scholarly journals The Error Analysis on the Students of English Department Speaking Scripts

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Setia Rini
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
English Department ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
Subject Pronoun ◽  
Irregular Verbs ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Formal Rules

Speaking skill is different from writing skill. Writing is a formal skill, soas a writer he or she must be consistently follow the formal procedures.It is different from the speaking skill which doesn‘t so strict inaccommodating the formal rules. The Writing of script at Speaking 2lecture is the focus of this study because the scripts are presented afterthey prepare for having conversation. Through writing the speakingscript the students learn carefully of khow to deliver a conversationpurposefully and use the language features correctly even in oralcommunication. Moreover, in speaking they are able to convey theirfeeling, emotion and thought. The purposes of this study are to know thekind of grammatical errors made by the students of the EnglishDepartment in writing their speaking scripts and the sources of studentsin making error in writing the speaking scripts. The researcher takes thesubjects of students of the second semester of the English DepartmentSTAIN Salatiga in academic year of 2012/2013 as they took Speaking 2subject. And to collect the data the researcher used test anddocumentation. The result of this study explains that the writer analyzedthe errors made by the students included the use of grammatical rules,vocabulary choice by implementing error analysis. In addition, the errors are analyzed such as the use of preposition, subject pronoun, objectpronoun, verbs and nouns, irregular verbs, tenses, pronouns andpossessive case, word choice, writing questions, and conditionalsentence.Keywords: error analysis ; Speaking skills ; writing and script 

scholarly journals The Error Analysis on the Students of English Department Speaking Scripts

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Setia Rini
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
English Department ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
Subject Pronoun ◽  
Irregular Verbs ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Formal Rules

Speaking skill is different from writing skill. Writing is a formal skill, soas a writer he or she must be consistently follow the formal procedures.It is different from the speaking skill which doesn‘t so strict inaccommodating the formal rules. The Writing of script at Speaking 2lecture is the focus of this study because the scripts are presented afterthey prepare for having conversation. Through writing the speakingscript the students learn carefully of khow to deliver a conversationpurposefully and use the language features correctly even in oralcommunication. Moreover, in speaking they are able to convey theirfeeling, emotion and thought. The purposes of this study are to know thekind of grammatical errors made by the students of the EnglishDepartment in writing their speaking scripts and the sources of studentsin making error in writing the speaking scripts. The researcher takes thesubjects of students of the second semester of the English DepartmentSTAIN Salatiga in academic year of 2012/2013 as they took Speaking 2subject. And to collect the data the researcher used test anddocumentation. The result of this study explains that the writer analyzedthe errors made by the students included the use of grammatical rules,vocabulary choice by implementing error analysis. In addition, the errors are analyzed such as the use of preposition, subject pronoun, objectpronoun, verbs and nouns, irregular verbs, tenses, pronouns andpossessive case, word choice, writing questions, and conditionalsentence.Keywords: error analysis ; Speaking skills ; writing and script 

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING PECHA KUCHA TECHNIQUE TO PROMOTE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Eva Faliyanti ◽  
Devi May Ratih
Keyword(s):  
Average Score ◽  
Control Group ◽  
English Department ◽  
Oral Test ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
And Control ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Better Than

The aimed of this research is to test the effectiveness of using Pecha Kucha Technique in students’ speaking performance at fourth semester of English Department in Muhammadiyah University of Metro. Pecha Kucha is a presentation form of 20 pictures for 20 seconds and it is also called 20x20 presentations.The entire presentation always lasts for exactly 6 minutes and 40 seconds. The research method used in this research is an experimental research. The subjects of this research are the students at fourth semester of English Department in Muhammadiyah University of Metro academic year 2020. There are 21 students of control group and 21 students of experimental group. The research instrument used to collect the data in this research is an oral test. From the two classes, the experimental and control group, the measurement shows that increasing line of the speaking ability of the experimental group is higher than the control group. The result of pre-test score shows that the average score of the experimental group and the control group are 52.38 and 56.19. From the score of both groups, the result shows that the control group is better than experimental group. Then, the result of the post test of the experimental group is higher than control group; the average scores are 70,71 for experimental group and 62.38 for control group. It can be concluded that there is significant influence of using Pecha Kucha Technique in students’ speaking skill.

scholarly journals An Analysis of Grammatical Errors made by Senegalese English Majors

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10) ◽  
pp. 64-76
Author(s):  
Hafissatou KANE
Keyword(s):  
French Language ◽  
English Department ◽  
Structural Error ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
English Majors ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Error Types

This study identifies, classifies, and interprets the grammatical errors made by 30 second-year students at the English Department of Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar (Senegal) in their grammar translation tests. The said students took a course on Grammar during the academic year 2018-2019. The exercises consist of translating some French sentences into English. The errors made by these participants can be classified into seven categories. There are errors in the use of tenses, auxiliaries, articles, relative adverbs. In addition, morphological and structural error types and other errors related to the choice of verbs (i.e., tell/say) have also been listed. The results show that the participants made both inter-lingual errors (due to the influence of French language) and intra-lingual errors (over generalization of rules, addition or omission of items, etc.).

scholarly journals THE EFFECTS OF LEARNING MODELS AND LINGUISTIC INTELLIGENCE ON THE PERSUASIVE WRITING SKILL

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Yusri Yusri ◽  
Emzir Emzir
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Persuasive Writing ◽  
Intelligence Test ◽  
English Department ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Writing Test ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Academic Year

The objective of this study is to know the effects of learning models (problem solving and project based learning) and linguistic intelligence  on the students of persuasive writing skill of the fourth semester students  of English Department, State Polytechnic of Sriwijaya Palembang, in the academic year of 2016-2017. The writer used linguistic intelligence test and persuasive writing test to collect the data. The data was analyzed  statistically by using two-factor ANOVA at 0.05 significance level. The results of this study showed that (1) The students’ persuasive writing skill taught through problem solving was higher than those who were  taught through project based learning. (2) There was interaction effect between learning models and linguistic intelligence toward persuasive writing skill of the fourth semester students of English Department, State Polytechnic of Sriwijaya Palembang. (3) The students’ persuasive writing skill who were taught by using problem solving and having high linguistic intelligence is higher than those who were taught through  project based learning and having high linguistic intelligence. (4)  The students’ persuasive writing skill who were taught through  problem solving and having low linguistic intelligence is lower than those who were taught through project based learning and having low linguistic intelligence.

scholarly journals ERROR ANALYSIS IN THE TRAVEL WRITING MADE BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vika Agustina ◽  
Esti Junining
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
Travel Writing ◽  
Document Analysis ◽  
English Department ◽  
State University ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Dominant Type ◽  
Verb Inflection ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Written Materials

This study was conducted to identify the kinds of errors in surface strategy taxonomy and to know the dominant type of errors made by the fifth semester students of English Department of one State University in Malang-Indonesia in producing their travel writing. The type of research of this study is document analysis since it analyses written materials, in this case travel writing texts. The analysis finds that the grammatical errors made by the students based on surface strategy taxonomy theory consist of four types. They are (1) omission, (2) addition, (3) misformation and (4) misordering. The most frequent errors occuring in misformation are in the use of tense form. Secondly, the errors are in omission of noun/verb inflection. The next error, there are many clauses that contain unnecessary phrase added there.Keywords: Error, Error Analysis, Surface Strategy Taxonomy, Travel Writing

scholarly journals Kemampuan menulis bahasa Inggris siswa melalui self-editing and self-correcting berdasarkan analisis kesalahan gramatikal dan kosakata

LingTera ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Mathelda Obisuru ◽  
Widyastuti Purbani
Keyword(s):  
Action Research ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Writing Skills ◽  
The Self ◽  
English Writing ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Action Analysis ◽  
Minimum Score ◽  
The Difference

Penelitian ini bertujuan meningkatkan kemampuan menulis bahasa Inggris siswa melalui self-editing and self-correcting berdasarkan analisis kesalahan tata bahasa dan kosakata. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian tindakan kelas. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi dan dari tes menulis siswa. Penelitian dilakukan secara kolaboratif dalam dua siklus, dan setiap siklus terdiri dari perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, dan refleksi. Setelah dilakukan tindakan self-editing and self-correcting dalam dua siklus, ditemukan adanya peningkatan kemampuan menulis bahasa inggris siswa. Peningkatan ini dapat dilihat dari adanya perbedaan hasil analisis kesalahan pada pra-tindakan, tindakan siklus I dan tindakan siklus II. Hasil analisis pra-tindakan menemukan 29,16% memperoleh skor minimal 70, siklus I menemukan 60% siswa memperoleh skor minimal 70, dan siklus II 86,21% siswa memperoleh skor minimal 70. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah hasil analisis kesalahan tata bahasa dan kosakata yang digunakan sebagai landasan pembelajaran menulis melalui self-editing and self-correcting terbukti mampu meningkatkan kemampuan menulis bahasa Inggris siswa.Kata Kunci: analisis kesalahan, tata bahasa dan kosakata, self-editing and self-correcting, kemampuan menulis. Improving the students english writing skill through self-editing and self-correcting based on grammatical and vocabulary error analysis Abstract This study aims to improve students' English writing skills through self-editing and self-correcting based on grammar and vocabulary error analysis. This is calssroom action research. The data were collected through observation and test techniques from 28 students. The research was carried out collaboratively in two cycles. Each cycle consists of two actions. Each action consists of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. After the self-editing and self-correcting action in two cycles, there is an increase in students’ English writing skills. The improvement of students’ writing skills can be seen from the difference in the error analysis in pre-action, first and second cycle action. The results of pre-action analysis show that 29,16% of students get 70 as a minimum score. After the implementation of cycle I, it is found that 60% of students get 70 as a minimum score, and in the second cycle, it is found that 86,21% of students get 70 as a minimum score. The conclusion of this research is the analysis of grammatical errors and vocabulary that is used as the basis for studying writing through self-editing and self-correcting can improve the students' English writing skills.Keywords: error analysis, grammar and vocabulary, self-editing and self-correcting, writing skills.

scholarly journals Analysing Grammar Errors in Malay Language Learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-85
Author(s):  
Isabella Jali
Keyword(s):  
Error Analysis ◽  
Language Learning ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
Group Assignment ◽  
Analysis Theory ◽  
Analysis Task ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Language Writing ◽  
Local Students ◽  
The University

This study aims to describe the grammatical errors in an analysis of a Malay language course assignment. It focuses on several local students who enrolled on MPU3312 Malay Language course at a public university in Semester 1, 2020/2021 session. The study was conducted on 250 students, using scripts from their group assignment, namely Text Error Analysis Task (Tugasan Analisis Kesalahan Teks). A total of 25 samples of student assignments were analysed and described using Corder Error Analysis Theory. Findings show that students committed 79 types of grammatical errors. Errors in the orthographic (ortografi) aspect are the most common. Preposition (Kata sendi nama) errors and redundancy (kelewahan) were also distinctively found in the writing samples. There were also other types of grammatical errors identified, such as copular verb (kata pemeri), "ianya", abbreviation (singkatan), affix (imbuhan), and word choice (pemilihan kata). The study has brought an understanding of the nature of typical grammatical errors in Malay language writing at the university.

TEACHING AND LEARNING MOTIVATION IN ENGLISH MASTERY FOR EARLY SEMESTER STUDENT OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-103
Author(s):  
Arjulayana Arjulayana ◽  
Cut Novita Srikandi
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Reading Skill ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
English Department ◽  
Real Condition ◽  
Listening Skill ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Speaking Skill

Student can be said master the English if they can master four skills of language, there are speaking skill, writing skill, listening skill, and reading skill. Those skills are will be impossible to achieve if the student do not have motivation, both internal and external The aims of this research is to explain and describe what kinds of motivations that students required to support their expectable achievement related to four skills of language. This research uses qualitative approach, with field research scheme, because the data and instruments are implemented in real condition. The research instruments consist of observation, interview, script interview, and study document. The interview conducted to 10 English lecturers to find out the students’ problems and lecturers’ suggestion regarding to students’ motivation to support teaching and learning process in English department. The result of this research shows that Early semester students are having trouble in adapting English at their university, because of some problems, such as; unconfident in performing English as their instruction language in the classroom, because of their vocabulary limit, difficult in understanding lecturer’s English explanation, and difficult to interact among others in using English. Therefore, they need motivation, both internal and external.

scholarly journals Using Picture Series in Teaching Writing Skill for Students of Midwife Program

LETS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-22
Author(s):  
Lidia Deviga ◽  
Radian Arum Ardhani
Keyword(s):  
Research Design ◽  
Teaching Writing ◽  
Teaching English ◽  
English Writing ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Future Researcher ◽  
Writing Skill ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
Academic Year

The aim of this research was to find out the using picture series in teaching writing skill for the fourth semester students of midwifery program in STIKES Bhakti Husada Mulia Madiun. This study was done on May 2020. The subjects were 32 students of the fourth semester students of midwifery program of STIKES Bhakti Husada Mulia Madiun in the academic year 2020/2021. The method used in this research was a qualitative descriptive research design. The techniques for collecting data were observation, interview, and documentation. During the research, the researcher acted as the teacher and observer during the implementation of picture series. The findings of observation show that there is good interaction between lecturer and students. The lecturer gives the task and assignment to make the students understand the material well. The finding of interview shows that by using picture series, the students can have the ideas how to start writing recount text well. They can arrange the picture series to help them in composing the writing. By using picture series the students can improve their writing based on the criteria asked by the lecturers. The criteria of the writing are vocabulary, content, language, mechanic and organization. The finding of documentation shows that the use of picture series in teaching writing recount text make the students interested. Thus, the learning process is supported that the students are better to write from their experiences to compose recount text. Then, the use of picture series is effectively used in helping students improve their performance in writing recount text. The future researcher can conduct the use of picture series in other skill of English such as on speaking skill. It is hoped can be used as the easy media to express the students’ creativity in their speaking. Furthermore, the researcher can do this study by using the other design such as the experimental research design in teaching English writing skill.

scholarly journals AN ERROR ANALYSIS ON USING PERSONAL PRONOUNS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Rahayu Pratiwi ◽  
Rahma Putri Aulia ◽  
Lilis Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Omission Error ◽  
Personal Pronoun ◽  
Personal Pronouns ◽  
Subject Pronoun ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Types Of Error

The objective of this research was to know the most types of error and the most error of personal pronouns in descriptive text due to the eleventh-grade students in their descriptive paragraph writing. This research conducted qualitative research. This research was conducted at SMK Negeri 1 Cimahi in Academic Year 2018/2019. To get the data, the researchers gave an instruction for the students to make a descriptive text about person, conduct the students' writing result, read the students’ writing result, identified the type of students’ writing error from their text, classified the type of personal pronouns error from students’ writing, and  identified the high students, middle students and lower students. The sample of this research is nine students of eleventh grade from PFPT A Class (Broadcast). The result showed that there are four types of errors, they are: omission, addition, misordering, and disordering. In students’ writing had been found many errors that focused on personal pronoun is 8 or 32% of omission error, 0 or 0% of addition error, 17 or 68% of mis-formation error, and 0 or 0% of disordering error. So, the highest percentage of types of error is a mis-formation error that is 17 or 68%. The most error of personal pronouns in descriptive text due by the students is when they used a subject pronoun. Keywords:  Error Analysis, Personal Pronoun, Descriptive Text.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document