Začetki razprav o človekovih pravicah segajo v 17. stoletje, mednarodna pravna arhitektura človekovih pravic pa je bila postavljena s Splošno deklaracijo o človekovih pravicah leta 1948. Po koncu hladne vojne je razumevanje varnosti dobilo novo dimenzijo, spoštovanje človekovih pravic je postalo imperativ vojaške organizacije, s tem pa so se odprle razprave o zagotavljanju celotnega spektra človekovih pravic pripadnikom vojaške organizacije. Skozi analizirane dokumente evropskih institucij in sodbe sodišč ugotavljamo, da so priporočila usmerjena k uveljavljanju koncepta
»državljan vojak« in tako k zmanjševanju omejitev uživanja človekovih pravic za pripadnike vojaške organizacije. Članice EU uporabljajo pri zagotavljanju človekovih pravic vojakom dva pristopa, ki sta odvisna predvsem od zgodovine, tradicije in razumevanja vloge vojske v družbi posamezne nacionalne države. Prvi, tradicionalni pristop, postavlja v ospredje vojaško organizacijo in njene naloge, pravice pripadnikov so majhne. Drugi, postmoderni pristop, ki sledi konceptu »državljan vojak«, postavlja v ospredje spoštovanje človekovih pravic in povečuje obseg vojakovih pravic. Spoštovanje človekovih pravic znotraj vojske lahko država zagotovi z zakonodajo, uveljavitev v praksi pa preverja z učinkovitmi nadzornimi mehanizmi.
The beginnings of discussions about human rights go back to the 17th century, while the international legal architecture relating to human rights was established by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. When the Cold War ended, the understanding of security entered a new dimension. Respect for human rights became an imperative of military organizations, which opened discussions about the provision of an entire spectrum of human rights for members of a military organization. Analyzed documents of European institutions and rulings of courts bring us to a conclusion that recommendations are designed to enforce the concept of the »citizen-soldier« and, consequently, to decrease the limits imposed on the volume of human rights enjoyed by members of a military organization. When ensuring human rights for soldiers, EU member states use two approaches which depend mainly on history, tradition and understanding of the role of the armed forces in the society of an individual nation state. The first, traditional approach is focused on a military organization and its tasks, while the level of rights enjoyed by servicemembers is low. The second, post-modern approach is focused on respect for human rights and increases the extent of rights enjoyed by soldiers. A state can ensure respect for human rights in a military organization by the means of legislation, and verify its practical implementation through effective control mechanisms.