scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning Berbasis Pendekatan Scientific Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Puisi

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Imam Kisnanto ◽  
Muhamad Sholehhudin ◽  
Joko Setiyono

This research aims to determine whether the Quantum Learning model based on the Scientific approach can provide better learning outcomes rather than direct learning model. This research is a quasi experimental research with matching static group comparison design. The research instrument used to obtain data is in the form of documentation and test. The calculation of the hypothesis test the value of tcount > ttable where tcount = 1.83 and ttable = 1.68 at the significant level of 5% with dk=50. The conclusions from the analysis of the hypothesis test is that the Quantum Learning model based on Scientific approach provides better learning outcomes than students who were taught using direct learning models.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37
Author(s):  
Marlifia Berhitu ◽  
Semuel Unwakoly ◽  
Y Manoppo

The purpose of this research is to know thestudent learningoutcomes of grade X SMA KARTIKA XIII-1 AMBON as well as knowing there is a difference whether or not the results of student learning using cooperative type Team Games Tournament(TGT) with type Make a Match as the learning model.This research is the comparison research which the sample consists of two classes, the class was given further study of chemistry at the consept of moles materials, first classexperiment (X-1) using the cooperative type Team Games Tournament(TGT) and in secondclass experiment (X-2) using the cooperative type Make a Match as the learning model. Based on the results of the study gained note that both models of learning that can enhance the learning outcomes of students, it can be seen from the success of the qualifications obtained from both the class when there has same qualification of 75% of students are on completed qualifying, 25% of students are on failed qualifying, with average from X-1 class used Type TGT is 66.125 and X-2 class used Type Make a Match is 57.3125. Hypothesis test data derived from posttest both class indicates the value significance of 0.25 (> 0.05) this a value of H0received and value of H1 rejected so it can be concluded there is no difference in student learning outcomes are either the cooperative type Team Games Tournament (TGT)and type Make a Match as the learning model.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Hayati . ◽  
Retno Dwi Suyanti

The objective in this research: (1) Determine a better learning model to improve learning outcomes physics students among learning model Inquiry Training based multimedia and Inquiry Training learning model. (2) Determine the level of motivation to learn in affects physics student learning outcomes. (3) Knowing the interactions between the model of learning and motivation in influencing student learning outcomes. This research is a quasi experimental. The population in this research was all students in class XI SMA Negeri 1 T.P Sunggal Semester I 2012/2013. The sample of this research was consisted of two classes with a sample of 70 peoples who are determined by purposive sampling, the IPA XI-2 as a class experiment using a model-based multimedia learning Training Inquiry as many as 35 peoples and XI IPA-3 as a control class using learning model Inquiry Training 35 peoples. Hypotheses were analyzed using the GLM at significant level of 0.05 using SPSS 17.0 for Windows. Based on data analysis and hypothesis testing conducted found that: (1) Training Inquiry-based multimedia learning model in improving student learning outcomes rather than learning model physics Inquiry Training. (2) The results of studying physics students who have high motivation to learn better than students who have a low learning motivation. (3) From this research there was an interaction between learning model inquiry-based multimedia training and motivation to study on learning outcomes of students.


Author(s):  
Putri Irma Delianti ◽  
Elfi Tasrif ◽  
Ika Parma Dewi

This research aimed to analyze the difference of learning outcomes by using Student Facilitator and Explaining model and direct learning model on Digital Simulation subject at class X TKJ SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. The problem in this study was the student learning result which were still under KKM on Digital Simulation subjects at SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Type of this research was Quasi Experiment. The sample was taken through Probability Sampling technique. The research samples were class X TKJ A  and class X TKJ B. Class X TKJ A as sample for experiment class using Student Facilitator and Explaining  model and class X TKJ B as sample for control class using direct learning model. Data analyzed based on post-test experiment class and control class, then analyzed for normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. From the experimental class, the research results obtained an average of 82.47, while the control class was averaged of 76.94. Result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 found tcount> ttable that is 1,78> 1,699, because tcount was bigger than ttable, so null hypothesis (H0) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It can be concluded at the real level that this study showed that Student Facilitator and Explainingmodel gave significant effect on students learning results of Digital Simulation at class X TKJ in SMKN 1 Tilatang Kamang. Therefore, the Student Facilitator and Explaining model is better than the direct learning model.Keywords: Student Facilitator and Explaining Model,Direct Learning Model, Learning outcomes, Experiment Class, Control Class.


Author(s):  
Kiki Riska Ayu Kurniawati ◽  
Budiyono Budiyono ◽  
Dewi Retno Sari S

<p><strong>Abstract</strong>: The aims of this research were to find out the different effect of each categories of learning model, students interpersonal intelligence and their interaction towards students mathematics learning achievement on the subject of plane geometry. The research was quasi experimental with 3×3 factorial design. The population was all students of grade VIII State Junior High School in Madiun City on the second semester of 2013/2014 academic years. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample of this research consisted of the students of SMP N 3 Madiun, SMPN 7 Madiun, and SMPN 10 Madiun. The sample consisted of 260 students. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance at the significance level of 0,05. Based on hypothesis test, it can be concluded that: (1) the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model; (2) students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; (3) on the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type, NHT type and direct learning model, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the medium interpersonal intelligence, students with the high interpersonal intelligence had better achievement than students with the low interpersonal intelligence and the students with the medium interpersonal intelligence had the same achievement as students with the low interpersonal intelligence; and (4) on students interpersonal intelligence high, medium and low, the cooperative learning model of <em>Jigsaw</em> type gives a better mathematics achievement than cooperative learning model of NHT type and direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of NHT type gives a better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.</p><p><strong>Keywords</strong>:  <em>Jigsaw</em>, NHT, interpersonal intelligence</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Vina Susanti ◽  
Harun Sitompul ◽  
Hamonangan Tambunan

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) untuk mengetahui hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran mind mapping lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran langsung, (2) untuk mengetahui hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik tinggi lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik rendah, (3) untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi intrinsik terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan  = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; (1) hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran mind mapping lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran langsung dengan  = 6,08 >  = 3,97, (2) hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik tinggi lebih tinggi dari siswa yang memiliki motivasi intrinsik rendah dengan  = 60,34 >  = 3,97, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi intrinsik terhadap hasil belajar keterampilan membaca bahasa Arab, dengan  = 28,92 >  = 3,97.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, motivasi intrinsic, keterampilan membaca bahasa arab Abstract: This study aims (1) to determine the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills students who are taught using mind mapping learning models are higher than students who are taught using direct learning models, (2) to find out the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills students who have higher intrinsic motivation than students who have low intrinsic motivation, (3) to find out the interaction between learning models and intrinsic motivation on the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills. This research is a quasi-experimental research with 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANAVA at a significant level = 0.05. Research findings indicate that; (1) the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills students taught with mind mapping learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with direct learning models with F count = 6.08 > F table = 3.97, (2) learning outcomes of students' Arabic reading skills those who have high intrinsic motivation are higher than students who have low intrinsic motivation with F count = 60.34 > F table = 3.97, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and intrinsic motivation towards the learning outcomes of Arabic reading skills, with F count = 28.92> F table = 3.97. Keywords: learning model, intrinsic motivation, Arabic reading skills


Author(s):  
Desri Adita ◽  
Hanesman Hanesman ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem at this research is laerning outcomes of students at Digital Simulation subject in X TITL SMK N 2 Sawahlunto, which not achieve the baoundary of Minimal Thoroughness Criteria or in Indonesian called KKM. This research purpose in order to know what level of the difference learning outcomes by apply drills and practice learning model and simulation learning model at Digital Simulation subject in X TITL SMK N 2 Sawahlunto school year 2014/2015. This research is an experimental research using quasi experimental method. Interpretation of sampels using non probability sampling technique with purposive sampling, as first experiment class is X TITL 2. This class using drills and practice learning model. Second experiment class is X TITL 1 which use simulation learning model. Datas collection technique from posttests gave every meeting, than this data were analyzed to get normality test, homogenous test and hypothesis test. The result of research in first experimen class get subjection mean 78.79 and second experiment class get subjection mean 70.91. Value of hypothesis test degree of significant α = 0.05 was tcount > ttable (5.3005 > 2.023). It’s mean nil hypothesis (H0) was denied and alternative hypothesis (H1) was received with the difference 8.87 and percentage of different is 12.51%. In conclusion result of analyzed learning outcomes first experiment class and second experiment class, its have significant different of influences between using drills and practice learning model and used simulation learning model. Key Word : learning outcomes, drills and practice learning model, simulation learning model.


Eksponen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Venty Meilasari

This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, GI model or direct learning model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning outcomes, the high, medium or low learning independence students, (3) interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes. This research used the quasi-experimental research method with 2×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the 8 th class of SMP Negeri 6 Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using purposive sampling. The instruments used were learning independence questionnaire and mathematics learning outcomes test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) GI model provided better mathematics outcomes than direct learning model. (2) The high learning independence student had better mathematics learning outcomes than medium and low learning independence students, and the medium had as good as low learning independence students. (3) there was no interaction between learning models and learning independence on mathematics learning outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-141
Author(s):  
Bella Anandya Yovita Oktaviani ◽  
Mawardi Mawardi ◽  
Suhandi Astuti

The purpose of this study is to determine differences in learning outcomes of 4th grade students in Mathematics in SD Gugus Patimura using Problem-based Learning and Discovery Learning model. This is a quasi experimental research. The instrument of data collection was test items, previously tested of its validity and reliability. The result of hypothesis test using ANCOVA test showed the result of significance / probability 0,00 <0,05, meaning H0 was refused and Ha was accepted. It means that Problem-based Learning has significantly higher impact than Discovery Learning model. The conclusion is supported by the average value of the learning outcomes using Problem-based Learning model which was 80.24, while the one using Discovery Learnings model only reached 71,87. Based on the conclusions of this study, it is recommended that the elementary school teachers use the model of learning Problem Based Learning.


Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukkar

ABSTRAK. Media pendidikan sebagai salah satu sarana meningkatkan mutu pendidikan sangat penting dalam proses PBM. Penggunaan media pendidikan dapat memperbaiki PBM siswa yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar yang dicapainya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling. Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization.   ABSTRACT. Educational media as a means of improving the quality of education is very important in the PBM process. The use of educational media can improve students' PBM which in turn can improve the learning outcomes they achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling. Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


Author(s):  
Wonang Saputra ◽  
Thamrin Thamrin ◽  
Almasri Almasri

The problem in this study is the low average learning outcomes of students on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics is under the Minimum Criterion of completeness which has been established SMKN 1 Batipuh is 75. This study aims to determine the effect of application of Team Assisted Individualization model to learning outcomes on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics in Audio Video Techniques department at SMKN 1 Batipuh. The type of this research is experimental research with pre experimental design with intact group comparison design. The sample of research is class X TAV 2A as experiment class using Team Assisted Individualization model and class X TAV 2B as control class using direct learning model. Data is collected  from post-test in the experimental class and control class, then analyzed for homogeneity, normality and hypothesis test. From the experimental class results obtained an average value of 80.71, while the control class gets an average value of 75.79. The result of hypothesis calculation at significant level α = 0,05 got tcount> ttable that is 2,442 > 2,056, because big tcount of ttable, null hypothesis (H0) rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) accepted.itCan be concluded mean at the real level, this research shows that, there is work on of student learning result which signifikan between usage of Team Assisted Individualization type with direct learning model on subjects Applying Digital Engineering Basics of student of Audio Video Technique at SMKN 1 Batipuh. So the Team Assisted Individualization learning model is better than the direct learning model. Keywords: Applying Digital Engineering Basics, Team Assisted Individualization model, direct learning model, pre experimental design, learning outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document