scholarly journals Proposed changes to the Bank Indonesia law as a solution to the impact of the COVID-19 spread on banking in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
Theresia Anita Christiani
Keyword(s):  
Central Bank ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Alternative Solution ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Banking Institutions ◽  
The Impact

Every amendment to the Bank Indonesia Law is caused by a situation that requires changes to the Law regulating the Central Bank in Indonesia as a solution. The spread of COVID-19 in Indonesia has also led to proposals to amend the Bank Indonesia Law. The purpose of the study is to find answers to the relevance of the proposed Amendment to Bank Indonesia Law to address the spread of COVID-19 to banking institutions in Indonesia. This type of research methods is normative legal research. In normative legal analysis, secondary data are used, consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. They are obtained from applicable regulations in Indonesia. The study results show that every change is always based on events that prove the weak implementation of existing rules with a regulatory and conceptual approach. The spread of COVID-19 is a situation, that has no practical basis and requires amendments to the Bank Indonesia Law as an alternative solution. Also, the proposed amendments are not yet relevant to address the impact of COVID-19 on banks because they have not yet realized and achieved the legal goals of providing benefits to the community. AcknowledgmentThanks to Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia, for providing funding for research and publication.

scholarly journals The Outbreak of Covid-19 as an Overmacht Claim in Credit Agreements

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-92
Author(s):  
Merry Tjoanda
Keyword(s):  
Interest Rates ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Banking Institutions ◽  
The Government ◽  
Credit Agreement ◽  
Branch Office

This research aims to determine and analyze the law consequences of overmacht in credit agreements due to the Covid-19 Pandemic and as legal remedies for settlement of the credit agreement due to the Covid-19 Pandemic. This research is socio-legal research, a combination research method between doctrinal law research methods and empirical legal research methods. This research was conducted in banking institutions and financing institutions in Ambon City, namely at Bank Mandiri Ambon Branch Office, BCA Ambon Branch Office, Bank Artha Graha Ambon Branch Office, and BFI Limited Company Ambon Branch Office. The types of research data are primary data and secondary data, obtained through literature study and interviews. Based on the results of the research, the Covid-19 Pandemic is a non-natural disaster, so it is categorized as a relative overmacht, so the result of the comparative overmacht law in the credit agreement due to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Ambon City has not changed the risk burden in the sense that the Debtor still fulfills their achievements after the outbreak of Covid - 19 Pandemic is over. The legal effort that can be taken to settle credit agreements due to Covid-19 Pandemic in Ambon City is through credit restructuring in the form of lowering interest rates, extending the period, reducing principal arrears, and reducing interest arrears as determined by the government to be implemented by the bank or financing institutions with debtors.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PELAKSANAAN PENGADAAN VAKSIN DALAM PENANGANAN CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) [A Legal Analysis of the Implementation of Vaccine Procurement in Managing the Coronavirus Disease 19 (Covid-19)]

Law Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 270
Author(s):  
Lailatul Mufidah ◽  
Kukuh Tejomurti
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Management ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Legal Accountability ◽  
Unique Mechanism ◽  
Bahasa Indonesia

<p><em>This article elaborates two legal issues related to how to implement the procurement of the Covid-19 vaccine during a pandemic and the legal responsibility for the implementation of vaccine procurement in the context of handling Covid-19. This article is a prescriptive normative legal research using the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The study results show that the implementation of procurement for handling emergencies requires a unique mechanism that is carried out through simplification of administrative processes and under Regulation Related to Procurement of Goods/Services in Emergency Management. Article 27 paragraph (2) and section (3) of the Covid-19 Handling Law, which has legal impunity that does not necessarily eliminate the procurement actors' responsibility, but the procurement actors are still subject to legal accountability based on good faith parameters and implementation under regulations legislation. State finances issued in the procurement of the Covid-19 vaccine can be given a temporary conclusion that it has been implemented effectively considering the efficacy level of the Sinovac vaccine is above the minimum percentage given by WHO, namely 65.3% of the minimum amount of 50%</em></p><p><strong>Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: </strong>Artikel ini meneliti dua permasalahan hukum terkait bagaimana penerapan pengadaan vaksin Covid-19 di masa pandemi dan pertanggungjawaban hukum atas pelaksanaan pengadaan vaksin yang dilaksanakan dalam rangka penanganan Covid-19. Artikel ini adalah termasuk penelitian hukum yang bersifat preskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pengadaan guna penanganan keadaan darurat membutuhkan suatu mekanisme khusus yang mana dilaksanakan melalui penyederhanaan proses administratif dan sesuai regulasi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa dalam Penanganan Keadaan Darurat. Pasal 27 ayat (2) dan ayat (3) UU Penanganan Covid-19 yang memiliki impunitas hukum yang sejatinya tidak serta-merta menghilangkan tanggung jawab para pelaku pengadaan melainkan para pelaku pengadaan tetap dikenai adanya pertanggungjawaban hukum berdasarkan parameter itikad baik dan pelaksanaan yang sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Keuangan negara yang dikeluarkan dalam pengadaan vaksin Covid-19 dapat diberikan kesimpulan sementara bahwa telah dilaksanakan secara efektif, mengingat tingkat efikasi vaksin Sinovac berada di atas minimal persentase yang diberikan oleh WHO, yaitu 65,3% dari jumlah minimal 50%.</p>

scholarly journals Legal Analysis of Fingerprint Formation in the Original Deed of Land Deed Official (PPAT)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Siti Humaero Rukmana ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin ◽  
Sahnan Sahnan
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Force

This research aims to analyze the formation of fingerprints in the deed of Land Deed official (PPAT). According to Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia number 24 of 2016 about the amendment of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 about department Regulation (PPAT) Land deed official. In the event that the fingerprint of the the appearers on this PPAT deed there is an empty norm, because in the Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia number 24 of 2016 about the amendment of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 on department rules Land deed Office (PPAT), not listed in the article on the formation of fingerprints on the original deed of PPAT. Apart from this, it is also questionable about the legal force of the The Appearers fingerprint on the PPAT deed in terms of providing legal protection to PPAT that prints fingerprints on the deed which is made. The problem is how the concept of fingerprint formation in the creation of the original deed of PPAT and what is the juridical implication on the formation of fingerprints in the original deed of PPAT. This research aims to determine the concept of fingerprint formation in the creation of the original deed of PPAT and to know the juridical implications for the formation of fingerprints in the original deed of PPAT. This method of research uses normative legal research methods. The approach used is the of approach, and the conceptual approach. The results of this study are the first the creation of fingerprints is only in accordance with law No. 2 of 2014 on the amendment of law No. 30 of 2004 on the Department of notary, found in article 16 paragraph (1) C which is "to attach letters and documents as well as fingerprint in the deed minuta", so that this rule only applies to notaries instead of PPAT. While in the regulation of the Department of PPAT, there is no rule on the formation of fingerprints in the PPAT deed but in practice many PPAT put fingerprints on the PPAT deed. To attach the appearer to the original deed PPAT aims to anticipate if a time when the complainers deny his or her signature to the original deed of PPAT, then as evidence for additional use of the appearer. So it should be made a provision or regulation of legislation that set it. Second according to the PPAT formation of fingerprints, of course, can be, in addition to no rules advocating, there are no rules that prohibit and there is no sanctions if a fingerprint in the PPAT deed, especially if the complainant does not feel the objection to fingerprint in the deed.

scholarly journals Perspektif Kode Etik Jabatan Notaris terhadap Publikasi dan Promosi Jabatan Notaris melalui Aplikasi Android

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nadia Imanda
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Android Application ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Provisions

Abstract: The era of technology brings people to the development of sophisticated computers and smartphones in which the applications of various types and purposes are. Notary as a public official appointed by the state to take care of most countries and communities in the context of civil law, has legal provisions related to what may and may not be done by a Notary. In this case, the Notary Code of Ethics of the Indonesian Notary Association (INI) states that notaries are denied publication and self-promotion of their positions through writing media as well as electronic media, but the category of advertising on publicity and self-promotion does not provide clear interpretation on android application that indicates to violate the Article 4 paragraph (3) Notary Code of Ethics. This legal research uses normative research methods using the statute approach and conceptual approaches. The use of an android application by a notary who indicates committing violation must be studied and supervised from the Notary Honorary Board and Notary Supervisory Board  so that the inteniont and the purpose of the UUJN and the Notary Code of Ethics can be realized and the office of notary as a profession cannot be dishonored.  Abstrak: Era teknologi membawa manusia pada perkembangan komputer dan smartphone canggih yang di dalamnya terdapat fasilitas aplikasi berbagai macam jenis dan tujuan. Notaris sebagai pejabat umum yang diangkat oleh negara untuk mengurusi sebagian urusan negara dan masyarakat dalam lingkup hukum perdata, memiliki ketentuan hukum terkait apa yang boleh dan tidak boleh dilakukan oleh seorang Notaris. Dalam hal ini, Kode Etik Notaris Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (I.N.I) menyatakan bahwa notaris dilarang melak         ukan publikasi dan promosi diri terhadap jabatannya melalui media tulis mau pun media elektronik, namun kategori batasan terhadap publikasi dan promosi diri dinilai kurang memberikan kejelasan hukum bahwasanya ditemukan aplikasi android yang berindikasi pelanggaran Pasal 4 ayat (3) Kode Etik Notaris. Penelitian hukum ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan berdasarkan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Penggunaan aplikasi android oleh notaris yang berindikasi melakukan pelanggaran harus dilakukan pengkajian dan pengawasan dari Dewan Kehormatan Notaris dan Majelis Pengawas Notaris agar maksud dan tujuan UUJN serta Kode Etik Notaris dapat terwujud dan tidak mencederai jabatan notaris sebagai profesi yang mulia. 

scholarly journals Kedudukan Sita Umum Terhadap Sita Lainnya Dalam Proses Kepailitan (The Position Of General Seizure Towards Others In The Process Of Bankrupcy)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-234
Author(s):  
Luthvi Febryka Nola
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Impact

Article 31 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law stipulate that all seizures that have been determined on the debtor's assets are null and void since the bankruptcy verdict is pronounced and since then the only validity is general seizure. However, in its practice various seizures are still stipulated on bankrupt assets ranging from civil, criminal and tax seizures. This paper discusses the forms of seizure in the bankruptcy process, the position of general seizure of other seizures in bankruptcy and the impact of the position of general seizure on debt payments to creditors. The research method used is normative legal research using secondary data collected through library studies and document studies. The various data were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This writing found that there are rules in other laws such as Article 39 paragraph (2) KUHAP and Article 6 paragraph (1) Law No. 19 of 2000 that have ruled out the position of general seizure. The experts in each field of science also have different views regarding the position of general seizure. This condition has resulted in the emergence of friction between law enforcement, inconsistency of judges’ decisions, length of bankruptcy proceedings, injustice, unclear data on bankruptcy assets and reduced bankruptcy assets. Therefore, the understanding of law enforcement regarding legal principles, especially the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generalis, needs to be improved. The use of prejudgment seizure in the bankruptcy process must be socialized to maximize control over bankrupt assets. To avoid prolonged process of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy law should limit the time period for the settlement of assets to the curator.AbstrakPasal 31 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Kepailitan mengatur bahwa segala sita yang telah ditetapkan atas harta kekayaan debitor menjadi hapus semenjak putusan pailit diucapkan dan semenjak itu satu-satunya yang berlaku adalah sita umum. Akan tetapi pada praktiknya berbagai sita tetap ditetapkan atas harta pailit mulai dari sita perdata, pidana dan pajak.  Tulisan ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk sita dalam proses kepailitan, kedudukan sita umum terhadap sita lainnya dalam kepailitan dan dampak dari kedudukan sita umum terhadap pembayaran utang kepada para kreditor. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui kegiatan studi perpustakaan maupun studi dokumen. Berbagai data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Penulisan ini menemukan bahwa adanya aturan dalam UU lain seperti Pasal 39 ayat (2) KUHAP dan Pasal 6 ayat (1) UU No. 19 Tahun 2000 telah mengesampingkan kedudukan sita umum. Ahli masing-masing bidang ilmu juga memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terkait kedudukan sita umum.  Kondisi ini berdampak pada munculnya pergesekan antara penegak hukum, inkonsistensi putusan hakim, lamanya proses kepailitan, terjadi ketidakadilan, ketidakjelasan data harta pailit, berkurang bahkan hilangnya harta pailit. Oleh sebab itu, pemahaman penegak hukum tentang asas hukum terutama asas lex specialis derogate legi generalis perlu ditingkatkan. Penggunaan lembaga sita jaminan dalam proses kepailitan harus disosialisasikan untuk memaksimalkan penguasaan terhadap harta pailit. Supaya proses kepailitan tidak berlarut-larut, UU kepailitan harusnya membatasi jangka waktu penyelesaian aset kepada kurator.

scholarly journals Application of Restorative Justice Values in Settling Medical Malpractice Cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Ahmad Syauf ◽  
◽  
Diana Haiti ◽  
Mursidah Mursidah
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Social Injustice ◽  
Sense Of Control ◽  
Original Condition ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Civil Lawsuits ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Formal Justice

Lawsuits submitted by patients or their families to the hospital and / or their doctors can take the form of criminal or civil lawsuits by almost always basing on the theory of negligence. This paper seeks to explore the application of the values of restorative justice in resolving cases of medical malpractice in Indonesia. This research is a qualitative research using normative legal research and uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that settlement of medical malpractice cases through a restorative justice approach or which is known in the culture of the Indonesian people as a consensus agreement as contained in the 4th Precepts of Pancasila is one alternative settlement that is to restore conflict to the parties most affected (victims, perpetrators and interests community) and give priority to the interests of all parties. The conclusion showed that the restorative justice emphasizes human rights and the need to recognize the impact of social injustice and in simple ways to restore the parties to their original condition rather than simply giving formal justice actors or legal actors and victims not getting any justice. Hence, restorative justice also strives to restore the security of victims, personal respect, dignity and more importantly is a sense of control so as to avoid feelings of revenge both individual or family or group.

scholarly journals Ad Hoc Board’s Ethics and Conduct Code Violation in Bolaang Mongondow General Election Commissions (KPU)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Made Desika Ermawati Putri
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
North Sulawesi ◽  
Preventive Actions ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Code Violations

The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of repressive and preventive actions of the Ad Hoc board’s Ethics and Conduct Code in Bolaang Mongondow KPU. The research method used was empirical legal research methods, the data were from primary and secondary data with data collection techniques used were documents study and interview. The data were analyzed using qualitative data analysis, where all collected data were analyzed, connected into one another, and presented descriptively and systematically. Based on the study results, it is known that the repressive and preventive mechanism of the Ethics and Conduct Code of Ad Hoc Board of Bolaang Mogondow KPU in organizing Election for the Governor and Deputy Governor of North Sulawesi in 2020 had been carried out in accordance with statutory regulations. There were 5 (five) cases of Ethics and Conduct Code violations carried out by the Ad Hoc Board within the Bolaang Mongondow KPU.

scholarly journals Konsep dan Penerapan Model Kebijakan Corporate Environmental Responsibility di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Syamsudin Isnaini ◽  
Amalia Diamantina
Keyword(s):  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Environmental Responsibility ◽  
Corporate Environmental Responsibility ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Economic Interests ◽  
Policy Model ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact ◽  
A Company

The friction between economic interests and environmental interests has become a serious problem today. The friction between the two interests is evident in the activities of a company, therefore a company is given responsibility for the impact caused by its activities. This responsibility is “corporate social and environmental responsibility”. However, the term "Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)" is often used in Indonesian society. The use of this term has a legal consequence, namely that the company's responsibility is only social responsibility, while environmental responsibility does not exist. Departing from these problems, this study will focus on discussing problems regarding the “Corporate Environmental Responsibility (CER)” policy model in Indonesia, particularly regarding the CER policy model, and the types of CER policies. This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The data used is secondary data in the form of laws and regulations and news about company and / or government programs in the field of environmental management. Based on the research results, it is known that the CER policy model clarifies and reinforces the regulation of corporate responsibility towards environmental aspects, CER policies can come from corporate initiatives or come from government initiatives.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH MENGENAI PENANGANAN PANDEMI VIRUS CORONA DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-58
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat ◽  
Budiman
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Social Impact ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Impact

Perkembangan pandemi Covid-19 saat ini sangat mengkhawatirkan dimana terjadinya suatupeningkatan kasus corona khusus di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuidan menganalisis kebijakan yang diambil pemerintah dalam penanganan pandemi Covid-19serta langkah-langkah yang diambil pemerintah untuk menganggulangi dampak-dampak, terutama dampak dari segi ekonomi dan sosial akibat pandemi Covid-19. Metode penelitianhukum yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yangdigunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatankonseptual. Penelitian ini berlandaskan pengaturan perundang-undangan yang mengaturmengenai penanganan dan penganggulangan pandemi Covid-19 serta analisis atas konseppenetapan peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalamrangka penanganan Covid-19, berawal dari pemerintah tmengeluarkan kebijakan tentangPembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang merujuk pada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Peraturan pelaksanaannya yaitu PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, sertaKeputusan Presiden tentang Kedaruratan Kesehatan sampai dengan saat ini pemerintah telahmengeluarkan kebijakan PPKM yang dimana dilakukan secara berkala. Untukmenganggulangi dampak Covid-19 dari segi ekonomi dan sosial pemerintah mengambilbeberapa kebijakan-kebijakan, yang diantaranya adalah: Peraturan Menteri KeuanganRepublik Indonesia Nomor 23/Pmk.03/2020 tentang Insentif Pajak Untuk WajibPajakTerdampak Wabah Virus Corona; Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Kata Kunci : Kebijakan, Penanganan, Covid-19 The current development of the Covid-19 pandemic is very worrying where there is anincrease in special corona cases in Indonesia. This study aims to identify and analyze thepolicies taken by the government in handling the Covid-19 pandemic and the steps taken bythe government to mitigate the impacts, especially the economic and social impacts of theCovid-19 pandemic. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Thisresearch is based on the legislation governing the handling and handling of the Covid-19pandemic as well as an analysis of the concept of establishing these laws and regulations. The results of this study are in the context of handling Covid-19, starting with thegovernment issuing a policy on Large-Scale Social Restrictions which refers to Law Number6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The implementing regulations are GovernmentRegulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions, as well as thePresidential Decree on Health Emergencies. Until now, the government has issued a PPKMpolicy which is carried out regularly. To address the economic and social impact of Covid- 19, the government has taken several policies, including: Regulation of the Minister ofFinance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23/Pmk.03/2020 concerning Tax Incentives forTaxpayers Af ected by the Corona Virus Outbreak; Regulation of the Financial ServicesAuthority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 /Pojk.03/2020 concerning NationalEconomic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy for the Impact of the Spread of Corona VirusDisease2019; and Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of2020 concerning Refocussing of Activities, Reallocation of Budgets, and Procurement ofGoods and Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019(Covid-19). Keyword : Policy, Handling, Covid-19

scholarly journals PEMBEBANAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PERDATA KEPADA KEPALA DAERAH AKIBAT WANPRESTASI OLEH KEPALA DINAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Bachtiar Bachtiar ◽  
Tono Sumarna
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Civil Liability ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
State Administration

ABSTRAKWanprestasi dalam perjanjian konstruksi kerap ditemui dalam praktik, baik yang dilakukan oleh pemberi pekerjaan, maupun pihak pelaksana pekerjaan. Konsekuensinya, pihak yang melakukan wanprestasi dibebankan memulihkan kerugian yang timbul dari pelaksanaan perjanjian. Hal demikian tercermin dalam Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TGR, di mana Kepala Dinas Kesehatan Kota Tangerang Selatan selaku pihak pemberi pekerjaan proyek terbukti melakukan wanprestasi. Menarik untuk dicermati, majelis hakim dalam putusannya justru membebankan Walikota Tangerang Selatan untuk bertanggung jawab secara keperdataan. Isu hukum yang hendak dijawab dalam tulisan ini, terkait apakah penafsiran hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TNG tentang pembebanan tanggung jawab perdata kepada kepala daerah akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan oleh kepala dinas telah sesuai dengan ajaran hukum administrasi negara, dan ajaran hukum perdata. Untuk menjawab isu hukum tersebut, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan bersandar pada data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa majelis hakim telah keliru dalam menafsirkan konsep pertanggungjawaban kepala daerah. Menurut ajaran hukum administrasi negara, walikota selaku kepala daerah tidak dapat dimintai tanggung jawab secara perdata akibat wanprestasi yang dilakukan kepala dinas. Demikian pula dari perspektif Pasal 1340 KUHPerdata, walikota bukanlah merupakan pihak dalam pelaksanaan perjanjian yang dibuat oleh kepala dinas, sehingga tidak dapat dibebani tanggung jawab secara keperdataan.Kata kunci: tanggung jawab perdata, kepala daerah, wanprestasi. ABSTRACT Breach of contract in construction agreements is often found in practice, whether carried out by the employer, or the implementing party. As a consequence, the defaulting party is charged to recover losses arising from the implementation of the agreement. This was reflected in Court Decision Number 72/PDT.G/2014/ PN.TGR, which is the Head of South Tangerang City Health Office, as the project employer, has been proven in breach of contract. It is interesting to note that the panel of judges in its decision actually charged the Mayor of South Tangerang with a contractual liability. The legal issue in this paper is whether the interpretation of judges in Court Decision Number 72/PDT.G/2014/ PN.TNG concerning the imposition of civil liability to the regional head due to default committed by the head  of office is in accordance with the teachings of the law of state administration and civil law. To answer these issues, the author uses normative legal research methods based on secondary data obtained through literature studies. The results of the analysis show that the panel of judges has erred in interpreting the concept of regional head accountability. According to the teachings of the state administration law, the mayor as the head of the region cannot be privately liable for the default committed by the head of office. Likewise, from the perspective of Article 1340 of the Civil Code, the mayor is not a party to the implementation of the agreement made by the head of office, therefore civil liability cannot be burdened to him. Keywords: civil liability, regional head, default.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document