scholarly journals Mokslo komunikacija: Lietuvos mokslo žurnalai mokslo komunikacijos kaitos požiūriu

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 70-83
Author(s):  
Zenona Atkočiūnienė

Šiandieną mokslas yra transformuojamas sparčiai besivystančių technologijų, o mokslininkai bei mokslinėje erdvėje veikiantys asmenys turi prisitaikyti prie kintamos aplinkos. Mokslo rezultatų sklaida, vykusi įvairiais komunikacijos kanalais, suskaitmeninama, todėl atsiranda efektyvesnio mokslininkų bendradarbiavimo, mokslinių tinklų plėtros, mokslo rezultatų sklaidos prielaidų, taip pat žinioms visuomenėje plisti. Mokslo komunikacijoje matoma rinkos ekonomikos sąlygota vartojomosios mokslo komunikacijos sampratos apibrėžtis, kai mokslo rezultatai lemia ne tik mokslo populiarinimą, bet ir valstybės remiamą mokslo žurnalų finansavimą. Atviras mokslo kūrinių pateikimas visuomenei, naudojant skaitmeninėmis informacijos ir komunikacijos technologijomis grįstą mokslo komunikacijos infrastruktūrą, yra nulemtas tiek demokratinės visuomenės pagrindų suformuoto viešo intereso žinoti, tiek komercinių mokslo komunikacijos modelių kaitos.Straipsnio tikslas – susisteminti ir išanalizuoti informaciją apie mokslo komunikaciją, mokslo žurnalus, kaip formalios dokumentinės komunikacijos priemonę mokslo komunikacijos kaitos kontekste. Straipsnyje pristatomas tyrimas apie mokslininkų, Lietuvos valstybės lėšomis finansuojamų mokslo žurnalų vyriausiųjų redaktorių požiūrį į mokslo komunikaciją bei atvirąją prieigą prie elektroninių mokslo kūrinių.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: mokslas, mokslo komunikacija, mokslo kūriniai, formali dokumentinė mokslo komunikacija, mokslo žurnalai, mokslo komunikacijos kaita, atviroji prieiga.Scientific Communication: Lithuanian scientific journals of science communication in terms of changeZenona Atkočiūnienė SummaryThe aim of the article is to analyze traditional formal science communication models and typical functions. Modern technologies create a new type of information resources which can be converted to electronic forms. New forms of publishing, communication with scholars take place and are approved by scientific community all over the world. Open Access movement which promotes and supports a free distribution Summaryof scholar production is essential to scholarship in the digital age.The study was aimed to clarify the Lithuanian state budget-funded scientific journal editors’ approach to the situation of scientific journals in Lithuania number, financial assessment and to investigate the Lithuanian state budget-funded scientific journals’ chief editors’ approach to scientific journals and their free access.

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 48-69
Author(s):  
Marija Stonkienė

Straipsnyje, analizuojant teorinius mokslo komunikacijos modelius, tiriama formaliosios mokslo komunikacijos kaita.Tradicinės formaliosios mokslo komunikacijos modelių analizė atskleidė tipinių mokslo komunikacijos veikėjų ir tipinių jų funkcijų esatį, mokslo komunikacijos vyksmą informacijos grandine. Formaliosios dokumentinės mokslo komunikacijos modelių analizė leido konstatuoti šiuose modeliuose vyraujančią procesinę komunikacijos sampratą.Analizuojant informacijos ir komunikacijos technologijų taikymą mokslo komunikacijai ir su šiuo taikymu susijusius mokslo komunikacijos kultūros pokyčius įvertinančius mokslo komunikacijos modelius pastebėti tokie mokslo komunikacijos pokyčiai: naujų mokslo komunikacijos subjektų radimasis, komunikacijos vyksmas informacijos tinklu, formaliosios ir neformaliosios mokslo komunikacijos susiliejimas, persiklojimas, mokslininko komunikacinių intencijų reikšminimas. Ne tik šios įžvalgos, bet ir pastebėta pakitusi mokslo komunikacijos pranešimo artikuliacija leido konstatuoti klostantis naują mokslo komunikacijos paradigmą, grįstą semantine komunikacijos samprata.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: mokslinės informacijos sklaida, mokslo žinių sklaida, mokslo komunikacijos teorija, formali dokumentinė mokslo komunikacija, mokslo komunikacijos modeliai.Formal science communication in theoretical models: providence of changeMarija Stonkienė SummaryThe article presents an analys of W. Garveys and B. Griffith’s (1971, 1972, 1979), UNISIST (1971), F. W. Lankaster’s (1978), N. Fjallbrant’s (1997), T. M. Aitchison’s (1988), E. Buck’s, R. Flagan’s and B. Coles (1999), J. Hurd’s (2000), T. F. Sondergaard’s, J. Andersen’s, B. Hjorland’s revising and updating UNISIST (2003), Kling’s, G. McKim’s and A. King’ (2003), J. M. Makenzy Owen’s (2000, 2007), B.-C. Bjork’s (2007) theoretical models of science communication. The analysis of traditional formal science communication in these models indicated typical science communication subjects and functions in science communication. In the traditional formal science communication model, the process of science communication is perceived as an information chain. The analysis showed that the teorethical basis of these models is the concept of process communication. Information and communication technologies have been applied to science communication. Due to these technologies, communication culture in sciences has changed. The analysis of science communication models, which evaluate technological and cultural changes, showed the coming of new communication mediators and multifuncionality of all communication subjects. In the new science communication models the process of science communication is perceived as an alternative and the intersecting information chains as an information network. One apparent change is the convergence of formal and informal science communication. Due to this convergence, the concept of communicated message has changed. New tendencies allow to consider the emerging semantic approach to the concept of communication in science communication.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rustono Farady Marta ◽  
Hanny Hafiar ◽  
Yuliyanto Budi Setiawan ◽  
Sigit Pamungkas ◽  
Puji Lestari ◽  
...  

This study aims to test the theory proposed by D. Cuilier (2010) that compliance gaining has a correlation with the availability of information access. In this study, hypothesis testing is done on the phenomenon of influence between the availability of information in open journals system in the field of science communication in Indonesia to the compliance of the author. In order to fulfill the important elements of the implementation of Tri Dharma (Three Pillars of Higher Education), lectures need a means for scientific dissemination. On the other hand, the managers of scientific journals, as well as the managers of scientific journals in the field of communication science studies in Indonesia incorporated in APJIKI (Association of Publishers Journal of Communication Science Indonesia), seeks to manage the existence of the issue by maintaining the quantity and quality of incoming scientific articles. The main problem in the process of review of scientific articles is the authors' compliance with the style guide of scientific journal. The availability of information regarding to the provisions of the writing of scientific journals provided on the online page should be responded by the applicant's compliance during the preparation of a scientific article. The influence between the two variables is tested by quantitative research approach in positivistic paradigm, based on the concept of information availability from Mark Burgin and the concept of Robert Cialdini about the writer's compliance in obeying the style guide of scientific journal. This study has been done to 42 respondents who can be said to represent the manager of communication science journals in Indonesia. The study showed that H₀ rejected and H₁ accepted, which means that there is a significant influence of the availability variable of OJS style guide information towards the compliance of the writer of 13.10%, while the other 86.9% was influenced by other factors that can be used as a further research studies.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
alvira permata

ABSTRACKScientific journals are an effective means of publishing scientific articles for the general public. In order for scientific journals to be accepted by national and international circles, the insight aspirations and confinement styles must refer to national and international standards. Articles designed to be published in scientific journals, in addition to being written in a scientific manner, must also follow the guidelines required by the intended scientific journal. In order for the article to be sent according to criteria and accepted by the journal, at least it must fulfill three elements, namely the suitability of the field of science, the standard grammar, and the special style (cellulite style) required by an article journal to be sent.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loïc Rossi

<p>First published in 1887 by Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof, Esperanto is the most successful constructed language, with speakers all around the globe and even native speakers.</p> <p>The relationship between Esperanto and science starts very early: the scientific journal <em>Internacia Scienca Revuo</em> was created in 1904 and the International Esperantist Science Association (ISAE) was founded in 1907 (Wera Blanke, <em>Scienca Revuo</em> 206, 2006). Many publications and books about scientific topics have since been written or translated in Esperanto. </p> <p>Esperanto has initially been envisioned as a lingua franca to be used in international communication, both in general and for scientific purposes. While English has since taken this role, there is still a desire to maintain and develop the scientific culture and the related terminology in Esperanto. Science outreach is one way to achieve this goal, and new projects have appeared in the last few years.</p> <p>Esperanto represents an interesting challenge for outreach : being a more neutral language, not related to a specific country or ethnic group, the community of speakers (albeit small) is by essence more international and more diverse than in national languages. This is an opportunity, but also comes with some difficulties.</p> <p>In this work, I’ll discuss the advantages and obstacles of communicating science in Esperanto. I’ll present various projects of science communication in Esperanto, with a focus on my personal experience with my YouTube channel <em>D-ro Loĉjo</em>, where I do videos about science and in particular about planetary science.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 41-54
Author(s):  
Muhammad Qomaruddin ◽  
Ratih Nur Pratiwi ◽  
Sarwono Sarwono

AbstractThe current publication of scientific journals is transitioning from a print format format to an electronic format, which has a different management model than before. Publication of scientific journals is an important thing in the existence of universities. In the dissemination of science results of an education, research, and community service generated by college civitas (Students & Lecturers) can be done with the publication of scientific journals. The purpose of this study is to determine the strategy of management publication of scientific journals that publish many articles of students at higher education. The type of this research is qualitative descriptive research. The research data were collected by indepth interview the Director of Graduate, Head of journal publishing unit, and staff of journal publishing unit. This research was conducted at the Journal Publishing Unit of Postgraduate of Brawijaya University. The managers of scientific journal publications should be continue to improve scientific publishing services and the quality of published articles, so that the management of scientific publications can compete with other electronic journals. The development of electronic journals in Indonesia has grown rapidly, within three years of electronic journal publication in Indonesia has increased sharply, from 1500 journals in 2012 to 16280 journals in 2016. This is a challenge for managers of scientific publications in Brawijaya University. The strategy in developing the management of scientific journal publications of students is to hold training activities of scientific journal writing for students to be able to provide the availability of quality articles. Benchmarking activities and management training for journal editing teams to maintain quality management and scientific journal publications. In addition, it is necessary to improve the reputation of scientific journals by paying attention to the Impact Factor; Index Journal, Ranking Journal, h-index, Number of Cites, & Percentage of Rejection Rates in managed journals.


Author(s):  
Iryna Dykan

The journal "Radiation Diagnostics, Radiation Therapy" was founded in 2010. The founder and publisher of the journal is the SI "Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Radiology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine". The purposes and objectives of the journal: informing national and foreign readers about new experimental and clinical researches in the field of radiation diagnostics, radiation therapy and surgery; providing a platform for scientific discussions and reaching consensus on controversial and actual aspects of radiation diagnostics and radiation therapy of diseases in adults and children; promoting the expansion of cooperation between domestic and foreign specialists in the field of radiation diagnostics, radiation therapy and surgery for the formation of modern effective practice. In 2019, the journal was re-registered as "Radiation Diagnostics, Radiation Therapy" (RDRT). All scientific articles are peer-reviewed. Since 2019, all scientific articles published in the journal have been assigned the DOI index as one of an essential accessory for integration into the scientific space of our planet. As of December 2020, a total of 36 RDRT issues have been published. For 10 years, a total of 373 publications, within 23 headings, from 70 institutions of Ukraine, Belarus, Russia, Germany, and the USA, have been printed on its pages. All high-tech technologies of radiation diagnostics and radiation therapy to one degree or another are reflected in the published articles. It is planned to master live publication – posting on the Internet in the free access of scientific work, which is periodically brought up to date by its author. The advantages of such a publication: comfortable perception by the reader (in the text, all inaccuracies and errors noticed from the moment of the first publication of the work on-line are carefully corrected, and also changes in this branch of science are constantly monitored); comfort for the author (mistakes and misprints are now not fatal, and do not haunt the author for the rest of his life); interest in the periodically updated publication even intensifies over time, many readers return to the actual text not only to refresh the most significant points in their memory, but also to find out how the author's views are being transformed and what’s new appeared in a particular area. Key words: science, scientific journal, scientific article, scientific communication, scientometrics, scientific ecosystem.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-366
Author(s):  
Muhammet Usak

Science Education is a multidisciplinary field of study with roots about three centuries ago. Researches in this field were published for the first time in a scientific journal with School Science and Mathematics, which started in 1901. The number of scientific journals in Science Education has increased in parallel with the increase in the number of related research. The published literature is sometimes about trending topics. In some other cases, they offer novelty and new paradigms. Last 50 years of Science Education are shaped by various topics. Hence, these different issues are being published in scientific journals. At the end of the 70s, studies on constructivism, meaningful learning, misconception, conceptual learning (Driver, & Easley, 1978; Driver, 1983; Driver, & Oldham, 1986; von Glasersfeld, 1984; Ausubel, Novak, & Hanesian, 1978; Novak, 1979 & 1990, Novak, & Gowin, 1984; Novak, & Musonda, 1991) began to come forward. Conferences are being held especially on misconception. Many articles have been published and continue to be published on the topic. Starting with the second half of 80s, studies on PCK, which were first described by Shulman, began to surface in science education journals in the field of teacher training (Shulman, 1986; Usak, 2009, Usak, Ozden, & Eilks, 2011; Usak, Ozden, & Saglam, 2011).


mBio ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arturo Casadevall ◽  
Lynn Enquist ◽  
Michael J. Imperiale ◽  
Paul Keim ◽  
Michael T. Osterholm ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The publication of scientific information that derives from dual use research of concern (DURC) poses major problems for journals because it brings into conflict the benefits of free access to data and the need to prevent misuse of that information by others. Recently, a group of authors and a major scientific journal addressed the issue of publishing information on a newly discovered, highly lethal toxin that can be delivered to large populations and for which there are no available countermeasures. The journal addressed this conflict by permitting the redaction of information that is normally considered essential for publication. This action establishes a precedent for redaction of sensitive data that also provides an example of responsible scientific publishing. However, this precedent leaves many questions unanswered and suggests a need for a discussion by all stakeholders of scientific information so as to derive normative standards for the publication of DURC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengli Ren ◽  
Adrian Thomas Stanley ◽  
Hong Yang ◽  
Phillippa J. Benson ◽  
Weiguo Xu

Based on a detailed analysis of the global academic impact of China’s scientific journals, as well as of the publishing strategies and communication media used by their publishers, we conclude that the Science, Technology, and Medicine (STM) journal publishing industry in China is going through very rapid transformation. Journals are attempting to become more broadly international, and doing so by adopting new digital production methods and commercial models. In light of these efforts, we discuss the current challenges to the development of China’s scientific journal industry and suggest strategies that may be useful for reaching key goals.


Ta dib ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 166
Author(s):  
Jumira Warlizasusi ◽  
Ifnaldi Ifnaldi ◽  
Lendrawaty Lendrawaty ◽  
Hartini Hartini ◽  
Fathur Rizki

The purposes of this research are to find out a) the strategies in human resources development to improve the quality of Postgraduate lecturers at IAIN Curup, (b) supporting factors, and  (c) the obstacles of human rights development. Using qualitative research method, the data were collected through interviews and documentary study. The research results showed that the strategies used for developing human resources or improving the quality of postgraduate lecturers include: (1) organizing the research methodology training; (2) holding the scientific journal writing training; (3) holding book writing/teaching materials training; and (4) involving lecturers into National and International Seminars. Supporting factors for human resource development are (a) high commitmentof  IAIN Curup Postgraduate management, (b) organization and socialization activities for professors acceleration programs, and (c) conducting coaching clinic activities for reputable international publications, in the form of programs to publish research results in reputable international scientific journals. Meanwhile, the obstacles are inadequate infrastructure and limited funds because there are still few students and tuition fee is still in the third category in the Ministry of Religion's General Cost Standards (SBU). The funds have not been fully handed over to the Postgraduate, because it is still centralized at the Institute, if the Postgraduate organize an activity, it must be approved by the Institute before it run.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document