scholarly journals Legal Protection for Vaccine Recipients Covid-19 in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-82
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mahendra Abdi

Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Vaccination in the Context of Combating the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, this Minister of Health Regulation is a government step in carrying out the legality of administering the COVID-19 vaccine because the spread of the COVID-19 virus is very fast. Occurs in humans, thus creating great concern for human life because it can lead to death. Therefore, the government took a response action by providing vaccinations for the people of Indonesia, the purpose of this vaccination is to overcome the high spread of COVID-19, the provision of the covid-19 vaccine given to the Indonesian people must also fulfill the proper rights for the recipients of the COVID-19 vaccine, so that when there is an impact on the administration of the Covid-19 vaccine, the government can handle it quickly. The problems in this paper are how is legal protection for people who receive the COVID-19 vaccine, the extent to which the government provides legal protection rights to people who receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 313
Author(s):  
Tamara Teguh

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was determined by the President as a non-natural disaster through Presidential Decree Number 12 of 2020 concerning the Designation of Non-Natural Disaster for the Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a National Disaster. Its rapid spread has an impact on all aspects of human life, especially in the economic sector, many business actors have suffered losses and a number of banks are experiencing credit risk, which debtors or customers are unable to make credit installments on the pretext of being affected by the pandemic. The Presidential Decree cannot automatically cancel existing agreements, so that the Government makes policies in order to stimulate economic growth. This policy was issued by the Financial Services Authority through Regulation of the Financial Services Authority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11/POJK.03/2020 concerning National Economic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy on the Impact of the Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 which has been extended by the Financial Services Authority Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48/POJK.03/2020 as an effort to avoid default. The debtor is given loan repayment relief at the Bank or Leasing with terms determined by the Bank. This payment relief is known as credit restructuring, which there is a renegotiation process to change existing loans. One of the changes in the agreement is by rescheduling, namely extending the installment payment period. Keywords: COVID-19 Disease Outbreak; Credit Restructuring; Rescheduling.Wabah penyakit Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ditetapkan oleh Presiden sebagai bencana non alam melalui Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penetapan Bencana Non Alam Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Sebagai Bencana Nasional. Penyebarannya yang begitu pesat berdampak pada segala aspek kehidupan manusia terutama di bidang ekonomi, banyak pelaku usaha yang mengalami kerugian dan sejumlah perbankan mengalami risiko kredit, dimana debitur atau nasabah tidak mampu untuk melakukan pembayaran cicilan kredit dengan dalih terkena dampak pandemi. Dengan adanya Keputusan Presiden itu tidak dapat serta merta membatalkan perjanjian yang sudah ada, sehingga Pemerintah membuat kebijakan dalam rangka menstimulus pertumbuhan ekonomi. Kebijakan tersebut dikeluarkan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan melalui Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 11/POJK.03/2020 Tentang Stimulus Perekonomian Nasional Sebagai Kebijakan Countercyclical Dampak Penyebaran Corona Virus Disease 2019 yang telah diperpanjang dengan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 48/POJK.03/2020 sebagai upaya agar tidak terjadinya wanprestasi. Debitur diberikan keringanan pembayaran cicilan pinjaman di Bank atau Leasing dengan persyaratan-persyaratan yang ditentukan oleh Bank. Keringanan pembayaran ini dikenal dengan restrukturisasi kredit, dimana terdapat proses renegosiasi atau negosiasi ulang untuk merubah perjanjian kredit yang sudah ada. Perubahan perjanjian tersebut salah satunya ialah dengan penjadwalan kembali atau rescheduling, yaitu memperpanjang periode pembayaran cicilan.Kata Kunci: Wabah Penyakit COVID-19; Restrukturisasi Kredit; Penjadwalan Kembali.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Hendra Sukmana

The number of positive COVID-19 patients in the Sidoarjo area continues to increase. As of April 19, 2020, there were 11,028 positive COVID-19 patients, 6,068 suspect patients, 617 patients who were declared dead due to Covid-19 and 10,398 people declared cured of Covid-19. This study was conducted to identify and describe the implementation of policies in the form of the Decree of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number HK. 01.07/Menkes/382/2020 concerning Protocols for Public Health in Public Places and Facilities in the Context of Prevention and Control of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in the Sidoarjo area. Data analysis was carried out by Miles and Huberman interactive analysis. The results showed that the implementation of the Decree of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number HK. 01.07/Menkes/382/2020 concerning Protocols for Public Health in Public Places and Facilities in the Context of Prevention and Control of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in the Sidoarjo region can be seen from four things. First, communication, where policy communication is carried out through socialization and education related to 3M (wearing masks, maintaining distance and washing hands) to the people of Sidoarjo. However, in practice, socialization and education related to 3M (wearing masks, maintaining distance and washing hands) are considered insufficient to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic. Need to add 2M (limit mobility and stay away from crowds) so that it becomes 5M. This is because mobility and crowd problems are felt to have contributed to causing many Covid-19 virus infections. Second, resources, where the task of fixing the level of compliance with health protocols actually requires the help of many parties. Not only from themselves, the media is also tasked with providing a sense of security and positive messages to the community. Likewise, the government should also not instill too much fear, but rather recommendations that arouse the desire to comply with health protocols.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-58
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat ◽  
Budiman

Perkembangan pandemi Covid-19 saat ini sangat mengkhawatirkan dimana terjadinya suatupeningkatan kasus corona khusus di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuidan menganalisis kebijakan yang diambil pemerintah dalam penanganan pandemi Covid-19serta langkah-langkah yang diambil pemerintah untuk menganggulangi dampak-dampak, terutama dampak dari segi ekonomi dan sosial akibat pandemi Covid-19. Metode penelitianhukum yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yangdigunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatankonseptual. Penelitian ini berlandaskan pengaturan perundang-undangan yang mengaturmengenai penanganan dan penganggulangan pandemi Covid-19 serta analisis atas konseppenetapan peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalamrangka penanganan Covid-19, berawal dari pemerintah tmengeluarkan kebijakan tentangPembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang merujuk pada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Peraturan pelaksanaannya yaitu PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, sertaKeputusan Presiden tentang Kedaruratan Kesehatan sampai dengan saat ini pemerintah telahmengeluarkan kebijakan PPKM yang dimana dilakukan secara berkala. Untukmenganggulangi dampak Covid-19 dari segi ekonomi dan sosial pemerintah mengambilbeberapa kebijakan-kebijakan, yang diantaranya adalah: Peraturan Menteri KeuanganRepublik Indonesia Nomor 23/Pmk.03/2020 tentang Insentif Pajak Untuk WajibPajakTerdampak Wabah Virus Corona; Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Kata Kunci : Kebijakan, Penanganan, Covid-19 The current development of the Covid-19 pandemic is very worrying where there is anincrease in special corona cases in Indonesia. This study aims to identify and analyze thepolicies taken by the government in handling the Covid-19 pandemic and the steps taken bythe government to mitigate the impacts, especially the economic and social impacts of theCovid-19 pandemic. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Thisresearch is based on the legislation governing the handling and handling of the Covid-19pandemic as well as an analysis of the concept of establishing these laws and regulations. The results of this study are in the context of handling Covid-19, starting with thegovernment issuing a policy on Large-Scale Social Restrictions which refers to Law Number6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The implementing regulations are GovernmentRegulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions, as well as thePresidential Decree on Health Emergencies. Until now, the government has issued a PPKMpolicy which is carried out regularly. To address the economic and social impact of Covid- 19, the government has taken several policies, including: Regulation of the Minister ofFinance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23/Pmk.03/2020 concerning Tax Incentives forTaxpayers Af ected by the Corona Virus Outbreak; Regulation of the Financial ServicesAuthority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 /Pojk.03/2020 concerning NationalEconomic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy for the Impact of the Spread of Corona VirusDisease2019; and Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of2020 concerning Refocussing of Activities, Reallocation of Budgets, and Procurement ofGoods and Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019(Covid-19). Keyword : Policy, Handling, Covid-19


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Inggit Akim

ABSTRACTSupervise the government as the provider of public services to carry out their duties and authorities under applicable regulations. Large-Scale Social Restrictions are restrictions on certain activities in an area suspected of being infected with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which causes the quality of public services to be disrupted. The Ombudsman has the task of supervising the implementation of shared services organized by state or government officials and private or individual bodies assigned the task of providing services according to minimum service standards as a benchmark for service delivery and assessing the quality of services to the community. The research method used is normative juridical research with a conceptual approach (Statute Approach).The results of this study are large-scale social restriction policies through the Mayor of Tarakan Regulation Number 17 of 2020, restrictions on activities outside the house such as the implementation of learning at schools and/or other educational institutions, Work From Home (WFH), religious movements in houses of worship, activities in public places, social and cultural activities and Mandatory rapid tests for those using Sea and Air transportation modes, and providing social assistance to communities affected by COVID-19. Ombudsman's supervision of public services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tarakan City, namely by conducting coordination and control and cooperation with state and private officials as well as community or individual organizations, opening an Online Complaint Post for COVID-19 Affected Persons. Also, conduct unannounced checks to improve public services in the City of Tarakan. Based on the supervision, the receipt of reports on suspicion of maladministration and the Ombudsman's investigation results are subject to examination. Suppose it is proven that it has committed maladministration in public services, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia can take corrective action and provide recommendations/suggestions to state administrators to improve the quality of public services. Keywords: Surveillance; Ombudsman; Public Service; COVID-19 Pandemic


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Retnowati WD Tuti ◽  
Ma'mun Murod ◽  
Tria Patrianti

Large-scale Social Limitation (hereinafter referred to as PSBB) is one form of concern. The government and local governments are Pendemic throughout Indonesia and the world, namely Pandemic Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19). Bogor Regency, which is one of the buffer cities of the Republic of Indonesia, is an area that is quite vulnerable in spreading the Corona virus. Why? because many DKI Jakarta employees / laborers live in Bogor Regency, whose mobility is very high. With the birth of Regent Regulation No. 16 of 2020 concerning Implementation of Large- Scale Social Restrictions in Handling COVID-19 in order to conserve the use of Covid 19. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Implementation of Large Scale Social Limitation Policies in the Government of Bogor Regency. This research method uses Qualitative Methods with Literature Study research methods. (Huberman, Miles, 1994). The technique of inviting data is by searching Scientific Journals, Online Mass Media, Legislation and Books. The technique to determine Online Media by Pusposive, while for data analysis using Nvivo 12 Plus. Test the validity of the data by testing the data source. The results of the study show that the implementation of the Large-Scale Social Limitation Policy in the Bogor District Government has not yet proceeded, starting from the clash of authority between the Central Government and the Regional Government so that it cannot make improvements, and many more are in accordance with the provisions of Covid-19 and its distribution. Social assistance to the community.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beny Yunianto ◽  
Tomy Michael

AbstractThe aim of the research is to offer novelty regarding the constitualism of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law regarding Covid-19 which has now become a Law. This study uses a normative research method, with a focus on solving issues (problems) based on legal principles, legal rules, as well as on recognized legal expert opinion or doctrine. Through this research, the researcher offers that the perppu which has now become a law must be declared invalid or revoked because it is unconstitutional. As is well known, the Government issued Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2020 concerning State Financial Policy and Financial System Stability for Handling Pandemic Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and / or in the Context of Facing Threats that Endanger the National Economy and / Or Financial System Stability, on March 31, 2020 (now Law Number 2 of 2020, on May 18, 2020). In Article 27 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3) it is stated that there are parties who have "privileges", namely obtaining legal immunity from all actions they take on the basis of implementing the Covid Perppu. Of course this is a problem, because as a rule of law, Indonesia must provide justice in the form of equal treatment before the law or equality before the law to society without exception. This is stated in Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D paragraph (1), and Article 28I paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, the Perppu which has now become a law is contrary to the Constitution, so it must be canceled or declared invalid.Keywords: constitution; Covid-19; equality before the lawAbstrakTujuan penelitian, yaitu menawarkan kebaruan mengenai konstitualisme dari Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang mengenai Covid-19 yang sekarang telah menjadi Undang-Undang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan berfokus pada pemecahan isu (masalah) yang didasarkan pada asas hukum, aturan hukum, maupun pada doktrin atau pendapat ahli hukum yang diakui. Melalui penelitian ini, peneliti menawarkan bahwa, perppu yang sekarang telah menjadi undang-undang tersebut harus dinyatakan tidak berlaku atau dicabut karena inkonstitusional. Seperti diketahui, Pemerintah mengeluarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Dan/Atau Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Ancaman Yang Membahayakan Perekonomian Nasional Dan/Atau Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan, pada tanggal 31 Maret 2020 (sekarang menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020, pada tanggal 18 Mei 2020). Dalam Pasal 27 ayat (1), ayat (2), dan ayat (3) disebutkan bahwa ada pihak-pihak yang mendapat “keistimewaan”, yaitu mendapat kekebalan hukum dari segala tindakan yang dilakukannya atas dasar pelaksanaan perppu covid tersebut. Tentu itu menjadi masalah, karena sebagai negara hukum, Indonesia harus memberikan keadilan berupa perlakuan yang sama didepan hukum atau equality before the law kepada masyarakat tanpa terkecuali. Hal tesebut tercantum dalam Pasal 27 ayat (1), Pasal 28D ayat (1), dan Pasal 28I ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sehingga, Perppu yang kini telah menjadi undang-undang tersebut bertentangan dengan Konstitusi, sehingga harus di batalkan atau dinyatakan tidak berlaku.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Rusdi Kasman ◽  
Nuha Lutfiah ◽  
Hadining Hadining ◽  
Hafsah Nur Afifah ◽  
Hikmah Khamelia ◽  
...  

<p>The situation of the Corona Virus Disease 2019 pandemic or Covid-19 which is endemic throughout the world, including Indonesia.These conditions have changed every field of human life, one of which is the field of education. The government then determined that the learning process was carried out at home through online or distance learning to provide a meaningful learning experience for students. Online learning has an impact on students, both positively and negatively. One of the negative impacts is psychological pressure. The written idea submitted is an idea related to efforts to deal with online school stress faced by students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The alleviation of the problem in question is through the Psychological First Aid skill approach. Ways to realize PFA activities include, preparing the PFA concept to deal with online school stress by students. Next, ideas are submitted to the education and culture office to be known and provide legality. Socialization of PFA ideas to schools at every level of education.</p><p><strong>Abtrak</strong></p><p>Situasi pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 atau dikenal Covid-19 yang mewabah seluruh dunia termasuk Indonesia. Kondisi tersebut telah merubah setiap bidang kehidupan manusia, salah satunya adalah bidang pendidikan. Pemerintah kemudian menetapkan proses belajar dilaksanakan di rumah melalui pembelajaran daring (online) atau jarak jauh dilaksanakan untuk memberikan pengalaman belajar yang bermakna bagi siswa. Pembelajaran daring memiliki dampak kepada peserta didik, baik secara positif maupun negatif. Salah satu dampak negatif adalah tekanan psikologis. Gagasan tertulis yang diajukan adalah gagasan terkait upaya penanganan stres sekolah online yang dihadapi peserta didik selama masa pandemi covid-19. Pengentasan permasalahan yang dimaksud melalui pendekatan keterampilan Psychological First Aid. Cara merealisasikan kegiatan PFA melputi, Penyusunan konsep PFA untuk mengatasi stres sekolah online oleh mahasiswa Selanjutnya, gagasan diajukan ke dinas pendidikan dan kebudayaan untuk diketahui serta memberikan legalitasSosialisasi gagasan PFA ke sekolah di setiap jenjang pendidikan.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-23
Author(s):  
Suci Fitria Citra ◽  
Tari Muzalifah ◽  
Lukman Ibrahim

This research aims to describe the accuracy in the distribution of social assistance during Covid-19 to the people of Gampong Sapik and Air Berudang. It uses a case study with a qualitative approach. Data collection was carried out by observation, interview, and analysis using thematic techniques. The distribution of social assistance has received a positive response from the community because it can help the economy of residents in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, even though there are several polemics that have occurred due to incorrect data used and several other obstacles. Based on the Decree of the Minister of Social Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 54 / HUK / 2020 regarding the Implementation of Basic Food Social Assistance and Social Cash Assistance in Handling the Impact of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19), the Government realizes social assistance to people affected by Covid-19 which involves the Central Government, regional governments and heads of villages in distributing it to the community.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-253
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Rosi Triana Ayu Nuratih ◽  
I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati

Health is an important aspect and become a measure of the welfare of the people of a country. The development of national development, one of them is in the health sector, must be in accordance with and based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The purpose of this research is to reveal the government's responsibility for handling Covid-19 patients and legal protection for Covid-19 patients medical services in the hospital. The research method used is normative. The assessment is carried out by means of a literature study which is specifically related to law in the health sector. The data sources used were prmiary, secondary and tertiary sources and were analyzed systematically. The result of this research indicates that the responsibility of the government for Covid-19 patients provides rights to patients regulated in related regulations. If the government and parties who violate the rights that should be received by Covid-19 patients, they can be subject to sanctions in accordance with applicable regulations. Legal protection or the issuance of legal rules regarding the rights of Covid-19 patients aims to protect the community itself.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Rifumuni Nancy Mathebula ◽  
Tawanda Runhare

Despite stringent preventative measures, the corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had adversely affected the contemporary global community. The pandemic has had an inevitable negative impact on education globally. This paper critiques the South African Department of Basic Education’s opening of schools at the beginning of severe winter in June 2020 based on the claim of having the capacity to implement preventive measures against the spread of COVID-19 in schools.  Using literature, government statements and constitutional frameworks, we argue that it was unrealistic, irrational and contradictory to open schools when the government was decongesting other public sectors and at a time when the country was in severe cold season, which is suitable for the survival of the corona virus. We note that schools opened when the COVID-19 infections and fatalities were heightening in the country, when winter was at its doorsteps and personal protective equipments (PPEs) were inadequately supplied in schools. We also argue that it was a myth that children are safe from COVID-19 and saving the school calendar at the expense of human life was catastrophic and therefore schools should not have opened in the severe winter, without a cure or vaccine for the COVID-19.   Received: 26 November 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 10 May 2021


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document