scholarly journals Kualitas Soal Pilihan Ganda Kelas VI Tema 1 MI MHM Banjarsari Ngronggot Nganjuk

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-207
Author(s):  
Liana Mutholiin ◽  
Bustanul Arifin
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Final Assessment ◽  
Multiple Choice Items ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Assessment Questions

This research was conducted to find out how to compile and analyze the Odd End Semester Assessment questions at MI MHM Banjarsari, and to determine the quality of the multiple choice items of the Odd End Semester Assessment Grade VI Theme 1 MI MHM Banjarsari Academic Year 2019/2020. The research design used in the analysis of the quality of the multiple choice items Final Assessment of the odd semester class VI Theme 1 MI MHM Banjarsari Academic Year 2019/2020 is quantitative descriptive. Data collection in this study used document analysis method. The source of the data of this study was the question sheets and answer sheets of students participating in the Odd End Semester Assessment (PAS) of Class VI Theme 1 MI MHM Banjarsari. Calculation of the level of difficulty, different power, the effectiveness of deceit, the validity and reliability of the instrument in this study using the Anates V 0.4 program. The results of the research that have been done show that the quality of the final semester semester 1 question items in MI MHM Banjarsari in 2019/2020 from a total of 35 multiple choice questions viewed from the difficulty level obtained as many as 10 items (28.57%) with the difficulty level of questions in very easy category, 7 items (20%) in the easy category, 14 items (40%) in the medium category, 3 items (8.57%) in the difficult category, and 1 item (2.86%) in the very difficult category. Judging from the different power of the final semester assessment questions, theme 1 found 5 items (14.29%) in the very bad category, 13 items (37.14%) in the bad category, 6 items (17.14%) in the category enough, 10 items (28.57%) in the good category, and 1 item (2.86%) in the very good category. Judging from the deception of answers to the odd semester final assessment questions, there were 3 questions (8.57% in the very bad category, 6 questions (17.14%) in the bad category, 4 questions (11.48%) in the good category, and 22 questions (62.86%) in the very good category Judging from the validity of the odd semester final evaluation questions theme 1 obtained valid questions (significant / very significant) of 15 questions (42.86%) and for invalid questions a total of 20 questions (57.14%) In terms of reliability, it was obtained 0.81. Thus it can be concluded that the quality of the items can be said to be less good. [Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui cara menyusun dan menganalisis soal Penilaian Akhir Semester ganjil di MI MHM Banjarsari, dan untuk mengetahui kualitas butir soal pilihan ganda Penilaan Akhir Semester ganjil kelas VI Tema 1 MI MHM Banjarsari Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Desain penelitian yang digunakan dalam analisis kualitas butir soal pilihan ganda Penilaan Akhir Semester ganjil kelas VI Tema 1 MI MHM Banjarsari Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020 adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metodeanalisis dokumen. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah lembar soal dan lembarjawaban siswa peserta Penilaian Akhir Semester (PAS) ganjil Kelas VI Tema 1 MI MHM Banjarsari. Penghitungan tingkat kesulitan, daya beda, efektivitas pengecoh, validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen pada penelitian ini menggunakan program Anates V 0.4. Hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan menunjukan bahwa kualitas butir soal penilaian akhir semester ganjil tema 1 di MI MHM Banjarsari tahun 2019/2020 dari total 35 soal pilihan ganda ditinjau dari tingkat kesukaran didapatkan sebanyak 10 butir soal (28,57%) dengan tingkat kesukaran soal dalam kategori sangat mudah, 7 butir soal (20%) dalam kategori mudah, 14 butir soal (40%) dalam kategori sedang, 3 butir soal (8,57%) dalam kategori sukar, dan 1 butir soal (2,86%) dalam kategori sangat sukar. Ditinjau dari daya beda soal penilaian akhir semester ganjil tema 1 didapatkan 5 butir soal (14,29%) dalam kategori sangat jelek, 13 butir soal (37,14%) dalam kategori jelek, 6 butir soal (17,14%) dalam kategori cukup, 10 butir soal (28,57%) dalam kategori baik, dan 1 butir soal (2,86%) dalam kategori sangat baik. Ditinjau dari pengecoh jawaban soal penilaian akhir semester ganjil tema 1 terdapat sebanyak 3 soal (8,57% dalam kategori sangat buruk, 6 soal (17,14%) dalam kategori buruk, 4 soal (11,48%) dalam kategori baik, dan 22 soal (62,86%) dalam kategori sangat baik. Ditinjau dari validitas soal penilaian akhir semester ganjil tema 1 didapatkan soal valid (signifikan/sangat signifikan) sejumlah 15 soal (42,86%) dan untuk soal yang tidak valid sejumlah 20 soal (57,14 %). Ditinjau dari reabilitas didapatkan sebesar 0.81. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa kualitas butir soal bisa dikatakan kurang baik]

scholarly journals Quality of Tests on Mathematics Questions for Year-End Assessment (PAT) Class VIII at SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 259
Author(s):  
Yola Putri Anggraini ◽  
Yenita Roza ◽  
Maimunah Maimunah
Keyword(s):  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Reliability Level ◽  
School Year ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive ◽  
High Level ◽  
Academic Year

This study aims to determine the quality of the test on multiple choice questions in mathematics for Year End Assessment (PAT) class VIII SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota for the 2019/2020 academic year based on the level of question validity, reliability level, difficulty level, distinguishing power, and option effectiveness cheater). This research is an evaluation with a quantitative descriptive approach. The research was conducted with a sample of 30 student answer sheets. Techniques for collecting data are documentation techniques. After the data is collected, the data will be analyzed with the help of Excel. Judging from the results of this analysis, it can be seen that the End of Year Assessment (PAT) questions for class VIII SMPN 2 Bangkinang Kota for the 2019/2020 academic year were not carried out by quantitative reviewers. Judging from the level of validity, it consists of 14 valid questions, while the other 16 questions are said to be invalid. The PAT questions have a high level of reliability. As for the difficulty level of the questions, there are 7 items (23.33%) difficult, 18 items (60%) moderate, and 5 items (16.66%) easy. The distinguishing power is 8 questions that are bad (26.66%), 7 questions with sufficient criteria (23.33%), 7 questions with good criteria (23.33%), and 8 questions with very good criteria (26.66%) ). For the effectiveness of the option, 4 items (13.33%) were very good, 15 items (50%) were good, 9 items (30%) were bad, and 2 items (6.33%) were very bad. So that based on the results of the quantitative test, it turns out that most of the items were not of good quality for Class VIII Year End Assessment (PAT) for the 2019/2020 school year.

scholarly journals EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER MATA PELAJARAN BISNIS ONLINE KELAS XII SMK SUNAN DRAJAT LAMONGAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
MIFTACHUL ULUM
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Cronbach Alpha ◽  
Learning Evaluation ◽  
Online Business ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Academic Year

At the end of each semester in an education unit, a learning evaluation is always carried out. One form of learning evaluation in schools is to carry out final semester exams. This study aims to determine the quality of online business lesson items for class XII SMK Sunan Drajat Lamongan in the odd semester 2017/2018 academic year in terms of validity, reliability, difficulty level and difference tests. This quantitative research is based on data from 21 student answer sheets from 25 multiple choice questions. The use of SPSS and Anates V4 software was used to measure the level of validity, reliability, difficulty level and item difference. The results showed that the validity value obtained was 15 items (60%) were declared invalid and 10 items (40%) were declared valid. Reliability of the items with a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.640> 0.6, which means that the instrument of the 25 items was declared reliable. The level of difficulty of the tested items obtained 5 items in the very easy category, 10 items in the easy category and 10 items in the moderate category. Of the 25 items, 8 items (32%) are good, 7 (28%) are sufficient and 10 (40%) are bad

Experience Versus Potential of Multiple-Choice Tests in Marketing Courses

1979 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. McMillan
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Test Form ◽  
Multiple Choice Tests ◽  
Choice Tests ◽  
Classroom Evaluation ◽  
Quality Objective ◽  
Multiple Choice Items

Most educators agree that classroom evaluation practices need improvement. One way to improve testing is to use high-quality objective multiple-choice exams. Almost any understanding or ability which can be tested by another test form can also be tested by means of multiple-choice items. Based on a survey of 173 respondents, it appears that marketing teachers are disenchanted with multiple-choice questions and use them sparingly. Further, their limited use is largely in the introductory marketing course even though there are emerging pressures for universities to take a closer look at the quality of classroom evaluation at all levels.

scholarly journals Aceh Besar تحليل بناء بنود الإختبار لمادة اللغة العربية بمعهد روح الإسلام أناك بنجسا

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 204
Author(s):  
Sheila Meilina ◽  
Tarmizi Ninoersy ◽  
Salma Hayati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Arabic Language ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Evaluation Question ◽  
Multiple Choice Items

So far, the making of evaluation question for Arabic language lessons at MAS Ruhul Islam Anak Bangsa Aceh Besar has not been conducted in-depth qualitative research according to competency standards, especially in item construction, before being tested on students. The teacher designs the items only based on the difficulty level of the questions without looking at other aspects. Therefore, the aim of this research is to describe the accuracy of the construction of multiple choice items in Arabic lessons in class XI MAS 2019/2020 using descriptive statistical analysis methods. This type of research is qualitative research, the population in this research is 50 multiple choice questions in Arabic that designed by the teacher for class XI MAS Ruhul Islam Anak Bangsa 2019/2020. The sample of this research is 25 questions from the population and the sampling uses simple random sampling technique. Data collection techniques of this research are documentation. Qualitative analysis techniques was carried out using a format (table) designed by the researcher. The results of this study were based on samples, there were 16 questions in accordance with the research aspect of the accuracy of the construction of multiple choice items, while 9 other questions were not in accordance with the aspects of the accuracy of the construction of multiple choice items. When viewed from the aspect of construction accuracy in the total sample size, it is found that 8 aspects have been dominantly owned by all samples and 4 other aspects are not owned by the sample. And it is known that the 50 questions designed by the teacher belong to the types of distracters questions.

Affix-based Distractor Generation for Tamil Multiple Choice Questions using Neural Word Embedding

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanthi Murugan ◽  
◽  
Balasundaram S R ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Research Effort ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Automatic Generation ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Educational Domain ◽  
Part Of Speech ◽  
Educational Applications

Assessment plays an important role in learning and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are quite popular in large-scale evaluations. Technology enabled learning necessitates a smart assessment. Therefore, automatic MCQ generation became increasingly popular in the last two decades. Despite a large amount of research effort, system generated MCQs are not useful in real educational applications. This is because of the inability to produce the diverse and human alike distractors. Distractors are the wrong choices given along with the correct answer (key) to confuse the examinee. Especially, in educational domain (grammar learning) the MCQs deal with affix-based or morphologically transformed distractors. In this paper, we present a method for automatic generation of affix-based distractors for fill-in-the-blanks for learning Tamil Vocabulary. Affix-based distractor generation relies on certain regularities manifest in high dimensional spaces. We investigate the quality of distractors generated by a number of criteria, including Part-Of-Speech, difficulty level, spelling, word co-occurrence, semantic similarity and affixation. We evaluated our proposed method in grammar based Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) dataset. The result shows that affix-based distractors, yield significantly more plausible outcomes in certain grammar based questions.

scholarly journals Item and distracter analysis of multiple choice questions (MCQs) from a preliminary examination of undergraduate medical students

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 5351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Durgesh Prasad Sahoo ◽  
Rakesh Singh
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Discrimination Index ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Preliminary Examination ◽  
High Discrimination ◽  
Difficulty Index

Background: Multiple choice questions (MCQs) or Items forms an important part to assess students in different educational streams. It is an objective mode of assessment which requires both the validity and reliability depending on the characteristics of its items i.e. difficulty index, discrimination index and distracter efficiency. To evaluate MCQs or items and build a bank of high-quality test items by assessing with difficulty index, discrimination index and distracter efficiency and also to revise/store or remove errant items based on obtained results.Methods: A preliminary examination of Third MBBS Part-1 was conducted by Department of Community Medicine undertaken for 100 students. Two separate papers with total 30 MCQs or items and 90 distractors each in both papers were analyzed and compared. Descriptive as well as inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.Results: The findings show that most of the items were falling in acceptable range of difficulty level however some items were rejected due to poor discrimination index. Overall paper I was found to be more difficult and more discriminatory, but its distractor efficiency was slightly low as compared to paper II.Conclusions: The analysis helped us in selection of quality MCQs having high discrimination and average difficulty with three functional distractors. This should be incorporated into future evaluations to improve the test score and properly discriminate among the students.

scholarly journals ANALISIS KUALITAS BUTIR SOAL PILIHAN GANDA MATA PELAJARAN KIMIA PADA UJIAN AKHIR SEMESTER (UAS) KELAS XI MAN 2 KEPULAUAN MERANTI

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Ulfah Zahiroh ◽  
Pangoloan Soleman Ritonga
Keyword(s):  
Test Item ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Answer Sheet ◽  
Choice Test ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
Good Test ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This research aimed at knowing the quality of test item derived from its validity, reliability, difficulty level, discriminator power, and distractor effectiveness. Quantitative descriptive method was used in this research. Interview and documentation were the techniques of collecting the data. The data source used was in evensemester exam questions that were in the forms of multiple-choice, student answer sheet, and answer key. Anates 4.0.9 program was to analyze the quality of test items. The research findings of the analysis of multiple-choice test item quality on semester final exam of Chemistry subject at the eleventh grade of State Islamic Senior High School 2 Kepulauan Meranti showed that in the validity analysis there were 6 valid test items (17%) and 29 non validitems (83%); in the reliability analysis it was obtained the reliability score 0.955; in the difficulty level analysis there were 12 easy test items (34%), 17 medium items (49%), and 6 hard items (17%); in the discriminator power analysis there were 4 very good test items (11.5%), a good item (3%), 19 items (54%) that should be revised, and 11 items (31.5%) that should be eliminated; in the distractor effectiveness there 26 very good options (19%), 10 good options (7%), 25 poor options (18%), 55 bad options (39%), and 24 very bad options (17%). Therefore, it could be concluded that the quality of test items could be stated bad.

CORRELATION OF DIFFICULTY INDEX AND DISCRIMINATING INDEX IN MEDICAL STUDENT’S ASSESSMENT.

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Bhoomika R. Chauhan ◽  
Jayesh Vaza ◽  
Girish R. Chauhan ◽  
Pradip R. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Item Difficulty ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Discriminating Power ◽  
Good Discriminator ◽  
Difficulty Index ◽  
The Relationship

Multiple choice questions are nowadays used in competitive examination and formative assessment to assess the student's eligibility and certification.Item analysis is the process of collecting,summarizing and using information from students' responses to assess the quality of test items.Goal of the study was to identify the relationship between the item difficulty index and item discriminating index in medical student's assessment. 400 final year medical students from various medical colleges responded 200 items constructed for the study.The responses were assessed and analysed for item difficulty index and item discriminating power. Item difficulty index an item discriminating power were analysed by statical methods to identify correlation.The discriminating power of the items with difficulty index in 40%-50% was the highest. Summary and Conclusion:Items with good difficulty index in range of 30%-70% are good discriminator.

scholarly journals Developing Computerized Adaptive Testing: An Experimental Research on Assessing the Mathematical Ability of 10 Graders (Vietnam K12 Education Program)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Thai Hung ◽  
Nguyen Thi Quynh Giang ◽  
Tang Thi Thuy ◽  
Tran Lan Anh ◽  
Nguyen Tien Dung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computerized Adaptive Testing ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Adaptive Testing ◽  
Mathematical Ability ◽  
Difficulty Level ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Multiple Choice Tests ◽  
Mathematical Algorithms ◽  
Kolmogorov Smirnov ◽  
Initial Outcome

Computerized Adaptive Testing - CAT is a form of assessment test which requires fewer test questions to arrive at precise measurements of examinees' ability. One of the core technical components in building a CAT is mathematical algorithms which estimate examinee's ability and select the most appropriate test questions for those estimates. Those mathematical algorithms serve as a locomotive in operating the system of adaptive multiple-choice questions on computers.  Our research aims to develop essential mathematical algorithms to a computerised system of adaptive multiple-choice tests. We also build a question bank of 500 multiple-choice questions standardised by IRT theory with the difficulty level follows the normal distribution satisfying Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, to measure the mathematical ability of students in grade 10. The initial outcome of our experiment of the question bank shows: the question bank satisfies the requirements from a psychometric model and the constructed mathematical algorithms meets the criteria to apply in computerised adaptive testing.

scholarly journals The problems that face the six grade students in Kuwait state in learning science subject from the point of students and teachers view in Mubarak Al-Kabeer area: المشكلات التي تواجه طلاب الصف السادس بدولة الكويت في تعلم مادة العلوم من وجهة نظر المعلمين والطلاب في منطقة مبارك الكبير

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuzha Abdulaziz Alrashed
Keyword(s):  
Science Teachers ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Teaching Aids ◽  
Sixth Grade Students ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
The Given ◽  
Academic Year

This research aims to identify the difficulties of science learning among sixth grade students as determined and estimated by science teachers and students. To achieve the aims of this research, the researcher depends on the analysis descriptive approach. It identifies the percentages of the difficulty aspects included in questionnaires. For this purpose, the researcher designed two templates of questionnaires. First questionnaire consists of 20 items regarding the difficulties of science learning from students' perspective. Second questionnaire consists of 22 items regarding impediments of science learning from teachers' perspective. The validity and reliability of questionnaires were established. A random sample of 24 science teachers and 295 sixth grade students was used in Mubarak Al-kabeer area. The study was conducted in the second semester of the academic year 2018-2019.The findings reveal that there are no significant differences in the responses of students in different schools about the difficulties of science learning listed in the questionnaires such as the required topics quantity that forms a common difficulty for the student and the teacher in the same time , and some topics that needs longer time more than the given time in the lesson plans to explain and simplify them for the students. In light of the findings of the research were presented a number of recommendations and proposals, including: the need for attention to quantity and quality of academic content, where suitable for students in the sixth grade level and the specificity of the stage they are going through, the need to use teaching methods, activities and teaching aids, and to train in-service teachers on modern trends in science education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document