scholarly journals Analisis Pesan Persuasif Yang Dibangun Oleh Kementerian Kesehatan Melalui Video Cegah, Lawan, Obati Diabetes Di Youtube

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Yunita Permatasari ◽  
Sophia Bernadette
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Persuasive Communication ◽  
Main Question ◽  
Health Campaigns ◽  
Health Campaign ◽  
Ministry Of Health ◽  
Persuasive Message ◽  
Communication Campaign ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Abstract Health messages are important in the field of public health to encourage behavior change. In 2017, through a “Prevent, Treat, Fight Diabetes” Campaign initiated by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia, the Government uploaded a digital video public service advertisement through a you tube account with the username of the Ministry of Health's P2PTM Directorate. This research was conducted to understand how the Persuasion Technique used by the Ministry of Health in building messages contained in the communication campaign carried out through the video. The main question in this connection is how the persuasion technique used in the health campaign "Prevent, Treat, Fight Diabetes" conducted by the Ministry of Health in persuading message recipients? To find out how the Persuasion Technique of a health campaign persuasion message carried out by the Ministry of Health in the “Prevent, Treat, Fight Diabetes” campaign by the Ministry of Health in persuading message recipients, this study uses the theory of Campaign Communication, Social Campaigns, and Persuasion Techniques with a fear approach. to analyze the elements in a persuasive message from the Ministry of Health. Keywords: Persuasive Communication, Persuasion Techniques, Health Campaigns, Ministry of Health

Recommendations of The Ombudsman’s Dilemma: Between Law Enforcement Officials and Protection of Credibility

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Muslim Majority ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One ◽  
Oversight Body

The Ombudsman as an external oversight body for official performance, in Fikih Siyasah (constitutionality in Islam) is included in the supervision stipulated in legislation (al-musahabah al-qomariyah). Supervision is done so that public service delivery to the community is in accordance with the rights of the community. This is done because in carrying out its duties, officials are very likely to conduct mal administration, which is bad public services that cause harm to the community. The Ombudsman is an institution authorized to resolve the mal administration issue, in which one of its products is by issuing a recommendation. Although Law No. 37 of 2018 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia states that the recommendation is mandatory, theombudsman's recommendations have not been implemented. This is due to differences in point of view, ie on the one hand in the context of law enforcement, but on the other hand the implementation of the recommendation is considered as a means of opening the disgrace of officials. Recommendations are the last alternative of Ombudsman's efforts to resolve the mal administration case, given that a win-win solution is the goal, then mediation becomes the main effort. This is in accordance with the condition of the Muslim majority of Indonesian nation and prioritizes deliberation in resolving dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the community and officials related to the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations in order to provide good public services for the community, which is the obligation of the government.

scholarly journals Fostering public accountability in South Africa: A reflection on challenges and successes

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pandelani H. Munzhedzi
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Service Provision ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Public Accountability ◽  
The Public ◽  
Current State ◽  
Public Service Provision ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Accountability and oversight are constitutional requirements in all the spheres of government in the Republic of South Africa and their foundation is in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa of 1996. All spheres of government are charged with the constitutional mandate of providing public services. The level of responsibility and public services provision also goes with the level of capacity of a particular sphere. However, most of the direct and visible services that the public receives are at the local sphere of government. As such, enormous resources are channelled towards this sphere of government so that the said public services could be provided. It is imperative that the three spheres of government account for the huge expenditures during the public service provision processes. The parliaments of national and provincial governments exercise oversight and accountability over their executives and administrations through the Public Accounts Committees, while the local sphere of government relies on the Municipal Public Accounts Committees. This article is theoretical in nature, and it seeks to explore the current state of public accountability in South Africa and to evaluate possible measures so as to enhance public accountability. The article argues that the current public accountability mechanisms are not efficient and effective. It is recommended that these mechanisms ought to be enhanced by inter alia capacitating the legislative bodies at national, provincial and local spheres of the government.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS OBAT DAN MAKANAN TERHADAP PERDA PROVINSI BALI NO 5 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENGENDALIAN PEREDARAN MINUMAN BERALKOHOL

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Putu Mahentoro
Keyword(s):  
Drug Administration ◽  
Food And Drug Administration ◽  
Alcoholic Beverage ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Alcoholic Beverages ◽  
Ministry Of Health ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Imported Foods

ABSTRACTThe research was conducted based on the same authority which is ownedby the two institutions, namely Food and Drug Administration of the Republic ofIndonesia and Bali Provicial Government in monitoring and controlling ofalcoholic beverages in Bali.The results of this study demonstrate the Food and Drug Administrationand the Provincial Government of Bali have the same authority to supervise andcontrol alcoholic beverages in Bali. Bali Local Government Regulation Number 5of 2012 on the Circulation of Alcoholic Beverage Control only requires each hasa label on alcoholic beverages issued by the Government of Bali has to bedistributed to the public, while the authority of the Food and Drug Administrationis regulated in the Regulation of Minister of Health of the Republic of IndonesiaNumber 382/MENKES/PER/VI/1989 on Registration of Food that requires allfood produced both by local producers and imported foods are required to beregistered to the Ministry of Health through the Food and Drug Administration.In the Regulation Number 5 Year 2012 did not include the authority of theFood and Drug Administration (the Empty Norms) so that the Food and DrugAdministration can not perform optimally the law enforcement againstmanufacturers, distributors and sellers of alcoholic beverages in violation. Tocope with the condition it should be a amendment in the Bali ProvincialRegulation Number 5 of 2012 by stating firmly and clearly the authority of theFood and Drug Administration related to the registration of food, which requiresthat for all foods and beverages that will be distributed to the public must beregistered to the Ministry of Health through the Food and Drug Administration.

scholarly journals STATEOWNED ENTERPRISE AND PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATION IN THE SECTOR OF OIL AND GAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 515
Author(s):  
Muhammad Insa Ansari
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Oil And Natural Gas ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Oil And Gas Sector ◽  
Energy Law ◽  
Public Service Obligation

AbstractThe 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates natural recources in its particular article. Then, the Energy Law and the Oil and Gas Law regulate the state’s control of oil and natural gas. In the sectoral regulations of oil and gas, there is a public service obligation (PSO) which must be assumed by the Government and State Owned Enterprises (SOE). Meanwhile, in the SOE Law introduced entity Perum and Persero. Where in Perum entities carrying out public service, while the Persero entity to assume the role for profit. But in practice found a PSO on the oil and gas sector carried by state-run entities Persero. IntisariDalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 diatur penguasaan negara terhadap sumber daya alam. Kemudian UU Enegi dan UU Minyak dan Gas Bumi mengatur penguasaan negara terhadap minyak dan gas bumi. Dalam pengaturan sektoral di bidang tersebut juga mengatur kewajiban pelayanan umum yang harus diemban oleh pemerintah dan BUMN. Sementara itu dalam UU BUMN diperkenalkan  entitas Perusahaan Umum (Perum) dan Perseroan Terbatas (Persero). Dimana entitas Perum mengemban peran pelayanan umum (public service), sementara entitas Persero mengemban peran mencari keuntungan (profit oriented). Namun dalam praktek ditemukan kewajiban pelayanan umum pada sektor minyak dan gas bumi diemban oleh BUMN dengan entitas Persero. 

scholarly journals Maladministration in the Public Service: Should Government Officials be Responsible for their Decisions?

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Maulida Zulia Irmajayanti ◽  
Totok Sudaryanto ◽  
Antikowati Antikowati
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Government Officials ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Obligations ◽  
Normative Basis ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Welfare State

The concept of the welfare state upholds the existence of the legal system under the premise of legal certainty and the protection of basic human rights. Paragraph IV of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia emphasizes the existence of “state obligations” and “the government duty” to protect and serve all public interest. The normative basis of the Constitution was translated as the national principle to embody the public services. The Public Service Law Number 25 of 2009 is a formulation of legal certainty. However, the main problem that occurs in the public services is maladministration in bureaucracy. It is important to build interpretations of the authority attached to the bureaucratic system or on subjects who become government officials. By analyzing the Constitution, this article states that the government official dimensions must be considered as an interrelated issue, so that the articulate practice must be seen as inherent social conditions. Keywords: Responsibility, Government Officials, Maladministration.

scholarly journals PENGOSONGAN JABATAN WAKIL LURAH DI PROPINSI DAERAH KHUSUS IBUKOTA JAKARTA: Dilema Antara Efisiensi Birokrasi dan Layanan Publik

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmatullah Rahmatullah
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
The Public ◽  
Urban Village ◽  
Personnel Staffing ◽  
Government Bureaucracy ◽  
Thousand Islands ◽  
Heavy Burden ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Village

Specificity of autonomy Jakarta as the Capital of the Republic of Indonesia that is placed on the area provincial level, so that the government area consists of 5 (five) City and 1 (one) Thousand Islands District up units at the lower level, namely District and Village is a unit of government administrative and technical services. Urban Village as a government bureaucracy that deal directly with the public is the frontline in the public service. The existence of the village chief and deputy village chief was reinforced by law No. 147 of 2009 on the Organization and Work Procedure village, which strengthened the position of deputy village chief duties and functions as an auxiliary Lurah such a heavy burden of their duties to serve citizens of the capital densely populated. The reform of the bureaucracy over the birth of Jakarta Bylaw No. 12 of 2014 concerning the regional Organization still beg the question why the position of deputy village chief who is still listed in the rules of the "vacated" in all regions of Village Capital. Occurred in the dilemma between the demands of expectations as a public service town, but on the other hand the reform of the bureaucracy is still a "maintenance of structures" without "tightening" of personnel staffing.

scholarly journals Implementation of E-Government as a Public Service Innovation in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-79
Author(s):  
Ida Farida ◽  
Annisa Lestari
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Service Innovation ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Access To Information ◽  
Data Systems ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
Information And Communication ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

E-Government implementation is the use of technology, information, and communication to realize more efficient and effective government practices in the process of implementing public services in order to facilitate public access to information and create principles of accountability, transparency and good public participation in the Indonesian government. This study aims to explain the implementation of E-Government in Indonesia which encourages the development of information and data systems and is adapted to existing bureaucratic processes. The method used in this research is qualitative research methods. The results showed that public service innovation organized by the government of the Republic of Indonesia was able to create relationships between elements in a country online, not inline, so that efficiency and speed in public services was not only a symbol but a reality.

scholarly journals URGENSI АJUDIKАSI KHUSUS OMBUDSMАN REPUBLIK INDONESIА DАLАM PENYELESАIАN SENGKETА PELАYАNАN PUBLIK

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-118
Author(s):  
Intan Meitasari ◽  
Shinta Hadiyantina ◽  
Indah Dwi Qurbani
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Many ◽  
And Function

ABSTRAKPemerintah pada hakekatnya menyelenggarakan fungsi pelayanan publik kepada masyarakat. Karena itu pemerintah berkewajiban dan bertanggungjawab untuk memberikan pelayanan publik yang baik dan professional, namun pelayanan publik yang diberikan oleh penyelenggara pelayanan publik di rasa masih belum maksimal, hal ini di tandai dengan masih banyaknya praktik-praktik Maladministrasi dan pengaduan dari masyarakat. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia yang dibentuk dan disahkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 Tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia, yang memiliki tugas dan fungsi untuk mengawal proses pelayanan publik yang efisien, efektif, dan terlepas dari kolusi, korupsi, dan nepotisme (KKN). Selain itu Ombudsman juga memiliki wewenang dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pelayanan publik dengan cara mediasi, konsiliasi dan ajudikasi khusus atau ganti rugi yang dapat di putus oleh Ombudsman. Kenyataannya Ombudsman hanya mampu memberikan rekomendasi kepada terlapor, untuk tindakan selanjutnya tergantung dari itikad baik terlapor, karna rekomendasi yang di berikan oleh Ombudsman tidak bersifat mengikat. Selain itu terdapat ketidak relevasian antara Undang-Undang Pelayanan Publik dan Undang-Undang Ombudsman sehingga perlu adanya pembaharuan dalam kedua Undang-Undang tersebut, dan perlu di atur lebih lanjut terkait Peraturan Presiden Tentang mekanisme dan tata cara pembayaran ganti rugi ajudikasi khusus.Kata kunci: ajudikasi khusus; ombudsman; pelayanan publik; urgensi. ABSTRACTThe government is essentially carrying out the function of public services to the community. Therefore the government is obliged and responsible to provide good and professional public services. However, the public services provided by the public service providers are felt still not optimal, this is marked by the many practices of maladministration and complaints from the community. The Ombudsman of the Republic Indonesia which was formed and approved in UUD (Indonesian constitution) Number 37 of 2008 concerning of the Ombudsman of the Republic Indonesia, which has the duty and function to oversee the process of public services that is efficient, effective, and free from collusion, corruption and nepotism. In addition, the Ombudsman also has the authority to resolve public service disputes by means of mediation, conciliation and special adjudication or compensation that can be decided by the Ombudsman. In reality the Ombudsman is only able to provide recommendations to the reported, for further action depends on the reported good faith, because the recommendations given by the Ombudsman are not binding. In addition, there is an irrelevance between the Public Service Act and the Ombudsman Law, so there is a need for reforms in both of these Laws, and it needs a renewal to the both of the Act, and also needs to be regulated further related to the Presidential Regulation concerning the mechanism and procedures for paying special adjudication compensation.Keywords: ombudsman; public services; special adjudication; urgency.

scholarly journals The Legal Strength of the Ombudsman Recommendation of the Republic of Indonesia in the Effort of Realizing Good Governance

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dodik Setiawan Aji ◽  
◽  
Irma Cahyaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Public Service ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
State Administrators ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Administrative Sanctions

This study aims to discuss issues regarding what is the role and authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia ? What is the process for examining complaints at the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia ? How is the strength of the Ombudsman Recommendation of the Republic of Indonesia in the effort to realize good governance ? The research method used in this research is normative juridical , using secondary legal data obtained through literature study. The results showed that The Ombudsman is a state institution that has the authority to supervise the implementation of public services externally, both those organized by state administrators and the government. The adjudication process by the Ombudsman in resolving public service disputes is only one of several possibilities for resolving public service disputes. The imposition of administrative sanctions for those who ignore the Ombudsman Recommendation shows that basically the Ombudsman is an institution that can actually carry out its function as a supervisory agency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document