scholarly journals The Application of the Accelerated Learning Cycle, Brain-based Learning Model, and Direct Instruction Model toward Mathematical Reasoning in Terms of Mathematical Communication

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Ramadoni Ramadoni
Keyword(s):  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Accelerated Learning ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Brain Based Learning

The students' mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication abilities are influenced by several factors such as the use of learning models used by teachers in learning. The use of appropriate learning models can increase students' mathematical communication abilities and reasoning. This study aims to determine the effect of the Accelerated Learning Cycle, Brain-based learning model and Direct Instruction learning models on students' mathematical reasoning abilities seen from their communication abilities. This is a quasi-experimental research. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance with unequal cells. This study concludes that, first, Accelerated Learning Cycle provides better mathematical reasoning abilities than the Brain-based learning model and the Direct Instruction learning model and Brain-based learning model provide better mathematical reasoning abilities than the Direct Instruction learning model. Second, students who have high mathematical communication abilities have better mathematical reasoning than students with moderate or low mathematical communication abilities, students who have medium communication abilities have better mathematical reasoning than students with low mathematical communication abilities 

KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Pair Share terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VII

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-352
Author(s):  
Asurya Octaviyunas ◽  
Arta Ekayanti
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Experimental Study ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Mathematics Ability ◽  
Quasi Experimental

AbstrakPenelitian ini didasari atas permasalahan pentingnya kemampuan penalaran matematis dan pencapaiannya yang masih rendah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran Giving Question Getting Answer dan Think Pair Share terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa, dan efektifitasnya dalam meningkatkan kemampuan tersebut. Populasi Penelitian eksperimen semu ini mencakup seluruh siswa kelas VII SMPN 1 Balong. Kelas VIIA diberi pembelajaran dengan model TPS sedangkan kelas VIIB dengan model GQGA. Instrumen pengumpulan data berbentuk tes, meliputi soal pretest dan posttest. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran GQGA berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran siswa kelas VIIB dengan peningkatan yang terjadi dari nilai pretest ke posttest. Begitu juga dengan model pembelajaran TPS berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa kelas VIIA dengan peningkatan nilai pretest ke posttest. Model pembelajaran GQGA tidak lebih efektif daripada model pembelajaran TPS dalam meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran matematika siswa. The Effect of Learning Model Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share Toward Reasoning Mathematics Ability Student’s Grade VII AbstractThis research is based on the problem of the importance of mathematical reasoning abilities and their low achievement. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Giving Question Getting Answer and Think Pair Share learning models on students' mathematical reasoning abilities and their effectiveness in enhancing these abilities. Population This quasi-experimental study included all seventh-grade students of Balong 1 Junior High School. The VIIA class is given learning with the TPS model while the VIIB class is with the GQGA model. The instruments of data collection are in the form of tests, including the questions of the pretest and posttest. The results showed that the GQGA learning model had an effect on the reasoning ability of students in class VIIB with an increase that occurred from the pretest to the posttest. Likewise, the TPS learning model influences the mathematical reasoning abilities of VIIA students with an increase in the value of the pretest to posttest. The GQGA learning model is no more effective than the TPS learning model in improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals PERBEDAAN SIKAP ILMIAH SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRY TRAINING DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DIRECT INSTRUCTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-188
Author(s):  
Dyan Wulan Sari Hs ◽  
Agus Kistian
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Scientific Attitude ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Alternative Choice ◽  
Scientific Attitudes

This study aims to analyze the differences in scientific attitudes of students using inquiry training learning models with direct instruction learning models. This research is a quasi-experimental study. In this study there are two classes that are used as an experimental class and a control class, the experimental class is a class that is treated with learning with inquiry training models, while the control class is a class using the direct instruction learning model. The instrument used consisted of a questionnaire to measure students' scientific attitudes in the posttest, as well as an observation sheet. The results of this study indicate that the average value of the scientific attitude of learning in the experimental class is 75.01 with a standard deviation of 7.373, while in the control class is 71.60 with a standard deviation of 7.935. The results of this research suggest that inquiry training learning model is a solution and an alternative choice for teachers in improving students' scientific attitudes. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan sikap ilmiah siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran inquiry training dengan model pembelajaran direct instruction. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu (quasi experiment). Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua kelas yang digunakan sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol, kelas eksperimen merupakan kelas yang diberi perlakuan pembelajaran dengan model inquiry training, sedangkan kelas kontrol adalah kelas dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran direct instruction. Instrumen yang digunakan terdiri dari berupa angket untuk mengukur sikap ilmiah siswa dalam posttest, serta lembar observasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata nilai sikap ilmiah belajar pada kelas eksperimen sebesar 75,01 dengan simpangan baku sebesar 7,373, sedangkan pada kelas kontrol sebesar 71,60 dengan simpangan baku sebesar 7,935. Hasil penelitan ini menyarankan bahwa model pembelajaran inquiry training merupakan solusi dan alternatif pilihan guru dalam meningkatkan sikap ilmiah siswa. Kata Kunci: Sikap Ilmiah, Inquiry Training, Direct Instruction

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA PEMBELAJARAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Collection Methods

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>

scholarly journals Implementasi Teams Games Tournaments dan Number Head Together ditinjau dari Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Achievement ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Learning ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this research is to know the influence of Teams Games Tournaments (TGT), Numbered Head Together (NHT) model to the students 'mathematical learning achievement that reviewed students' mathematical reasoning ability. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 3 × 3 factorial design. The researcher uses 2 indicators of learning achievement that is (1) Mathematics achievement test and (2) Test of mathematical communication ability. Analysis of the data used is the analysis of two-way variants with different cells. The results of this research can be summarized as follows. (1) Learning using TGT learning model makes better student's mathematical learning achievement compared to student's mathematical learning achievement with NHT learning model and conventional learning, while NHT model gives a better result of student's mathematical learning achievement from student's learning achievement with conventional learning. (2) Learners with high mathematical reasoning ability have better learning achievement compared with learners with medium ability as well as medium ability better than low ability. (3) Students have high and moderate reasoning abilities with the three learning models giving the same mathematical achievement, whereas students with low mathematical reasoning ability using TGT and NHT models provide the same mathematical achievement, but better than conventional learning models, and conventional learning models and NHT produces the same mathematical achievement. (4) The learning model of TGT and NHT in students with high, medium and low mathematical reasoning ability produce the same mathematical achievement, whereas conventional learning model on students with high and medium mathematical reasoning has the same mathematical achievement but better than students with reasoning low math.

scholarly journals The Implementation of Advance Organizer Model on Mathematical Communication Skills in terms of Learning Motivation

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredi Ganda Putra ◽  
Santi Widyawati ◽  
Ardian Asyhari ◽  
Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Communication Skill ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Advance Organizer ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Advanced Organizer

Students’ low mathematical communication skill is influenced by several factors such as learning models applied by teachers in the classroom and the students’ learning motivation. Advanced organizer Model is appropriate to improve the students’ low ability. This study aims to determine whether: (1) there is an influence of advance organizer model toward the mathematical communication skill; (2) there is an influence of learning motivation toward the students’ mathematical communication skill, and; (3) there is an interaction between learning model and motivation toward mathematical communication skill. This research employs quasi-experimental design and the statistical analysis used is the two-ways variance with unequal cells. The result of this research shows that: (1) there is an influence of advance organizer model toward mathematical communication skill; (2) there is an influence of learning motivation toward students’ mathematical communication skill, and ; (3) there is no interaction between learning model and motivation toward mathematical communication ability.

scholarly journals Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266
Author(s):  
Putri Yulia ◽  
Maya Riskayani ◽  
Selvia Erita
Keyword(s):  
Communication Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
The Difference

This study aims to find out (1) the POGIL learning model effective on mathematical communication skills. (2) conventional learning models are effective against mathematical communication skills. (3) the difference between the POGIL learning model and the conventional model of mathematical communication skills. This research is quasi-experimental research with the research design of The Nonequivalent Posttest Only Control Group Design. The population in this study is all students of grade VII MTS Negeri 02 Kerinci. This study's sample consisted of an experimental class and a control class selected by a random sampling cluster. The research instrument is a test f mathematical communication ability, and the data is analyzed using one-sample t-test statistics and independent t-test samples. This study shows that (1) the POGIL learning model is effective on mathematical communication skills. (2) conventional learning models are ineffective against mathematical communication skills. (3) there is a difference between the POGIL learning model and the conventional model of mathematical communication skills.

scholarly journals MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN PRESPEKTIF GENDER TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA

Numeracy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-78
Author(s):  
Bedilius Gunur ◽  
Apolonia Hendrice Ramda
Keyword(s):  
Random Sampling ◽  
Model Problem ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Test Technique ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Direct Learning

This research aims to; 1) comparing the Problem Based Learning model with the direct learning model from the perspective of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. 2). Look at the interaction of effects between learning models and gender on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. The design of this study used a 2 x 2 factorial design. Sampling was carried out using a simple random sampling technique by first conducting a class equality test. Data was collected using a test technique in the form of a question matter. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. The analysis shows that; 1). The problem-based learning model of learning is better than the direct learning model in terms of students 'mathematical punishment abilities, 2. There was no interaction between the learning models used with the gender on the students' mathematical punishment abilities of students. Both male and female students requested compilation to be taught by applying the problem-based learning model to the direct learning model. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk; 1) membandingkan model Problem Based Learning dengan model pembelajaran langsung dalam perspektif kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. 2). Melihat interaksi efek antara model pembelajaran dan gender terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Rancangan penelitian ini menggunakan desain factorial 2 x 2. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik simpel random sampling dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan uji kesetaraan kelas. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan teknik tes dengan bentuk soal uraian. Data dianalisis menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur. Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa; 1). Model pembelajaran problem based learning lebih baik dibandingkan model pembelajaran lansung dalam hal kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa, 2. Tidak terdapat efek interaksi antara model pembelajaran yang digunakan dengan gender terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa. Baik siswa laki-laki maupun siswa perempuan sama baiknya ketika dibelajarkan dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran problem based learning dari pada model pembelajaran lansung. Kata Kunci:  Problem Based Learning; Gender; Penalaran Matematis

scholarly journals APPLICATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL TYPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) ON MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION ABILITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andi Mulawakkan Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Mathematical Communication ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Communication Ability

This research is a quasi-experimental study which aims to describe the effect of cooperative learning type Think Pair Share (TPS) on students' mathematical communication skills, and to find out the percentage of students' activeness in participating in learning and knowing students' positive responses to learning. The output that will be generated in this study is that students can be more active in the learning process, more active in solving mathematical problems, and can be more confident in expressing their answers in public so that after applying cooperative learning models the Think Pair Share (TPS) mathematical communication skills of students will be better. The research subjects were divided into 2 groups, namely the experimental group taught using the cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) type, and the control group taught using Conventional learning models. Each group is taught with the same frequency of meetings with the same material. The results of the study show that the application of the cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) influences students' mathematical communication skills

scholarly journals Model Pembelajaran Accelerated Learning Cycle Terhadap Self Concept Matematis Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-308
Author(s):  
Rahma Hayati Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Hypothesis Testing ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Accelerated Learning ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Paired Sample ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This research is motivated by the mathematical self-concept of students in learning mathematics is not yet formed with positive self concept and this is influenced by many factors, one of which is the teacher factor. A teacher must be able to create a learning atmosphere that is meaningful, fun, creative and dynamic through the use of appropriate learning models one of which is the learning model Accelerated Learning Cycle is a learning model that creates a learning process environment that is meaningful and promotes the emergence of positive emotions. The formulation of the problem is Is there a significant influence on the application of the accelerated learning cycle learning model to students' mathematical self-concepts? This research is a quantitative study using the Quasi-experimental method, the type of experimental design is the quasi experimental design method with the type of Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design in two different classes which are divided into experimental and control classes. class VII 3 totaling 31 students and VII 11 totaling 34 students. Then the data collection instrument was a questionnaire that was given twice, that is before being treated and after being treated. Analysis of the data used is descriptive and inferential statistical formulas namely normality test and hypothesis testing with paired sample t-test. In accordance with the hypothesis testing using the Paired Sample t-test, the value of t thitung = 37.177 is greater than ttabel = 2.03452 then according to the basis of decision making in the t test, it can be concluded that H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted at the 5% significance level (α = 0.05) this shows that there is a significant effect of the application of the accelerated learning cycle learning model to students' mathematical self-concepts

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document