Relationship of a Multiplex Molecular Pneumonia Panel (PN) Results with Hospital Outcomes and Clinical Variables
Abstract Background Antibiotic treatment decisions in severely ill patients must often be made in the absence of microbiologic results. The recently FDA-cleared BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (PN) detects fifteen bacteria semi-quantitatively, three atypical pneumonia bacteria, eight viruses, and seven antimicrobial resistance markers by multiplex PCR in ~1 hour in the laboratory. Previous reports have shown the PN panel bacterial detections are highly accurate, even when routine culture had no growth. Methods Consecutive bronchoalveolar lavage and endotracheal specimens submitted for culture between June-September 2018 from 270 patients with sufficient clinical and laboratory data were tested with the PN panel. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) both culture and PN panel positive, 2) PN panel positive but culture uninformative (no growth or normal flora) and 3) patients with no PN panel detections. Results Groups 1 and 2 had significantly higher maximum temperatures on the day of culture (p=0.00036, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction), higher levels of an inflammatory response as measured by % polymorphonuclear leukocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (p=0.00025, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction) and the gram stain report of white blood cells, as previously reported 4. Conclusions Both group 1 (culture and PN panel positive), and group 2 (PN panel positive but culture uninformative) had higher levels of host response inflammatory responses compared with group 3 that had no targets detected, suggesting PN panel detections need to be interpreted in the clinical context, even if cultures are discordant. Depending on laboratory turnaround time, there could be opportunity for improved diagnosis and antibiotic stewardship.