scholarly journals Formulative Policy of Death Penalty for Corruptors in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-69
Author(s):  
Ni Wayan SINARYATI ◽  
I Gede ARTHA
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Materials Used

Corruption is committed by state officials, law enforcement and other related parties. Various efforts have been made by the government in preventing and eradicating corruption in Indonesia, but the efforts that have been made have not yet gotten optimal results. The fundamental weakness in eradicating corruption in Indonesia is the formulation of the main criminal sanctions in the form of criminal threats that are facultative, uncertain or must be. So that the corruptors are never deterred or afraid. In the future, the legislators need to reformulate the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. Various criminal law policies still need to be carried out by the state in order to eradicate corruption to achieve the expected results. This type of research in this paper uses the type of normative legal research. The type of approach is in the form of a legal approach related to corruption. There are two legal materials used, namely primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, with legal material collection techniques used in the form of library studies. The analysis technique used is descriptive, interpretation, evaluation and argumentative techniques. The research in this paper intends and aims to examine and analyze the facts and phenomena of corruption that are stated in specific legislation concerning criminal sanctions (capital punishment) for corruptors in Indonesia. Moreover, corruption is qualified as an extraordinary crime so it needs extraordinary handling as well.

scholarly journals Election violation and election law enforcement in general election in Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-34
Author(s):  
Syailendra Anantya Prawira
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
General Election ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The People ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

General Elections are the embodiments of the mandate stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph (2) which affirms that "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out according to the Constitution". The Formulation Document that will be formulated in the research are: (1) What is the violation in the general election? And (2) What is law enforcement in general election. The method used in this study is normative legal research, normative legal research methods or library law research methods are methods or procedures that are used in legal research by examining existing library material. Election violations constitute acts prohibited by the Election Law against election organizers resulting in the imposition of sanctions for violations. The enactment of Law Number 7 Year 2017 on General Elections provides for different types of violations, disputes, criminal offenses and electoral disputes. The crime of elections is a criminal offense punishable by a particular punishment based on the criminal justice system. The purpose of election is to carry out popular sovereignty and the realization of the political rights of the people to produce leaders who will occupy important positions in the government.

scholarly journals Advokasi Dualisme Kebebasan Visa di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Dewa Krisna Prasada
Keyword(s):  
Legal Research ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Domestic Affairs ◽  
Administrative Sanctions ◽  
Tourism Economy ◽  
And Control

Visa is a written letter that has an element of legality used when one visits another country. In 2016 the President of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Presidential Regulation regarding Visa-Free Visit. Presidential Decree Number 21 Year 2016 concerning Visa-Free Visit (BVK) provides an opportunity for 169 countries to freely visit the territory of the Republic of Indonesia without a visa. With this provision, it creates dualism in a social environment. On one hand, this provision is beneficial in increasing the tourism economy, and on the other hand, the growth of the risk of criminalization by foreigners is increasing. This study aims to provide a solution to the problem in legal provisions to prevent and control the traffic of foreigners to Indonesia after the enactment of the BVK and how to sanction citizens who abuse the visa-free visit permit. This study uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the rules that determine the supervision and implementation of the rules systematically against foreigners who abuse BVK are specified in Law Number 6 Year 2011, Regulation of the Ministry of Law and Human Affairs (Permenkumham) Number 17 Year 2016, and Regulation of the Ministry of Domestic Affairs (Permendagri) Number 49 Year 2010. In addition, for foreigners who are caught having committed violations, the government can provide administrative sanctions up to criminal sanctions and deportation. From the perspective of the ius constituendum, the provisions regarding BVK need to carry out legal reconstruction to determine specific sanctions against foreigners who commit violations. Besides, there is a need for provisions regarding the system for providing BVK to foreigners in detail so that it is right on target. Visa merupakan sesuatu surat tertulis yang memilki unsur legalitas yang digunakan dalam kegiatan kunjungan menuju negara lain. Pada tahun 2016 Presiden Republik Indonesia mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden mengenai bebas visa kunjungan. Perpres Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Bebas Visa Kunjungan (BVK) memberikan kesempatan bagi 169 negara untuk bebas berkunjung ke wilayah Republik Indonesia tanpa visa. Ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan dualisme dalam suatu lingkungan sosial. Di satu sisi, ketentuan ini menguntungkan dalam peningkatan ekonomi pariwisata, dan di sisi lain pertumbuhan resiko kriminalisasi oleh orang asing kian bertambah. Kajian ini bertujuan memberikan suatu jawaban dari permasalahan dalam ketentuan hukum untuk mencegah dan mengendalikan lalu lintas orang asing ke Indonesia pasca berlakunya BVK dan bagaimana sanksi kepada warga yang menyalahgunakan izin bebas visa kunjungan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (normative legal research). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa aturan-aturan yang menentukan mengenai pengawasan dan berjalannya aturan secara sistematis terhadap orang asing yang menyalahgunakan BVK ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011, Permenkumham Nomor 17 Tahun 2016, dan Permendagri Nomor 49 Tahun 2010. Selain itu bagi orang asing yang tertangkap telah melakukan pelanggaran, pemerintah dapat memberikan sanksi administratif sampai sanksi pidana dan deportasi. Dari prespektif ius constituendum ketentuan mengenai BVK perlu dilakukan rekonstruksi hukum guna menentukan sanksi secara khusus terhadap warga asing yang melakukan pelanggaran. Selain itu, perlu adanya ketentuan mengenai sistem pemberian BVK kepada orang asing secara mendetail agar tepat sasaran.

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan Bibit Lobster

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 569-574
Author(s):  
I Made Agus Sanjaya ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
The State ◽  
Marine Biota ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Marine Products ◽  
Fisheries Regulation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Smuggling is common given the fact that marine products are very attractive. In a really basic way, transactions of billions of rupiah can be carried out illegally, mostly by avoiding the customs office of different rates provided by Customs. Currently, the Government is trying to prevent the smuggling of marine products that are prohibited for trading, because in addition to harming the State, this can result in minimal marine biota and losses of up to trillions. The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation regarding the prohibition of catching lobster seeds and law enforcement against the crime of smuggling lobster seeds, the type of normative legal research. The sources of this research are obtained through approaches by examining based on statutory regulations, legal principles, and legal doctrines to respond to legal themes encountered in order to obtain new opinions, thoughts and understandings as rules for ending events that occur. The sources of this research are obtained through approaches by examining based on statutory regulations, legal principles, and legal doctrines to respond to legal themes encountered in order to obtain new opinions, thoughts and understandings as rules for ending events that occur. The guidelines for catching lobster seeds have recently been regulated in the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation No. 56 / PERMEN-KP / 2016 concerning the Prohibition of Catching and or Exporting Lobster, Crab and Crab. In 2020 the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia again provided guidelines Number 12 / PERM EN -KP / 2020 concerning Management of Lobster and Crabs. Which indirectly opens the export of lobster seeds in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Government's authority to provide protection of the victim of forest and land fire

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 173-183
Author(s):  
Dielasy Budiarti ◽  
Sudarsono Sudarsono ◽  
Bambang Sugiri ◽  
Abdul Rachmad Budiono
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Structure ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Historical Interpretation ◽  
Historical Approach ◽  
The Government ◽  
Materials Used

Forest and land fires often occur in Indonesia. The effects of fires are far-reaching and have significant impacts on the environment, economy, heritage and social structure of rural areas, as well as nearby cities and neighboring countries. Often the community is the victim of forest and land fires. The community expects benefits in the implementation of law enforcement. However, based on the ideals and objectives of the law, there is not a single legal umbrella or legislation that accommodates the interests of victims of forest and land fires. The purpose of this study is to find out how the government's authority in providing protection to the rights of people who are victims of forest and land fires. This research is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a comparative approach and a historical approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary with the technique of analyzing legal materials using Systematic, Grammatical, Extensive and Historical interpretation methods. The results of the study indicate that the government's authority in providing protection for the rights of the victims of forest and land fires is to provide preventive legal protection in the form of laws and regulations made based on the authority of the government as a legislator.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Peretasan sebagai Bentuk Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-339
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ayu Suanti Karnadi Singgi ◽  
I Gusti Bagus Suryawan ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
New Form ◽  
The Government

Along with technological developments, there are a lot of facilities available in cyberspace. The development of this technology can also provide opportunities for criminals, especially crimes in cyberspace. Cybercrime is a new form or dimension of a crime that is currently receiving a lot of attention from the international community. One type of cybercrime is hacking. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing law enforcement against criminal acts of hacking and the efforts to deal with cybercrime. This research was conducted using normative legal research methods and statutory approaches. The results of this study showed that law enforcement against criminal acts of hacking is regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016 amending Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. The perpetrator will be given criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines for violations in the field of hacking. In addition, efforts to eradicate cybercrime refers to the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions which is carried out with preventive and repressive measures. Therefore, the criminal act of hacking which is included in the realm of cybercrime has been regulated in Article 30 paragraph (1), (2) and (3) of the ITE Law, while the punishment is regulated in Article 46 paragraph (1), (2), and ( 3) of the ITE Law. In this regard, the government has taken various countermeasures in the form of preventive and repressive measures.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Pidana Mati dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Mochamad Sukedi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Capital Punishment ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Severe Type

The existence of human rights is a concept that in principle is inherent in the existence and life of humans, human rights actually have a long history in which history can be traced from daily intercourse between humans. The international world knows the form of capital punishment is a type of crime that is very controversial and heaviest imposed on the perpetrators of crime so that it always raises a variety of pros and cons opinions in it. Based on this, the purpose of this paper is to find out and understand the basic legal arrangements for the death penalty in Indonesia and the application of capital punishment in the perspective of human rights. This research uses normative legal research. The death penalty is a very old type of crime that may even be as old as the existence of humanity itself. Capital punishment is the most severe type of criminal offenses of all types of basic crimes, so that capital punishment sanctions constitute a threat imposed on the perpetrators of serious crimes that have been decided by the court. In the international worldview, capital punishment is one of the most controversial forms of crime of all types of criminal sanctions in the criminal justice system in force in the world. Regarding law enforcement applied in Indonesia itself, it still applies the provisions of criminal sanctions in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and there is also listed in the Law outside the Criminal Code. Keberadaan hak asasi manusia merupakan suatu konsep yang pada prinsipnya melekat pada keberadaan dan hidup manusia, hak asasi manusia sesungguhnya memiliki sejarah panjang yang mana sejarah tersebut dapat ditelusuri dari pergaulan sehari-hari antarmanusia. Dunia Internasional mengenal bentuk pidana mati adalah merupakan jenis pidana yang sangat kontroversial dan terberat dijatuhkan kepada pelaku kejahatan, sehingga selalu menimbulkan berbagai opini pro-kontra di dalamnya. Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka tujuan dalam penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui dan memahami tentang pengaturan dasar hukum pidana mati di Indonesia serta penerapan pidana mati dalam perspektif hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Sanksi pidana mati merupakan salah satu jenis pidana yang sangat tua bahkan mungkin sama tuanya dengan keberadaan umat manusia itu sendiri. Sanksi pidana mati yaitu jenis pidana yang paling berat dari segala jenis pidana pokok, sehingga sanksi pidana mati merupakan ancaman yang dikenakan kepada pelaku kejahatan berat yang telah diputus oleh pengadilan. Dalam pandangan dunia internasional, pidana mati adalah salah satu jenis bentuk pidana paling kontroversial dari semua jenis sanksi pidana dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang berlaku di dunia. Mengenai penegakan hukum yang diterapkan di Indonesia sendiri masih menerapkan ketentuan sanksi pidana dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan ada pula yang dicantumkan di dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di luar KUHP.

Recommendations of The Ombudsman’s Dilemma: Between Law Enforcement Officials and Protection of Credibility

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Muslim Majority ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One ◽  
Oversight Body

The Ombudsman as an external oversight body for official performance, in Fikih Siyasah (constitutionality in Islam) is included in the supervision stipulated in legislation (al-musahabah al-qomariyah). Supervision is done so that public service delivery to the community is in accordance with the rights of the community. This is done because in carrying out its duties, officials are very likely to conduct mal administration, which is bad public services that cause harm to the community. The Ombudsman is an institution authorized to resolve the mal administration issue, in which one of its products is by issuing a recommendation. Although Law No. 37 of 2018 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia states that the recommendation is mandatory, theombudsman's recommendations have not been implemented. This is due to differences in point of view, ie on the one hand in the context of law enforcement, but on the other hand the implementation of the recommendation is considered as a means of opening the disgrace of officials. Recommendations are the last alternative of Ombudsman's efforts to resolve the mal administration case, given that a win-win solution is the goal, then mediation becomes the main effort. This is in accordance with the condition of the Muslim majority of Indonesian nation and prioritizes deliberation in resolving dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the community and officials related to the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations in order to provide good public services for the community, which is the obligation of the government.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Sita Umum Terhadap Sita Lainnya Dalam Proses Kepailitan (The Position Of General Seizure Towards Others In The Process Of Bankrupcy)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-234
Author(s):  
Luthvi Febryka Nola
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Impact

Article 31 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law stipulate that all seizures that have been determined on the debtor's assets are null and void since the bankruptcy verdict is pronounced and since then the only validity is general seizure. However, in its practice various seizures are still stipulated on bankrupt assets ranging from civil, criminal and tax seizures. This paper discusses the forms of seizure in the bankruptcy process, the position of general seizure of other seizures in bankruptcy and the impact of the position of general seizure on debt payments to creditors. The research method used is normative legal research using secondary data collected through library studies and document studies. The various data were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This writing found that there are rules in other laws such as Article 39 paragraph (2) KUHAP and Article 6 paragraph (1) Law No. 19 of 2000 that have ruled out the position of general seizure. The experts in each field of science also have different views regarding the position of general seizure. This condition has resulted in the emergence of friction between law enforcement, inconsistency of judges’ decisions, length of bankruptcy proceedings, injustice, unclear data on bankruptcy assets and reduced bankruptcy assets. Therefore, the understanding of law enforcement regarding legal principles, especially the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generalis, needs to be improved. The use of prejudgment seizure in the bankruptcy process must be socialized to maximize control over bankrupt assets. To avoid prolonged process of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy law should limit the time period for the settlement of assets to the curator.AbstrakPasal 31 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Kepailitan mengatur bahwa segala sita yang telah ditetapkan atas harta kekayaan debitor menjadi hapus semenjak putusan pailit diucapkan dan semenjak itu satu-satunya yang berlaku adalah sita umum. Akan tetapi pada praktiknya berbagai sita tetap ditetapkan atas harta pailit mulai dari sita perdata, pidana dan pajak.  Tulisan ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk sita dalam proses kepailitan, kedudukan sita umum terhadap sita lainnya dalam kepailitan dan dampak dari kedudukan sita umum terhadap pembayaran utang kepada para kreditor. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui kegiatan studi perpustakaan maupun studi dokumen. Berbagai data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Penulisan ini menemukan bahwa adanya aturan dalam UU lain seperti Pasal 39 ayat (2) KUHAP dan Pasal 6 ayat (1) UU No. 19 Tahun 2000 telah mengesampingkan kedudukan sita umum. Ahli masing-masing bidang ilmu juga memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terkait kedudukan sita umum.  Kondisi ini berdampak pada munculnya pergesekan antara penegak hukum, inkonsistensi putusan hakim, lamanya proses kepailitan, terjadi ketidakadilan, ketidakjelasan data harta pailit, berkurang bahkan hilangnya harta pailit. Oleh sebab itu, pemahaman penegak hukum tentang asas hukum terutama asas lex specialis derogate legi generalis perlu ditingkatkan. Penggunaan lembaga sita jaminan dalam proses kepailitan harus disosialisasikan untuk memaksimalkan penguasaan terhadap harta pailit. Supaya proses kepailitan tidak berlarut-larut, UU kepailitan harusnya membatasi jangka waktu penyelesaian aset kepada kurator.

scholarly journals PROBLEMATIKA PENERAPAN PIDANA MATI DALAM KONTEKS PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Slamet Tri Wahyudi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Death Penalty ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Government Policies ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Law enforcement without direction and not based on the three pillars of the justice of law, legal certainty and the benefits to society can break the law anyway even violate human rights. As one of the policies of the government that are not considered mencerminakan the values of justice and disturbing for the people, the government policy that acts of omission or delay in the application of the death penalty. This research is a normative legal normative juridical approach. The data collected is secondary data were analyzed using qualitative methods juridical analysis. Based on these results it can be concluded that in the application of the death penalty there are serious legal issues, this is due to government policies that commit omission or delay in the execution of the death penalty is a violation of human rights as stipulated in Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. Keywords: Death penalty, Justice, Legal Certainty, Law

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Perantara Narkotika (Study Putusan No.14/Pid.Sus Anak.2015/PN.Dps)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
Rezky Ayu Saraswati ◽  
I Nyoman Sujana ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
District Court ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Moment

The rise of drug trafficking involving children as narcotics couriers is a problem that needs serious attention from both the government, law enforcement and the community. Children who commit crimes must continue to obtain legal protection in the best interests of the child. Child protection is contained in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile justice system, where at the moment children can become narcotics abuse even as narcotics brokers with the rampant abuse of narcotics for all circles both in Indonesia and in the international world. The formulation of the problem raised is how is the basis for judges' consideration in imposing criminal sanctions on children as intermediaries for narcotics? And what is the legal protection of children as an intermediary for narcotics? The problems to be discussed will be examined based on normative perspectives and the legislative approach to the decisions of the Denpasar District Court No. 14 / Pid.Sus Anak / 2015 / PN. Dps, that the judge considers that the accused child has committed narcotics crimes by being charged Law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics, which can be sentenced to a minimum of 5 years and a maximum of 20 years and can be subject to fines. Legal protection for children is carried out by judges by imposing criminal training on employment in a generation of Indonesian foundations, solely so that children can carry out their activities as usual when they return to the community and do not disturb their psychic rights and can increase their skills in children. The child does not return to committing a crime.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document