scholarly journals Analisis Pengembangan Budaya Akademik dan Problematikanya di Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-33
Author(s):  
Selvi Ma'ruf ◽  
Abdur Rahman Adi Saputera

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kendala dalam mengembangkan budaya akademik di Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Sedangkan jenis penelitian ini menggunakan gabungan metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif yang disebut mixed methods (metode campuran/kombinasi). Data kualitatif dan kuantitatif dikumpulkan untuk saling melengkapi. Hasil Penelitian menyatakan bahwa Budaya akademik FITK IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo berdasarkan pelaksanaan Tri dharma Perguruan. Kendala dalam mengembangkan budaya akademik di Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, yaitu faktor internal dan eksternal. Faktor internal masih terdapat dosen yang kurang disiplin terhadap frekuensi perkuliahan/tatap muka, budaya membaca dan menulis buku masih rendah baik dosen ataupun mahasiswa. Faktor eksternal, dimana sarana pendukung alat membaca buku-buku digital-e-reader di perpustakaan seperti komputer/laptop belum tersedia khusus untuk ruang baca serta minimnya pengadaan bahan pustaka baru setiap tahun.   Kata Kunci : Pengembangan, Budaya Akademik   Abstract This study aims to analyze the constraints in developing academic culture in the Faculty of Tarbiyah IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, while this type of research uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods called mixed methods (mixed methods/combination). Qualitative and quantitative data are collected to complement each other. The results of the study stated that the academic culture of FITK IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo was based on the implementation of the Tri Dharma Perguruan. Constraints in developing academic culture in the Faculty of Sciences Tarbiyah IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, namely internal and external factors. Internal factors are still lecturers who lack discipline in the frequency of lectures/face to face, the culture of reading and writing books is still low both lecturers and students. External factors, where the means of supporting tools to read digital-e-reader books in libraries such as computers/laptops are not yet available specifically for reading rooms and the lack of procurement of new library materials every year.   Keywords: Development, Academic Culture

HUMANIS ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1081
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Pradnya Wati ◽  
I Wayan Simpen ◽  
Ni Wayan Arnati

This research entitled "Bilingual of Employee Tourism in Gianyar Regency, Bali". The purpose of this research is to know the bilingual of tourism employee in Gianyar based on topic, situation, aspect, and causal factor. The theory used is a sociolinguistic theory that was discovered by Mackey and Fishman. Methods and techniques of data collection used is a method refer to instrument techniques, see libat ably, and record. In the data analysis phase using qualitative and quantitative methods. In the presentation stage of data analysis using informal and formal methods. The population of this study is the entire employees engaged in tourism in Gianyar regency, Bali. The sample of this study was sixty respondents. Based on the analysis that has been done is known that employees working in the field of tourism in Gianyar mastered two to three languages. The modern topic of the language office realm that is often used is Indonesian, while for traditional topics the language is often used is the local language. For situations in the realm of the office, formal situations use the Indonesian language, whereas in informal situations often use local languages. Modern and traditional topics in the domestic realm of informal situations use local languages, namely Balinese and Javanese. However, the most widely encountered is the Balinese language. The Balinese language consists of two types, namely high and low. The high variety used by triwangsa and low variety is used by employees not triwangsa. In addition, the factors that cause bilinguality among employees are internal and external factors. Internal factors, namely age, gender, and daily life of respondents. External factors, ie speech, topic, and speaker contact. The biggest factor is the external factor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Moltke Martiny ◽  
Juan Toro ◽  
Simon Høffding

Despite a long history of researchers who combine phenomenology with qualitative or quantitative methods, there are only few examples of working with a phenomenological mixed method—a method where phenomenology informs both qualitative and quantitative data generation, analysis, and interpretation. Researchers have argued that in working with a phenomenological mixed method, there should be mutual constraint and enlightenment between the qualitative (first-person, subjective) and quantitative (third-person, objective) methods for studying consciousness. In this article, we discuss what a framework for phenomenological mixed methods could look like and we aim to provide guidance of how to work within such framework. We are inspired by resources coming from research in mixed methods and existing examples of phenomenological mixed-method research. We also present three cases of phenomenological mixed methods where we study complex social phenomena and discuss the process of how we conducted the studies. From both the research inspiration and our own studies, we depict the landscape of possibilities available for those interested in mixing phenomenology with qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as the challenges and common pitfalls that researchers face. To navigate in this landscape, we develop a three-fold structure, focusing on (1) the phenomenological frame, (2) the phenomenologically informed generation of qualitative and quantitative data (tier one), and (3) the phenomenologically informed analysis and interpretation of data (tier two).


Author(s):  
Daphne C. Watkins

Mixed methods research integrates both qualitative and quantitative methods into a single study to produce a more inclusive and expansive understanding of a topic. This article defines mixed methods in social work research, and discusses design notation, language, popular mixed methods designs, and data integration. Using mixed methods provides an opportunity for social workers to take advantage of the strengths of both qualitative and quantitative approaches and to offset their weaknesses. It is important that social workers engaged in mixed methods research maximize the interpretation of their findings and articulate the advantages of using mixed methods over qualitative or quantitative methods alone. Given the unique features of the profession, it is imperative that social workers carve out a distinctive mixed methods niche for social work researchers and practitioners.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 666-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navdeep Kaur ◽  
Isabelle Vedel ◽  
Reem El Sherif ◽  
Pierre Pluye

Abstract Background Mixed methods (MM) are common in community-based primary health care (CBPHC) research studies. Several strategies have been proposed to integrate qualitative and quantitative components in MM, but they are seldom well conceptualized and described. The purpose of the present review was to identify and describe practical MM strategies and combinations of strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in CBPHC research. Methods A methodological review with qualitative synthesis (grouping) was performed. Records published in English in 2015 were retrieved from the Scopus bibliographic database. Eligibility criteria were: CBPHC empirical study, MM research with detailed description of qualitative and quantitative methods and their integration. Data were extracted from included studies and grouped using a conceptual framework comprised of three theoretical types of MM integration, the seven combinations of these types and nine practical strategies (three per type of integration) and multiple combinations of strategies. Results Among the 151 articles reporting CBPHC and MM studies retrieved, 54 (35.7%) met the inclusion criteria for this review. The included studies provided examples of the three theoretical types of MM integration, the seven combinations of these types as well as the nine practical strategies. Overall, 15 combinations of these strategies were observed. No emerging strategy was observed that was not predicted by the conceptual framework. Conclusions This review can provide guidance to CBPHC researchers for planning, conducting and reporting practical strategies and combinations of strategies used for integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in MM research.


2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Yalowitz ◽  
Marcella D. Wells

In visitor studies, there has been some debate about the use of qualitative versus quantitative research methods. Many evaluators understand the advantages and disadvantages of both methods, but deciding on the most appropriate method can still be problematic. This article summarizes the tenets of both qualitative and quantitative methods and provides examples of visitor studies for each. It also reviews several research studies that have successfully used mixed methods to evaluate visitors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 415-416
Author(s):  
Padam Simkhada ◽  
E Van Teijlingen ◽  
SP Wasti ◽  
Brijesh Sathian

Combining and integrating a mixture of qualitative and quantitative methods in one single study is widely used in health and social care research in high-income countries. This editorial adds a few words of advice to the novice mixed-methods researcher in Nepal.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/nje.v4i5.11993 Nepal Journal of Epidemiology 2014; 4(5):415-16  


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Sharp

Research using a mixed-methods design is increasingly becoming the norm, crossing the myriad of educational fields of research, including history education. While commonly interpreted as a combining of qualitative and quantitative methods, mixed methods in history education can also extend to a bricolage approach, whereby the epistemological aspect of research is explicitly used to frame a study incorporating a combination of interdisciplinary methodologies and theoretical underpinnings. It extends beyond the often asserted binary of qualitative and quantitative research. In considering directions of qualitative research in the broad discipline area of education, the work of researchers such as Kincheloe (2005) and Denzin and Lincoln (2005) is used throughout this paper within a qualitative research context based on the work of Kincheloe and Tobin (2006). Adopting their approach of investigating the complexity of the lived world means placing research within a number of contexts. Research can be framed – from conceptualization to data gathering to analysis – in a range of contexts, appropriately matched between stage of research and underpinning theories. This paper reports on how bricolage can be used to frame research in history education.


Author(s):  
Fina Muthia Deizi ◽  
Anna Fatchiya

ABSTRACTThe participation of the group members, LMDH Giri Makmur, is important in the success of a tourism development program in Cikole Village. This study aims to identify internal and external factors that encourage group members in managing tourism, identify the level of participation of group members and analyze the factors that influence the level of participation of group members. This research uses quantitative research methods supported by qualitative data. Quantitative methods are tested with regression tests and the selection of respondents using census techniques. The number of respondents in this study was 36 respondents. Results of this research is the level of participation of ecotourism members group in managing PAL 16 tourism is quite high at the planning, implementation, utilization of results and evaluation stages. Furthermore, the factors that have a significant influence on the level of participation of ecotourism members group in tourism management are internal factors (age, length of stay, level of income, length of membership and level of group desire) and external factors (level of Perhutani support, level of support for facilities and infrastructure and level of support group).Keywords : community participation, ecotourism, forest, group. village ABSTRAKPartisipasi anggota binaan kelompok yaitu LMDH Giri Makmur merupakan suatu hal yang penting dalam keberhasilan suatu program pengembangan wisata di Desa Cikole. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor internal dan eksternal yang mendorong anggota binaan kelompok dalam pengelolaan wisata, mengidentifikasi tingkatan partisipasi anggota binaan kelompok dan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi tingkat partisipasi anggota binaan kelompok. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif yang didukung dengan data kualitatif. Metode kuantitatif diuji dengan uji regresi dan pemilihan responden menggunakan teknik sensus. Jumlah responden dalam penelitian ini adalah 36 responden. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tingkat partisipasi anggota binaan kelompok dalam pengelolaan wisata PAL 16 cukup tinggi pada tahap perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pemanfaatan hasil dan evaluasi. Selanjutnya faktor yang memiliki pengaruh nyata dalam tingkat partisipasi anggota binaan kelompok dalam pengelolaan wisata ialah faktor internal (usia, lama tinggal, tingkat pendapatan, lama keanggotaan dan tingkat keinginan berkelompok) dan faktor eksternal ( tingkat dukungan perhutani, tingkat dukungan sarana dan prasarana dan tingkat dukungan kelompok) Kata Kunci : desa, ekowisata, hutan, kelompok, partisipasi masyarakat


2021 ◽  
pp. 155868982110498
Author(s):  
Ferdinand C. Mukumbang

Mixed methods studies in social sciences are predominantly employed to explore broad, complex, and multifaceted issues and to evaluate policies and interventions. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in social sciences most often follows the Peircean pragmatic approach—abductive hypothesis formation followed by deductive and inductive testing/confirmation—with limited theorizing properties. This paper contributes to the field of mixed methods research in social sciences by explicating a two-way interaction process between mixed methods data and [social] theory in a pluralistic inferencing approach espoused by critical realism—retroductive theorizing. The paper further illustrates how through retroductive theorizing, critical realism offers a more epistemologically and ontologically grounded alternative for integrating qualitative and quantitative methods compared to pragmatism.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Keller ◽  
Heinz Streib

Abstract Narrative study of religious lives has formed part of numerous projects at the Bielefeld Research Center for Biographical Studies in Contemporary Religion. An essential instrument in our designs, which mostly combine qualitative and quantitative methods, is the Faith Development Interview (FDI). In response to longstanding criticism its cognitive structural framework has been revised in respect of styles and schemata. The religious styles perspective examines the self as articulated in narratives and associates it with affectivity and emotion. This article gives an overview of our theoretical and methodological revisions, which take cognizance of current developments in lifespan developmental and clinical psychology such as attachment, mentalization and wisdom. We illustrate the implementation of these advances with a case study from our current study of ‘spirituality’,1 which we locate in the complex multi-method design, and outline the triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document