PARADIGMA HAK KEBENDAAN KEPEMILIKAN SARUSUN YANG DIBANGUN PADA LAHAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Martin Roestamy
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Common Property ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
The Law ◽  
Negative Implication ◽  
Construction Law ◽  
The Right

Of the title "The Legal Paradigm of the properties on the strata title ownership built above the land with the Right to Cultivate Ownership" research objectives to    be at said is knowing why the legal construction of the right material from the strata title built on land rights, attached to the Rights of material the building as common property rights and know how reconstruction material rights on the Strata titles  built on building rights or rights of use that reflects justice and legal certainty. With the concept of methodologies theories and research approaches, as well as of the problems of this study concludes that there are a couple of things. First by sticking the land rights of the unit, then Strata titles have a dependency on the bottom right HGB as with all buildings owned and also can weaken the property rights of apartment units as the strongest and most, but became assessors of HGB. This situation raises a negative implication in the community and has created legal uncertainty and considered unfair, weakening the material rights of Strata titles caused dualism applicable law, the law of the land, building law and the law of objects. It affects the mutual intervention and debilitates the material rights as stipulated in the rules of the law of things, namely; droit de suite, droit de preverent, and droit de levering. In construction law, state that debilitates the legal certainty and justice, it can be reconstructed from the perspective of the development of the legal system of the building against the law of the land, or to the development of HGB as of right down with some simulations and restoration of existing government regulations, or reconstruct the principal laws agrarian related lease rights, land rights, and the rights of use by developing existing government regulations become law, so the law on the new ground by adding the rights of others. In a reconstruction of the law of the land, which is more competitive and create legal certainty and fairness.

scholarly journals RIGHTS OWNERSHIP TO CERTIFIED LAND CONFRONTED WITH THE CUSTOMARY LAW IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saim Aksnudin
Keyword(s):  
National Development ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Status ◽  
Need For Support ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Of Land

In the national development the role of land for the fulfillment of various purposes will increase, either as a place to live or for business activities. In relation to that will also increase the need for support in the form of guarantee of legal certainty in the field of land. The result of the research is the conception of the state of Indonesia is a state law, which contains the meaning in the administration of government and the state based on the law, the protection of the law is a universal concept of the rule of law. The legal certainty on land rights as intended by the UUPA encompasses three things, namely the certainty of the object of land rights, certainty on the subject of land rights and certainty about the status of landrights. Legal conception of land title certificate is a proof that issued by authorized legal institution, containing juridical data and physical data which isused as evidence of ownership of land rights in order to provide assurance of legal certainty and certainty of rights to a plot of land owned or possessed by a person or legal entity. With the certificate of rights, it is expected that the juridical can guarantee the legal certainty and the right by the state for the holder of the right to the land. This country's guarantee is granted to the owner or the holder of the certificate may be granted because the land is already registered in the state land administration system.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Notaris dan PPAT dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah dan Jaminan Perlindungan bagi Para Pihak

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
I Komang Edy Susanto ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Equal Treatment ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

Basically, notaries also serve as Land Deed Making Official (hereafter called PPAT) after they carry out a test. Thus, in carrying out their role as PPAT, they are entitled to make deeds of transferring land rights. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the position of the notary and PPAT in transferring land rights and how legal protection for parties who transfer land through sale and purchase. The research method used in this research was a normative legal method. The results of this study indicated that the position of a notary in the transfer of land rights as an official deed maker is mentioned in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2/2014 concerning the Position of Notary, which states that a notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other Prevailing Laws. The position of the PPAT in essence has the task of carrying out land registration by making deeds as evidence and having carried out certain legal actions regarding land rights. Legal protection for parties transferring land through sale and purchase is stated in the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 27 paragraph (1) which states that each person has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, and legal certainty that is just and equal treatment before the law.

scholarly journals Kajian Hukum Agraria terhadap Ketentuan Larangan Pengalian Hak Milik atas Tanah Gereja (Studi Kantor Sinode Gereja Masehi Injili di Halmahera)

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Reli Jevon Laike
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Christian Church ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Evangelical Christian ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
The Church

The provisions of the evangelical Christian Church in Halmahera on the prohibition of transferring property rights on the land mention, any organic or retired employee who is entitled to the submission of land rights which has status of property, shall not divert, adjudicate, or other legal action. While the provisions of the land rights under the National Agrarian Law, having broad authority means that it can divert, adjuct or as long as not contrary to applicable law. This study aims to examine the concept of church arrangement on the prohibition of transferring property rights on land and associated with the concept of national agrarian law. Research is normative legal research. The results of the research were found first, the provisions of the property of land governed by the provisions of the Church in the implementation there are conflicts and fundamental differences with the concepts governed in national agrarian law. The two rights holders of the land who have received the surrender of land from the church do not have a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of the Church governing the prohibition of the transfer of property rights to the land.

scholarly journals JAMINAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM YANG TERKANDUNG DALAM SERTIPIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmat Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
Physical Data ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Subjects

The product of the land registration process is a certificate of title granted to the right holder. The certificate according to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 is in the form of one sheet of documents containing information about the juridical data and physical data required on a parcel of registered land. Although the certificate of land rights is referred to as the strongest evidence but in reality the certificate of land rights has not fully guaranteed legal certainty. This is because the law still opens loopholes for other legal subjects to question it both personally and in groups within the judiciary. In order to ensure legal certainty of a right to land for the right holder, the certificate of land rights must be tested in three aspects: relating to; Legal Certainty of Object, Legal Certainty of Status of Rights and Legal Certainty on Subject.

scholarly journals STATUS HUKUM HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG TERKENA ABRASI

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-107
Author(s):  
Dwi Susiati ◽  
Sri Setiadji
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact

Abrasion is a natural disaster that results in the owner of the right to land losing the right to control, use or take advantage of the land, because the land is lost in part or in whole due to erosion by water. Article 27 of the Law On Agraria determines that property rights over land are destroyed if the land is destroyed. In this study, the author will analyze the legal status of property of land affected by abrasion with the formulation of the problem What is the legal status of property rights on land affected by abrasion according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and how to guarantee the protection of affected land rights abrasion. The results of this study are that the status of land rights affected by abrasion is abolished, both in the provisions of the Law On Agraria and Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration because it is no longer compatible with physical data or juridical data as a strong evidence. The government has an obligation to provide guarantees and protection of rights to land affected by abrasion and those that have been affected by abrasion in part or in whole. On the basis of the state's right to control Article 2 of the Law On Agraria the state has the right to regulate land use, inventory, and maintenance to prevent and reduce the impact of abrasion on its citizens. The government can also provide compensation as contained in Article Number 24 of 2007 concerning Disaster Management which determines that the Government and regional governments are responsible for the implementation of disaster management.Abrasi merupakan bencana alam yang mengakibatkan pemilik hak atas tanah kehilangan hak untuk menguasai, menggunakan, atau mengambil manfaat atas tanah, karena tanah tersebut hilang sebagian atau seluruhnya akibat pengikisan oleh air. Pasal 27 UUPA menentukan hak milik atas tanah hapus, apabila tanahnya musnah. Pada penelitian ini, penulis akan menganalisa tentang status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi dengan rumusan masalah Bagaimana status hukum hak milik atas tanah yang terkena abrasi menurut PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah  dan bagaimana jaminan perlindungan hak-hak tanah yang terdampak abrasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa status hak atas tanah yang terkena abrasi adalah hapus, baik dalam ketentuan UUPA maupun PP No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah karena tidak sesuai lagi dengan data fisik maupun data yuridis sebagai alat bukti yang kuat. Pemerintah mempunyai kewajiban untuk memberikan jaminan dan perlindungan hak-hak atas tanah yang terdampak abrasi maupun yang sudah terkena abrasi baik sebagian maupun seluruh tanahnya. Atas dasar hak menguasai oleh negara Pasal 2 UUPA negara berhak mengatur peruntukan, penggunaan, persediaan,dan pemeliharaan tanah untuk mencegah dan mengurangi dampak abrasi bagi warga negaranya. Pemerintah juga dapat memberikan ganti kerugian sebagaimana yang ada di dalam UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana yang menentukan bahwa Pemerintah dan pemerintah daerah menjadi penanggung jawab dalam penyelenggaraan penang-gulangan bencana.

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN PENINGKATAN HAK GUNA BANGUNAN MENJADI HAK MILIK UNTUK RUMAH TINGGAL DI KANTOR PERTANAHAN KARAWANG DITINJAU DARI KEPUTUSAN MENTERI NEGARA AGRARIA / KEPALA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL NOMOR 6 TAHUN 1998 TENTANG PEMBERIAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-80
Author(s):  
Irma Garwan ◽  
Zarisnov Arafat ◽  
Yola Ardila
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Supplementary Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights

Tanah merupakan faktor yang sangat penting dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Selain sandangdan pangan, manusia juga membutuhkan tanah sebagai tempat tinggal mereka. Untukmemberikan kepastian hukum dan menjamin kepemilikan tanah kepada pemegang hak atastanah, maka mereka harus mempunyai bukti yang disebut sertipikat. Bahwa rumah tinggaldiperlukan masyarakat, maka tanah digunakan sebagai rumah tinggal dari status HakGuna Bangunan menjadi Hak Milik untuk rumah tinggal. Masalah yang dikaji dalampenelitian ini adalah bagaimana pelaksanaan peningkatan Hak Guna Bangunan menjadiHak Milik untuk rumah tinggal di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Karawang? dan apa sajasyarat-syarat yang harus dipenuhi dalam pendaftaran peningkatan Hak Guna Bangunanmenjadi Hak Milik untuk rumah tinggal?. Berkaitan dengan masalah tersebut, penelitianini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan peningkatan Hak Guna Bangunan menjadiHak Milik untuk rumah tinggal di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Karawang. Metodependekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Yuridis empiris yaitu pendekatanyang menitik beratkan pada pengumpulan data dari studi lapangan sebagai data utama danstudi kepustakaan sebagai data pelengkap. Adapun hipotesa dari penulis adalah perihalpelaksanaan Peningkatan Hak Guna Bangunan menjadi Hak Milik adalah seringditemuinya pemohon yang mendaftarkan peningkatan dengan berkas yang kurang lengkapdikarenakan kurangnya pengetahuan terkait proses tersebut sehingga menunda prosespeningkatan hak dan membutuhkan waktu yang lama. Kata Kunci : Peningkatan Hak, Hak Guna Bangunan, Hak Land is a very important factor in people's lives. In addition to clothing and food, humansalso need land as their residence. To provide legal certainty and guarantee ownership ofland to holders of land rights, they must have evidence called certificates. Whereas aresidence is needed by the community, the land is used as a residence from the status ofBuilding Use Rights to become Ownership Rights for the residence. The problem examinedin this study is how to implement an increase in Building Use Rights to Property Rights forresidences in the Karawang Regency Land Of ice? and what are the conditions that must bemet in registering an increase in the Right to Build into Ownership Rights for residences?In connection with these problems, this study aims to determine the implementation of theincrease in Building Use Rights to Property Rights for residences in the Karawang RegencyLand Of ice. The method of approach used in this study is empirical juridical, which is anapproach that focuses on collecting data from field studies as the main data and librarystudies as supplementary data. The hypothesis of the author is that regarding theimplementation of the Improvement of Building Rights to Ownership Rights, it is often thecase that an applicant registers an increase with an incomplete file due to lack ofknowledge related to the process, thus delaying the process of increasing rights and takes along time. Keywords: Increased Rights, Building Rights, Ownership Right

JUAL BELI TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN TANPA AKTA PPAT

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-107
Author(s):  
Cheri Bayuni Budjang
Keyword(s):  
Everyday Life ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Land Registration ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Buying and selling is a way to transfer land rights according to the provisions in Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration which must include the deed of the Land Deed Making Official to register the right of land rights (behind the name) to the Land Office to create legal certainty and minimize the risks that occur in the future. However, in everyday life there is still a lot of buying and selling land that is not based on the laws and regulations that apply, namely only by using receipts and trust in each other. This is certainly very detrimental to both parties in the transfer of rights (behind the name), especially if the other party is not known to exist like the Case in Decision Number 42 / Pdt.G / 2010 / PN.Mtp

Right to Promotion: Legal Certainty and Discretion of the Employer’s Representative

2021 ◽  
pp. 422-433
Author(s):  
M.V. Presnyakov
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Civil Servant ◽  
Equal Access ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Exhaustive List

Public Civil Service Act to establish such a mechanism for the exercise of the right to growth. This law provides for a competitive procedure for the replacement of all posts, including in the order of post growth, and at the same time establishes the principle of forming a personnel reserve on a competitive basis. In addition, the law contains an exhaustive list of exceptions to the competitive procedure for the placement of posts, one of which is the appointment of a civil servant in the personnel reserve. This is justified, since the personnel reserve itself is formed on a competitive basis. However, the law provides for the possibility of enrolling a civil servant in the personnel reserve based on the results of certification, which, in our opinion, does not comply with the principle of legal certainty, does not fully realize the right of equal access to public service, and also does not ensure the filling of posts according to the principle of competence. However, the potential of this law is not fully realized, as it contains a number of uncertain provisions that overextend the discretion of the employer's representative.

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK EIGENDOM VERPONDING SEBAGAI JAMINAN KEBENDAAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-55
Author(s):  
Irman Widi Kurniawan ◽  
Etty Mulyati ◽  
Betty Rubiati
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Force

ABSTRAKDi dalam bagian kedua UUPA mengatur tentang pelaksanaan konversi hak atas tanah menjadi wujud kepastian hukum sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD 1945. Namun kepastian hukum terhadap konversi Hak atas tanah barat terutama sertifikat Hak Eigendom Verponding masih menjadi problematika tersendiri bagi masyarakat yang memiliki bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah barat tersebut apabila dijadikan sebuah jaminan guna memperoleh fasilitas kredit. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah yuridis normatif dengan kajian bahan hukum primer, sekunder serta tersier. Berdasarkan pembahasan tersebut bahwa Kepastian Hukum terkait konversi hak Eigendom Verponding telah memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat dengan ketentuan diperlukan konversi sehingga dapat dijadikan objek jaminan namun dalam prakteknya masih terdapat objek jaminan dengan tidak memperhatikan asal mula objek jaminan tersebut serta akibat hukum terhadap konversi hak atas tanah tersebut adalah pemberlakuan UUPA menjadi dasar bahwasanya prinsip status quo hak atas tanah terdahulu memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dengan ketentuan hak-hak lama menjadi tidak diakui keberadaannya. Kata Kunci: hak atas tanah; hak barat; kepastian hukum jaminan; konversi ABSTRACTIn the second section of the UUPA regulates the conversion of land rights into a form of legal certainty as stipulated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. But the legal certainty of the conversion of the Right to western land, especially the Eigendom Verponding Rights certificate, remains a problem for people who have proof of ownership of the western land if it is used as a guarantee to obtain credit facilities. The research method used is normative juridical with the study of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the discussion that legal certainty related to the conversion of rights Eigendom Verponding has had a binding legal force with the necessary provisions of conversion so that it can be used as an object of guarantee but in practice there is still an object of guarantee by not taking into account the origin of the object of the guarantee and the legal consequences of the conversion of the right to land is the enactment of the UUPA being the basis that the principle of the status quo of the former land rights provides a guarantee of legal certainty with the provisions of old rights to be unclaimed civility. Keywords: conversion; guarantee legal certainty; land rights; western rights

scholarly journals The Basics of Good Faith and Good Intention in Land Purchase System in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaldi Pratama Bagus Putra
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Land Title ◽  
Good Intention ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Legal Procedures

The legal consequences of the issuance of the land title certificate whose application is made by a party who is not the right holder / owner is legally flawed. Issuance of a legally invalid certificate and no binding force and cancellation by the court. The defendant obtains a parcel of land through an auction, the auction is proven by photocopies of the auction object certificate, according to Article 21 of the 2016 Bidding Guidelines that the registered land auction must include an original certificate, so The Defendant did not go through the correct legal procedures. For the issuance of a double certificate for the same land field, the buyer of the land field loses the ownership certificate that is purchased by another party as a buyer with good intentions, because it has been carried out in accordance with the correct legal procedure, which means that the purchaser's certificate is guaranteed legal certainty. Legal protection for the purchaser of good land rights, that the buyer as a buyer has good intentions, with the issuance of the HGB certificate Number 181 Village / Cicau Village covering an area of ​​26,700 m2 in the name of the Defendant, is impaired, so that legal protection provided to the Plaintiff is filing an objection to the issuance HGB certificate to the Land Office as a preventive legal protection. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document