scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODEL LEARNING LEARNING WITH YOUTUBE VERSUS MEDIA FLASH CARD MEDIA AND LEARNING MOTIVATION ON LEARNING OUTCOMES IN ENGLISH

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-139
Author(s):  
Rahesa Nalendra ◽  
Iskandar Wiyokusumo ◽  
Ibut Priono Leksono

Learning models only emphasize rote thinking, reproductive and looking for the right answer. Many English teachers only emphasize the theoretical aspects, not the actual function, communication skills. This study aims to determine the effect of active learning model learning with Youtube media versus flash card media and students' learning motivation towards student learning outcomes in SMP N 1 Sidoarjo and SMP N 4 Sidoarjo. The study was conducted with a quantitative approach with a factorial design experimental model. The results showed learning outcomes between learning English using active learning models with Youtube media and learning English with flash card media.

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-61
Author(s):  
Fira Zarti ◽  
Khairani Khairani

This study aims to implement the Numbered Head Togerher (NHT) type of cooperative learning model in social studies subjects for grade VII students of SMPN 40 Padang. This research is an experimental research. Research instruments in the form of tests and questionnaires. Data analysis techniques using ANOVA. The results showed (1) student learning outcomes applied to the NHT type cooperative model were higher than student learning outcomes with conventional methods at SMPN 40 Padang. (2) The learning outcomes of students who have high motivation to learn are higher using NHT type cooperative learning models than students who have low motivation with conventional methods. (3) The learning outcomes of students who have lower learning motivation are higher using conventional learning models higher than using NHT learning models. (4) there is an interaction between the use of the Numbered Head Together (NHT) type of cooperative learning model and motivation in influencing student learning outcomes in social studies subjects in class VII SMPN 40 Padang.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 697
Author(s):  
Diliza Afrila

This study aims to determine (1) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course taught using cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students taught using conventional learning models in the Economic Education Study Program, (2) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course who has high learning motivation which is taught by using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing is higher than students who have high learning motivation who are taught using conventional learning models in the Economic Education Study Program, (3) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy courses who have low learning motivation who are taught using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have low learning motivation who are taught using conventional learning models in the Education Study Program Economics, and (4) the interaction between cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing and learning motivation towards student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course in the Economic Education Study Program. This type of research is a quasi experiment. The study population was 27 students of the Economic Education Study Program Semester VI / A1 and VI / A2 Academic Year 2019/2020. The sampling technique was purposive sampling (purposive sampling). The results showed that (1) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course taught by using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing were higher than those taught using conventional learning models. This is indicated by the t value of 2.159 and the probability value of 0.041. So that the probability value of 0.041 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected, (2) Student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course who have high learning motivation who are taught using the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have high learning motivation being taught with conventional learning models. This is indicated by the t value of 7.260 and the probability value of 0.001. Thus, the probability value of 0.001 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected, (3) The learning outcomes of students in the Political Economy course who have low learning motivation who are taught using cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing are higher than students who have low learning motivation which taught by conventional learning models. This is indicated by the t value of 1.532 and the probability value of 0.006. Thus, the probability value of 0.006 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected, and (4) There is no interaction between the cooperative learning model type Kancing Gemerincing and learning motivation on student learning outcomes in the Political Economy course. This is indicated by the Sig level of 0.205. This means that the value of Sig is greater than the value of α = 0.05 (sig α), so the null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted.


Author(s):  
Astuty Sriwahyuni Tarigan ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Efendi Napitupulu

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial dan model pembelajaran drill and practice. (2) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar tinggi dan motivasi belajar rendah. (3) Mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan motivasi belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar KKPI. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Hasil analisis data diperoleh; (1) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan media pembelajaran drill and practice lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 114,59 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). (2) hasil belajar KKPI siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar KKPI siswa dengan motivasi belajar rendah. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 167,04 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1.56), dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan motivasi belajar siswa dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar KKPI. Hal ini ditunjukkan Fhitung = 16,82 dan Ftabel = 4,01 untuk taraf signifikansi ∝=0.05 dengan derajat dk (1,56). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar KKPI, model pembelajaran drill and practice tepat digunakan bagi siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar tinggi. Siswa yang memiliki motivasi belajar rendah lebih efektif dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran tutorial. Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran, Motivasi Belajar, Hasil Belajar KKPI  Abstract: This study aims to: (1) Know the differences in KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with tutorial learning models and drill and practice learning models. (2) Knowing the differences in learning outcomes of KKPI students with high learning motivation and low learning motivation. (3) Determine the interaction between the learning model and student learning motivation towards KKPI learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research. The results of data analysis are obtained; (1) KKPI learning outcomes of students taught with drill and practice learning media are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students who are taught with tutorial learning models. This is indicated by Fcount = 114.59 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). (2) KKPI learning outcomes of students who have high learning motivation are higher than KKPI learning outcomes of students with low learning motivation. This is indicated by Fcount = 167.04 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56), and (3) there is an interaction between learning models and student motivation in influencing KKPI learning outcomes. This is indicated by Fcount = 16.82 and Ftable = 4.01 for the significance level ∝ = 0.05 with degrees dk (1.56). The results showed that to improve KKPI learning outcomes, the drill and practice learning model is appropriate for students who have high learning motivation. Students who have low learning motivation are more effectively taught with a tutorial learning model. Keywords: Learning Model, Learning Motivation, KKPI Learning Outcomes


Author(s):  
Dominggas Radjangolo ◽  
H Tuaputty ◽  
Ine Arini

Background: The use of the right learning model is an alternative to overcome the problem of students' low absorption of lessons, in order to improve the quality of teaching. In its implementation, an appropriate learning model is needed that is able to arouse students' motivation to learn. The use of the right learning model is to use Discovery Learning models and Problem Posing learning models. Method: This study aims to determine the differences in student learning outcomes taught using Discovery Learning models and Problem Posing learning models on the concept of the digestive system in the food of class VIII students of YPKPM Christian Middle School Ambon. Results: Based on the results of the study the use of the Discovery learning model the average value of cognitive aspects = 87.82, the affective aspect = 80.88, the psychomotor aspects = 90.4, the final value = 94.64, the final test value = 94. While the model Problem Posing learning the average value on cognitive aspects = 95.49, affective aspects = 93.76, psychomotor aspects = 93.32, final value = 93.90 and final test value = 96.17. With t count 2.04 and t table 2.01. Conclusion: Student learning outcomes in the problem posing learning model class are higher than students in the class of discovery learning models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Eni Rosda

The right learning model is needed to achieve an active learning process, generally teachers at UPT. SD Negeri 22 Baringin is not right to use a learning model that should be in accordance with the teaching material. So that students in the class often feel bored and less enthusiastic about learning, which makes the classroom atmosphere passive and few students want to ask the teacher even though the material being taught has not been understood so that it affects learning outcomes. Given the problems that lead to unsatisfactory student learning outcomes, researchers are very careful in applying the learning model. Researchers try to use the learning model learning starts with a question. This study aims to determine teacher activities, student activities and student learning outcomes through the application of the learning model learning starts with a question. This research is a Classroom Action Research with the research subjects of class V UPT students. SD Negeri 22 Baringin. This research was conducted in two cycles, each of which included planning, implementing, observing and reflecting. Data obtained through research instruments, observation sheets, tests, and processed using a percentage formula. Based on the research results, it is known that: (1) Teacher activity with the application of the learning model starts with a question increased from cycle I only at 66.67% increased in cycle II to 83.33%, (2) Student activity in cycle I was only 69.74% increase in cycle II to 82.95%, (3) Classical student learning outcomes in cycle I only 65% increase in cycle II to 85% this means that most students complete their learning by applying the learning model learning starts with a question on the material on the relationship between living things in the ecosystem in class V UPT. SD Negeri 22 Baringin.


Author(s):  
Devi Zetira Fauziah ◽  
Basori Basori ◽  
Dwi Maryono

<p>This study aims to find out how much increased learning motivation and student learning outcomes in using the blended learning model. The study involved class XI TKJ students at SMK Sakti Gemolong as participants, who were selected using cluster random sampling techniques. The treatment given to the experimental class is in the form of a blended learning model, while the control class is with conventional learning. The research method used is quantitative. Data were collected by questionnaire method and learning achievement test. Analysis of the questionnaire is used to get data on student motivation. Then to analyze the test of learning outcomes is get to obtain data on student learning outcomes. The study found 1) there is a significant influence of student learning motivation by .209 which means greater than the level of error (0.05). 2) there is a significant influence of learning outcomes of .698 which means it is greater than the level of error (0.05). 3) there is effectiveness in increasing students' learning motivation by using blended learning models with a total score gain of 0.2028. Compared to using conventional learning with a total score gain of 0.0735. 4) there is an effectiveness in increasing student learning outcomes by using a blended learning model with a total score gain of 0.4810. Compared to using conventional learning with a total score gain of 0.2176.</p>


Perspektif ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Darmina Darmina

This research is motivated by a lack of students 'ability to master the concepts in Economics subjects, this is indicated by many students who score below the determined KKM, namely 76. The students' ability to master the concept is low because the ongoing learning process is teacher-centered where learning is only emphasize students to memorize material only, so as not to provide opportunities for students to construct their own knowledge through their learning experiences. This study tries to apply the discovery learning model. The purpose of this study is to improve student learning outcomes through the application of Discovery Learning Learning models in Economic subjects in class XII IPA-2 Pekanbaru 8 High School. The method used in this study is the class action research method (CAR). Where in this study there are three variables, namely input variables, process variables, and output variables. The research procedure consists of the planning stage, the implementation phase of the action, the observation and evaluation stage, and the analysis and reflection stages. Data collection techniques in this study were taken by using student activity observation sheets and teacher activity observation sheets, as well as evaluating the material taught in each cycle. The subjects in this study were students of class XII IPA-2 Pekanbaru 8 High School, amounting to 35 people and this study was devoted to Economics subjects. Based on the results of this study indicate that the improvement of the learning process and student learning activities that have an impact on student learning outcomes can be shown in the first cycle of student learning outcomes, from the results of analysis used, students who complete the economic learning process in Kejra Paper and Adjustment Journal material, from 35 students were subjected to action, 26 students completed learning with a percentage of 74.28% and students who received an unfavorable category were 9 students with a percentage of 25.71%, of the 9 students 6 students who were in the very good category 17,14 %, whereas in cycle II where 35 students were subjected to action, 34 of them were in very good category, had reached completeness namely 97.14% while those that were still not completed were only 1 student, which was 2.86%. Thus the hypothesis that reads If applied to the Learning Learning Model Learning in Economic subjects in class XII IPA-2 Pekanbaru 8 High School, will increase and be accepted.Keywords: Learning Outcomes, Discovery Learning Learning Models in Economics subjects


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 423
Author(s):  
Miftah Athor Sanjaya ◽  
Asmadi M. Noer ◽  
Roza Linda

This research was motivated by the difficulty of students in understanding the concepts in chemical material. The goal of this research is to see the differences in learning outcomes between students who are given two different learning models and see it from Goal Oriention (GO) factors owned by students. This research was conducted at SMA Muhammadiyah 01 Pekanbaru City. The variables in this study were the Learning Model and GO characters (independent variables) and chemistry learning outcomes (the dependent variable). The results of data analysis on One Way Anava was a sig. 0.02 for the application of two learning models and the Independent Sample T-Test obtained sig. 0.02 and sig. 0.32. Based on data analysis, it was concluded that student learning outcomes with those taught with the DL model were better than students taught with the PBL model. Learning outcomes MGO students who are taught with the DL model are better than those taught with the PBL model and there is no difference in the learning outcomes of the PGO students who are taught with the PBL learning model with students who are taught using the DL model.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (36) ◽  
pp. 402-414
Author(s):  
Vera Septi ANDRINI ◽  
MATSUN A. ◽  
Tri Wahyuni MADURETNO

The existence of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 has had a devastating impact on education. Interaction between teachers and students typically cannot be done. Based on this, innovations in education must continue to be done to improve the quality of learning. This study aimed to find out blended learning models through webinar applications and motivation on student learning outcomes in the Human Skeletal System course. The study was conducted at the Vocational High School Teachers Association of the Republic of Indonesia 2 Nganjuk Regency, East Java, Indonesia, and held in class 1 of the academic year 2019/2020 on science subjects with material on the Human Order System. The number of samples was 83 students divided into 42 experimental class students and 41 control class students. The experimental class uses the blended learning model by utilizing a webinar application, while the control class uses the help of e-modules. Data collection methods that be used are observation, questionnaires, and tests. Data analysis techniques used Two Way Anova. The results showed that (1) there were differences in student learning outcomes in the Human Skeletal System course based on the blended learning model through webinar applications, (2) there were different student learning outcomes in the Human Skeletal System course based on high learning motivation and low learning motivation, (3) there is an interaction between blended learning models through webinar applications and motivation on students’ learning outcomes in the Human Skeletal System course. The novelty of this result is the application of webinars in the learning process and outcomes in the form of the holographic learning media products developed on the human skeletal system. Through holographic media, the material looks more real and resembles its original form. Students can learn skeletal systems through holographic images from a variety of different perspectives. Students are more motivated through projects given by teachers because the projects provided are engaging and able to improve skills. Students can study material both in terms of physical and biological sciences.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-46
Author(s):  
NUR HAMID

Research has been done on the effect of cooperative learning model type make a match on creativity, motivation, and learning outcomes of biology in the material of Moss class X SMA 2 Sarmi. The purpose of this study is that there is 1). The influence of cooperative learning model type Make a match on the creativity of learning biology of class X students in the material of Moss plants in SMA 2 Sarmi. 2). Effect of Make a match type cooperative learning models on learning motivation 3). Effect of Make a match type cooperative learning models on student learning outcomes. 4). Improvement of cooperative learning model type Make a match to the results of learning biology in Moss material of class X students of SMA Sarmi 2.The results of this study indicate there are: 1). The effect of cooperative learning model type Make a match on the creativity of student learning in Moss material. 2). Make a match type of student learning motivation in moss plant material. 3). Make a match type on student learning outcomes in Moss material. 4). Improvement of Make a match type of cooperative learning model on student learning outcomes in Moss material. Keywords: Cooperative model type make a match, creativity, motivation, resultsstudying biology, moss plants


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document