FAO «GLAVGOSEKSPERTIZA OF RUSSIA» AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
I. A. LYSENKO
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Land Allocation ◽  
Construction Work ◽  
Development Activity ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Project Documentation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Protection ◽  
State Body

Тhe article provides an overview of the typical requirements of the FAO Glavgosexpertiza of Russia when examining the results of engineering surveys and project documentation, in terms of ensuring the safety of cultural heritage sites (hereinafter — the CHS). The FAO Glavgosexpertiza of Russia requires: 1) provide information on the absence (or presence) of restrictions on development activities (CHS, located in the registry of the Russian Federation , identified CHS, objects with signs of CHS, protective and guard zones of the CHS) in the territory of conducting development activities; 2) provide information on the boundaries of the territory for which information on the absence of restrictions on development activity is provided; 3) in the case of restrictions on development activity related to the availability of the CHS — to provide the boundaries of protective and guarding zones of CHS within which development activities agreed by the relevant state body of the CHS; 4) provide information on the boundaries of protective and guarding zones of the CHS, within which the relevant state body of the CHS is allowed to carry out development activities, subject to a number of conditions specified in the project documentation for the preservation of the CHS. Typical problems encountered by survey organizations are also described, trying to satisfy the requirements of the FAO Glavgosexpertiza of Russia: 1) the need to obtain information about the CHS not only from the regional state authorities exercising state protection of the CHS, but also from the federal and sometimes municipal authorities; 2) discovering of the СHS and objects with signs of the CHS, after the state historical and cultural expertise has established their absence; 3) the need and ways to ensure the safety of the CHS in the conduct of development activities that do not involve earthwork and even construction work; 4) lack of understanding in what boundaries of the territory it is necessary to establish the presence (or absence) of HS; 5) the need to correct the boundaries of land allocation after the discovering of HS.

scholarly journals PERSPECTIVE LINES FOR EXPLOITATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES LOCATED WITHIN THE FRAMES OF PROTECTED ZONES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Yuri Putrik ◽  
◽  
Andrei Solovyov,
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Cultural Development ◽  
Paper Briefly ◽  
Natural Landscape ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Russian State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Skilled Workforce ◽  
State Protection

The paper briefly outlines legal framework of activities run by the modern Russian state for physical safekeeping cultural heritage sites, one of key form of which is making zones of protected natural landscape. The authors trace a graduately process of mainstreaming issues concerning preservation historical and cultural heritage sites and integration of these constructions into a structure of economic, social and cultural development of regions of the country. Researchers analyze a set of current problems in sphere of preservation and state protection of cultural heritage sites (such as lack of monetary funds and skilled workforce for repair and restoration, fulfilling research tasks, etc. Also, the article reviews ongoing programs for preservation cultural heritage sites located in the Russian capital, Moscow.

scholarly journals Military Monuments as Objects of Cultural Heritage: Features of State Protection (On the Example of Krasnodar Krai)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
А.В. Гончаров ◽  
А.В. Крюков
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
National Standard ◽  
Krasnodar Krai ◽  
Military Equipment ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Cultural Heritage Objects ◽  
State Protection

Цель статьи – определить правовой статус и особенности государственной охраны объектов культурного наследия, созданных для увековечения событий военной истории, а также принадлежащих к произведениям монументального искусства. Исследование выполнено на материалах ведомственного архива управления государственной охраны объектов культурного наследия Краснодарского края, использованы национальные стандарты Российской Федерации, акты федерального и регионального законодательства. Изучены проблемы, связанные с правоприменительной практикой в отношении братских могил воинов и отдельных памятников, содержащих в своем составе военную технику, тиражированные монументы и обелиски из листового железа. Определено, что в каждом конкретном случае юридический статус и особенности государственной охраны рассмотренных монументов могут быть установлены с опорой на нормативно-техническую документацию (национальный стандарт), в большинстве случаев содержащую достаточно точные определения этих объектов. The aim of the study is to determine the status and peculiarities of the state protection of cultural heritage objects, which were created in order to perpetuate military history and are works of monumental art, within the framework of the current Russian legislation. The materials used in the article mainly relate to the regulatory framework for the protection of monuments in Krasnodar Krai. The study is based on documents from the departmental archive of the regional Office of State Protection of Cultural Heritage Objects of Krasnodar Krai, on national standards of the Russian Federation, and on acts of federal and regional legislation. The study uses historical legal, formal legal, and comparative legal methods, as well as methods of interpretation of law and logical methods. The authors examine the novelties of the Russian legislation affecting the establishment of protective zones around the monuments of architecture and urban construction and note that the acts of Krasnodar Krai also prescribe the arrangement of such zones for monuments containing burials and monuments of monumental art. The authors formulate questions related to the law enforcement practice in relation to the mass graves of soldiers and to individual monuments containing military equipment, replicated monuments, and obelisks made of sheet iron. The authors analyze the national standard of the Russian Federation, “Cultural Heritage Preservation. Terms and Definitions”, and give examples of checks for compliance with the terms in the standard at individual objects of cultural heritage. The analysis of the status of monuments containing military equipment is based on methodological recommendations published in the 1980s. They prescribed state protection for monuments made at a high artistic level from durable materials, but in practice these requirements were rarely met. The authors conclude that, along with samples of military equipment, works of architecture or sculpture created in honor of specific historical events, including guns or transport-combat vehicles installed on pedestals, are subject to state protection. It is the presence of an architectural base that allows classifying such objects with the term “monument”. In each specific case, the legal status and features of the state protection of the monuments considered in the article can be established based on the regulatory and technical documents (national standard) that contain sufficiently accurate definitions of these objects.

scholarly journals CURRENT PROBLEMS OF USING CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES IN HISTORICAL CITIES FOR TOURIST PURPOSES (EXPERIENCE OF THE CITY OF KALININGRAD)

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Анна МИТРОФАНОВА ◽  
Anna MITROFANOVA ◽  
Юрий ФИЛИППОВ ◽  
Yuriy Filippov
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Regional Tourism ◽  
Tourism Product ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Programs ◽  
The City

The article presents an overview of the theoretical and practical approaches of domestic and foreign authors to the using historical and cultural heritage sites for tourist purposes for the development of regional tourism. Most scientists define cultural heritage sites as one of the most important conditions for the development of cultural and educational tourism. Further development of this territory is provided by strategic planning, state policy, the creation of a regulatory and legal framework, the development of specialized state programs, attraction of investments, creation of a specialized infrastructure, and implementation of a competent marketing policy. The article also presents the limiting factors of the using cultural heritage sites in the Russian Federation on the example of Kaliningrad region. Within the study the authors examine institutional capacities and state instruments for the restoration of cultural heritage objects with the aim of including in a regional tourism product. The authors develop authorial methodology of systematizing cultural heritage sites used for tourist purposes. The criterion for ranking cultural heritage sites is the degree of their preservation, accessibility and functional purpose. This methodology has been tested on cultural heritage sites in the city of Kaliningrad functionally related to fortifications. But it can be used in scientific research and in practice for ranking and other categories of cultural heritage sites of the regions of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals Problems and prospects for the conservation and rational use of cultural heritage sites of the local (municipal) significance

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-37
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Ivanovich Lebedev ◽  
Tamara Anatolevna Pushkareva ◽  
Svetlana Yur'evna Samokhodova
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Practical Experience ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Rational Use ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic

The object of this research is the immovable cultural heritage. The subject of this research is the activity of the local self-government for the conservation, use, and popularization of cultural heritage sites owned by the municipalities, located in their territories, as well as state protection of cultural heritage sites of local (municipal) significance. Such authority is set in by the Federal Law “On Cultural Heritage Sites (Historical and Cultural Monuments) of the Peoples of the Russian Federation” and the Federal Law No.131-FZ “On General Principles of the Organization of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation). Leaning on the experience of the colleagues and analysis of the activity of Ufa City Municipal District Administration  of the Republic of Bashkortostan, positive and negative results obtained in the course of exercising the authority granted by the legislation in this sphere, the author acknowledges the need for a more integrated approach towards conservation of immovable cultural heritage of the local (municipal) significance; it includes the stage of its identification, and registration (with the municipal authorities), as well as organization of their rational use, such as leasing, privatization, etc. The article provides a number of recommendations, which are based on the practical experience and comprehension of theoretical material.

«PRESERVATION» AND «ENSURING PRESERVATION» IN THE DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENT AND GREENING OF CENTERS OF HISTORICAL CITIES

2019 ◽  
pp. 54-70
Author(s):  
Elena Belyaeva
Keyword(s):  
Urban Planning ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Natural Environment ◽  
Public Spaces ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Heritage Sites ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Historic Cities

The urgency of the problem of comprehensive improvement and greening of the centers of historic cities has increased with the «May» decrees of the President of the Russian Federation V. V. Putin in 2018. Howev-er, the scientific foundations, methodology and design methodology of improvement does not take into ac-count the peculiarities of historical cities, the need to preserve architectural monuments, landscape and gar-den-garden art, valuable urban planning and natural environment. Evaluation of projects implemented in 2010-2018, own design experience in the historical territories of Moscow confirmed that many of the pro-ject’s shortcomings are due to the lack of special regulatory and methodological documents for design. The current GOST regulates the composition and content of works for the preservation and facilitation of the modern use of cultural heritage sites that are works of landscape and landscape art. For ordinary ob-jects of improvement in the centers of historical cities located in protective and protective zones, in the united protective zones, a design technique is necessary taking into account the status and features of such territo-ries according to the current legislation. According to the experience of designing in Moscow, most of the projects of comprehensive landscaping are areas that do not have the status of cultural heritage sites, and ordinary public spaces, landscaped and near-house areas of 0.5–2.5 hectares, located within the boundaries of protected, protected areas, including the united security zone of the historical part of Moscow established within the boundaries of the Kamer-Kollezhsky Val. Often, small parks, squares, boulevards in various functional areas, small public spaces ad-jacent to subway exits are being developed. For a comprehensive improvement and greening of the city center of historic cities, a systematic ap-proach is important – not only the preservation of cultural heritage sites, valuable urban planning, land-scape and natural environment based on the status and mode of use of territories established in accordance with Federal Law No. 73-FZ «Heritage (historical and cultural monuments) of the peoples of the Russian Federation». Within the boundaries of cultural heritage sites, there should be a «conservation» mode, in pro-tected areas and in protected zones, a «security preservation» regime of cultural heritage sites. The prospects for the use of integrated improvement and landscaping as a special type of urban plan-ning activity and means providing a socially and environmentally oriented solution of the issues of regenera-tion of the centers of historic cities are considered.

Preservation of Book Cultural Heritage: Sub-program “Book Monuments of the Russian Federation”, 2000—2010

2010 ◽  
pp. 23-25
Author(s):  
Alexander Yu. Samarin
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Scientific Conference ◽  
Russian State ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State Library

On the International scientific conference The Rumyantsev Readings, taken place in the Russian state library on April, 20-22th, 2010.

ON THE NEED TO COLLECT, PRESERVE AND STUDY DISAPPEARED NAMES OF SETTLEMENTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 187-192
Author(s):  
S.A. Popov
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Historical Memory ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Local History ◽  
The Past ◽  
Cultural Systems ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
The Disappeared

The article deals with the problem of collecting, preserving and researching the disappeared names of localities in the subjects of the Russian Federation, which for centuries have become an integral part of the historical and cultural heritage of the peoples of our country. The author believes that only a comprehensive analysis of the past oikonyms in nominational, lexical-semantic, historical-cultural, historical-ethnographic, local history aspects will restore the linguistic and cultural systems of different time periods in different microareals of the Russian Federation. The author comes to the conclusion that in order to preserve the historical memory of the disappeared names of geographical objects, local researchers need the support of regional state authorities and local self-government.

Law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on tax disputes

2021 ◽  
pp. 550-563
Author(s):  
Alexandr V. Izmalkov ◽  
Alexander A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Pavel A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Ella Y. Kuzmenko
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Effect Relationship ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Law ◽  
Qualitative Characteristics ◽  
State Body

We analyze the law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on taxes and fees, since the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is a rather controversial regulatory legal act. Tax disputes arise both at the initiative of tax authorities and at the initiative of taxpayers. Purpose: to determine the main directions of law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes. We use general scientific and specially legal methods as research methods. The focus is on the method of analysis. In the course of the research, we analyze the con-sideration of cases by judicial authorities on tax disputes, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics. We conclude that the emergence of disagree-ments between taxpayers and the state body when resolving the issue of the legality of their actions (inaction), as well as the legality of a non-normative legal act is the main reason for the formation of law enforcement practice in tax disputes. During the passage of all stages of the application of the law, it is also necessary to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the actions of the taxpayer and the resulting consequences. The main points of this process go through several stages. We define the main directions of the law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes.

ON THE SYSTEM OF SOURCES REGULATING PROPERTY RELATIONS RELATED TO CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS

2020 ◽  
pp. 126-130
Author(s):  
V. V. Kudryashova
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Cultural Heritage Objects

In the article the author examines the possibility of applying other legal acts and normative legal acts of Federal ministries to the regulation of property relations related to cultural heritage objects. A proposal to amend the industry legislation in order to bring it into line with the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is formulated

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document