scholarly journals Education: socialization vs individualization

2021 ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
N.I. Lobanova ◽  

Presented is an attempt to understand the concept of individualization of education. The article analyzes interpretations of this concept, that have emerged in recent years. Identified are elements, on which is focused attention of researchers, namely: individualization of the educational process, and individualization of the student. It is established that reasons, that prevent individualization of learning, are features of organization of educational process, while influence, that conservative nature of institute of education has effect on reducing effectiveness of the process of differentiation and individualization is not noticed. It is revealed that the need for educational system to perform functions of socialization and cultural reproduction sets tasks that at latent level contradict with requirements of individualization. Implementation of these functions is accompanied by formation of logical conformism among students and unification of their identifications that are individually and personally expressed in processes of self-typing. Thus, in order to transform education in accordance with ideas of variation, differentiation and individualization, it is necessary to study the limits of institutional possibilities for individualization of both student and learning process, as well as to explore the possibility of transformation in the context of individualization of institutional nature of the education system itself.

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
NATALIA S. EPIFANOVA ◽  
◽  
MIKHAIL G. POLOZKOV ◽  

The article studies the necessity and features of transformation of the educational system under conditions of accelerated development in the digital economy. Particular attention in the context of this transformation is given to significance and possibilities of digital literacy, which forms the whole complex of fundamentally new requirements for all participants in the education system. The authors argue that the current stage of development of the digital economy requires the education system not only to digitalize its individual elements and links, but to apply a fundamentally new integrated approach that would transform the education system while taking into account new goals, structure and content of the educational process. The authors define digital literacy as the ability to form and apply educational content through digital technologies. The article gives particular emphasis on the significance and potential of individualizing the educational trajectory and the concept of continuing education. The authors consider the main factors in the development and achievement of the level of digital literacy, considering the requirements that the digital economy is currently imposing on the educational system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Zhypargul Aydarova ◽  

The article talks about the need to apply pedagogical methods, techniques, and learning technologies to help students actively and more actively participate in the cognitive process as a result of changes in the education system. Pedagogical principles that affect the effectiveness of the educational process, serve as the basis for the application. The main purpose of applying the proposed pedagogical methods is to interest students in the reading process, which is why they must be selected taking into account the age characteristics of adolescents. In addition, the article offers an answer to the question of how can we raise the activity of teenage children? Applying reading and writing in the activities of students of adolescents in the learning process, we can build their informational competence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 224 ◽  
pp. 03016
Author(s):  
A I Dashkina ◽  
A M Kobicheva ◽  
M Odinokaya ◽  
D. A. Tarkhov

This article describes the problem of computer simulation of the educational process at a research university. We consider some models and methods of organizing the intelligent learning environment described by a number of researchers. We also come up with a few ideas of creating an intelligent learning environment and organizing the learning process, such as a hierarchical educational system, the model of which was tested in our previous studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 12110
Author(s):  
Yanina Morozova ◽  
Oksana Rozhnenko

The modern educational system has a peculiarity: acting as a user, it simultaneously stimulates the development of information and digital technologies. This characteristic is especially come out in the higher education system. At the same time, despite the objective and subjective attractiveness of modern information and digital technologies, it is necessary to realize that their adaptation is, although effective, but still an auxiliary tool in the organization and implementation of the educational process. The introduction of information technologies into the educational process makes it possible to significantly enrich the process of transferring knowledge from teacher to student, to facilitate understanding of complex topics, to level the repetitive monotony in the classroom, to increase the motivation of educational activities, to intensify the activities of students in the classroom, to form a conscious attitude to the educational process, etc. At the same time, the use of information and digital technologies should be justified, logically expedient, designed to complement (and not replace) the teacher's activities in the classroom.


Author(s):  
Tatiana Vladimirovna Zak

In recent years, the system of higher education has undergone significant changes affecting the most important spheres of university activities: management of the educational process, its organization, which significantly changes the attitudes, incentives, motives and value system of the academic staff. In a number of cases, as a result of reforming the management system there are created special conditions that affect the quality of educational services. The task of investigating the consequences of the ongoing reforms is being actualized in order to identify the main factors that restrain the growth of quality. To solve this problem there has been made comparative analysis of the quality of higher education in Russia and abroad. Significant reserves of its growth in Russia have been revealed. There had been proposed a classification based on the scope of action: factors that operate within the educational system, but are external to the higher education; factors that are external to the educational system as a whole; factors acting within the system of higher education. The most significant external factor for the educational system is the low innovative potential of the economy, underestimation of the quality of education by business, which determines the aim of the majority of students not to build up human capital, but to obtain a diploma with minimal expenses. The factors intrinsic to the educational system, but external to the higher education system, include the lack of interest and unpreparedness of school teachers for working with gifted students, which is primarily due to the use of the results of the General State Examination and Unified State Examination for evaluating their work . The main negative factor operating within the higher education system is the distortion of teachers' incentives, the increase of their opportunistic behavior caused by the transition to a new management system for higher education organizations.


Author(s):  
Mukhabbat Tayirova ◽  

The article analyzes the process, advantages and possibilities of using educational websites in the educational process and examines the research work done in this regard.


2021 ◽  
pp. 90-105
Author(s):  
Т.Е. Давыдова

Введение. Статья посвящена разработке теоретических положений и практических рекомендаций. В статье рассматриваются аспекты деятельности и развития региональных университетов с позиции уникальности учебных заведений. Представлен обзор научной литературы, содержащей исследование национальных программ цифровизации экономики в целом и ее отдельных направлений. Изучены работы, посвященные рассмотрению тенденций развития, цифровизации и безопасности экономики и ее субъектов, в том числе региональных. Дано видение региональных университетов в системе образования в целом, в инновационной среде, в условиях цифровизации системы, в структуре технологического предпринимательства. Отмечена актуальность исследования уникальности деятельности региональных университетов в условиях активизации дистанционного формата обучения при необходимости предотвращения распространения коронавируса. Данные и методы. Проведен анализ эмпирических данных, опросов и исследований, касающихся развития регионального университета в цифровой экономике. В основу структурного анализа особенностей развития положен принцип уникальности деятельности университетов с учетом их традиций и опыта, специфики региона. Представлены результаты изучения тенденций мирового развития системы высшего образования в региональном разрезе. Предложена классификация особенностей развития региональных университетов, основывающаяся на ряде признаков, определяющих уникальность подхода к подготовке высококвалифицированных специалистов в условиях цифровизации экономики. Полученные результаты. В соответствии с особенностями развития выделены и структурированы аспекты, определяющие сохранение уникальности или переход к стандартизации деятельности регионального университета. В числе особенностей - ориентация деятельности университета на внутреннюю или внешнюю сторону региональной образовательной системы; статус учебного заведения в системе образования с точки зрения масштабности реализации проектов различных уровней; традиционные и креативные подходы к организации образовательного процесса; репутация университета в академическом и бизнес-сообществе; степень включенности в систему цифровизации; широта специализации вуза; ориентация показателей успешности деятельности университета на процесс или результат. Заключение. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы в качестве теоретической базы для изучения ряда вопросов цифровизации экономики, науки и образования. С практической точки зрения, полученные результаты будут способствовать совершенствованию организации образовательного процесса в региональных университетах. Introduction. The article is devoted to the development of theoretical provisions and practical recommendations Introduction. The article deals with the aspects of the activity and development of regional universities from the point of view of the uniqueness of educational institutions. The review of the scientific literature containing the research of national programs of digitalization of the economy as a whole and its separate directions is presented. The works devoted to the consideration of trends in the development, digitalization and security of the economy and its subjects, including regional ones, are studied. The vision of regional universities in the education system as a whole, in the innovative environment, in the conditions of digitalization of the system, in the structure of technological entrepreneurship is given. The relevance of the study of the uniqueness of the activities of regional universities in the context of the activation of distance learning in the need to prevent the spread of coronavirus is noted. Data and methods. The analysis of empirical data, surveys and studies related to the development of a regional university in the digital economy is carried out. The structural analysis of the development features is based on the principle of the uniqueness of the universities ' activities, taking into account their traditions and experience, and the specifics of the region. The results of the study of trends in the global development of the higher education system in the regional context are presented. A classification of the features of the development of regional universities is proposed, based on a number of features that determine the uniqueness of the approach to training highly qualified specialists in the conditions of digitalization of the economy. The results obtained. In accordance with the peculiarities of development, the aspects that determine the preservation of uniqueness or the transition to standardization of the activities of a regional university are identified and structured. Among the features are the orientation of the university's activities to the internal or external side of the regional educational system; the status of the educational institution in the educational system in terms of the scale of implementation of projects at various levels; traditional and creative approaches to the organization of the educational process; the reputation of the university in the academic and business community; the degree of involvement in the digitalization system; the breadth of the university's specialization; the orientation of the university's success indicators to the process or result. Conclusion. The results of the research can be used as a theoretical basis for studying a number of issues of digitalization of the economy, science and education. From a practical point of view, the results obtained will contribute to improving the organization of the educational process in regional universities.


Author(s):  
Serhii Kubitskyi ◽  
◽  
Oleksandr Pastovenskyi ◽  

The article examines the features of control in the development of education systems. It is concluded that in order to increase the efficiency of education management depending on the level of development of the education system, control in it should be implemented on the basis of differentiated participation in the control activities of public structures involved in the educational process. In a rigid education system, control is exercised by the management of the institution almost without the participation of public structures. In the system with delegated managerial powers, it is advisable to involve the self-governing bodies of the educational institution in the implementation of certain micro-functions of control in educational subsystems. In a «soft» education system, the self-governing bodies of an educational institution can be involved in the implementation of individual micro-functions of control in the education system or in the implementation of control functions in its subsystems as a whole. In the system with network interactions, it is expedient to transfer control functions to self-governing bodies of the institution both in the education system as a whole and in its subsystems; other public structures included in the educational process may be involved in the implementation of certain micro-functions of control in the subsystems of the educational system. In the synergetic education system, it is expedient to delegate control functions in the educational system and its subsystems to the self-governing bodies of the institution; public structures involved in the educational process may be involved in the implementation of individual micro-functions of control in the education system or in the implementation in its subsystems of control functions as a whole. That is, the article substantiates that depending on the level of development of the educational institution, it is advisable to control it on the basis of differentiated participation in control measures of concerned public structures, ensuring the implementation of differentiated participatory control in the system. At the same time, further research requires into the use of optimal methods of control, the choice of which may also largely depend on the level of development of the education system.


Vestnik NSUEM ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 277-283
Author(s):  
N. P. Sukhanova ◽  
I. S. Rodicheva

The modern educational process is focused on the training of a specialist who is able to think critically and creatively solve problematic situations, constantly raising the level of his education. Education as the most important social institution reacts sharply to the processes taking place in society. Actively developing distance learning is quite popular today, but there are different kinds of questions related to its implementation and the  significance of a personal example, personal contacts in the learning process is one of the questions that is analyzed in this article. Would the distance learning be complete if it was deprived of subjectivity by definition? The educational system is understood to be a tradition in the article. The authors stress two types of traditions: verbalized and non-verbalized. The specificity of pedagogical activity does not allow many of its significant components to be explicated. The attention is focused on non-verbalized traditions existing in the form of implicit knowledge. Specific examples (V.I. Vernadsky, V.V. Dokuchaev, P.V. Ototsky) reveal the necessity of personal knowledge in the educational process. The article concludes that personal communication between the lecturer and the student is necessary as a conscious movement against deindividuation in modern society. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
pp. 145-164
Author(s):  
Sumiati Sumiati

AbstrakGuru memiliki tugas yang beragam yang berimplementasi dalam bentuk pengabdian. Tugas tersebut meliputi bidang profesi, bidang kemanusiaan dan bidang kemasyarakatan. Tugas guru sebagai profesi meliputi mendidik, mengajar dan melatih. Mendidik berarti meneruskan dan mengembangkan nilai-nilai hidup dan kehidupan. Mengajar berarti meneruskan dan mengembangkan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi. Sedangkan melatih berarti mengembangkan keterampilan-keterampilan pada siswa. Syarat yang berhubungan dengan pelajaran adalah guru hendaknya mengajarkan pelajaran yang sesuai dengan keahlian, guru hendaknya memiliki amanah ilmiah, guru hendaknya bersikap bijak dalam proses pembelajaran, guru hendaknya berpakaian bersih dan rapi. Syarat yang berkenaan dengan peserta didik maksudnya adalah guru hendaknya bersikap adil terhadap peserta didik, guru sebaiknya motivator bagi peserta didiknya dalam mencari ilmu pengetahuan, guru hendaknya memperhatikan tingkat perkembangan peserta didiknya, guru hendaknya melakukan evaluasi tehadap peserta didiknya. Menurut Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional adalah Bab I, pasal I, Ayat 4 dinyatakan bahwa : “Peserta didik adalah Anggota masyarakat yang berusaha mengembangkan potensi diri melalui proses pembelajaran  yang tersedia pada jalur, jenjang dan jenis pendidikan tertentu.( UU RI, No.20 Tahun 2003 , 2003; 3). Untuk itu peserta didik harus dipandang secara filosofis menerima keadaan dan keberadaannya. Inilah prinsif dasar pendidikan untuk peserta didik sehingga proses pendidikan dapat berjalan dengan baik. Ada empat sifat anak didik yang harus dimiliki antara lain : 1)Seorang anak didik harus membersihkan hatinya dari kotoran dan penyakit jiwa sebelum menuntut ilmu, 2)Seorang anak didik harus mempunyai tujuan menuntut ilmu, 3) Seorang anak didik harus tabah dalam menimbah ilmu pengetahuan, 4)Seorang anak didik harus menghormati guru. Oleh sebab itu tugas seorang guru tidaklah mudah, mereka yg berprofesi guru harus mampu melaksanakan segala peranannya dalam memberikan motivasi kepada peserta didik agar meningkat dan berkembang. Kata Kunci :  Peranan, guru, Motivasi, Belajar, SiswaAbstractTeachers have a variety of tasks that implement in a dedication. The task covers the fields of profession, humanity and social affairs. Teacher’s task as a profession includes educating, teaching and training. Educating means continuing and developing the values of living and life. Teaching means continuing and developing science and technology, while training means developing in student skills. The terms related to the lesson are that the teacher should teach lessons that are appropriate to the expertise, the teacher should have a scientific mandate, the teacher should be wise in the learning process, the teacher should dress clean and neat. The terms relating to students mean that teachers should be fair to students, the teacher should be a motivator for students in seeking knowledge, teachers should pay attention to the level of development of their students, and teachers should evaluate their students.According to law number 20 of 2003 on National Education System Chapter I, Article 1, Subsection 4, stated that: "Students are community members who try to develop their potential through the learning process that is available on certain pathways, levels and types of certain education (RI Law, No. 20 of 2003, 2003; 3)” That is why students must be seen philosophically to accept the situation and existence. This is the basic principle of education for students so that the educational process can run well. There are four characteristics of students that must be possessed, among others: 1) a student need to cleanse their scurrilous psyche and mental illness before studying, 2) a student must have a goal for studying, 3) a student must be resilient in seeking knowledge, and 4) a student must respect the teacher. Therefore the task of a teacher is not easy, those who are teachers must be able to carry out all their roles in providing motivation to students to increase and develop. Keywords : Roles, Teachers, Motivation, Studying, Students


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document