scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM PENGELOLAAN HULU MIGAS PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
M. Ilham F Putuhena
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Alternative Models ◽  
Institutional Management ◽  
Relationship Model ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
New Institutions

<p>Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012 dalam permohonan Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 telah membawa arah baru di dalam pengelolaan hulu migas di Indonesia. Mahkamah Konstitusi berpendapat model hubungan BPMigas dalam melakukan pengelolaan Migas telah mendegradasi makna penguasaan negara atas sumber daya alam Migas sebagaimana diamanatkan Pasal 33 UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Berangkat dari kondisi tersebut beberapa hal yang menarik untuk diteliti, yaitu bagaimana arah politik hukum pengelolaan hulu migas pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, kemudian dilanjutkan terhadap pembahasan alternatif model pengelolaan hulu migas yang sesuai dengan konstitusional. Guna menjawab permasalahan tersebut penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis Normatif, yang meneliti pengaturan hulu Migas dibandingkan dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, dan kemudian dijadikan dasar untuk menentukan alternatif arah politik hukum hulu migas yang baru. Dari hasil penelitian didapat sedikitnya empat alternatif model kelembagaan pengelolaan hulu Migas yaitu: model melembagakan SKK Migas secara permanen; model yang memberikan wewenang kembali kepada PERTAMINA; model pemerintah secara langsung melakukan penunjukan, dan mendirikan BUMN baru atau model dengan pembentukan lembaga baru. Dari penelitian ini disarankan Pemerintah dan DPR harus menjadikan putusan mahkamah konstitusi sebagai bahan acuan dalam mendesain model pengelolaan hulu Migas, dapat menghasilkan kelembagaan dan pengelolaan yang konstitusional dalam rangka membangun kepastian berinvestasi dalam bisnis Migas di Indonesia.</p><p>Constitutional Court Decision No. 36 / PUU-X / 2012 in a petition for judicial review of Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 has brought a new direction in the management of upstream oil and gas in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court argued that BPMigas business relationship model in managing oil and gas has been degrading the meaning of state control over natural resources of oil and gas as mandated by the Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. Departing from these conditions some interesting things to be investigated, are how the politics of law direction of the upstream oil and gas management after the Constitutional Court decision, and then followed by the discussion of alternative models of upstream oil and gas management that is in accordance with constitutional. To answer these problems this research is using normative juridical method, which examined the setting of upstream oil and gas compared with the Constitutional Court decision, which is then being used as the basis for determining the alternative direction of politics of law of the new upstream oil and gas laws. The result is at least four alternative models of institutional management of upstream oil and gas obtained, namely: a model where it institutes SKK Migas permanently; a model that gives authority back to Pertamina; a model where the government make direct appointment, and established new state-owned enterprises or a model with the establishment of new institutions. What this research suggested is that the Government and Parliament must make Constitutional Court decision as a reference in designing the management model of the upstream oil and gas, where it can produce institutional and constitutional governance in order to establish certainty to invest in oil and gas business di Indonesia.</p>

scholarly journals HAK MENGUASAI NEGARA DALAM SISTEM TATA KELOLA MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI: ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 36/PUU-X/2012 / The State Control Rights In Oil And Gas Management System: The Analysis Of Constitutional Decision No 36/PUU-X/2012

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 407
Author(s):  
Nizammudin Nizammudin
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
The State ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Management Policy ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Control Rights ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
State's Rights

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012 tentang judicial review UU No. 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi telah menimbulkan perdebatan publik tentang sistem tata kelola minyak dan gas bumi di Indonesia. Adapun hasil yang ditemukan dalam penelitian ini yaitu, Pertama, konsep “hak menguasai negara” dalam Pasal 33 UUD 1945 secara filosofis berangkat dari konstruksi Pancasila yang memberikan kekuasaan kepada negara untuk campur tangan dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam demi mewujudkan sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat, namun pada saat yang sama tetap memberikan peluang bagi kepemilikan perdata sepanjang tidak mendegradasi peran negara dalam pengambilan keputusan dan penentuan kebijakan. Kedua, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-X/2012 tidak membatasi kewenangan Pemerintah dan DPR untuk membentuk badan pengelola migas tertentu sejauh tidak bertentangan dengan opsi yang terdapat dalam pertimbangan hukum MK, yakni BUMN atau Pemerintah. Terminologi “Pemerintah” dalam pertimbangan hukum MK memiliki makna yang jauh lebih luas dan tak harus dibatasi pada Kementerian ESDM, namun mencakup pula BUMN atau badan independen yang mungkin dibentuk oleh pemerintah berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan.The Constitutional Court Decision No. 36 / PUU-X / 2012 concerning the unconstitutionality of BP Migas in Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas has provoked public debate about the management systems of Indonesian oil and gas. This study focuses on the following questions: First, what the meaning and the concept of the state control rights of oil and gas under the 1945 Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia?; Second, what what are the legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-X/2012 on the national oil and gas management policy?. The results of the study shows the following conclusions. First, the concept of state’s rights in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia philosophically derived from the construction of Pancasila which empowers the state to involve in the management of natural resources in order to provide the prosperity of the people, but at the same time providing opportunities for private ownership as far as not to degrade the state's role in determining the decision-making and policy-making. Secondly, the Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-X/2012 does not limit the authority of the Government and the Parliament to form any oil and gas administrative body to the extent not contrary to the options proposed by the Constitutional Court, i.e. the state-owned enterprises or the government. The term ‘government’ in the legal consideration of the Constitutional Court has a much broader meaning and should not be limited to the Ministry of Energy, but also includes the SOE itself or an independent agency that may be established by the government based on the law.

scholarly journals KELEMBAGAAN PENGELOLA MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 36/PUU-X/2012)

Yuridika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Ganesha Patria Wicaksono
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Similar Function ◽  
Exploration And Exploitation ◽  
Reform Agenda ◽  
Regulation Function ◽  
The Government

BP Migas the kind of reform agenda from institutional manager oil and gas which is the part of Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001. BP Migas is institusional manager of oil and gas that formed to become the government representation as mining rights to controlling and supervising exploration and exploitation oil and gas that formerly held by pertamina. Politiekrecht establishment BP Migas is to avoiding conflict of interest if the regulation function and business has been place in the same institutional like the old Pertamina, so doing the separation institutional which do the function of regulation and business. The existancy of BP Migas impact to the mining rights which is the part of the authority of state control become obscuur ,because the fifth function that constructed by Constitutional Court by doing interpretation to  section 33 act (2) dan (3) UUD NRI Tahun 1945 can’t through all and gradual. Through Constitutional Court decision No 36/PUU-X/2012 all the section which have related with BP Migas are unconstitutional. BP Migas should be dissolved and government from the regulation function should control the new institutionals function and authority. With the dissolution of BP Migas the government would establish similar function and authority institutional which named SKK Migas .With the present SKK Migas, so all the mining rights problems become interested to be re-examined.

scholarly journals TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKINGS PROTECTION OF EMPLOYMENT (TUPE) DALAM PERJANJIAN OUTSOURCING

Media Iuris ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 335
Author(s):  
Muhammad Johar Fathoni
Keyword(s):  
Service Provider ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Employment Service ◽  
Labor Agreement ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right

Transfer of Undertaking Protection of Employment Based on Constitutional Court Decision Number 27/PUU-IX/2011, there are two models that must be fulfilled in outsourcing agreement, that is First, by requiring for agreement between worker and company conducting work outsourcing does not take the form of a certain time labor agreement (PKWT), but is in the form of an indefinite time agreement (PKWTT). The consequences of termination of contract for the Employment Service Provider who laid off his employees for the law, the employer shall be entitled to grant the right to his employees in accordance with the Manpower Act, Kepmenaker No. Kep. 150/Men/2000 on the Settlement of Termination of Employment and Stipulation of Severance, Money of Work and Indemnification. Then the government also stipulates the Decree of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration of the Republic of Indonesia no. Kep. 76/Men/2001 on Amendment to several articles of Minister of Manpower Decree no. Kep. 150 / Men / 2000 on the Settlement of Termination of Employment and Stipulation of Severance, Money of Work and Indemnification at the Company.

scholarly journals Strategi Penguatan Pengelolaan Bersama Minyak dan Gas Bumi di Wilayah Laut

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Cut Asmaul Husna TR
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Geological Structure ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Joint Management ◽  
The People ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Kondisi tatanan tektonik dan geologi Aceh memiliki prospek untuk dilakukan eksplorasi dan pengembangan serta produksi Minyak dan Gas Bumi, baik di Wilayah Darat maupun di Wilayah Laut. Penemuan cadangan Minyak dan Gas baru di Aceh diharapkan dapat meningkatkan Penerimaan Negara dan Penerimaan Pemerintah Aceh dalam membangun infrastruktur dan Ketahanan Energi Aceh untuk melahirkan kembali industri-industri skala internasional. Ketentuan dalam Pasal 3 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pengelolaan Bersama Sumber Daya Alam Minyak dan Gas Bumi di Aceh, kewenangan pengelolaan Migas pada Wilayah Laut 12 (dua belas) sampai dengan 200 (dua ratus) mil laut yang merupakan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE) dikelola dan dilaksanakan Pemerintah Pusat dengan mengikutsertakan Pemerintah Aceh. Tafsir dalam 3 (tiga) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 002/PUU-I/2003, 20/PUU-V/2007 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 36/PUU-X/2012 tentang Uji Materiil Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2001 tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 bahwa penguasaan negara terhadap sumber daya alam dan cabang-cabang produksi yang penting bagi negara dan menguasai hajat hidup orang banyak dimaknai sebagai mandat yang harus dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah untuk mengadakan kebijakan (beleid), pengurusan (bestuursdaad), pengaturan (regelendaad), pengelolaan (beheersdaad), dan pengawasan (toezichthoudensdaad) untuk tujuan sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat.Conditions of tectonic and geological structure in Aceh prospect for explorating and producing Oil and Natural Gas, either in onshore or offshore. The discovery of Oil and Gas news reserved in Aceh is expected to increase the Central Government Take and Aceh Government Take to build infrastructure and Aceh’s Energy Security to regenerate industries on an international scale. The provisions in Article 3 of the Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2015 concerning Joint Management of Natural Resources Oil and Gas in Aceh, the joint management authority of Oil and Gas in Offshore 12 (twelve) to 200 (two hundreds) nautical miles of an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is managed and held by the Central Government to include the Government Aceh. Commentary within 3 (three) Decision of Constitutional Court Number 002/PUU-I/2003, 20/PUU-V/2007 and Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 36/PUU-X/2012 of Judicial Review of Law Number 22 Year 2001 concerning Oil and Gas (Oil and Gas Law) Against the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia the meaning of “controlled by the state” must be comprehended to include the meaning of a wide-ranging state occupation, as a result of the people’s sovereignty concept. The people, collectively constructed by the 1945 Constitution, provide a mandate to the state to conduct policy (beleid) and functions of administration (bestuurdaad), regulation (regelendaad), management (beheersdaad) and supervision (toezichthoudensdaad) for the greatest prosperity of the people.

scholarly journals Legal Implications of the Decision of the Constitutional Court (Cases Number 57, 58, 59 and 63 / PUU-XIV / 2016, Concerning Application for Material Testing of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016 Concerning Tax Waivers)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Muhammad Naufal Arifiyanto ◽  
I Nyoman Nurjaya ◽  
Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara ◽  
Bambang Sugiri
Keyword(s):  
Material Testing ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Tax Revenue ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Tax Amnesty ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty is a regulation from the government as part of increasing tax revenue in Indonesia. Tax amnesty is considered to have various deficiencies that injure the value of justice and constitutionality. Review of laws that have been decided by the Constitutional Court with Decisions Number 57, 58, 59 AND 63 / PUU-XIV/2016 and strengthen the a quo law to remain valid in Indonesia. This decision is considered inconsistent with social and legal facts that occur in society. This study intends to answer and analyze how the Constitutional Court’s considerations on the examination of the Tax Amnesty Act and to analyze the legal implications after the Constitutional Court decision.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT PEOPLE’S RIGHTS OVER THE CLEAN WATER

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nadzir
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Human Life ◽  
The State ◽  
Responsibility To Protect ◽  
Clean Water ◽  
State Control ◽  
Government Responsibility ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

Water plays a very important role in supporting human life and other living beings as goods that meet public needs. Water is one of the declared goods controlled by the state as mentioned in the constitution of the republic of Indonesia. The state control over water indicated that water management can bring justice and prosperity for all Indonesian people. However, in fact, water currently becomes a product commercialized by individuals and corporations. It raised a question on how the government responsibility to protect the people's right to clean water. This study found that in normative context, the government had been responsible in protecting the people’s right over the clean water. However, in practical context, it found that the government had not fully protected people's right over clean water. The government still interpreted the state control over water in the form of creating policies, establishing a set of regulations, conducting management, and also supervision.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Audit Internal dan Akuntabilitas Suber Daya Manusia terhadap Perwujudan Good Governance pada Lembaga SKK Migas

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Latifah Latifah ◽  
A. Rinto Pudyantoro
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Internal Audit ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
The State ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Special Unit ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

<p>Special Unit for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities (SKK Migas) is an institution established by the Government of the Republic of Indonesia through Presidential Regulation (Perpres) No. 9 of 2013 on the Management of Upstream Oil and Gas Business Activities. The task of SKK Migas is to manage the upstream oil and gas business activities based on cooperation contracts. The purpose of the establishment of this institution so that retrieval of natural resources of oil and gas owned by the State can provide maximum benefit and acceptance for the state to the greatest prosperity of the people. Based on these tasks and objectives, SKK Migas is responsible to the state and all Indonesian people to work properly, honestly, fairly, cleanly, transparently and competently in order to achieve good governance of state institutions. Therefore, internal monitoring (internal audit) and accountability of its human resources are required. This research has a purpose to test the influence of internal audit and human resource accountability to the achievement of good governance at SKK Migas institution. This research uses survey method with population of all staffs of SKK Migas. Sampling method used is sampling with purposive sampling technique. In this study, 145 samples were taken. Methods of data collection was done by using questionnaires containing several questions with the method of data analysis using multiple regression. The result of this research is to accept both hypothesis which is internal audit have positive effect toward the achievement of good governance in SKK Migas. And the accountability of human resources positively affect the achievement of good governance in SKK Migas.</p>

scholarly journals Dinamika Konsepsi Penguasaan Negara Atas Sumber Daya Alam

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 401
Author(s):  
Ahmad Redi
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resources ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Control ◽  
Control Rights ◽  
Control Concept ◽  
Control Right ◽  
The Government ◽  
Draft Bill ◽  
The Guardian

Discourse concerning state control concept on natural resources in Article 33 clause (3) of the 1945 Constitution is very dynamic. Such dynamic can be seen on      a variety of conceptions of state control rights on natural resources formulated in various acts in natural resources area. Lack of single concept on ‘state control right’ will impact to unfavorable situation where natural resources shall escape from conception of state control right and into control not by the state. The Constitutional Court as the Guardian and Interpreter of the Constitution has a significant role to ascertain that an act in natural resources area really adopt the principle of state control on natural resources in Indonesia. This article analyzes on dynamics of conception of state control on natural resources in various acts and the role of the Constitutional Court in guarding and interpreting acts in natural resources in order to be in accordance with Article 33 clause (3) of the 1945 Constitution. From the result of analysis a conclusion is achieved that there are many different concepts    of state control on natural resources in various acts in natural resources area. The Constitutional Court indeed has made interpretation on state control right. In order to make the conception stronger it is necessary to have an act in natural resources area as instruction of Article 33 clause (5) of the 1945 Constitution that further provisions of Article 33 shall be regulated by an act. Moreover, DPR (The House of Representatives) and the Government have to make certain or definite the concept of state control right in every draft bill of natural resources area so that liberalism and capitalism stream will not erode the principle of state control right.

scholarly journals STATEOWNED ENTERPRISE AND PUBLIC SERVICE OBLIGATION IN THE SECTOR OF OIL AND GAS

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 515
Author(s):  
Muhammad Insa Ansari
Keyword(s):  
Natural Gas ◽  
Public Service ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Oil And Natural Gas ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Oil And Gas Sector ◽  
Energy Law ◽  
Public Service Obligation

AbstractThe 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates natural recources in its particular article. Then, the Energy Law and the Oil and Gas Law regulate the state’s control of oil and natural gas. In the sectoral regulations of oil and gas, there is a public service obligation (PSO) which must be assumed by the Government and State Owned Enterprises (SOE). Meanwhile, in the SOE Law introduced entity Perum and Persero. Where in Perum entities carrying out public service, while the Persero entity to assume the role for profit. But in practice found a PSO on the oil and gas sector carried by state-run entities Persero. IntisariDalam Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 diatur penguasaan negara terhadap sumber daya alam. Kemudian UU Enegi dan UU Minyak dan Gas Bumi mengatur penguasaan negara terhadap minyak dan gas bumi. Dalam pengaturan sektoral di bidang tersebut juga mengatur kewajiban pelayanan umum yang harus diemban oleh pemerintah dan BUMN. Sementara itu dalam UU BUMN diperkenalkan  entitas Perusahaan Umum (Perum) dan Perseroan Terbatas (Persero). Dimana entitas Perum mengemban peran pelayanan umum (public service), sementara entitas Persero mengemban peran mencari keuntungan (profit oriented). Namun dalam praktek ditemukan kewajiban pelayanan umum pada sektor minyak dan gas bumi diemban oleh BUMN dengan entitas Persero. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document