scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN DAN WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 1088
Author(s):  
Nanang Sri Darmadi

Fundamental changes in the 1945 is the amendment of Article 1 paragraph (2) as follows: "Sovereignty belongs to the people and carried out according to the Constitution". Change the 1945 Constitution has given rise to the Constitutional Court. By the Constitutional Court, the constitution guaranteed as the supreme law that can be enforced as it should. The Constitutional Court in its development, it is feared will be the agency that has authority super body.Particularly in resolving the matter related to its authority, the Constitutional Court can unilaterally interpret the Constitution without being questioned, other than that produced the Constitutional Court ruling is final and binding, so that when there is one party who feels aggrieved by the decision of the Constitutional Court cannot make the effort for other law.From the approach used in this study is normative juridical, because the study was conducted by examining library materials or secondary data relating to the status and authority of the Constitutional Court in constitutional legal system of Indonesia. Specifications of this research is descriptive analysis, which is expected to give a detailed overview, systematic, and comprehensive on all matters relating to the object to be examined. The data used in this study is secondary data, it means the data obtained from library materials collected through the study of literature and documentary studies, which are then analyzed qualitatively. The conclusion of this study is that the formation of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia is inseparable from the development of judicial review occurring in several countries in the world, especially during the implementation of judicial review which was pioneered by John Marshall in Marbury versus Madison case.Thinking about the importance of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia has emerged during the discussion of the draft Constitution in BPUPKI, then the idea of judicial review of the need to re-emerge during the discussion draft Judicial Power Act (Act No. 14 of 1970). At the time of the discussion of the 1945 changes in the era reformation, the opinion of the importance of the Constitutional Court appeared. Ultimately, the Third Amendment to the 1945 to be of the Constitutional Court, which serves as the guardian of the Constitution and constitutional interpretation.

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Susanto

Doktrin Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) yang dahulu dipercaya hanya sebagai negative legislature telah bergeser menjadi positive legislature. Menjadi pertanyaan, apakah doktrin MK sebagai negative legislature maupun positive legislature, dapat pula dimaknai sebagai negative budgeter dan positive budgeter dalam pengujian Undang-Undang Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara (UU APBN). Berdasarkan hasil kajian konseptual dan pendalaman terhadap beberapa putusan MK dalam pengujian UU APBN, secara nyata dan dalam keadaan tertentu, doktrin MK sebagai negative legislature dapat dimaknai sebagai negative budgeter dalam bentuk pernyataan mata anggaran tertentu dalam UU APBN bertentangan dengan UUD 1945. Bahkan dapat pula dimaknai sebagai positive budgeter karena MK juga mengharuskan pemerintah dan DPR untuk menambahkan mata anggaran tertentu dalam UU APBN. Hal tersebut tidak lain sebagai bentuk diakuinya supremasi konstitusi, sehingga MK yang berperan sebagai the guardian constitution harus menjaganya. Apalagi dalam UUD 1945 terdapat pasal yang spesifik menyebut batas minimal anggaran pendidikan 20% dan pasal-pasal lain yang mengharuskan APBN harus dipergunakan untuk sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat.The doctrine of the Constitutional Court which was previously believed to be only as a negative legislature has shifted into positive legislature. The question, is the doctrine of the Constitutional Court as a negative legislature and a positive legislature can also be interpreted as a negative budgeter and a positive budgeter in the judicial review of the State Budget Law. Based on the result of conceptual study and deepening of several decisions of the Constitutional Court in the judicial review of the State Budget Law, in real and in certain circumtances, the doctrine of the Constitutional Court as a negative lagislature can be also interpreted as a negative budgetary in the form of specific budget items in the State Budget Law contradictory to the 1945 Constitution. Also as a positive budgeter because the Constitutional Court requires the executive and the legislative to add a specific budget in the State Budget Law. It is a form of recognition of constitutional supremacy, so that the Constitutional Court can role as the guardian constitution. Moreover in the 1945 Constitution there is a specific article that mentions the minimum limit of 20% education budget and other articles that require the state budget should be used for the greatest prosperity of the people.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 99
Author(s):  
Anies Prima Dewi ◽  
Idea Islami Parasatya

This study discusses the implementation of elections as an indicator in the democratic system because it is the people who determine the direction of the policy of state power through their political suffrage. The people as the highest authority in their voting rights are very important in the implementation of elections. After the issuance of the Constitutional Court ruling Number 14/PUU-XI/2013 concerning the implementation of simultaneous general elections in 2019, what became much of a conversation and debate was about the voters' rights for persons with mental disability. This study uses the normative legal research method. Using secondary data sources and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study show that the KPU Commissioner stated that persons with mental disabilities can exercise their right to vote by bringing a letter of recommendation or information from a doctor to be able to exercise their right to vote at the polling station (TPS). This is confirmed after the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 135/PUU-XIII/2015 which states Article 57 paragraph (3) of the Election Law does not have binding legal force as long as the phrase 'mentally disturbed or memory' is not interpreted as' experiencing mental disorders and/or permanent memory impairment which according to mental health professionals has eliminated a person's ability to vote in elections'. This reinforces and becomes a normative basis that persons with mental disabilities have the right to vote in the simultaneous general elections in 2019.Keywords: general elections; people with mental disabilities; voting rights.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini mebahas tentang pelaksanaan pemilihan umum menjadi indikator dalam sistem demokrasi karena rakyatlah yang menjadi penentu arah kebijakan kekuasaan negara melalui hak pilihan politiknya. Rakyat sebagai pemegang kekuasaan tertinggi dalam hak pilihnya menjadi sangat penting dalam pelaksaan pemilihan umum. Pasca keluarnya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 mengenai pelaksanaan pemilihan umum serentak tahun 2019, yang menjadi banyak perbincangan dan perdebatan adalah mengenai hak pemilih bagi penyandang diisabilitas mental. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Penelitian Hukum normatif. Menggunakan sumber data sekunder serta analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Adapun hasil penelitian ini terlihat bahwa Komisioner KPU menyatakan penyandang disabilitas mental dapat menggunakan hak pilihnya dengan membawa surat rekomendasi atau keterangan dari dokter untuk bisa menggunakan hak pilihnya di tempat pemungutan suara (TPS). Hal ini dipertegas pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 135/PUU-XIII/2015 yang menyatakan Pasal 57 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Pemilu tidak mempunyai kekuatan hukum mengikat sepanjang frasa ‘terganggu jiwa atau ingatannya’ tidak dimaknai sebagai ‘mengalami gangguan jiwa dan/atau gangguaningatan permanen yang menurut professional bidang kesehatan jiwa telah menghilangkan kemampuan seseorang untuk memilih dalam pemilihanumum’. Hal ini memperkuat dan menjadi dasar normatif bahwa penyandang disabilitas mental memiliki hak pilih dalam pelaksanaan pemilihan umum serentak tahun 2019.Kata kunci: hak memilih; pemilihan umum; penyandang disabilitas mental.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Abishkar Khatiwada ◽  
Aadesh Subedi ◽  
Rashmi Dangol

AbstractThe study mainly focuses on the status of production and marketing of large cardamom in Nepal and also compares these dimensions in the context of different countries. For the study mainly secondary data were collected from research articles, reports, publications and news articles. Large cardamom is the third most expensive crop and one of the major cash crops of Nepal. Nepal is the largest producer of large cardamom in the world followed by India and Bhutan. Taplejung, Sankhuwasabha, Panchthar and Illam are the four major districts that contribute more than 80% of the national production. Cardamom produced in Nepal is graded according to tail cutting after drying and packed in jute bag or plastic to export it to foreign countries. Nepal exports almost 90 percentage of its total cardamom production to India. In the global scenario, Guatemala is the largest exporter of cardamom (small and large combined) followed by India, Nepal, Singapore and Indonesia respectievly. It was found that the production of cardamom is declining in Nepal due to price fluctuation and viral diseases such as Chirkey, Furkey. Problem such as absence of unique HS code for large cardamom and ‘duplicate large cardamom’ are also seen in the market.


ICL Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-397
Author(s):  
Jorge Farinacci-Fernós

Abstract Constitutional courts are portrayed as counter-majoritarian institutions empowered to strike down ordinary legislation that is inconsistent with the constitution. This power is to be used sparingly, since it is seen as being in tension with basic democratic principles. Judicial review in these circumstances should be limited to minority rights protection and the enforcement of structural limitations that prevent majority rule excess. But this is only half the story. Depending on the democratic credentials of the particular constitution, courts that strike down legislation as inconsistent with the constitution can also be said to be engaging in majoritarian action. The characterization of constitutional courts as counter-majoritarian institutions is premised on: (1) the status of ordinary legislation as the quintessential majoritarian instrument, (2) the un-elected nature of judges, (3) a narrow understanding of the concept of the ‘negative legislator’, and (4) the democratic deficit that results when judges impose their views over those enacted by parliament. This Article challenges these assumptions. First, this Article demonstrates that ordinary statutes adopted by elected legislatures are not necessarily the superior articulation of popular will. On the contrary, the democratization of modern constitution-making allows the constitution to acquire ultimate majoritarian status. Because of popular skepticism about the ability of ordinary politics to adequately reflect society’s views on important substantive policy matters, the People have repeatedly decided to bypass the legislative process and directly entrench these policy views in the constitutional text. As a result, it is the constitution that embodies popular will. Second, this Article dissects the so-called counter-majoritarian difficulty, in order to distinguish between illegitimate counter-majoritarian review and legitimate counter-majoritarian review. The former occurs when the constitutional court substitutes the legislature’s policy views with its own, thus generating an impermissible democratic deficit. The latter occurs when the constitutional court invalidates ordinary legislation that violates minority rights or exceeds the structural limits imposed by the constitution. In both instances, counter-majoritarian intervention is warranted, precisely, to make sure that democratic self-government through ordinary politics can be adequately carried out. Third, this Article suggest the existence of a third class of judicial review: legitimate majoritarian review. This is when a constitutional court invalidates ordinary statutes because the legislature attempted to substitute the will of the constitutional drafters with their own. In other words, in instances when the legislative body carries out an anti-majoritarian act by ignoring the policy choices made by the People and entrenched in the constitutional text. When a court strikes down legislation of this sort, it is actually re-establishing majoritarian self-rule by making sure that the constitution’s policy commands are respected. In that sense, the court is not exercising independent judgment. Instead, it becomes the enforcement instrument of the majoritarian constitution to avoid legislative usurpation. This makes the un-elected nature of courts an almost irrelevant factor. Finally, this Article explores how the majoritarian potential of judicial review on constitutional matters interacts with the ‘negative legislator’ role of constitutional courts. In particular, how the ‘negative legislator’ should not be characterized, necessarily, as a limited one.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Dede Agus Agus

Employers may be protected from the obligation to pay wages and any payments arising from employment if it has expired two year since the inception of the right. This is unfair to workers (harm), then judicial review an article 96 of Law No.13 of 2003 on Manpower to Constitution by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 100 / PUU-X / 2012. Therefore, this paper is aimed to discuss  the protection of wage payment of workers post-judicial review. This research method, normative juridical based on the secondary data and the statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach and qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that the Post-Decision of the Constitutional Court payment of wages of workers has been protected, this is  no expiry in the payment of wages and other benefits. The Constitutional Court declares that Article 96 of Law No.13 of 2003 is contradictory to the  Constitution, and has no binding force. The Constitutional Court's verdict provides legal certainty that wages and any payments arising from employment relationships may at any time be prosecuted if they have not been fulfilled, but on the other hand it creates legal uncertainty, since the expiration institution is created by law in the context of legal certainty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Supriadi Supriadi ◽  
Abrian Amirullah ◽  
Nurani Hartatik

I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport, as it is known, is taken from the name of national hero I Gusti Ngurah Rai who is a very influential figure for the people of Bali Island. I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport currently has 11 taxiways which are divided into 9 taxiways on the North runway / North (2 parallel taxiways, 2 rapid exit taxiways, and 5 exit taxiways) and 2 taxiways on the South runway. This writing uses primary and secondary data which will be analyzed by descriptive analysis method. Descriptive analysis method is research that is intended to collect information about the status - the status of a symptom that exists, namely the state of symptoms according to what they were when the study was conducted. The author also uses the pavement design application in the form of FAARFIELD and COMFAA to support the research method used. Therefore, to be able to receive loads from aircraft passing through taxiways, it is necessary to calculate the planing of the pavement on the taxiways that will be built so that they are able to withstand the loads that will be received for flight safety and fulfill the age of the plan itself. The new taxiway parallel to the south of the runway needs to be built to support the operational activities of the annual IMF (International Monetary Fund) activities and taxiway overlaying in all North taxiways. In addition, it is expected to reduce the number of aircraft carrying out cross runways from the southern apron to the northern apron or to the northern taxiway parallel.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
Nyoman Mas Aryani

Law Number 1 Year 1974  on Marriage, embraces the principle of  separate property where except husband and wife determine otherwise by making a marriage agreement before or at the time of marriage is held. In the middle of 2015, Ike Farida, a lawyer who performs a mixed marriage, filed a petition for judicial review to the Constitutional Court because he felt his  constitutional  rights were injured  by the  enactment  of  Law Number  5  of  1960  on Basic Agrarian Law, namely Article 21 paragraph (1), (3), Article 36 paragraph (1); and Article 29 paragraph (1), (3), (4) and Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law. The Constitutional Court through Decision Number 69 / PUU-XIII / 2015, in particular on the verdict stating: “At the time or before the marriage takes place or during the marriage bond, the two parties to mutual consent may  submit a written agreement  authorized by the marriage registry officer, after which the contents also apply to the third party caught “. This poses a problem where it will be difficult to know the existence of a third party related to the making of a marriage agreement. The conclusion is that the Constitutional Court Decision does not regulate the legal consequences of marriage agreement after marriage to the status of property but implicitly regulate the legal effect on a third party


Author(s):  
Anggit Rahmat Fauzi ◽  
Ansari Ansari

The utilization of e-commerce media in the trading world brings impact to the international community in general and the people of Indonesia in particular. For Indonesian people, This is related to a very important legal problem. The importance of law in the field of e-commerce is mainly in protecting the parties who transact through the Internet. The purpose of this study is to know the legal review of the buying and selling agreements through electronic media as well as to know the legal protections for sellers and buyers if one of the parties commits a default. The research uses a normative juridical method of approach and the discussion is done in a descriptive analysis. The source and type of data used are primary data and secondary data. While the data collection techniques using literature studies, and the data obtained will be analyzed qualitatively. The agreement to buy and sell through electronic media is a new phenomenon that has been implemented in various countries and regulated in the Civil state nor law ITE. Legal protection for the parties in the sale and purchase agreements through electronic media is governed by the consumer protection ACT. Any breach must respond to any loss arising from his or her actions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Hasan ◽  
Dedi Budiman Hakim ◽  
Irdika Mansur

This study aims to analyze causes of the low uptake of the budget and formulate a strategy of maximizing the absorption of expenditure on Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Manokwari. Respondents involved are 20 people that consist of: treasury officials and holder output of activity. The data used were secondary data in the form of reports on budget realization (LRA) quarter I, II, III and IV of the fiscal year 2011 to 2015, and the primary data were in the form of interviews with the help of a questionnaire. While the analysis of the data used was descriptive analysis using data tabulation, and the analysis of the three stages strategy of the decision making used IFE and EFE matrix, SWOT matrix and QSPM matrix.The results showed that there are 19 factors causing low of budget absorption until the end of the third quarter, and there were 10 drafts of policy as a strategy for maximizing the absorption of the budget on Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Manokwari.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penyebab rendahnya penyerapan anggaran belanja dan merumuskan strategi maksimalisasi penyerapan anggaran belanja pada Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Manokwari. Responden yang terlibat adalah 20 orang yaitu pejabat perbendaharaan dan pemegang output kegiatan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan realisasi anggaran (LRA) triwulan I, II, III dan IV tahun anggaran 2011 sampai 2015, dan data primer berupa wawancara dengan bantuan kuesioner. Sedangkan analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis deskriptif menggunakan analisis tabulasi, dan analisis analisis strategi tiga tahap pengambilan keputusan menggunakan matriks IFE dan EFE, matriks SWOT dan matriks QSPM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 19 faktor penyebab rendahnya penyerapan anggaran belanja sampai akhir triwulan III, dan terdapat 10 rancangan kebijakan sebagai strategi maksimalisasi penyerapan anggaran belanja di Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Manokwari.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeya Sutha M

UNSTRUCTURED COVID-19, the disease caused by a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a highly contagious disease. On January 30, 2020 the World Health Organization declared the outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. As of July 25, 2020; 15,947,292 laboratory-confirmed and 642,814 deaths have been reported globally. India has reported 1,338,928 confirmed cases and 31,412 deaths till date. This paper presents different aspects of COVID-19, visualization of the spread of infection and presents the ARIMA model for forecasting the status of COVID-19 death cases in the next 50 days in order to take necessary precaution by the Government to save the people.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document