scholarly journals CRAFTSMANSHIP AND ARTISTIC ANALYSIS IN INTERPRETATIONS

2021 ◽  
Vol 02 (05) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Abduhamid Kholmurodov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Literary Critic ◽  
Current Development ◽  
Works Of Art ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
Artistic Analysis

The article discusses in detail the contribution of literary critic D. Turaev to the current development of Uzbek literary criticism, the analysis of news and changes in the literary process, the features of new interpretations. Criticism of Munaqqid's analysis of works of art, his skill in the study of poetic and prose works created and being created during the years of independence.

scholarly journals BOHDAN LEPKY`S LITERARY CRITICISM IN “SLOVANSKÝ PŘEHLED” JOURNALLITERARY CRITICISM IN “SLOVANSKÝ PŘEHLED” JOURNAL

2019 ◽  
pp. 162-174
Author(s):  
Vasyl BUDNYI ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Literary Critic ◽  
Critical Writing ◽  
Artistic Value ◽  
Cultural Concepts ◽  
Early Twentieth Century ◽  
European Culture ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background: A famous literary critic and writer, representative of the “Moloda Muza” group, B. Lepky was published in numerous Ukrainian and foreign journals in the early twentieth century. Today, his cooperation with Polish and German editions has been partially explored, but the Czech direction remains almost unclear. There are only individual references to B. Lepky's cultural publications in the “Slovanský přehled” journal in the works of V. Doroshenko, V. Lev, B. Rubchak. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyze the interpretative bases of B. Lepky's publications in “Slovanský přehled”, namely, five annual reviews of Ukrainian literature (1901, 1902, 1903, 1905, 1906) and three cultural pieces of knowledge: about the composer M. Lysenko, about the translation of short stories by M. Kotsiubynsky into Polish, and the scientific works of M. Hrushevsky, B. Barvinsky and V. Shchurat. Results: B. Lepky followed I. Franko in editing “Slovanský přehled” journal. I. Franko prepared the ground for the Czechs to familiarize them with Ukrainian literature. In a series of annual reviews, B. Lepky considered Ukrainian literature in the pan-European context, translating the realities of national culture into the language of universal cultural concepts. Not contradicting realism and modernism, the critic appraised the high artistic value of the works by Lesya Ukrainka, V. Stefanyk, M. Kotsyubynsky, O. Kobylyanska, which were marked by modern stylistic trends. Trying to convey the original content to the foreign reader, B. Lepky approached his critical speech to the poetic one, painting it with impressionistic strokes and symbolic imagery. The author concluded that the importance of B. Lepky’s Czech publications was important for understanding the ways in which Ukrainian writing was modernized and contextualized in Slavic and pan-European culture in the early twentieth century. Key words: Modernism period, literary process, critical writing, literary review, review, contextualization, impressionism, symbolism.

scholarly journals Sociological concept of Ukrainian literature by Professor KhINO V. Koryak

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Socialist Realism ◽  
Works Of Art ◽  
Soviet Literature ◽  
Marxist Approach ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
History Of ◽  
Sociological Method ◽  
Original Concept ◽  
Sociological Concept

The article discusses the features of the concept of Ukrainian literature teacher and professor of KhINO, the head of the department of the history of Ukrainian literature (1933–1936) of the Kharkov University V. Koryak (1889–1937). His aesthetic views combined Marxism, sociological criticism and the ideas of building “proletarian culture”. The sociological concept of the dynamics of the national literary process and the interpretation of works of art reflected the Marxist approach to the analysis of writing and significantly influenced the Ukrainian literary criticism of the 1920s, as well as its further transformations during the period of “socialist realism”. V. Koryak taught at KhINO since 1925, and having defended his thesis, he first became the so-called “red professor”, from 1927 - a visiting professor, while continuing to teach the course of history of Ukrainian literature. He was also the head of the Soviet literature room at the T. G. Shevchenko Institute of Literature, and from 1933 to 1936, after the restoration of Kharkov University, he headed the department of the history of Ukrainian literature. The basic terms of the sociological concept of V. Koryak were made public in the textbook of Ukrainian Literature (1928), which was used to teach this subject. This course was the first attempt to synthesize the problematic issues of "Marxist literary criticism" to create an original concept of the history of Ukrainian literature based on the sociological method. Negative and positive features of V. Koryak’s literary-critical concept were reflected to the greatest extent in his interpretation of T. G. Shevchenko’s works. A significant amount of his extraordinary ideas can also be traced in the interpretation of the works of other Ukrainian writers.

‘People and good books make me happy’. Ekaterina Livshits’ letters to Aleksandr Deich and Evgenia Deich-Malkina

2018 ◽  
pp. 298-377
Author(s):  
P. M. Nerle
Keyword(s):  
Literary Critic ◽  
State Archive ◽  
Literary Works ◽  
The Core ◽  
Russian State ◽  
Literary Process

At the core of this publication are letters written by E. Livshits (1902–1987), the widow of B. Livshits, to her close friends: literary critic A. Deich (1893–1972), whom she knew ever since her Kiev days, and his wife E. Deich-Malkina (1919–2014). Kept at the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art, this epistolary collection spans over 20 years, starting from 1967. Along with accounts of private circumstances, each letter contains accounts related to B. Livshits, Osip and Nadezhda Mandelstam, I. Nappelbaum, A. Shadrin, and others. At the same time, E. Livshits’ comments and descriptions of people and literary works are very lifelike and fascinating. On the whole, the reader gets a picture of the period and certain literary process, viewed by a sophisticated connoisseur rather than squinted at by an aging disenfranchised widow of an executed writer. The publication is prefaced by P. Nerler, who collected and prepared the book of letters and reminiscences of E. Livshits, to be printed by Elena Shubina Publishers (AST).

The “Idea of Human” Literary Category: Epistemological Potential

2021 ◽  
pp. 23-31
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav M. Golovko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Modern Science ◽  
Artistic Practice ◽  
Object Knowledge ◽  
Human Type ◽  
A Value ◽  
The World ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
Relevant Category ◽  
Successive Change

The “idea of human” (“type of attitude to the world”) is considered as a relevant category of the conceptual apparatus of the modern science of literature. The aim of the work is to analyze the theoretical and methodological potential of this category on the basis of large typological units of the literary process, marked with the concepts of “historical and literary era”, “artistic and cognitive cycle”, “literary direction”, “big style”, “artistic method”. The research used the methods of a typological and complex study of literary works, which in the synthesis of literary criticism and philosophy determine the strategy of searches in the field of theoretical and methodological content of the “idea of human” category as the foundation of the literary and philosophical anthropology of cultural and historical eras. The historical and genetic links between the worldview aesthetic principles and the artistic practice of literary trends are problematized. The logic of the research reveals the concept “object – knowledge”, fundamental for epistemology, in the aspects of the structuring of the knowledge of the methodological semantics of the “idea of human” category and of the functioning of the definitions “generalized idea of human”, “type of attitude to the world”, “concept of human and reality”, “whole of human”, “human as a value”. The article shows that the “idea of human” as a philosophical and aesthetic interpretation of the nature and essence of human at a certain stage in the development of artistic consciousness, worked out by the whole culture (R.R. Moskvina, G.V. Mokronosov) and defining integrity and logical consistency of the artistic system, is a synergistically functional semantic core of the historical and cultural era, and this core contains the dialectical potential of “negation of the negation”. As a variable, the historical “idea of human”, in the perspective of the stage development of artistic consciousness, undergoes dramatic changes and is realized in the logic of the successive change of historical and cultural epochs and their philosophical paradigms, in the constant alternation of “realistic” and “mystical”, materialistic and idealistic methods of cognition and images of human and the world (D.I. Chizhevsky, A.M. Panchenko, and others). The conclusions are substantiated that the successive development of literary trends, creative methods and their axiological systems is conditioned by the dynamics of “types of attitude to the world”; that the functioning of the “idea of human” category in literary discourse is focused on argumentation of the ontological nature of fiction, on the identification of philosophical and aesthetic principles that determine the systematic nature and the successive change of artistic and cognitive cycles; that the evolution of the “idea of human” within the framework of one artistic and cognitive cycle is fixed by the dynamics of genre systems since, in the correlations of method, genre and style, “the idea of human” acts as a factor in genre formation.

scholarly journals Galina Yakovlevna Ilyina: On the occasion of her 90th Birthday

2020 ◽  
pp. 519-527
Author(s):  
Nadezhda N. Starikova
Keyword(s):  
Literary Critic ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
South Slavs ◽  
Russian Literary ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
Systematic Character ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Academic School ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Academic Personnel

Galina Yakovlevna Ilyina is an outstanding Russian literary critic specializing in Yugoslav literatures. A researcher of the history and typology of the literatures of the South Slavs, she devoted her whole life to their study and popularization. Thanks to her efforts, the development of the literary process of the Bulgarian, Bosnian, Macedonian, Serbian, Slovenian, Croatian and Montenegrin literature has acquired a complex and systematic character in our country. Galina Yakovlevna can rightfully be considered the founder of the academic school of literary Yugoslav studies in Russia, the academic personnel trained by her are currently successfully continuing to develop the themes and problems of the literatures of the Yugoslav and post-Yugoslavian space. Galina Yakovlevna became the first Yugoslav literary critic in the Russian Federation who was awarded the academic title of Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the qualification Literature of the Peoples of Foreign Countries.

Interpretative Syntax

PMLA ◽  
1900 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-113
Author(s):  
C. Alphonso Smith
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Modern Trend ◽  
Literary Critic ◽  
English Syntax ◽  
Interpretation Of Literature ◽  
The Prestige

I am well aware that the expression interpretative syntax has not the prestige of previous usage. Indeed no one at all familiar with the modern trend of syntactical studies could say that they serve in the slightest degree as aids in the interpretation of literature. It seems to be assumed that syntax has nothing to do with literary criticism or with stylistic effects. And as the study of English syntax is now conducted, one can hardly imagine two persons more alien in their aims and methods than the literary critic and the writer on syntax.

STEPHEN GREENBLATT, NEW HISTORICISM, AND CULTURAL HISTORY, OR, WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT INTERDISCIPLINARITY

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
SARAH MAZA
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Cultural History ◽  
Social Practices ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
New Historicism ◽  
Literary Representations ◽  
Literary Critic ◽  
New Criticism ◽  
Canonical Texts ◽  
Historical Practices

Michael Warner, a literary critic with a keen sense of history, wrote in 1987 that “New Historicism is a label that historians don't like very much because they understand something different by historicism. But nobody's asking historians….” This essay is an answer to questions nobody asked me, questions about interdisciplinarity and the differences between literary critical and historical practices. A return to historically informed literary criticism, which many critics still consider a dominant trend in the profession, emerged in the early 1980s following the publication of Stephen Greenblatt's acclaimed Renaissance Self-Fashioning (1980). Reacting as it did against the decontextualized abstractions of New Criticism and Deconstruction, the movement soon labeled New Historicism sought to breathe new life into canonical texts by relating them to non-literary texts and social practices of their day. This historicist inclination should have formed the basis for a coming together of the movement's practitioners with historians interested in literary representations. But no such merger has occurred: New Historicists evince little interest in the systematic, archivally based study of history, and historians have at best shown indifference to the work of Greenblatt and his followers.

scholarly journals “HOW DO WE WRITE”, OR THE PROBLEM OF LITERARY SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-79
Author(s):  
M.A. Chernyak ◽  
◽  
M.A. Sargsyan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
21St Century ◽  
Textual Criticism ◽  
Literary Work ◽  
Turn Of The Century ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Aesthetic Taste ◽  
Non Fiction ◽  
Literary Process

Statement of the problem. The interest of modern literary criticism to the problem of literature reflection is carried out mainly on the material of various metatexts, especially vividly represented in the turn of the century. The purpose of the article is to reveal author’s identity and artistic self-reflection in non-fiction texts. In this regard, the collection of articles entitled “How Do We Write”, compiled in 2018 by St. Petersburg writers Pavel Krusanov and Aleksander Etoev, is of particular interest. This book was written in reply to the book “How Do We Write” in 1930. The literary process of the 1920s, like, in many respects, literature of the new 21st century, was a period of renewal of various types and genres of artistic creativity, a period of the birth of new forms. Research results. Comparison of the two books, in which writers from different literary eras reflect on the nature of creativity, on the technology of literary work, on relationships with a reader, gives grounds to talk about the contours of a new textual criticism of the 21st century. Deformation of the canon, destruction of the boundaries of literature and aesthetic taste, and new forms of communication influenced the content and form of texts. Conclusions. With emergence of Internet reality, new sources of textual criticism appeared. The new literary reality dictates its own laws and creates new conditions for the development of publish- ing, writing, and reading relationships. Modern literature, like the literature of past years, reacts to cultural and historical events and to the development of the literary process, reflecting on the creation of the text and on the role of a writer here and now.

scholarly journals The publicism of Kostiantyn Rodyk in the context of contemporary book journalism

2019 ◽  
pp. 411-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emiliya Ohar
Keyword(s):  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Publishing Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
Non Fiction ◽  
The World ◽  
Literary Process ◽  
Publishing Houses ◽  
Top Manager ◽  
National Book ◽  
Broad Subject

The paper seeks to develop new avenues for a study of book journalism. Specifically, it deals with a problem of institutionalization of book journalism as a self-sufficient thematic direction in contemporary cultural journalism. More specifically, the article aims to explore a publicism of Kostiantyn Rodyk, the well-known Ukrainian cultural journalist formerly a book journalist. He is the former editor-in-chief of one of the most professional specialized magazine Knyzhnyk-Review (2000―2007s), the television and radio presenter, the founder and top manager of the annual National book rating Knyzhka Roku, columnist of the newspapers Den’ and Ukraina Moloda, author of the book series Ukrainian Best. Knyzhka Roku, some non-fiction books Actualna Literatura and Sizif XX. Knyzhka vs. polityka. The latter feature numerous essays dealing with actual publishing and literary process in Ukraine. We show that combined in one book; it created continuous nonfiction (publicist) meta-narrative or nonfiction (publicist) meta-text. The latter makes it possible to distinguish the most specific features of quality book journalism. The paper attempts to define concepts of the «book publicism» and «book journalism», highlight differences between book journalism and literary-critical journalism. The author proposes to consider book publicism as a generalized phenomenon uniting both texts and the process of their creation. On the contrary, we argue that book journalism is one of the possible mediatized practices. It is a discourse that implies both the creation and the public reflection on the products of journalistic activity. In the course of the textual analysis of publicism works of Kostiantyn Rodyk, we have identified essential features of his book, non-fiction criticism. Those were: a broad subject (so-called «book culture»); socio-communicative approach to comprehension of literary and publishing artifacts; multi-functionality (informing about new books and literary works by the Ukrainian and foreign authors as well as publishing houses; criticism; creating culture; worldview, aesthetic and artistic tastes shaping and so on); hypertextuality and cross-mediality; preference given to genres such as essay and review; masterful use of expressive stylistics and linguistic means of popularization of knowledge. We conclude that such specific features can be considered as criteria for quality book journalism, a benchmark for mastering creative writing about the «world of books». Key words: publicism, book journalism, literary criticism, Kostiantyn Rodyk, literary and publishing process, essay.

scholarly journals ANALISIS TUGAS MENULIS KRITIK SASTRA SUNDA DALAM MATA KULIAH KRITIK SASTRA DI JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAERAH FPBS UPI TAHUN AKADEMIK 2012/2013

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Retty Isnendes
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Literary Criticism ◽  
Academic Writing ◽  
Task Analysis ◽  
Literary Critic ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Writing Task

AbstrakAnalisis Tugas Menulis Kritik Sastra Sunda dalam Mata Kuliah Kritik Sastra di Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah FPBS UPI Tahun Akademik 2012/2013. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan: (1) kecenderungan jenis kritik mahasiswa dan (2) kualitas kritik sastra mahasiswa. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif dengan teknik: telaah pustaka, observasi, dokumentasi, dan analisis. Hasil yang didapat adalah sebagai berikut. Kecenderungan jenis kritik yang dipergunakan mahasiswa meliputi jenis tulisan dan jenis isi. Jenis tulisan kritik mahasiswa adalah sastrawan dan akademik, sedangkan jenis isinya adalah intrinsik dan ekstrinsik. Kualitas kritik mahasiswa dengan pola tulisan sastrawan dan akademik adalah: cukup, baik, dan sangat baik nilainya. Adapun kualitas kritik mahasiswa dengan pola tulisan akademik pada kritik tugas kelompok adalah baik dan sangat baik. Saran ditujukan bagi mahasiswa, tim dosen, dan lembaga JPBD.Kata kunci: Tugas, kritik sastra, Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah Abstract Writing Task Analysis of Literary Criticism in Literary Criticism in Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah FPBS UPI 2012/2013. The purpose of this study is to describe: (1) the tendency of criticism types of students and (2) quality of student literary criticism. The method used is descriptive techniques: literature review, observation, documentation, and analysis. The results are as follows. Tendency kind of criticism that students used include the type of writing and content type. Type of writing is a literary critic and academic students, while it is a kind of intrinsic and extrinsic. Quality of student criticism with literary and academic writing pattern is: pretty, good, and excellent value. As for the criticism of the quality of students with academic writing patterns on group assignments criticism is good and very good. Suggestion is intended for students, faculty teams, and institutions JPBD.Keywords: Assignment, literary criticism, Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document