scholarly journals Randomized Trial of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole versus Pyrimethamine-Sulfadiazine for Therapy of Toxoplasmic Encephalitis in Patients with AIDS

1998 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 1346-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donato Torre ◽  
Salvatore Casari ◽  
Filippo Speranza ◽  
Alessandra Donisi ◽  
Giampietro Gregis ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The aim of the present pilot study was to compare the efficacy and safety of trimethoprim (TMP) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) with those of the standard therapy pyrimethamine (P)-sulfadiazine (S) for the treatment of toxoplasmic encephalitis in patients with AIDS. This was a pilot, multicenter, randomized, and prospective study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive TMP (10 mg/kg of body weight/day) and SMX (50 mg/kg/day) or P (50 mg daily) and S (60 mg/kg/day) as acute therapy (for 4 weeks) and then as maintenance therapy for 3 months at half of the original dosage. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled and randomized to the study: 40 patients were treated with TMP-SMX and 37 were treated with P-S. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical efficacy during acute therapy. In contrast, patients randomized to TMP-SMX appeared more likely to achieve a complete radiologic response after acute therapy. Adverse reactions were significantly more frequent in patients treated with P-S, and skin rash was the most common adverse event noted in these patients. In conclusion, the results of the study suggest that TMP-SMX appears to be a valuable alternative to P-S, in particular in patients with opportunistic bacterial infections.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Gu ◽  
Jingjing Wang ◽  
Huihua Liao ◽  
Jian Mo ◽  
Weiming Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of different compatibility schemes in the prevention of visceral pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods: from April 2019 to April 2020, patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were randomly divided into four groups: group A: sufentanil 3 μ g / kg; group B: low-dose nalbuphine group: 0.1 mg / kg of nabufen + 3 μ g / kg of sufentanil; group C: medium dose of nabufen group: 1 mg / kg of nabufen + 2 μ g / kg of sufentanil; group D: high-dose nabufen 2 There were 30 cases in each group. The degree of pain and the number of adverse reactions at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation were observed and recorded. The number and dosage of morphine used as a remedial analgesic were recorded. The pain degree was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS). The total amount of analgesic pump used, the total number of times of pressing and the effective times of pressing were recorded. The adverse reactions included respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting, drowsiness, restlessness and skin The skin itches. Results: the analgesic effect of group B was similar to that of group A, and there was no significant difference in the number of invalid pressing, total pressing times and rescue analgesia rate (P > 0.05), while the invalid pressing times, total pressing times and remedial analgesia rate of group C and group D were significantly lower than those of group A (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between group C and group D in the number of invalid compressions, the total number of compressions and the rate of remedial analgesia (P > 0.05), suggesting that increasing the dose of nalbuphine could not significantly increase the analgesic effect. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, skin pruritus, lethargy and Ramsay Sedation score in group B and group C were significantly lower than those in group A (P < 0.05). Ramsay Sedation score and incidence of drowsiness were lower than those in group D, which indicated that the incidence of adverse reactions was higher in group D than group B and group C.Conclusion: the combination of 1 mg / kg nabufen and 2 μ g / kg sufentanil is a safe and effective combination scheme for the prevention of visceral pain after gynecological laparoscopic surgery with small adverse reactions.Trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=40635Registration number:ChiCTR1900025076 . Prospectively registered on 10 August 2019.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 779-785
Author(s):  
Xiaobin Gu ◽  
Wenhui Zhu ◽  
Haiyi He ◽  
Zili Wang ◽  
Shaolong Ding ◽  
...  

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) combined with osteoporosis. METHODS: Eighty patients with LSS combined with osteoporosis were divided into a control and PTED group, which received conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and PTED, respectively. The surgical indications, incision visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar and leg pain VAS, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, bone mineral density (BMD), and adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the operation time, bleeding loss and hospitalization duration, incision VAS scores at postoperative 12, 24 and 48 h and lumbar and leg pain VAS and lumbar ODI scores on postoperative 6 months were significantly decreased (P < 0.01), and the lumbar JOA score on postoperative 6 months was significantly increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in BMD between two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, in the PTED group, the total effective rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTED is safe and effective in the treatment of LSS combined with osteoporosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Ximing Zhang ◽  
Xiumei Tian ◽  
Yuezi Wei ◽  
Hao Deng ◽  
Lichun Ma ◽  
...  

In clinical practice, tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) therapy is commonly administered to treat nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 treatment for NPC. We searched PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP databases for RCTs of chemotherapy with or without S-1 for NPC, from 2001 to 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 and Stata15. Randomized controlled trials published in journals were included irrespective of blinding and language used. Patients were diagnosed with NPC through a clinicopathological examination; patients of all cancer stages and ages were included. Overall, 25 trials and 1858 patients were included. There were significant differences in the complete remission (OR = 2.42, 95% CI (1.88–3.10), P < 0.05 ) and overall response rate (OR = 2.68, 95% CI (2.08–3.45), P < 0.05 ) between the S-1 and non-S-1 groups. However, there was no significant difference in partial remission (OR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.87–1.39), P = 0.42 ) and seven adverse reactions (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, dermatitis, oral mucositis, and anemia) between the S-1 and non-S-1 groups. Additionally, statistical analyses with six subgroups were performed. S-1 was found to be a satisfactory chemotherapeutic agent combined with radiotherapy, intravenous chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy for NPC. As an oral medicine, the adverse reactions of S-1, especially gastrointestinal reactions, can be tolerated by patients, thereby optimizing their quality of life. S-1 may be a better choice for the treatment of NPC. This trial is registered with CRD42019122041.


1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 426-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich Horak

In this single-blind study, the efficacy and safety of Disophrol® Syrup was compared to Rinomar® Syrup in seventy-eight paediatric patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Patients took 5–10 ml of the randomly assigned medication three to four times daily for a 2-week period. Severity of nasal obstruction, nasal secretion and mucosal swelling was graded and patient response to each week of therapy evaluated. An overall favourable response to Disophrol® Syrup was observed in thirty-one out of thirty-five (89%) patients and in thirty out of thirty-five (86%) patients in the Rinomar® group. No statistically significant difference in patient response to therapy between treatment groups was noted and no mentionable adverse reactions were reported.


1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hojyo

The combination creams, betamethasone dipropionate/clotrimazole/gentamicin sulphate and flumethasone pivalate/clioquinol, were compared in patients with corticosteroid responsive dermatoses and/or cutaneous fungal and/or bacterial infections. Medication was applied to affected areas twice daily for 28 days. Of 67 patients enrolled, 31 treated with betamethasone/clotrimazole/gentamicin and 33 given flumethasone pivalate/clioquinol were evaluated for efficacy and safety each week during therapy and once 14 days post-therapy. Disease signs and symptoms were less severe in the group given betamethasone/clotrimazole/gentamicin than in the comparative group at days 7 (P = 0.04), 21 (P = 0.02), 28 (P = 0.09), and 42 (P = 0.09) and at patients’ last valid visit (P = 0.06). By the last valid visit, signs/symptoms had improved by 82% for patients treated with betamethasone/clotrimazole/gentamicin versus 68% for those treated with flumethasone pivalate/clioquinol. Patients given betamethasone/clotrimazole/gentamicin had statistically significantly better therapeutic responses than those given flumethasone pivalate/clioquinol at day 7 and, by the last valid visit, 19/31 (61%) patients given betamethasone/clotrimazole/gentamicin compared to 15/33 (45%) given flumethasone pivalate/clioquinol had a complete cure or an excellent therapeutic response. Median time of onset of relief of erythema and pruritus was approximately 2 days, regardless of treatment. No adverse reactions were reported.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3956-3956
Author(s):  
Tongyu Lin ◽  
Xueying Li ◽  
Tingzhi Liu ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Huangming Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is a folic acid reductase inhibitor widely used. Peripheral infusion of high dose MTX (HD-MTX) could prevent the central nervous system recurrence of leukemia and NHL. Due to the blood brain barrier, only 1-3% of MTX in the peripheral blood can enter the cerebrospinal fluid. Improving the peripheral MTX drug dosage helps to improve MTX concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid. However, high concentration of MTX has serious side effects to normal organs. Leucovorin (CF) rescue is given to reduce the toxic effect of methotrexate on normal cells. During high dose MTX therapy, monitoring of serum concentration of MTX and timely CF rescue therapy are mandatory so as to maximum the efficacy of MTX and minimize the toxicities. Due to the lack of randomized clinical trials with large sample, the safe dose and most appropriate time of leucovorin rescue treatment are of no consensus. In order to study the effect of different time of leucovorin rescue treatment on the serum concentration of MTX, we carried out this study. Patients and methods: We included patients who had pathological diagnosis of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and indications to receive HD-MTX as single agent or component in combined regimen consecutively from October 2011 to June 2014 at our hospital. Patients were randomized to receive CF rescue at the sixth hour after MTX infusion in the first course and twelfth hour in the second course or the twelfth hour in the first course and sixth hour in the second course. A dosage of 3.5 g/m2 of MTX was provided. Adequate hydration, alkalization and monitoring of laboratory tests were administered. Intrathecal injection of MTX plus cytarabine and dexamethasone were given after MTX infusion. 100mg of CF was given at the first time, then 30mg of CF were given every 6 hours for a total of 7 times until the plasma concentration of MTX were lower than 1×10-7 mol/L. Blood samples were collected at 2, 12, 18, 24, 28, 72 hours after the beginning of MTX infusion. High performance liquid chromatography was used to test the plasma concentration of MTX. Results: There were 23 male patients and 12 female patients with a mean age of 41 years. Most of patients were diagnosed as diffuse large B cell lymphoma (65.7%). Eleven cases (31.4%) had central nervous system invasion at the time of HD-MTX treatment. Twenty-one patients (51%) had more than one extra-nodal lesion. Sixteen patients were randomly to be rescued at the sixth hour in the first course then the twelfth hour in the second course. Nineteen patients were randomly to be rescued at the twelfth hour in the first course then the sixth hour in the second course. The plasma concentration of MTX of patients rescued at the sixth hour at the time of 2, 12, 18, 24, 48 hours were 5.21±0.36×10-5 mol/L, 8.01±0.635×10-5 mol/L, 4.57±1.67×10-6 mol/L, 1.43±0.83×10-6 mol/L, 0.1±0.1×10-6 mol/L, respectively; The plasma concentration MTX of patients rescued at the twelfth hour at the time of 2, 12, 18, 24, 48 hours were 5.46±0.34×10-5 mol/L, 8.65±0.663×10-5 mol/L, 5.4±0.93×10-6 mol/L, 1.12±0.21×10-6 mol/L, 0.1±0.24×10-6 mol/L, respectively. There was no significant difference of MTX concentration level between patients treated with different CF rescue timing, P >0.05. Most of patients achieved maximal MTX concentration at the twelfth hour, and descended to be lower than the minimal effective concentration at the eighteenth hour. At the forty-eighth hour, majority of patients had MTX concentration being in a safe range. The rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse reactions including neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and grade 1 to 2 side effects including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, fatigue, and MTX discharge delay were higher when patients were rescued with CF at the twelfth hour, though P >0.05. Conclusion: Most of patients treated with high dose MTX reached the maximum MTX concentration at the twelfth hour after MTX infusion, and descended to be under the minimal effective concentration at the eighteenth hour, then to be in the safe range at the forty eighth hour. No significant difference of MTX concentration was found between patients rescued with CF at the sixth hour or the twelfth hour. However, adverse reactions were lower when patients were treated with CF rescue at the sixth hour. It seems a better choice to give patients CF rescue at the sixth hour after MTX infusion. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15665-e15665
Author(s):  
Yoshimichi Haruna ◽  
Atsuo Inoue ◽  
Seiichi Kawamoto

e15665 Background: Some animal studies showed that vitamin K enhances anti-cancer action of sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our previous examination suggested that it might be because the vitamin K suppresses des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) production of tumor cells under ischemic status caused by sorafenib. The DCP is known as a tumor growth factor and a tumor angiogenesis factor. In order to clarify the efficacy and safety of vitamin K dosing in sorafenib treatment, we have performed a single center, open label, randomized, phase 2 study. Methods: Forty-four patients with advanced HCC were studied. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to receive vitamin K + sorafenib or to receive sorafenib alone, stratified according to macrovascular invasion and/or extrahepatic spread. The anti-cancer outcome was evaluated by modified RECIST. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in baseline characteristics (gender, age, Child-Pugh status and background liver disease). The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in the vitamin K + sorafenib group compared with sorafenib alone group (median time 3.7 months vs. 1.5 months, P = 0.001, hazard ratio 0.35). The disease control rates were 55% in vitamin K + sorafenib group and 18% in sorafenib alone group (P = 0.012). On the other hand, median overall survival (OS) times were 12 months in vitamin K + sorafenib group and 11.5 months in sorafenib alone group (P = 0.27, hazard ratio 0.67). However, 5 patients (23%) of 22 survived for more than 21 months in the vitamin K + sorafenib group, while one (5%) of 22 did in sorafenib alone group. There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions: The vitamin K dosing safely improved anti-cancer outcome of sorafenib treatment against advanced HCC. Clinical trial information: 000007855.


2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavio Augusto Vercillo Luisi ◽  
Antônio Sérgio Petrilli ◽  
Cristiana Tanaka ◽  
Eliana Maria Monteiro Caran

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Chemotherapy-induced emesis is a limiting factor in treating children with malignancies. Intensive chemotherapy regimens along with emetogenic drug administration have increased the frequency and severity of emesis and nausea. Our study was designed to consider the importance of this problem and the need for improvement in emesis treatment for patients receiving chemotherapy. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of the antiemetic drug granisetron and a regimen of metoclopramide plus dimenhydrinate. DESIGN AND SETTING: Open, prospective and randomized study at Instituto de Oncologia Pediátrica, Department of Pediatrics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. METHODS: From February to August 1994, 26 patients (mean age: 14 years) with osteosarcoma received 80 chemotherapy cycles of iphosphamide (2,500 mg/m²) plus epirubicin (75 mg/m²) or carboplatin (600 mg/m²), or epirubicin (75 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (600 mg/m²). Eighty chemotherapy treatments were analyzed regarding nausea and vomiting control. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of granisetron (50 µg/kg) or metoclopramide (2 mg/kg) plus dimenhydrinate (5 mg/kg infused over eight hours). Emesis and nausea were monitored for 24 hours by means of the modified Morrow Assessment of Nausea and Emesis. Statistical analysis utilized the chi-squared, Student t and Mann-Whitney tests, plus data exploration techniques. RESULTS: 62.5% of the patients undergoing chemotherapy responded completely to granisetron, whereas 10% responded to metoclopramide plus dimenhydrinate (p < 0.0001). No severe adverse reactions were found in either of the treatments given. CONCLUSION: In children and adolescents with osteosarcoma, granisetron was safe and more efficient than metoclopramide plus dimenhydrinate for controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis and nausea.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanbing Wang

Objectives: To analyze and study the efficacy and safety of Endu combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin in the clinical treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: From August 2016 to September 2020, 32 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who were treated in our hospital were selected for group trials. According to their specific treatment plan, the patients were divided into control group and experimental group, with 16 cases in each group. The control group was treated with pemetrexed and cisplatin, and the experimental group was treated with Endostar combined with the treatment received by the control group. The clinical efficacy and safety of the two regimens were assessed by comparing the changes in symptoms and the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups of patients after treatment. Results: The disease control rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusions: From the experimental results, we found that the treatment of patients with lung adenocarcinoma by Endostar combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin can effectively improve the treatment efficacy without increasing adverse reactions and therefore relevant chemotherapy regimens can be considered for wider clinical applications.


Antibiotics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Huan Lan ◽  
Wei-Ting Lin ◽  
Shen-Peng Chang ◽  
Li-Chin Lu ◽  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
...  

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of novel tetracyclines for treating acute bacterial infections. Data from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane databases, Ovid Medline, and Embase databases were accessed until 11 July 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of novel tetracyclines with that of other antibiotics for treating acute bacterial infections were included. Primary outcomes included the clinical response, microbiological response, and risk of adverse events (AEs). A total of eight RCTs were included, involving 2283 and 2197 patients who received novel tetracyclines and comparators, respectively. Overall, no significant difference was observed in the clinical response rate at test of cure between the experimental and control groups (for modified intent-to-treat [MITT] population, risk ratio [RR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99–1.05; for clinically evaluable [CE] population, RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.04; and for microbiological evaluable [ME] population, RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99–1.04). No significant difference in the microbiological response at the end of treatment was observed between the experimental and control groups (for ME population, RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99–1.03; for microbiological MITT population, RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96–1.07). No difference was observed concerning the risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events, and discontinuation of treatment due to TEAEs and all-cause mortality between the two groups. In conclusion, clinical efficacy and safety profile for novel tetracyclines in the treatment of acute bacterial infections were found to be similar to those for other available antibiotics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document