scholarly journals MODEL PENGATURAN YANG EFEKTIF TERKAIT PENGELOLAAN PASAR TRADISIONAL DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-292
Author(s):  
Sudi Fahmi ◽  
Ardiansah ◽  
DONI APRIALDI

Abstract, This study aims to discuss the existence of the regulation of the Minister of Trade No. 56/M.DAG/PER/9/2014 and analyze the implementation problems. This research is normative legal research (juridical normative) using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach where the analysis method is carried out qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that the state must promote Indonesian national culture, one of which is to maintain and maintain traditional markets in Indonesia as a manifestation of cultural identity and one of Indonesia's national cultures. This is enshrined in the constitution based on Article 32 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. About the arrangement of traditional markets in Indonesia, specific and detailed arrangements relating to traditional markets are regulated by Presidential Regulation Number 112 of 2007 concerning Arrangement and Development of Traditional Markets, Shopping Centers, and Modern Stores was then followed up with Minister of Trade Regulation Number 70/MDAG/PER/12/2013 concerning Guidelines for Arrangement and Development of Traditional Markets, which was later updated with Minister of Trade Regulation No: 56/M/DAG /9 2014 the Year 2014. However, the Minister of Trade Regulation only regulates the arrangement of modern markets. The existence of people's markets or traditional markets which are in great demand by the community to this day still causes polemics in their management, so they are often considered not so necessary. Therefore, it is very important to pay attention to the interests of the community from all levels, especially government policies in the regulation and management of emerging markets. Because the Indonesian constitution has explained that the state is responsible for providing protection and is responsible for maintaining traditional markets in Indonesia.   Keywords: Arrangement, Regulation, and Management, People's Markets or Traditional Markets   Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas eksistensi dari peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor. 56/M.DAG/PER/9/2014 dan menganalisis problematika pelaksanaannya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dimana metode analisis dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa negara mempunyai kewajiban untuk memajukan kebudayaan nasional Indonesia salah satunya adalah dengan tetap menjaga dan mempertahankan pasar-pasar tradisional di Indonesia sebagai wujud dari identitas budaya dan salah satu kebudayaan nasional Indonesia. Hal ini termaktub didalam konstitusi berdasarkan Pasal 32 ayat (1) Undang-undang Dasar Republik Indonesia tahun 1945. Berkaitan dengan penataan pasar-pasar tradisional di Indonesia, pengaturan secara khusus dan terperinci yang berkaitan dengan pasar tradisional diatur dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 112 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan dan Pembinaan Pasar Tradisional, Pusat Perbelanjaan, dan Toko Modern kemudian ditindaklanjuti dengan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 70/MDAG/PER/12/2013 tentang Pedoman Penataan dan Pembinaan Pasar Tradisional, yang kemudian diperbaharui dengan peraturan Menteri Perdagangan No: 56/M/DAG/9 2014 Tahun 2014. Namun Permendag tersebut hanya mengatur terkait penataan pasar modern saja. Keberadaan pasar rakyat atau pasar tradisional yang banyak diminati oleh masyarakat sampai hari ini masih menimbullkan polemik dalam pengelolaannya, sehingga sering kali dianggap tidak begitu diperlukan. Oleh karena itu, kepentingan masyarakat dari segala tingkatan sangat perlu diperhatikan terutama kebijakan pemerintah didalm pengaturan dan pengelolaan pasar-pasar yang bermunculan. Karena konstitusi Indonesia telah menjelaskan bahwa negara bertanggung jawab untuk memberikan perlindungan dan bertanggung jawab mempertahankan pasar-pasar tradisional di Indonesia.   Kata Kunci: Penataan, Pengaturan dan Pengelolaan, Pasar Rakyat atau Pasar Tradisional  

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Wildan Sena Utama

This book investigates how culture, particularly national culture, in Indonesia has been shaped by the government policies from the Dutch colonial period in 1900s to the Reformation era in 2000s. It is an attempt to show the relationship between the state and culture around the process of production, circulation, regulation and reception of cultural policy through different regimes. Although this book discusses government policy, the author has realized that the book needs to overcome contradictions and confusions of cultural discourse by incorporating people as explanatory element. Many aspect of culturality may be influenced by the state, but according to Jones, “it is a field that is not stable and easy to shift that facilitates resistance, and is able to turn against the state, market and other institutions” (p. 31). Jones employs two postcolonial cultural policy tools to review the history of cultural policy in Indonesia: authoritarian cultural policy and command culture. The first means that the state has assumption if majority of citizen do not have capability to inspirit a responsible citizenship and need a state’s direction in the choice of their culture. On the contrary, command culture shows that the cultural idea that is planned in fact always been placing the state as center in planning, creating policy and revising cultural practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 929
Author(s):  
Rini Yarti ◽  
A.M Tri Anggraini

An imported product to be traded into the territory of Indonesia must include an Indonesian language label in accordance with established regulations, the regulation is regulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Minister of Trade Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 73 / M-DAG / PER / 9/2015 concerning Label Inclusion In Indonesian in Goods. Every product introduced to consumers must be accompanied by correct information. This information is needed so that consumers do not have a wrong picture of the product. This information can be submitted in various ways, one of which is by including an Indonesian translation label on the foreign language label listed on the product packaging. Information on product packaging labels is very necessary for the community so that each individual can correctly determine the choice before buying and consuming the product. In fact there are still many producers who are not responsible for selling cosmetic products that do not meet the requirements. Cosmetic products that do not meet these requirements can be found easily in malls, in traditional markets, or through the internet. The role of the state in this case the government is needed to protect consumers from the circulation of products that do not meet the requirements. So legal protection for consumers is needed to increase awareness of the rights as consumers.


Author(s):  
S.K. Zhalmagambetova ◽  

The article analyzes the features of the modern language trilingual’s policy in the Republic of Kazakhstan under conditions of modernization of public consciousness. The author studies cause and effect relationships of the occurrence of this phenomenon in the state, assesses the prospects for its development, identifies the difficulties faced by the Kazakhstan’s society on the path to introducing trilingual’s, and shows the current development priorities of the linguistic personality of the most developed countries of the world. Nowadays many difficulties arise in the way of ensuring a new language policy in Kazakhstan, caused by the fact that the Kazakh language lacks many scientific terms and concepts. Their use in the state has always been provided by the Russian language. At the same time, a number of scholars evaluate the transition to the Latin alphabet as a destructive phenomenon in language policy that can harm the Kazakh language and national culture. At the same time, experts offer acceptable options for solving emerging problems and


Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih

<p>Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, Dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3) pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) dinilai memiliki problem substantif/materil akibat materi muatannya bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), yang mengakibatkan kerugian konstitusional terhadap Dewan Perwakilan Daerah (DPD), meliputi dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk dapat mengajukan (Rancangan Undang-Undang) RUU, dikuranginya kewenangan DPD untuk membahas RUU dan dikuranginya kewenangan DPD dalam kedudukannya sebagai lembaga perwakilan daerah. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa pembentukan UU MD3 nyata-nyata tidak menghormati putusan MK yang diberi mandat UUD NRI 1945 sebagai lembaga penafsir dan penjaga konstitusi, dengan tidak menghormati, mematuhi, dan melaksanakan putusan MK ini menunjukkan ketidakpatuhan terhadap putusan lembaga negara yang telah ditunjuk konstitusi untuk mengawal kemurnian pelaksanaan konstitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan ( statute approach ), pendekatan konsep ( conceptual approach ), dan pendekatan historis ( historical approach ). Ketidaktaatan penyusunan UU MD3 pada putusan MK merupakan pengingkaran UUD NRI 1945 dan perkembangan ini merupakan langkah mundur reformasi. Pembentuk Undang-Undang, dalam hal ini, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dan Presiden harus segera melakukan perubahan UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dengan berpijak pada rambu-rambu konstitusional Putusan MK Nomor 92/PUU-X/2012.</p><p>Law Number 17 Year 2014 on the People’s Consultative Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional Representatives Council, and the Regional House of Representatives (MD3 Law) after the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) is considered to have a substantive problem due to the substance that is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (the 1945 Constitution), which resulted in the constitutional loss of Regional Representatives Council (DPD), including the reduction of DPD authority to propose draft bills, to discuss draft bills and the reduction in its authority as the regional representative institution. This shows that the drafting of MD3 Law is obviously not respecting the decision of the Court that is mandated by the 1945 Constitution as the interpreter and guardian institution of the constitutional, by not respecting, obeying and implementing MK’s decision which indicates non-compliance with the decision of the state institution that has been designated to guard the purity of the constitution implementation of the constitution. This study uses normative method with statute approach, conceptual approach and a historical approach. The noncompliance of the drafting of MD3 Law towards the MK’s decision is a denial of MK and this development is a step back of Reformation. The legislators, in this case, the House of Representatives (DPR) and the President should immediately amend the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Establishment of Laws and Regulations based on the MK’s Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012. </p>


GANEC SWARA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 991
Author(s):  
NI LUH ARININGSIH SARI

     The concept of the State's Right to Control over Land in Land Law (UUPA) and the Constitution are things that need to be clarified based on law. The type of research in this research is normative research, namely research on legal principles related to the concept of the State's right to control over land seen from the aspects of the Basic Agrarian Law and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The approach method used in this research is the statutory approach (the statute approach), the conceptual approach, which utilizes the views and thoughts of experts regarding the concept of the rule of law and the historical approach is carried out by examining what background. which underlie a development of the implementation of the right to control the State. The results of the study show that the concept of the right to control of the State which is regulated in the 1945 Constitution and the UUPA, is different from the legal relationship which is ownership between the State and land based on the Domeinverklaring principle which is regulated in the Land Law for the Administration of the Dutch East Indies Government which has been revoked in the UUPA. The principle of Domeinverklaring contradicts the legal awareness of the Indonesian people and the principles of an independent and modern State, especially in the 1945 Constitution which regulates State control of all agrarian resources which are essentially intended for the greatest prosperity of the people (Article 33 paragraph (3)).


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 279
Author(s):  
Bimo Lahkoro Anugroho

This paper focuses on the topic of what is the responsibility of heirs who not submit notary protocols when the protocol is lost or damaged ?,  What is the form of legal protection for notary clients or clients when the deed is lost or damaged? The method used in this paper is a normative juridical approach, using a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this paper indicate that the notary as public official who is in charge of making authentic deeds in his duties is also attached to the obligations to maintain the Notary Protocol. The Protocol shall be maintained and guarded properly by the Notary concerned or by the Notary Holder of the Protocol, and will remain in effect as long as or as long as the Notary's office is still required by the State. The form of the responsibility of a notary public or notary's heir for the notary's protocol when the deed is damaged or lost by negligence or deliberately related to the legal protection obtained by the applicant (client) for his deed at a later date. Then the notary concerned will be held accountable by making a report to the police for loss and damage, sending a report to the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the condition of loss or damage then waiting for action to continue in the settlement process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (7(76)) ◽  
pp. 19-27
Author(s):  
Ramil M. Valeev ◽  
Dmitriy E. Martynov ◽  
Roza Z. Valeeva ◽  
Dinar R. Hairutdinov

Gabor Balint (Gabor Balint de Szentkatolna, 1844–1913) was an outstanding Hungarian linguist, expert in Mongolian and Turkic studies, one of the leading scholars and educators of the so-called Renaissance of Hungarian national culture and ideology of the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Modern Hungarian historiography plays the leading role in studying the hand-written legacy of this researcher and educator. This is evidenced by a variety of publications dedicated to G. Balint, one of the leading experts of Austria-Hungary and Europe in the field of the Mongolian language and folklore, including ones published in the journal of Euro-Asian research called Journal of the Gábor Bálint de Szentkatolna Society and founded in 2009. The goal of this paper is to publish three previously unknown letters from Gabor Balint to N. I. Ilminsky written during the period from December of 1872 to November of 1874 (from St. Petersburg and Budapest) after his research trip to Kazan and Astrakhan and the completion of his travel to Mongolia. These letters are stored in the State Archives of the Republic of Tatarstan (coll. 968. aids 1. fol. 93).


Author(s):  
Nyoman Arif Budiman

This journal shall be entitled as " Implementation Of Public Interest Principles To Neglected Land In Indonesia".The existence of the land on earth must be beneficial both for the welfare and happiness that has it and for the people and the state. The purpose of this study is to know and understand the absolute limits of property rights to land; and want to understand the relationship between the principle of public interest in land. The method in this research is normative by using  conceptual  approach and statute approach. This journal’s preparation is done by legal research, and the approach method being used in this journal shall be used is the combination of the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The result of this research is the essence of the principle of public interest to the land is to create development based on the principle of humanity in the balance as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The exemption of land rights is caused by public and private interest with the provision of compensation and guided by the principle of musyawarah. While the revocation of land rights is the spirit of the provisions of Article 18 of the Basic Agrarian Laws states that for the interest of the state and the state and the common interest of the people of the right to land may be revoked by compensation. The legal effort that a third party can take to exploit the state land (abandoned land) is to apply the right to the government (Provincial or Regency / City Land Office). Jurnal ini mengambil julul “Penerapan Prinsip Kepentingan Umum Terhadap Terlantar. Keberadaan atas tanah di muka bumi ini  harus bermanfaat baik bagi kesejahteraan dan kebahagiaan yang mempunyainya maupun bagi masyarakat dan negara. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ialah ingin mengetahui dan memahami batas-batas absolut dari hak milik  terhadap tanah; dan ingin memahami hubungan antara prinsip kepentingan umum atas tanah. Jurnal ini mengangkat permasalahan yang juga menjadi tujuan penulisan yaitu apa hakikat kepentingan umum atas tanah dan apa upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga terhadap tanah terlantar. Penyusunan jurnal ini dilakukan dengan tipe penelitian normatif dan menggunakan pendekatan peaturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Hakekat dari prinsip kepentingan umum terhadap tanah ialah untuk menciptakan pembangunan yang berlandaskan asas perikemanusiaan dalam keseimbangan sebagaimana diatur dalam UUD NRI tahun 1945. Pembebasan hak atas tanah disebabkan oleh kepentingan umum dan swasta dengan pemberian ganti rugi dan berpedoman pada asas musyawarah. Sedangkan pencabutan hak atas tanah merupakan semangat dari ketentuan Pasal 18 UUPA menggariskan bahwa untuk kepentingan bangsa dan negara serta kepentingan bersama (hanya untuk kepentingan umum) dari rakyat hak atas tanah dapat dicabut dengan memberikan ganti kerugian. Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan pihak ketiga untuk dapat memanfaatkan tanah negara (tanah terlantar) ialah melakukan permohonan hak kepada kepada pemerintah (Kantor Pertanahan Provinsi atau Kabupaten/Kota).


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-109
Author(s):  
Arifin Zain ◽  
Maturidi Maturidi

This paper examines the Medina Charter, the 1945 Constitution, and Aceh Qanun No. 4 of 2016 as a fundamental source of structural da’wah policies. Structural da’wah is a character of da’wah that involves the state directly in regulating policies related to the implementation of da’wah. The primary purpose of this research is to describe the role and position of the Medina Charter, the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, and Aceh Qanun No. 4 of 2016, being the basis for the implementation of structural da’wah and discussed the regulation about the inter-religious correlation in those three regulations. This research is qualitative research using the content analysis method. The results showed that the Medina Charter, the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, and Aceh Qanun No. 4 of 2016 is a state acknowledgment of the structural da’wah implementation in Aceh because the da’wah is under the direct control of the state or government. The Medina Charter, as a result of the Prophet’s ijtihad, contains guidelines for inter-religious relations and the role of the state in regulating people’s lives. The 1945 Constitution of Indonesia is the highest source of law in the Republic of Indonesia, which states the guarantees the independence of citizens to embrace religion according to their beliefs. While Aceh Qanun No. 4 contains the rules for spreading religion amid society.


Solusi ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 303-316
Author(s):  
Evi Purnamawati

This study analyzes the power of the questionnaire rights of the House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia. The House of Representatives is a House of Representatives and holds the power to form laws. The House of Representatives has the functions of legislative and legislative oversight. This research uses research methods using the method of literature (ribarary research). Type of normative juridical research through approaching legislation and conceptual approach of the research results of the House of Representatives, which essentially has the power to form the current law, the power began to widen towards supervision and budget, actually with the oversight function of the House of Representatives (DPR) towards the executive in practice the meaning of the teaching of separation of powers began to shift, the teaching of separation of powers between state institutions must not intervene with one another. In carrying out its functions the DPR has the right of Interpellation which is the right to request information from the Government in handling Government policies that have an impact on the life of society and the state. In addition, the DPR has the Right to Question, namely the Right to Investigate Government policies that are alleged to be in conflict with laws and regulations and express opinions outside the institution. Members of the DPR have the right to submit draft laws, ask questions, submit proposals and opinions, defend themselves, the right of immunity, and the right to protocol. The recommendation of this research is that the writer suggests that the DPR should make the regulation on questionnaire rights clearer especially about the process of using the questionnaire right so that there is no multi-interpretation so that violations do not occur in the process of using the inquiry right.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document