Jiyoon Kim ◽  
Siwoo Cho ◽  
Yonghyun Park ◽  
Jiyoul Lee ◽  
Jaesung Park
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Extracellular Vesicles ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Rna Isolation ◽  
Micro Rna ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Micro Rnas ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Better Than

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) contain various types of molecules including micro-RNAs, so isolating EVs can be an effective way to analyze and diagnose diseases. A lot of micro-RNAs have been known in relation to prostate cancer (PCa), and we evaluate miR-21, miR-141, and miR-221 in EVs and compare them with prostate-specific antigen (PSA). EVs were isolated from plasma of 38 patients with prostate cancer and 8 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), using a method that showed the highest recovery of RNA. Isolation of EVs concentrated micro-RNAs, reducing the cycle threshold (Ct) value of RT-qPCR amplification of micro-RNA such as miR-16 by 5.12 and miR-191 by 4.65, compared to the values before EV isolation. Normalization of target micro-RNAs was done using miR-191. For miR-221, the mean expression level of patients with localized PCa was significantly higher than that of the control group, having 33.45 times higher expression than the control group (p < 0.01). Area under curve (AUC) between BPH and PCa for miR-221 was 0.98 (p < 0.0001), which was better than AUC for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level in serum for the same patients. The levels of miR-21 and miR-141 in EVs did not show significant changes in patients with PCa compared to the control group in this study. This study suggests isolating EVs can be a helpful approach in analyzing micro-RNAs with regard to disease.

scholarly journals Prostate-Specific antigen value and micro RNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
Aydemir Asdemir ◽  
Sevgi Durna Dastan ◽  
Esat Korgali ◽  
Tugba Yildiz Asdemir ◽  
Huseyin Saygin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Micro Rna ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarkers ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
Micro Rnas

Objective: It is necessary to provide PSA alternatives or methods that can be used in conjunction with PSA to regress complications rising from negative biopsies and to increase diagnostic value. Patients and Methods: The study is consisting of 59 men as the sample group. Blood samples from the individuals are grouped as prostate cancer and BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) groups. 27 prostate cancer patients whom some of them also operated are assembled in the patients group and the other 32 individuals are grouped as BPH group. Micro RNA expression levels evaluated by RT-PCR. Results: Prostate cancer group when compared with the control group, it is observed that expression levels of miRNA-221 and miRNA-432 increased while expression levels of miRNA-17-5p, miRNA-30c, miRNA-107, miRNA-141, miRNA-145, miRNA-181a-2, miRNA-331-3p, miRNA-574-3p decreased and expression levels of miRNA-21 and miRNA-375 are quite similar between the groups. Conclusion: The prospect of strong and sensitive serum miRNA expression levels in prostate cancer cases which are easily detectable by non-invasive methods as biomarkers is a promising field of study. Nevertheless, it is currently necessary to work in conjunction with both tissue and serum to enhance both sensitivity and specificity of miRNAs as biomarkers. As such, expression levels of the same miRNAs in tissue and serum provide different expression values which in turn make it difficult to indicate a common biomarker.

Detection of COX-2 in liquid biopsy of patients with prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2021-207755
Author(s):  
Vanessa Silva Pereira ◽  
Beatriz da Costa Aguiar Alves ◽  
Jaques Waisberg ◽  
Fernando Fonseca ◽  
Flavia Gehrke
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Slow Growth ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Quantitative Real Time Pcr ◽  
Diagnosis And Prognosis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cox 2

AimsTo determine the profile of COX-2 gene expression in patients with prostate cancer attended at the ABC University Health Center outpatient clinic and correlate the results with patients’ anatomopathological examinations. Prostate cancer is the sixth most common type of cancer worldwide and the second in Brazil. COX-2 expression is associated with an unfavourable prognosis.Methods15.0 mL of peripheral blood were collected from 24 patients and 25 healthy men. RNA extraction was performed using the QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit. Complementary DNA synthesis was performed using SuperScript II RNAse Reverse Transcriptase. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with specific COX-2 oligonucleotides and the endogenous GAPDH gene.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 69 years old. The Gleason scoring system showed 37.5% of patients with Gleason 6 (slow growth, low risk), 45.8% with Gleason 7 (intermediate risk) and 16.7% with Gleason 8 or 9 (risk of high-grade cancer). The median COX-2 expression in the study group was 0.97, while in the control group it was 0.11 (p<0.045).ConclusionsPatients with prostate cancer showed higher COX-2 expression at diagnosis compared with the control group. Since COX-2 detection associated with prostate-specific antigen dosage shows promise as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with prostate cancer, further research is required to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: A Measurement to Differentiate Benign Hypertrophy of Prostate from Prostate Carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-48
Author(s):  
Chandan Kumar Nath ◽  
Bhupen Barman ◽  
Pranjal Phukan ◽  
Stephen L. Sailo ◽  
Biswajit Dey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Prostate Volume ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen Density ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Background Determination of isolated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in asymptomatic individuals has not demonstrated sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be useful in the routine evaluation of prostate disease. To enhance the accuracy of serum PSA we have used a proportion of serum PSA and prostate volume, which we refer to as prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD). Prostate volume in this study was calculated using transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). Materials and Methods A total of 106 patients with prostatic disease clinically confined to the prostate glands were evaluated. Results and Observation The mean PSAD for prostate cancer was 0.15 ± 0.01 while that for benign hypertrophy of the prostate (BPH) was 0.11 ± 0.02 (p < 0.05). Significant difference (p < 0.05) was noted in the prostate volume in these two groups with the mean prostate volume measured by TRUS in the BPH to be 53.85 ± 9.71 mL compared with 58.14 ± 7.48 mL in the carcinoma. PSA density of 0.13 ng/mL can be used as a cutoff for the individual in our set-up who should go for prostate biopsy with sensitivity and specificity of over 90%. Conclusion These results suggest that PSAD may be useful in distinguishing BPH and prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Ar galima remiantis objektyviais ikioperaciniais veiksniais prognozuoti ankstyvą biocheminį atkrytį po radikalios prostatektomijos?

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Daimantas Milonas ◽  
Dainius Burinskas ◽  
Stasys Auškalnis ◽  
Mindaugas Jievaltas
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
Surgical Margins ◽  
Antigen Concentration ◽  
The Mean

Daimantas Milonas, Dainius Burinskas, Stasys Auškalnis, Mindaugas JievaltasKauno medicinos universiteto Urologijos klinika,Eivenių g. 2, LT-50009 KaunasEl paštas: [email protected] Tikslas Nustatyti objektyvius veiksnius, kurie leistų prognozuoti ankstyvą biocheminį atkrytį po radikalios prostatektomijos. Ligoniai ir metodai Į tyrimą įtraukti 142 prostatos vėžiu sergantys ligoniai, kuriems buvo atliktos radikalios prostatektomijos. Ankstyvas biocheminis atkrytis konstatuotas, kai prostatos specifinio antigeno koncentracija, praėjus 3 mėn. po operacijos, buvo >0,2 ng/ml. Neoadjuvantinė terapija (hormonų ar spindulių) buvo pagrindinis atmetimo kriterijus. Vertinta prostatos specifinio antigeno koncentracija, vėžio diferenciacijos laipsnis iki ir po operacijos, vėžio stadija, prostatos chirurginio šalinimo išlaidos. Rezultatai Galutinei analizei panaudoti 94 ligonų duomenys. Vidutinis jų amžius buvo 66,6 metų, prostatos specifinis antigenas iki operacijos – 9,87 ng/ml, Gleason diferenciacijos laipsnis iki operacijos – 5,87, diferenciacijos laipsnis po operacijos – 6,38, teigiami rezekciniai kraštai rasti 36 (38%), ankstyvas biocheminis atkrytis – 13 (14%) pacientų. Atlikus logistinę regresijos analizę nustatyta, jog ankstyvą biocheminį atkrytį galima patikimai prognozuoti, kai Gleason pooperacinis vėžio diferenciacijos laipsnis didesnis nei 7 (p = 0,02, tikimybių santykis – 7,8) ir vėžio stadija T3b (p = 0,012, tikimybių santykis – 6,76). Išvados Remiantis ikioperaciniais objektyviais veiksniais negalima patikimai prognozuoti ankstyvo biocheminio atkryčio. Prostatos vėžio išplitimas į sėklines pūsleles (T3b stadija) ir Gleasono pooperacinis vėžio diferenciacijos laipsnis > 7 leidžia reikšmingai prognozuoti ankstyvą biocheminį atkryti, po radikalios prostatektomijos, tokiems ligoniams indikuojamas ankstyvas adjuvantinis gydymas, nelaukiant biocheminio atkryčio požymių. Reikšminiai žodžiai: prostatos vėžys, radikali prostatektomija, ankstyvas biocheminis atkrytis Can objective preoperative parameters predict early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? Daimantas Milonas, Dainius Burinskas, Stasys Auškalnis, Mindaugas JievaltasClinic of Urology, Kaunas University of Medicine,Eivenių str. 2, LT-50009 Kaunas, LithuaniaE-mail: [email protected] Objective To estimate objective parameters which can be useful for predicting early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer. Patients and methods The study embraced 142 patients that underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. Early biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen level 3 months after radical prostatectomy > 0.2 ng/ml. Neoadjuvant treatment (hormonal therapy or radiation) was the mane exclusion criteria. Preoperative antigen concentration, Gleason score at the biopsy, patients’ age, postoperative Gleason score, stage and surgical margins were investigated as possible predictors of early biochemical recurrence. Results Final analysis was done using data on 94 patients. The mean patients’ age was 66.6 years and mean preoperative prostate specific antigen concentration 9.87 (range 0.44–98.4) ng/ml. The mean Gleason score preoperatively was 5.87 (range 2–8) and postoperatively 6.38 (range 4–9). Positive surgical margins were in 36 (38%) and early biochemical failure was detected in 13 (14%) cases. Logistic regression analysis shows that postoperative Gleason score >7 (p = 0.02, OR-7.8) and stage pT3b (p = 0.012, OR-6.76) are powerful parameters for predicting early biochemical recurrence. Conclusions Preoperative parameters cannot predict early biochemical recurrence. Postoperative parameters such as Gleason score >7 and stage pT3b are useful in the prediction of early biochemical recurrence. In such patients early adjuvant treatment is advisable. Keywords: prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, early biochemical recurrence

scholarly journals Prostate-specific antigen and (free prostate-specific antigen/ prostate-specific antigen) ratio in patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 17-25
Author(s):  
Amal A. Hussein ◽  
Rayah S. Baban ◽  
Alaa G. Hussein
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control ◽  
Control Study

Background: Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in menworldwide. Many markers are suggested as markers of prostate cancer with differentspecificity and sensitivity.Objective : The present study’s main aim is to examine the possible utility ofprostate-specific antigen indices as markers of prostate cancer.Methods: A case-control study was conducted in the Department of Chemistry andBiochemistry, College of Medicine, Al- Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq from July2018 till March 2019, includes 84 subjects divided into three groups:Twenty Four patients with prostate cancer (PCA), thirty patients with benignprostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and thirty healthy subjects as a control group wereexamined in this study.Thirty healthy volunteer subjects were asked to be involved in this study as a controlgroup. Blood samples from these patients were collected before obtaining a prostaticbiopsy. Serum PSA, fPSA levels were quantified by the ELISA technique.Results: PSA cut-off value was found to be more than 9.57 ng/ml for Prostate Cancerpatients, values range between 3.17 - 9.57 ng/ml for BPH patients and cut-off valuefor control was found to be less than 3.17 ng/ml, while serum (fPSA/PSA) % cut-offvalue was less than 11.1% for Prostate Cancer patients, values range between 11.1% -31 % for BPH patients, and cut-off value was greater than 31% for the control group.Conclusion: There is a highly significant difference in serum PSA levels and(fPSA/PSA)% between the prostate cancer and control groups. Body mass indexshowed an inverse association with the risk of prostate cancer.

Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (Tps) Immunoassay in the Diagnosis and Clinical Staging of Prostatic Carcinoma. Comparison with Prostate-Specific Antigen (Psa)

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ceriani ◽  
L. Giovanella ◽  
M. Salvadore ◽  
A.V. Bono ◽  
G. Roncari
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Skeletal Involvement

This experimental study investigated the potential role of Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (TPS) in comparison with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis and the clinical and pathological staging of prostate cancer. Serum TPS and PSA levels were determined in 128 patients (pts) with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH; Group 1) and in 92 pts with prostate cancer (Group 2). TPS was also measured in a control group of 100 healthy subjects. Normal cutoff values of 85 U/l for TPS and 4 ng/ml for PSA were determined on the basis of ROC curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 49%, 95% and 76% for TPS, and 84%, 90% and 87% for PSA. The combination of the two markers provided a higher accuracy (88%), improving the sensitivity of PSA, since 47% of patients with normal PSA had pathological levels of TPS. TPS showed an increase in sensitivity from low to higher stages of disease and, in patients with skeletal involvement, from small to larger numbers of bone metastases (Kruskal Wallis p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, TPS serum levels are not useful in the clinical staging of prostate cancer as they have a poorer performance than PSA. TPS was ineffective (ROC curve area=0.68) in predicting extraprostatic disease and demonstrated a reduced ability (area = 0.78) to identify skeletal involvement. Moreover, the combination of the two markers did not significantly improve the performance of PSA alone. The serum concentration of TPS in patients with localized tumors was not related to the degree of tumor cell differentiation evaluated by the Gleason score. Conclusion Our preliminary experience suggests that TPS in association with PSA may be useful at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, these preliminary data have to be confirmed by larger clinical trials and the role of this association in the clinical setting needs to be analyzed with an adequate evaluation of the cost-effectiveness ratio.

Effects of Lycopene Supplementation in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 227 (10) ◽  
pp. 881-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Kucuk ◽  
Fazlul H. Sarkar ◽  
Zora Djuric ◽  
Wael Sakr ◽  
Michael N. Pollak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dietary Intake ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Grade

Epidemiological studies have shown an inverse association between dietary intake of lycopene and prostate cancer risk. We conducted a clinical trial to investigate the biological and clinical effects of lycopene supplementation in patients with localized prostate cancer. Twenty-six men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were randomly assigned to receive a tomato oleoresin extract containing 30 mg of lycopene (n = 15) or no supplementation (n = 11) for 3 weeks before radical prostatectomy. Biomarkers of cell proliferation and apoptosis were assessed by Western blot analysis in benign and cancerous prostate tissues. Oxidative stress was assessed by measuring the Peripheral blood lymphocyte ONA oxidation product 5-hydroxymethyl-deoxyuridine (5-OH-mdU). Usual dietary Intake of nutrients was assessed by a food frequency questionnaire at baseline. Prostatectomy specimens were evaluated for pathologic stage, Gleason score, volume of cancer, and extent of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Plasma levels of lycopene, insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, and prostate-specific antigen were measured at baseline and after 3 weeks of supplementation or observation. After intervention, subjects in the intervention group had smaller tumors (80% vs 45%, less than 4 ml), less involvement of surgical margins and/or extra-prostatic tissues with cancer (73% vs 18%, organ-confined disease), and less diffuse involvement of the prostate by high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (33% vs 0%, focal involvement) compared with subjects in the control group. Mean plasma prostate-specific antigen levels were lower in the intervention group compared with the control group. This pilot study suggests that lycopene may have beneficial effects in prostate cancer. Larger clinical trials are Warranted to investigate the potential preventive and/or therapeutic role of lycopene in prostate cancer.

Lack of Effect of a Low-Fat, High-Fruit, -Vegetable, and -Fiber Diet on Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen of Men Without Prostate Cancer: Results From a Randomized Trial

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 3592-3598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moshe Shike ◽  
Lianne Latkany ◽  
Elyn Riedel ◽  
Martin Fleisher ◽  
Arthur Schatzkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Fruits And Vegetables ◽  
Dietary Intervention ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Serum Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Individual

PURPOSE: To determine whether a diet low in fat and high in fruits, vegetables, and fiber may be protective against prostate cancer by having an impact on serial levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). METHODS: Six hundred eighty-nine men were randomized to the intervention arm and 661 to the control arm. The intervention group received intensive counseling to consume a diet low in fat and high in fiber, fruits, and vegetables. The control group received a standard brochure on a healthy diet. PSA in serum was measured at baseline and annually thereafter for 4 years, and newly diagnosed prostate cancers were recorded. RESULTS: The individual PSA slope for each participant was calculated, and the distributions of slopes were compared between the two groups. There was no significant difference in distributions of the slopes (P = .99). The two groups were identical in the proportions of participants with elevated PSA at each time point. There was no difference in the PSA slopes between the two groups (P = .34) and in the frequencies of elevated PSA values for those with elevated PSA at baseline. Incidence of prostate cancer during the 4 years was similar in the two groups (19 and 22 in the control and intervention arms, respectively). CONCLUSION: Dietary intervention over a 4-year period with reduced fat and increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and fiber has no impact on serum PSA levels in men. The study also offers no evidence that this dietary intervention over a 4-year period affects the incidence of prostate cancer during the 4 years.

scholarly journals RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN P53 EXPRESSION AND PSA SERUM

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Zulfan Hendri ◽  
Danarto HR
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Serum Level ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Immunohistochemical Staining ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
P53 Expression ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Anatomical Pathology

Objective: To know the relationship between p53 expression and prostate specific antigen (PSA) serum level in prostate cancer patients. Material & method: Specimens were studied from patients with pathological diagnosis of prostate cancer in Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta during 2007 to 2008. The p53 expression was measured by immunohistochemical staining. The stains were done in Department of Anatomical Pathology and examined by a pathologist. The relationship between p53 mutated expression and PSA serum level were analyzed with correlation coefficient (rs). Results: There were 29 patients included in this study. The mean age was 66,34 ± 8,15 (50 - 83) years old. The mean PSA serum level was 165,98 ± 269,208 (1,4 – 1051) ng/ml. The mean number of p53 expression was 111,38 ± 94,30 (16 – 396). There was positive correlation between p53 expression and increasing PSA serum level in the prostate cancer patients (rs + 0,497; p = 0,006). Conclusion: P53 expression was positively correlated with increasing PSA serum level.Keywords: Prostate cancer, p53 expression, PSA serum level.

scholarly journals Can we expand the borders in active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer?

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
Ekrem Islamoglu ◽  
Erdem Kisa ◽  
Cem Yucel ◽  
Orcun Celik ◽  
Ozgur Cakmak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: We assessed the outcomes of men with low-risk prostate cancer enrolled in active surveillance. Methods: From January 2008, patients in our clinic who were classified as having low-risk prostate cancer according to the D’Amico classification were included in the protocol. Follow-up consisted of regular prostate-specific antigen tests, digital rectal examinations and biopsies. Outcomes were compared between men who progressed and those who did not, and survival analysis was obtained. Results: The mean follow-up period was 46 months. A total of six patients received curative treatment during follow-up as a result of meeting progression criteria. The mean follow-up time from the beginning of active surveillance until curative therapy was 27.1 months. Four of our 64 patients lost their lives due to diseases other than prostate cancer, none of the patients were lost due to prostate cancer. When patients who showed progression and those who did not were compared in terms of positive core numbers and the core tumour percentage we found no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) Conclusion: Active surveillance seems to be a safe and feasible practice in men with low-risk prostate cancer. Gleason score, clinical stage and initial prostate-specific antigen seem to be the most definite criteria for the selection of patients, while it is thought that the number of positive cores is a matter that can be dealt with more flexibility. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document