Fiber Intake, Fluid Intake and Defecation Habits of Pregnant Women in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Fitriana ◽  
Budi Prasetyo ◽  
Bangun Trapsila Purwaka

Objectives: To analyze the association between the fiber and fluid consumption with constipation in pregnancy.Materials and Methods: An analytic cross-sectional study conducted at Jagir Public Health Center Surabaya, with the samples of healthy pregnant women aged between 20-35 years old (n=99). Respondents were asked to record the amount of daily fluid intake, defecation frequency, and type of faeces, everyday for 7 days, also made a food recall during 24 hours. The recom-mendation of adequate fluid intake in first trimester was 2180 ml/day and 2300 ml/day for second and third trimester. The value of adequate fiber consumption was 25-30 g/day. Constipation diagnosed by the frequency of defecation <2x/week, or based on Bristol Stool Form Scale included as type 1, type 2, or type 3.Results: Pregnant women whose adequate fluid intake was 40,4% and those with adequate fiber intake was 4.1%. The percentage of constipation among them was 29.5%. There was significant association between fluid intake and constipation (p: 0,000; RR:1,85). There was no significant association between fiber intake and constipation p:0,317 (p<0.05). There was also no significant association between parity, gestational age, and level of education with constipation (p<0.05).Conclusion: Inadequate maternal fluid intake can increase the risk of constipation by 1.85 folds, and the adequate fluid intake may prevent constipation during pregnancy.


Gut Microbes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa F. Gomez-Arango ◽  
Helen L. Barrett ◽  
Shelley A. Wilkinson ◽  
Leonie K. Callaway ◽  
H. David McIntyre ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Muawanah Muawanah ◽  
Triska Susila Nindya

Postpartum constipation with symptoms such as pain or discomfort, straining and hard stools is a common condition that affects the incidence of hemoroids and pain in the area of episiotomy. Constipation is associated with inadequate intake of fi ber and fl uid. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between intake of fiber, fluids and constipationin postpartum mother. The study design was observational with cross sectional approach on thirty three (33) post partum mothers using systemic random sampling method in April to May 2016. Data was analyzed by chi-square test. The result showed that 97% of postpartum mother had inadequate fi ber intake and only 3% were adequate. There was 9.1% postpartum mother with inadequate fluid intake and 90.9% were categorized as adequate. There was 54.5% of postpartum mother had constipation, while 45.5% not constipated. Based on chi-square test, there was no signifi cant relationship between fiber intake, fluid intake and constipation (p > 0.05). The conclusion that there was no relationshipin fiber intake, fluid intake with the incidence of constipation in postpartum mother. This requires provision of health education to prevent the occurance of constipation in postpartum mother.Keywords: fluid intake, fiber intake, constipation, postpartum


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Ratna Ernawati ◽  
Bangun Trapsila Purwaka ◽  
Budi Prasetyo

Objectives: to identify correlation between nutritional status (energy, macronutrient and fluid intake) of the third trimester pregnant women and birth weight.Materials and Methods: correlative analytic prospective cohort’s study in Public Health Center Jagir, Surabaya with sample comprising healthy pregnant women aged 20-35 years in the third trimester and their newborns (n=34). Respondents noted fluid intake every day for 7 days (record method) and food for 24 hours (recall method). Adequacy of energy intake, macronutrient and fluid (mean) was assessed based on AKG 2012. LBW when <2500 g. Statistical analysis used Pearson correlation's and Spearman's rho with test with significance level of p<0.05.Results: in third trimester pregnant women energy intake (r: 0.854, p: 0.0001) and carbohydrates (r:0.912, p:0.0001) had strong positive correlation, protein intake had moderate positive correlation (r: 0.519, p: 0.0001), fat intake (r: 0.425p: 0.012) and fluid (r: 0.469 p: 0.005) had positive correlation with birth weight. The prevalence of LBW in Public Health Center Jagir Surabaya was 14.7%.Conclusion: Nutritional status of third trimester pregnant women correlates positively with birth weight.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Husnul Mar'ah ◽  
Dodik Briawan ◽  
Ikeu Tanziha

<p><em>T</em><em>his research has the aim to analyze the relationship of nutritional status, knowledge, body temperature with fluid intake in pregnant women in West Jakarta. This study design used a cross sectional approach, with number of subjects 84 pregnant women in West Jakarta. Sampling using a purposive sampling method. The nutritional status of pregnant women </em><em>was</em><em> obtained based on the weight record before pregnancy. Subject knowledge and fluid intake were obtained by interview</em><em> with questionnaire. The subject's body temperature was measured with a digital thermometer. </em><em>Analysis of the relationship between nutritional status, knowledge, and body temperature with fluid intake using the Spearman test. Based on the test of the relationship of nutritional status with fluid intake, the value of p = 0</em><em>,</em><em>002 was obtained. Analysis of the relationship of knowledge with fluid intake obtained p = 0</em><em>,</em><em>022 and the relationship between body temperature and fluid intake obtained p = 0</em><em>,</em><em>089. The conclusion that can be obtained is that there is a relationship between, nutritional status, knowledge with fluid intake, and  body temperature has no relationship with fluid intake.</em></p>


Author(s):  
Andon Hestiantoro ◽  
Priska A Baidah

    Objective: To estimate the prevalence of constipation inpregnancy and correlation between gestational age, dietaryfiber intake, water comsumption, and physical activity.   Methods: This study used cross-sectional design with samples of174 healthy pregnant women undergoing antenatal care atObstetrics and Gynecology Outpatient Clinic RSCM during August -October 2016. Data were collected using questionnaire. Diagnosisof constipation was based on ROME III criteria, dietary fiber ismeasured using Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), and physicalactivity was measured using International Physical Activity Questionnaire(IPAQ). Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were conducted toevaluate the association between variables.   Results: The prevalence of constipation in pregnant womenobserved in this study was 13.2% (95% CI 8.3-18.1). The mostfrequent complaints included straining, incomplete evacuation,and anorectal obstruction. Dietary fiber intake was low in 81.03%subject. with average dietary fiber intake of 18.97 gram/day.There was no significant association between constipation andgestational age (OR 4.36, 95%CI 0.51-37.48 for second trimesterand OR 2.04, 95%CI 0.25-16.7 for third trimester), dietaryfiber intake (OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.28-2.39), water consumption(OR 1.38, 95%CI 0.56-3.41), and physical activity (OR 1.167,95%CI 0.28-4.87).   Conclusion: Prevalence of constipation in pregnant women is13.2%. There is no significant correlation between gestational age,dietary fiber intake, water consumption, and physical activity.   Keywords: constipation, pregnant woman, ROME III


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Noora Houttu ◽  
Kati Mokkala ◽  
Kirsi Laitinen

AbstractHigh diversity is considered a property of gut microbiota that is beneficial for human health. A higher dietary fiber intake has been shown to increase gut microbiota diversity. Similarly, there is preliminary evidence that an excess adiposity relates to low diversity. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between dietary fiber intake and gut microbiota diversity whilst considering the overweight and obesity status. Overweight (n = 52, prepregnancy BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) and obese (n = 47, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) women were studied in early pregnancy (a mean of 13 weeks of gestation). The mean daily fiber intake (g) was calculated from 3-day food diaries by computerized software. To evaluate the gut microbiota α-diversity we determined the divergence-based measure, phylogenetic diversity (PD), and the qualitative and quantitative species-based measures, Chao 1 and Shannon index, from 16S RNA gene sequencing using QIIME pipeline. Dietary fiber intake (mean ± SD: 19.7 ± 6.2 g) correlated directly with PD (rho = 0.33, P = 0.002) and Chao 1 index (rho = 0.31, P = 0.004), but not with Shannon index (rho = 0.20, P = 0.06) in all women. Instead, no correlation between BMI and microbiota diversity indexes were seen, except for obese women in whom the BMI correlated inversely with PD (rho = -0.31, P = 0.04). Interestingly, distinct associations between fiber intake and microbiota diversity were detected in overweight and obese women. Fiber intake correlated directly with PD (rho = 0.34, P = 0.02 vs. rho = 0.32, P = 0.04), the measure depicting the phylogenetic branch length, in both overweight and obese women, the correlation with Chao 1 (rho = 0.35, P = 0.02), which depicts the presence or absence of each taxon i.e. richness, was seen only in obese women. Nevertheless, no correlation was seen between fiber intake and Shannon index (rho = -0.004, P = 0.98 vs. rho = -0.18, P = 0.25), the measure depicting the presence and absence as well as the abundance of each taxon i.e. richness and evenness, either in overweight or obese pregnant women. We found direct correlations between dietary fiber intake and gut microbiota α-diversity but obesity status intervened in this relation. In contrast to overweight women, in obese women, the higher dietary intake was reflected in a higher gut microbiota diversity measured at the level of taxon richness, suggesting that particularly obese pregnant women may benefit from a higher dietary fiber intake.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Eny Fatmawati ◽  
Diah Rumekti Hadiati ◽  
Heru Pradjatmo

Introduction: Adequate amniotic fluid volume is a requirement for intra uterine fetal development and good pregnancy outputs / neonatal. Adequate intake of fluid in pregnant women can increase both the amniotic fluid index on oligohydramniotic or normoamniotic, but the scientific basis for the adequacy of the recommended daily fluid have not clear yet. Furthermore, the fluid intake counseling in addition to nutrition for pregnant women is neededObjective: To determine the fluid intake in pregnant women and the mean difference of  amniotic fluid index on adequate fluid intake compared to less fluid intake.Methods: This research used prospective observational cohort study, conducted against the third semester pregnant women in Puskesmas Mergangsan and Tegalrejo Yogyakarta during July until September 2014. The subjects who met the inclusion criteria were divided into adequate and less fluid intake groups. The correlation between fluid intake and amniotic fluid index was analyzed using t-test and linear regression.Result and Discussion: The total subjects who met the criteria were 27 people, consist of 12 people in adequate fluid intake group and 15 people in less fluid intake group. The mean of subject’s fluid intake 2078 ml (enough), while the mean of amniotic fluid index (AFI) 12,76 cm (normoamniotic).The result showed that there was a significant difference (3,50 cm (IK 95%; 1,5-5,48); P < 0,05) between the mean of AFI from adequate fluid intake group compared to less fluid intake group . Simple linear regression test showed the effect of fluid intake for AFI namely 31,7%; with the amount of predicted AFI = 10,686 + 3,545 x fluid intake – 1,015 x age – 1,317 x education + 0,314 x occupation (ARS= 44,5%). External variables (age, education, and occupation) had no significant effect for AFI .Conclusion : The mean preview of fluid intake in the third semester pregnant women in Yogyakarta was adequate. Moreover, there was a AFI signifficant difference between adequate fluid intake compared to less fluid intake.  Keywords: fluid intake; amniotic fluid index; AFI


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document