scholarly journals Regorafenib in Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Large and Monocentric Real-Life Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4731
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lombardi ◽  
Mario Caccese ◽  
Marta Padovan ◽  
Giulia Cerretti ◽  
Giovanna Pintacuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Life Study

Despite multimodal treatment with surgery and radiochemotherapy, the prognosis of glioblastoma remains poor, and practically all glioblastomas relapse. To date, no standard treatment exists for recurrent glioblastoma patients and traditional therapies have showed limited efficacy. Regorafenib is an oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor showing encouraging benefits in recurrent GBM patients enrolled in the REGOMA trial. We performed a large study to investigate clinical outcomes and the safety of regorafenib in a real-life population of recurrent glioblastoma patients. Patients receiving regorafenib outside clinical trials at the Veneto Institute of Oncology were retrospectively reviewed. The major inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed diagnosis of glioblastoma, prior first line therapy according to “Stupp protocol”, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score ≤1. According to the original schedule, patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. The primary endpoints of the study were overall survival and safety. A total of 54 consecutive patients were enrolled. The median age was 56, MGMT methylated status was found in 28 out of 53 available patients (52.8%), IDH mutation in 5 (9.3%) and 22 patients were receiving steroids at baseline. The median overall survival was 10.2 months (95% CI, 6.4–13.9), the OS-12 was 43%. Age, MGMT methylation status and steroid use at baseline were not statistically significant on a multivariate analysis for OS. Patients reporting a disease control as best response to regorafenib demonstrated a significant longer survival (24.8 months vs. 6.2 months for patients with progressive disease, p = 0.0001). Grade 3 drug-related adverse events occurred in 10 patients (18%); 1 patient (2%) reported a grade 4 adverse event (rash maculo-papular). No death was considered to be drug-related. This study reported the first large “real-life” experience of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma. Overall, our results are close to the ones reported in the previous phase 2 study, despite the fact that we had a longer survival. We showed the encouraging activity and tolerability of this treatment in recurrent glioblastoma patients when used as a second-line treatment.

CTIM-14. RANDOMIZED PHASE II OPEN LABEL STUDY OF NIVOLUMAB PLUS STANDARD DOSE BEVACIZUMAB VS NIVOLUMAB PLUS LOW DOSE BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (RGBM). NIVOLUMAB BENEFITS OLDER POPULATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi52-vi52
Author(s):  
Manmeet Ahluwalia ◽  
David Peereboom ◽  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Patrick Wen ◽  
David Reardon
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Anti Vegf

Abstract BACKGROUND Approaches using anti-PD1 therapy alone in rGBM is of limited efficacy. VEGF is upregulated proangiogenic growth factor in GBM that contributes to tumor-associated immunosuppression. Preclinical data suggests a potential dose effect of anti-VEGF therapy on immunomodulation. Hence, a combination of anti-PD1 and anti-VEGF may be a promising approach in rGBM. METHODS 90 patients with GBM at first recurrence were randomized (1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg IV Q2 weeks) with bevacizumab at standard (10 mg/kg; Arm A) or at low dose (3 mg/kg; Arm B) IV Q2 weeks. Stratification included extent of resection, age, performance status and MGMT methylation status. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between two arms. RESULTS 90 patients (Median age 60.6 years ranged 27.4-86.4, 67.8% male, median KPS 80) were enrolled between May 2018 and Jan 2020. Patients were followed in median 7.7 months (Range 0.7, 28.2). 35 patients were MGMT methylated and 53 patients were MGMT not hypermethylated and 2 were indeterminate. Overall Survival was not significantly different between arm A and arm B (1 year: 41.1 vs 37.7%, p=0.14), while OS was better for arm A in age > 60 (At 1-year: 46.2% vs 23.8%; Median: 10.6 vs 5.9 months; P=0.046). OS was no different in the two arms for age ≤ 60 years (At 1-year: 35.6% vs 56.4; Median 8.0 vs 12.4 months; P=0.90). Most frequent toxicities ( >20%) included fatigue (45.6%), proteinuria (34.4 %), diarrhea (28.9%), hypertension (23.3%) and lipase increase (21.1%). Toxicities in grade 3-4 were hypertension (7.8%), fatigue (5.6) and other non-neurological toxicities including DVT, PE, infection, and abnormal liver function. CONCLUSIONS Overall PFS and OS rates appear similar for nivolumab with either standard or low-dose bevacizumab compared to historical benchmarks of bevacizumab monotherapy. Nivolumab with standard bevacizumab seem to benefit patients older than 60 years old.

scholarly journals Toxicity management of regorafenib in patients with gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST) in a tertiary cancer centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Chamberlain ◽  
Sheima Farag ◽  
Constance Williams-Sharkey ◽  
Cecilia Collingwood ◽  
Lucia Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Background Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as third line treatment for metastatic GIST. Dose limiting toxicities are frequently seen and many patients require dose reductions. This study aimed to evaluate regorafenib toxicities and their management in a real-world GIST population. Methods Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 50 patients with GIST treated with regorafenib at our centre between March 2013 and September 2018. Results Median progression free survival (PFS) was 7.7 months [interquartile range (IQR) 2.8–14.4 months]. Median overall survival (OS) from start of regorafenib to death or last follow up was 15.7 months (IQR 9.2–28.4 months). Baseline median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status on starting regorafenib was 1. The main reason for discontinuing regorafenib was progressive disease (PD) (31/50 [62%]) rather than toxicity (10/50 [20%]). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 23/50 (46%) patients; palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) was most frequently seen (9/50 (18%)). Two patients died whilst on treatment with regorafenib from multi-organ failure secondary to sepsis (4%). Dose reductions were required in 19/50 patients (38%) and 8/50 (16%) patients started regorafenib at a lower dose band than the recommended dose (160 mg) due to comorbidities or concern over a higher individual risk of toxicity. Conclusion Although PD was the main reason for discontinuing treatment, toxicity management and dosing of regorafenib remains critical. Median duration of treatment was longer compared to previous studies suggesting a durable clinical benefit with regorafenib with rigorous toxicity management.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

scholarly journals Clinical Application of Trans-Arterial Radioembolization in Hepatic Malignancies in Europe: First Results from the Prospective Multicentre Observational Study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres Therapy (CIRT)

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Helmberger ◽  
◽  
Rita Golfieri ◽  
Maciej Pech ◽  
Thomas Pfammatter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Application ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Disease Patient ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Liver Tumours ◽  
The Real

Abstract Purpose To address the lack of prospective data on the real-life clinical application of trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) in Europe, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) initiated the prospective observational study CIRSE Registry for SIR-Spheres® Therapy (CIRT). Materials and Methods Patients were enrolled from 1 January 2015 till 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were adult patients treated with TARE with Y90 resin microspheres for primary or metastatic liver tumours. Patients were followed up for 24 months after treatment, whereas data on the clinical context of TARE, overall survival (OS) and safety were collected. Results Totally, 1027 patients were analysed. 68.2% of the intention of treatment was palliative. Up to half of the patients received systemic therapy and/or locoregional treatments prior to TARE (53.1%; 38.3%). Median overall survival (OS) was reported per cohort and was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.2–19.3) for hepatocellular carcinoma, 14.6 months (95% CI 10.9–17.9) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. For liver metastases, median OS for colorectal cancer was 9.8 months (95% CI 8.3–12.9), 5.6 months for pancreatic cancer (95% CI 4.1–6.6), 10.6 months (95% CI 7.3–14.4) for breast cancer, 14.6 months (95% CI 7.3–21.4) for melanoma and 33.1 months (95% CI 22.1–nr) for neuroendocrine tumours. Statistically significant prognostic factors in terms of OS include the presence of ascites, cirrhosis, extra-hepatic disease, patient performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group), number of chemotherapy lines prior to TARE and tumour burden. Thirty-day mortality rate was 1.0%. 2.5% experienced adverse events grade 3 or 4 within 30 days after TARE. Conclusion In the real-life clinical setting, TARE is largely considered to be a part of a palliative treatment strategy across indications and provides an excellent safety profile. Level of evidence Level 3. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02305459.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955491882544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Aljubran ◽  
Mahmoud A Elshenawy ◽  
Magdy Kandil ◽  
Muhammed N Zahir ◽  
Ahmed Shaheen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of refractory advanced colorectal cancer. It was found in the clinical trials to have a modest benefit and significant toxicity. Our aim was to assess the outcome in our local clinic practice. Patients and methods: Records of patients with confirmed colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib were reviewed. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data were collected. Efficacy and factors of possible prognostic significance were analyzed. Results: A total of 78 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with regorafenib from February 2014 to February 2016 in 4 different institutions (median age: 50.5 years; male: 40 [51.3%]; KRAS mutant: 41 [52%]; right colonic primary: 18 [23%]). A total of 52 patients (66.7%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 to 1, whereas in 25 patients (32.1%) it was >1. In total, 58 patients (74%) had dose reduction. No patient achieved objective response, 15 patients (19%) achieved stable disease, and 56 patients (72%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 6.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-3.3) and overall survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.7). Only performance status of ⩽1 had a statistically significant impact on progression-free survival and overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Regorafenib in our clinical practice has equal efficacy to reported data from pivotal registration trials. Our data suggest that performance status is the most important prognostic factor in patients treated with regorafenib, suggesting a careful selection of patients.

Randomized phase II comparison of standard CHOP with weekly CHOP in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2386-2393 ◽  
Author(s):  
R M Meyer ◽  
G P Browman ◽  
M L Samosh ◽  
A M Benger ◽  
D Bryant-Lukosius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
And Performance

PURPOSE To determine whether modifying the standard regimen of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) from full doses given every 3 weeks to one-third doses given weekly (chop) increases the received chemotherapy dose-intensity in elderly patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consenting patients, age > or = 65 years who had acceptable cardiac, renal, and liver function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than 4, were stratified by bone marrow and performance status and randomized to receive standard CHOP or weekly chop. Drug doses were attenuated or escalated according to a defined dose-modification schedule. The primary outcome was average relative received dose-intensity. Secondary outcomes included response, progression-free and overall survival, toxicity, and performance status. RESULTS Nineteen patients were allocated to each group. No difference in received dose-intensity was seen. When dose-intensity was calculated for the first six cycles of therapy, average relative received dose-intensity was .92 with CHOP versus .89 with weekly chop (P = .5); when calculated for the first 18 weeks of therapy, values were .88 with CHOP versus .89 with weekly chop (P = .8). The complete response rate was 68% with CHOP versus 74% with weekly chop (P = .9). At 2 years, the progression-free survival rate was 57% with CHOP versus 46% with weekly chop (P = .16) and the survival rate was 74% with CHOP versus 51% with weekly chop (p = .05). More myelotoxicity was seen with CHOP. CONCLUSION We conclude that CHOP can be given in sufficient doses to elderly patients and that weekly chop does not increase received dose-intensity. Progression-free and overall survival are unlikely to be superior with weekly chop, and may be worse. CHOP should remain the standard against which new therapies for elderly patients with intermediate-grade lymphoma are compared.

scholarly journals Cemiplimab for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinomas: Real-Life Experience from the French CAREPI Study Group

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3547
Author(s):  
Candice Hober ◽  
Lisa Fredeau ◽  
Anne Pham-Ledard ◽  
Marouane Boubaya ◽  
Florian Herms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinomas ◽  
Early Access

Although cemiplimab has been approved for locally advanced (la) and metastatic (m) cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas (CSCCs), its real-life value has not yet been demonstrated. An early-access program enrolled patients with la/mCSCCs to receive cemiplimab. Endpoints were best overall response rate (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. The 245 patients (mean age 77 years, 73% male, 49% prior systemic treatment, 24% immunocompromised, 27% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥ 2) had laCSCCs (35%) or mCSCCs (65%). For the 240 recipients of ≥1 infusion(s), the BOR was 50.4% (complete, 21%; partial, 29%). With median follow-up at 12.6 months, median PFS was 7.9 months, and median OS and DOR were not reached. One-year OS was 73% versus 36%, respectively, for patients with PS < 2 versus ≥ 2. Multivariate analysis retained PS ≥ 2 as being associated during the first 6 months with PFS and OS. Head-and-neck location was associated with longer PFS. Immune status had no impact. Severe treatment-related adverse events occurred in 9% of the patients, including one death from toxic epidermal necrolysis. Cemiplimab real-life safety and efficacy support its use for la/mCSCCs. Patients with PS ≥ 2 benefited less from cemiplimab, but it might represent an option for immunocompromised patients.

Randomized clinical trials and real life studies: Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients in oral target therapies for renal cell carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110055
Author(s):  
Ruggero Lasala ◽  
Fiorenzo Santoleri ◽  
Alessia Romagnoli ◽  
Felice Musicco ◽  
Paolo Abrate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Target Therapies ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Introduction Pivotal Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) constitute scientific evidence in support of therapeutic choices when a drug is authorized in the market. In RCTs, patients are selected in a rigorous manner, in order to avoid bias that may influence efficacy assessments. Therefore, patients who take the drug in Real Life Studies (RLSs) are not the same as those participating in RCTs, which, in turn, leads to low data transferability from RCTs to RLS. The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between RCTs and RLS, in terms of patient baseline characteristics. Materials and Methods Our study includes all oral target therapies for RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma) marketed in Europe before March 31, 2019. For each treatment, we considered both RCTs and RLSs, the former gathered from Summary of Product Characteristics published on the European Medicine Agency (EMA) website, and the latter yielded by our search in relevant literature. For each drug considered, we then compared the baseline characteristics of patients included in the RCT samples with those of the samples included in the RLSs using the Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests. Results We considered six medicines, for a total of 9 pivotal RCTs and 31 RLSs. RCTs reported the same type of patient baseline characteristics, whereas RLSs are more varied in reporting. Some patient baseline characteristics (metastases, previous treatments, etc.) were significantly different between RCTs and RLs. Other characteristics, such as ECOG Performance Status, brain metastases, and comorbidities, liver and kidney failure, are comprised in exclusion criteria of RCTs, though are included in RLS. Discussion and Conclusion: While evaluating equal treatments for the same indications, RCTs and RLSs do not always assess patients with the same characteristics. It would be necessary to produce evidence from RLSs so as to have an idea of treatment effectiveness in patients groups that are not eligible or underrepresented in RCTs.

scholarly journals NCOG-19. BEVACIZUMAB IN REAL LIFE PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: BENEFIT OR FUTILITY?

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii133-ii133
Author(s):  
Cristina Smolenschi ◽  
Emeline Colomba ◽  
Elie Rassy ◽  
Naima Lezghed ◽  
Mohamed Kettab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Arterial Bleeding ◽  
Substantial Clinical Benefit ◽  
Radiological Response

Abstract Angiogenesis represents a hallmark of glioblastoma but most trials disappointed and failed to change the poor outcome of this disease. However, Bevacizumab (Bev) is widely used in clinical practice by expert oncologists due to experience or efficacy in real life.We retrospectively reviewed the use of Bev and its benefit in terms of Time to treatment failure (TTF), Overall Survival(OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and clinical benefit. METHODS: We analyzed two hundred and two patients treated at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus with Bev until definitive failure for recurrent glioblastoma between 2006 and 2016. Patients were treated with Bev alone or in association with radiotherapy, temozolomide, lomustine or irinotecan. RESULTS: The median duration of Bev treatment until definitive failure was 6 months. The median TTF was 7.27 months(95%CI 6.30-8.24) and the median OS from diagnosis was 22.43 months(95%CI 19.68-25.18). Two patients were still alive without active treatment at the end of study. A hundred and fourteen (56%) patients experienced symptom amelioration and seventy-five (37%) improved their Performance Status. Fifty percent of patients exhibited Partial and Complete Response on MRI, as best radiological response, within 1.6 months. No patient had anaphylactic reaction. Grade 1-2 hypertension(HT)(17%) and grade 1(10%) proteinuria were most common. Six patients presented lethal toxicity: 4 with GI perforation, 1 p with cerebral hemorrhage and 1 p with arterial bleeding. HT was correlated with treatment response in 67% of patients. A neutrophil count superior to 6000/mm³ was associated with longer TTF(mTTF 8.23m(95%CI 6.64-9.82). CONCLUSION: This retrospective study reports a substantial clinical benefit of Bev in patients with recurrent glioblastoma with an acceptable toxicity profile. As the panel of therapeutic option is still very limited in these tumors, this work supports the maintained use of Bev as a therapeutic option.

scholarly journals RADT-23. IMPACT OF REIRRADIATION UTILIZING STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY ON RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii186-ii186
Author(s):  
O’Dell Patrick ◽  
H Nickols ◽  
R LaRocca ◽  
K Sinicrope ◽  
D Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients who have recurrent glioblastoma have limited treatment options. We conducted a retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with standard initial radiation and temozolomide with tumor treating fields to investigate whether reirradiation using radiosurgery would be associated with improved outcomes. METHODS We reviewed the records of 54 consecutively treated patients with recurrent glioblastoma with ECOG 0 or 1 at recurrence and conducted Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-rank testing to determine significance between groups. RESULTS We identified 24 patients who were treated without radiation therapy (control) while 30 patients underwent re-irradiation using radiosurgery (ReSRS) with a median total dose of 25Gy in five fractions. All patients had completed standard initial therapy, and there was no difference in the time to recurrence between the two groups (10 months for control, 15 months for ReSRS, [P = 0.17, HR for progression 0.65 (95% CI 0.38-1.13)]. A larger proportion of patients in the control arm (54%) had subtotal or gross total resection of the recurrence compared with the ReSRS group (44%, P &lt; 0.05). The majority of patients had recurrence confirmed with biopsy (18/22 in control group, 25/31 in the ReSRS group). MGMT methylation status did not differ between control vs ReSRS (29% vs. 27%). ReSRS was associated with improved median survival from the time of first recurrence of 11.6 months versus 3.8 months in the control arm [P&lt; 0.0001, HR for death 0.33 (95% CI 0.18-0.6)]. CONCLUSIONS In a group of patients with high performance status diagnosed with recurrent glioblastoma, reirradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery was associated with nearly one year median survival after recurrence. Additional analyses are warranted to determine the impact of concurrent systemic therapies with irradiation and underlying tumor or patient factors to predict outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document