Development of a Novel Rating System to Assess Lower-limb Comfort

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 371-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kinchington ◽  
Kevin Ball ◽  
Geraldine Naughton
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Comfort Index ◽  
Third Stage ◽  
High Level ◽  
Evaluation Techniques ◽  
Level Of Agreement

Background: Comfort evaluation techniques are commonplace in medicine. However, measures of lower-limb comfort are infrequently used in the sporting environment. The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument for measuring lower-limb comfort, which will extend previous work in the field of injury awareness. Methods: A lower-limb comfort index (LLCI) was developed for use in the environment of elite sport. Forty professional footballers participated in development of the index. The study had three components. A critical appraisal of the literature established the need for an LLCI. The second phase involved 20 professional footballers establishing and testing the components of the comfort index as an instrument for measuring comfort. Results: Nonparametric statistics (the McNemar test) in phase 2 indicated that the LLCI demonstrated good responsiveness to suitability (P = .019) and ease of use (P < .01). After a high level of agreement for responses, the third stage required 20 players to pilot test the reliability of the LLCI in a controlled environment. Repeated measures of difference between two periods for sum comfort (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99) and individual anatomical segments (κ = 0.72–1) provided confidence that the comfort index was reliable. Conclusions: The LLCI showed good trait construct to provide confidence to conduct a future study to investigate interrater consistency in a wider cohort of professional footballers under different conditions, such as match-day and training-week environments. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101(5): 371–384, 2011)

scholarly journals Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Measured during Intracoronary Adenosine-Induced Hyperemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Irene Santos-Pardo ◽  
Patrik Alström ◽  
Nils Witt
Keyword(s):  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Microvascular Function ◽  
Coronary Pressure ◽  
Index Of Microcirculatory Resistance ◽  
Single Bolus Dose ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Simplified Procedure ◽  
High Level ◽  
Level Of Agreement

Background. The index of microcirculatory resistance is an invasive measure of coronary microvascular function that has to be calculated during maximal hyperemia, classically achieved with intravenous adenosine (IV). The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of intracoronary (IC) adenosine for the calculation of IMR. Methods and Results. 31 patients with stable coronary artery disease were included in the study. Coronary pressure and thermodilution measurements were obtained at rest and during maximal hyperemia using a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped coronary guidewire. Duplicate measurements were performed using first IC and then IV adenosine. Dispersion of transit times was comparable for IC and IV adenosine. IMR values based on IC vs IV adenosine showed a high level of agreement and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.90. Applying an upper normal limit of 25, misclassification of IMR using IC adenosine was seen in just one patient in whom IC adenosine resulted in a lower value. A simplified procedure based on a single bolus dose of saline did not change the level of agreement or the rate of misclassification. Conclusions. We found an excellent agreement between IMR values measured during hyperemia induced by IC as compared to IV adenosine. The use of IC adenosine may facilitate invasive assessment of microvascular function and is potentially time- and cost-saving with less patient discomfort as compared to IV infusion. The trail is registered with NCT03369184.

Absolute Circulating Pericyte Progenitor Cell Counts in Mice by Flow Cytometry: comparison of 2 single-platform technologies

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaochen Yuan ◽  
Qingbin Wu ◽  
Hongwei Li ◽  
Bingwei Li ◽  
Ruijuan Xiu
Keyword(s):  
Linear Correlation ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Angiogenic Biomarkers ◽  
The Stability ◽  
High Level ◽  
Level Of Agreement

Background Accumulating evidence indicates that circulating pericyte progenitor cells (CPPCs) may be angiogenic biomarkers in cancer and diabetes. Their validity as biomarkers depends on the accuracy of techniques used for enumeration. In this report, absolute CPPC counts were performed by 2 single-platform technologies. The reliability of the 2 methods, including retest reliability and intraobserver and interobserver variability, was assessed according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The linear correlation and agreement among both methods were assessed, and the stability of CPPC numbers in blood samples was analyzed. Methods The blood samples were obtained from ICR mice. The samples were processed through a no-lyse, 1-wash procedure, and Syto16+CD45-CD31-CD140b+ CPPCs were analyzed by exclusion of dead cells and by fluorescence-minus-one control. CPPCs were enumerated by 2 methods: bead-based 123count eBeads count (eBioscience) and direct volume–based Accuri C6 Flow Cytometer count (BD). The cells were measured immediately and after storage of blood samples for 24 and 48 hours. Results There were excellent retest correlations and intraobserver and interobserver agreement in both methods. The 2 methods showed a high linear correlation (R2 = 0.923) and with a high level of agreement (0.986). It was demonstrated that CPPCs are unstable in blood samples. Conclusions In this study, 2 reproducible protocols for CPPC quantification were established. These protocols should facilitate future studies to further define the role of CPPCs as cellular biomarkers.

Physiotherapy assessment and diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders of the knee via telerehabilitation

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley R Richardson ◽  
Piers Truter ◽  
Robert Blumke ◽  
Trevor G Russell
Keyword(s):  
Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Binary Data ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Remote Areas ◽  
Repeated Measures Design ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Heavy Burden ◽  
High Level

Introduction Lower limb musculoskeletal disorders place a heavy burden on healthcare systems. Appropriate management of these conditions is critical, however access to appropriate physiotherapy services is difficult for those in geographically remote areas or those with mobility or transport difficulties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of an online musculoskeletal physiotherapy assessment of the knee complex using telerehabilitation compared to traditional face-to-face assessment. Methods In a repeated-measures design, 18 subjects who sought treatment for knee pain underwent a traditional face-to-face assessment and a remote telerehabilitation assessment. Telerehabilitation assessments were conducted with participants performing facilitated self-palpation, self-applied modified orthopaedic tests, active movements and functional tasks. Results Primary pathoanatomical diagnoses were in exact agreement in 67% of cases and were similar in 89% of cases. The system of pathology was found to be in agreement in 17 out of 18 cases (94%). Comparisons of objective findings from the two physical assessments demonstrated substantial agreement (kappa = 0.635) for categorical data and binary data (chi-squared = 400.36; p < 0.001). A high level of intra-rater (89%) and moderate level of inter-rater (67%) reliability was evident for telerehabilitation assessments. Discussion Telerehabilitation assessment of the knee complex appears to be feasible and reliable. This study has implications for clinical practice and the development of physiotherapy services to address the burden of lower limb musculoskeletal pain and disability.

scholarly journals ANÁLISE DA EFICIÊNCIA DE LOCALIZADORES DE ARMADURA ELETROMAGNÉTICOS: UM ESTUDO COMPARATIVO

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Jesus de Souza ◽  
Marcelo Henrique Farias de Medeiros
Keyword(s):  
Precast Concrete ◽  
Concrete Columns ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Commercial Building ◽  
High Concentration ◽  
The Third ◽  
Third Stage ◽  
Three Stages

RESUMO: Na inexistência dos projetos executivos é possível determinar a armadura da estrutura e o seu respectivo cobrimento a partir de aparelhos denominados pacômetros. O presente trabalho tem como objetivo analisar as leituras de equipamentos de dois modelos, o Profometer 5+ e o Wallscanner D-Tect 150, utilizados na detecção das armaduras e cobrimento de um dos pilares do viaduto em Curitiba. A metodologia desenvolvida foi dividida em três etapas, a primeira, para calibração dos equipamentos, realizada em pilares pré-moldados de concreto armado. Na segunda fase, foram executadas leituras em um pilar de um edifício comercial e finalmente, na terceira etapa foram realizadas medições em um pilar com armação desconhecida localizado no viaduto. As leituras realizadas mostraram a eficiência dos equipamentos na localização das armaduras, porém, apresentaram pouca precisão na determinação dos diâmetros das barras. Não foram detectadas armaduras localizadas em camadas mais profundas. Os dois aparelhos permitiram a estimativa do cobrimento das barras detectadas, contudo, a leitura foi bastante afetada em zonas de alta concentração de armadura. Os resultados obtidos, aliados à leveza e facilidade de uso dos equipamentos, permitiram concluir que é recomendável a utilização de pacômetros em inspeções preliminares de pilares de estruturas de concreto armado.ABSTRACT: In the absence of the executive projects it is possible to determine the armature of the structure and its respective covering from devices called pacemakers. The present work has the objective of analyzing the equipment readings of two models, Profometer 5+ and Wallscanner D-Tect 150, used in the detection of the reinforcement and covering of one of the columns of the bridge in Curitiba. The methodology developed was divided into three stages, the first one, for equipment calibration, performed on precast concrete columns. In the second phase, readings were performed on a column of a commercial building and finally, in the third stage measurements were made on a column with unknown frame located on the viaduct. The readings showed the efficiency of the equipment in the location of the reinforcement, but presented little precision in the determination of the bar diameters. No reinforcement was found located in deeper layers. The two devices allowed the estimation of the covering of the detected bars, however, the reading was very affected in zones of high concentration of reinforcement. The results obtained, combined with the lightness and ease of use of the equipment, allowed us to conclude that the use of pacometers in preliminary inspections of pillars of reinforced concrete structures is recommended.

Power of Modified Brown-Forsythe and Mixed-Model Approaches in Split-Plot Designs

Methodology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Livacic-Rojas ◽  
Guillermo Vallejo ◽  
Paula Fernández ◽  
Ellián Tuero-Herrero
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Covariance Structure ◽  
Simulation Method ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Repeated Measures Design ◽  
Fixed And Random Effects ◽  
Split Plot ◽  
High Level

Abstract. Low precision of the inferences of data analyzed with univariate or multivariate models of the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in repeated-measures design is associated to the absence of normality distribution of data, nonspherical covariance structures and free variation of the variance and covariance, the lack of knowledge of the error structure underlying the data, and the wrong choice of covariance structure from different selectors. In this study, levels of statistical power presented the Modified Brown Forsythe (MBF) and two procedures with the Mixed-Model Approaches (the Akaike’s Criterion, the Correctly Identified Model [CIM]) are compared. The data were analyzed using Monte Carlo simulation method with the statistical package SAS 9.2, a split-plot design, and considering six manipulated variables. The results show that the procedures exhibit high statistical power levels for within and interactional effects, and moderate and low levels for the between-groups effects under the different conditions analyzed. For the latter, only the Modified Brown Forsythe shows high level of power mainly for groups with 30 cases and Unstructured (UN) and Autoregressive Heterogeneity (ARH) matrices. For this reason, we recommend using this procedure since it exhibits higher levels of power for all effects and does not require a matrix type that underlies the structure of the data. Future research needs to be done in order to compare the power with corrected selectors using single-level and multilevel designs for fixed and random effects.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Multi-Location External Workload Profile in the Most Common Movements in Basketball

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3441
Author(s):  
Carlos D. Gómez-Carmona ◽  
Sebastián Feu ◽  
José Pino-Ortega ◽  
Sergio J. Ibáñez
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Physical Conditioning ◽  
Lumbar Region ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Eta Squared ◽  
Subject Variability ◽  
Acceleration And Deceleration ◽  
Linear Movement

The present study analyzed the multi-location external workload profile in basketball players using a previously validated test battery and compared the demands among anatomical locations. A basketball team comprising 13 semi-professional male players was evaluated in five tests (abilities/skills/tests): (a) aerobic, linear movement, 30-15 IFT; (b) lactic anaerobic, acceleration and deceleration, 16.25 m RSA (c) alactic anaerobic, curvilinear movement, 6.75 m arc (d) elastic, jump, Abalakov test (e) physical-conditioning, small-sided game, 10’ 3 vs.3 10 × 15 m. PlayerLoadRT was evaluated at six anatomical locations simultaneously (interscapular line, lumbar region, knees and ankles) by six WIMU PROTM inertial devices attached to the player using an ad hoc integral suit. Statistical analysis was composed of an ANOVA of repeated measures and partial eta squared effect sizes. Significant differences among anatomical locations were found in all tests with higher values in the location nearer to ground contact (p < 0.01). However, differences between lower limb locations were only found in curvilinear movements, with a higher workload in the outside leg (p < 0.01). Additionally, high between-subject variability was found in team players, especially at lower limb locations. In conclusion, multi-location evaluation in sports movements will make it possible to establish an individual external workload profile and design specific strategies for training and injury prevention programs.

Intersession reliability of GPS-based and accelerometer-based physical variables in small-sided games with and without the offside rule

2021 ◽  
pp. 175433712098764
Author(s):  
Igor Junio de Oliveira Custódio ◽  
Gibson Moreira Praça ◽  
Leandro Vinhas de Paula ◽  
Sarah da Glória Teles Bredt ◽  
Fabio Yuzo Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Mean Square ◽  
Global Positioning System ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Physical Demands ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Total Distance ◽  
Global Positioning ◽  
High Level

This study aimed to analyze the intersession reliability of global positioning system (GPS-based) distances and accelerometer-based (acceleration) variables in small-sided soccer games (SSG) with and without the offside rule, as well as compare variables between the tasks. Twenty-four high-level U-17 soccer athletes played 3 versus 3 (plus goalkeepers) SSG in two formats (with and without the offside rule). SSG were performed on eight consecutive weeks (4 weeks for each group), twice a week. The physical demands were recorded using a GPS with an embedded triaxial accelerometer. GPS-based variables (total distance, average speed, and distances covered at different speeds) and accelerometer-based variables (Player Load™, root mean square of the acceleration recorded in each movement axis, and the root mean square of resultant acceleration) were calculated. Results showed that the inclusion of the offside rule reduced the total distance covered (large effect) and the distances covered at moderate speed zones (7–12.9 km/h – moderate effect; 13–17.9 km/h – large effect). In both SSG formats, GPS-based variables presented good to excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients – ICC > 0.62) and accelerometer-based variables presented excellent reliability (ICC values > 0.89). Based on the results of this study, the offside rule decreases the physical demand of 3 versus 3 SSG and the physical demands required in these SSG present high intersession reliability.

Comparing Performance Across In-person and Videoconference-Based Administrations of Common Neuropsychological Measures in Community-Based Survivors of Stroke

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Jodie E. Chapman ◽  
Betina Gardner ◽  
Jennie Ponsford ◽  
Dominique A. Cadilhac ◽  
Renerus J. Stolwyk
Keyword(s):  
Neuropsychological Assessment ◽  
Language Impairment ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Verbal Learning ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Service Access ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Neuropsychological Measures

Abstract Objective: Neuropsychological assessment via videoconference could assist in bridging service access gaps due to geographical, mobility, or infection control barriers. We aimed to compare performances on neuropsychological measures across in-person and videoconference-based administrations in community-based survivors of stroke. Method: Participants were recruited through a stroke-specific database and community advertising. Stroke survivors were eligible if they had no upcoming neuropsychological assessment, concurrent neurological and/or major psychiatric diagnoses, and/or sensory, motor, or language impairment that would preclude standardised assessment. Thirteen neuropsychological measures were administered in-person and via videoconference in a randomised crossover design (2-week interval). Videoconference calls were established between two laptop computers, facilitated by Zoom. Repeated-measures t tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland–Altman plots were used to compare performance across conditions. Results: Forty-eight participants (26 men; M age = 64.6, SD = 10.1; M time since stroke = 5.2 years, SD = 4.0) completed both sessions on average 15.8 (SD = 9.7) days apart. For most measures, the participants did not perform systematically better in a particular condition, indicating agreement between administration methods. However, on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised, participants performed poorer in the videoconference condition (Total Recall Mdifference = −2.11). ICC estimates ranged from .40 to .96 across measures. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that in-person and videoconference assessment result in comparable scores for most neuropsychological tests evaluated in mildly impaired community-based survivors of stroke. This preliminary evidence supports teleneuropsychological assessment to address service gaps in stroke rehabilitation; however, further research is needed in more diverse stroke samples.

scholarly journals Test–retest reliability of laser evoked pain perception and fMRI BOLD responses

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanzhi Bi ◽  
Xin Hou ◽  
Jiahui Zhong ◽  
Li Hu
Keyword(s):  
Resting State ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Pain Perception ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Repeated Measures Design ◽  
Brain Responses ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

AbstractPain perception is a subjective experience and highly variable across time. Brain responses evoked by nociceptive stimuli are highly associated with pain perception and also showed considerable variability. To date, the test–retest reliability of laser-evoked pain perception and its associated brain responses across sessions remain unclear. Here, an experiment with a within-subject repeated-measures design was performed in 22 healthy volunteers. Radiant-heat laser stimuli were delivered on subjects’ left-hand dorsum in two sessions separated by 1–5 days. We observed that laser-evoked pain perception was significantly declined across sessions, coupled with decreased brain responses in the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1), right primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and middle cingulate cortex. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the two sessions showed “fair” to “moderate” test–retest reliability for pain perception and brain responses. Additionally, we observed lower resting-state brain activity in the right S1 and lower resting-state functional connectivity between right S1 and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the second session than the first session. Altogether, being possibly influenced by changes of baseline mental state, laser-evoked pain perception and brain responses showed considerable across-session variability. This phenomenon should be considered when designing experiments for laboratory studies and evaluating pain abnormalities in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Automatic 3D dense phenotyping provides reliable and accurate shape quantification of the human mandible

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter-Jan Verhelst ◽  
H. Matthews ◽  
L. Verstraete ◽  
F. Van der Cruyssen ◽  
D. Mulier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Surface Registration ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Centroid Size ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Total Variability ◽  
Automatic Phenotyping

AbstractAutomatic craniomaxillofacial (CMF) three dimensional (3D) dense phenotyping promises quantification of the complete CMF shape compared to the limiting use of sparse landmarks in classical phenotyping. This study assesses the accuracy and reliability of this new approach on the human mandible. Classic and automatic phenotyping techniques were applied on 30 unaltered and 20 operated human mandibles. Seven observers indicated 26 anatomical landmarks on each mandible three times. All mandibles were subjected to three rounds of automatic phenotyping using Meshmonk. The toolbox performed non-rigid surface registration of a template mandibular mesh consisting of 17,415 quasi landmarks on each target mandible and the quasi landmarks corresponding to the 26 anatomical locations of interest were identified. Repeated-measures reliability was assessed using root mean square (RMS) distances of repeated landmark indications to their centroid. Automatic phenotyping showed very low RMS distances confirming excellent repeated-measures reliability. The average Euclidean distance between manual and corresponding automatic landmarks was 1.40 mm for the unaltered and 1.76 mm for the operated sample. Centroid sizes from the automatic and manual shape configurations were highly similar with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of > 0.99. Reproducibility coefficients for centroid size were < 2 mm, accounting for < 1% of the total variability of the centroid size of the mandibles in this sample. ICC’s for the multivariate set of 325 interlandmark distances were all > 0.90 indicating again high similarity between shapes quantified by classic or automatic phenotyping. Combined, these findings established high accuracy and repeated-measures reliability of the automatic approach. 3D dense CMF phenotyping of the human mandible using the Meshmonk toolbox introduces a novel improvement in quantifying CMF shape.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document