Observing Maturing Source Rocks on Seismic Reflection Data

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-56
Author(s):  
T. Matava ◽  
R. G. Keys ◽  
S. E. Ohm ◽  
S. Volterrrani
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Pore Space ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Eastern Canada ◽  
Amplitude Response ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data

Hydrocarbon generation in a source rock is a complex, irreversible phase change that occurs when a source rock is heated during burial to change phase to a fluid. The fluid density is less than the kerogen density so in a closed or partially closed system the volume of the pore space occupied by fluids increases. Burial also increases the effective stress which leads to compaction and a significant reduction in porosity. The challenge of identifying source rocks on seismic data then becomes differentiating the smaller porosity increase due to hydrocarbon formation from the larger porosity decrease associated with burial. We use a calibrated rock physics model to show that Vshale and porosity data can be used to predict the compressional and shear wave velocities and the density in wells over large sedimentary sections, including a source rock of variable maturity. These well data and models show that the difference between an immature and mature source rock is an increase porosity (lower density) relative to compacting, non-source rock sediments. We use these results to identify a potential source interval in the Orphan Basin in Eastern Canada on 2D regional seismic data. We show that the full stack amplitude response of a maturing source rock is significant during the main phase of generation (0.2<transformation ratio<0.8) relative to surrounding sediments. Regional scale consistency of the amplitude response with the kerogen maturity model from an integrated basin simulator reduces exploration risk because the independence of the thermal model from the seismic amplitude response. Finally, combining the seismic response with the source rock maturity model provides insight into the likely kerogen kinetics. Most applications require regional data sets to capture the maturity window, however, applications are also possible around allochthonous salt where geometries can lead to local changes in heat flow.

scholarly journals Study on Geochemical Characteristics of tight sandstone gas accumulation in Linxing area

2020 ◽  
Vol 206 ◽  
pp. 01017
Author(s):  
Yangbing Li ◽  
Weiqiang Hu ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Litao Ma ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Ordos Basin ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Light Hydrocarbons ◽  
Tight Sandstone ◽  
Source Type ◽  
Reservoir Type ◽  
Sandstone Reservoir ◽  
Main Component

Based on the comprehensive analysis of the characteristics of tight sandstone gas composition, carbon isotope, light hydrocarbons and source rocks in Linxing area of Ordos Basin, the reservoir-forming model of tight sandstone gas in this area is discussed. The study shows that methane is the main component of tight sandstone gas, with low contents of heavy hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbons, mainly belonging to dry gas in the Upper Paleozoic in Linxing area. The values of δ13C1, δ13C2 and δ13C3 of natural gas are in the ranges of -45.6‰ ~ -32.9‰, -28.9‰ ~ -22.3‰ and -26.2‰~ -19.1‰, respectively. The carbon isotopic values of alkane gas show a general trend of positive carbon sequence. δ13C1 value is less than -30‰, with typical characteristics of organic genesis. There is a certain similarity in the composition characteristics of light hydrocarbons. The C7 series show the advantage of methylhexane, while the C5-7 series mainly shows the advantage of isoalkane. The tight sandstone gas in this area is mainly composed of mature coal-derived gas, containing a small amount of coal-derived gas and oil-type gas mixture. According to the mode of hydrocarbon generation, diffusion and migration of source rocks in Linxing area, the tight sandstone gas in the study area can be divided into three types of reservoir-forming assemblages: the upper reservoir type of the far-source type (upper Shihezi formation-shiqianfeng formation sandstone reservoir-forming away from source rocks), the upper reservoir type of the near-source type ( the Lower Shihezi formation sandstone reservoir-outside the source rock), and the self-storage type of the source type (Shanxi formation-Taiyuan formation source rock internal sand reservoir).

scholarly journals The Cambrian Henson Gletscher Formation: a mature to postmature hydrocarbon source rock sequence from North Greenland

1987 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. 141-157
Author(s):  
F.G Christiansen ◽  
H Nøhr-Hansen ◽  
O Nykjær
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Hydrocarbon Source Rock ◽  
Reservoir Rocks ◽  
Potential Source ◽  
Potential Reservoir ◽  
Field Season ◽  
North Greenland

During the 1985 field season the Cambrian Henson Gletscher Formation in central North Greenland was studied in detail with the aim of evaluating its potential as a hydrocarbon source rock. The formation contains organic rich shale and carbonate mudstone which are considered to be potential source rocks. These are sedimentologically coupled with a sequence of sandstones and coarse carbonates which might be potential reservoir rocks or migration conduits. Most of the rocks exposed on the surface are, however, thermally mature to postrnature with respect to hydrocarbon generation, leaving only few chances of finding trapped oil in the subsurface of the area studied in detail.

scholarly journals GEOCHEMICAL AND GEOSTATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF CRETACEOUS COALS AND SHALES IN SOME NIGERAIN SEDIMENTARY BASINS FOR THEIR HYDROCARBON PRONESS AND MATURITY LEVELS

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Good Source ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Limit Value ◽  
The Impact

The Rock–Eval pyrolysis and LECO analysis for 9 shale and 12 coal samples, as well as, geostatistical analysis have been used to investigate source rock characteristics, correlation between the assessed parameters (QI, BI, S1, S2, S3, HI, S1 + S2, OI, PI, TOC) and the impact of changes in the Tmax on the assessed parameters in the Cretaceous Sokoto, Anambra Basins and Middle Benue Trough of northwestern, southeastern and northcentral Nigeria respectively. The geochemical results point that about 97% of the samples have TOC values greater than the minimum limit value (0.5 wt %) required to induce hydrocarbon generation from source rocks. Meanwhile, the Dukamaje and Taloka shales and Lafia/Obi coal are found to be fair to good source rock for oil generation with slightly higher thermal maturation. The source rocks are generally immature through sub-mature to marginal mature with respect to the oil and gas window, while the potential source rocks from the Anambra Basin are generally sub-mature grading to mature within the oil window. The analyzed data were approached statistically to find some relations such as factors, and clusters concerning the examination of the source rocks. These factors were categorized into type of organic matter and organic richness, thermal maturity and hydrocarbon potency. In addendum, cluster analysis separated the source rocks in the study area into two groups. The source rocks characterized by HI >240 (mg/g), TOC from 58.89 to 66.43 wt %, S1 from 2.01 to 2.54 (mg/g) and S2 from 148.94 to 162.52 (mg/g) indicating good to excellent source rocks with kerogen of type II and type III and are capable of generating oil and gas. Followed by the Source rocks characterized by HI <240 (mg/g), TOC from 0.94 to 36.12 wt%, S1 from 0.14 to 0.72 (mg/g) and S2 from 0.14 to 20.38 (mg/g) indicating poor to good source rocks with kerogen of type III and are capable of generating gas. Howeverr, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis shows a significant positive correlation between TOC and S1, S2 and HI and no correlation between TOC and Tmax, highly negative correlation between TOC and OI and no correlation between Tmax and HI. Keywords- Cretaceous, Geochemical, Statistical, Cluster; Factor analyses.

Liquid hydrocarbon characterization of the lacustrine Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China: Organic-matter source variation and thermal maturity

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. SF225-SF242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Sun ◽  
Quansheng Liang ◽  
Chengfu Jiang ◽  
Daniel Enriquez ◽  
Tongwei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Source Rock ◽  
Ordos Basin ◽  
Depositional Environments ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Type I ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Thermal Maturity ◽  
Yanchang Formation

Source-rock samples from the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in the Ordos Basin of China were geochemically characterized to determine variations in depositional environments, organic-matter (OM) source, and thermal maturity. Total organic carbon (TOC) content varies from 4 wt% to 10 wt% in the Chang 7, Chang 8, and Chang 9 members — the three OM-rich shale intervals. The Chang 7 has the highest TOC and hydrogen index values, and it is considered the best source rock in the formation. Geochemical evidence indicates that the main sources of OM in the Yanchang Formation are freshwater lacustrine phytoplanktons, aquatic macrophytes, aquatic organisms, and land plants deposited under a weakly reducing to suboxic depositional environment. The elevated [Formula: see text] sterane concentration and depleted [Formula: see text] values of OM in the middle of the Chang 7 may indicate the presence of freshwater cyanobacteria blooms that corresponds to a period of maximum lake expansion. The OM deposited in deeper parts of the lake is dominated by oil-prone type I or type II kerogen or a mixture of both. The OM deposited in shallower settings is characterized by increased terrestrial input with a mixture of types II and III kerogen. These source rocks are in the oil window, with maturity increasing with burial depth. The measured solid-bitumen reflectance and calculated vitrinite reflectance from the temperature at maximum release of hydrocarbons occurs during Rock-Eval pyrolysis ([Formula: see text]) and the methylphenanthrene index (MPI-1) chemical maturity parameters range from 0.8 to [Formula: see text]. Because the thermal labilities of OM are associated with the kerogen type, the required thermal stress for oil generation from types I and II mixed kerogen has a higher and narrower range of temperature for hydrocarbon generation than that of OM dominated by type II kerogen or types II and III mixed kerogen deposited in the prodelta and delta front.

TECTONOSTRATIGRAPHY AND POTENTIAL SOURCE ROCKS OF THE BASS BASIN

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 601 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E. Blevin ◽  
K.R. Trigg ◽  
A.D. Partridge ◽  
C.J. Boreham ◽  
S.C. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Data ◽  
Middle Eocene ◽  
Liquid Hydrocarbon ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Rift System ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Crustal Extension ◽  
Principal Source ◽  
Seismic Sequence Stratigraphy

A study of the Bass Basin using a basin-wide integration of seismic data, well logs, biostratigraphy and seismic/sequence stratigraphy has resulted in the identification of six basin phases and related megasequences/ supersequences. These sequences correlate to three periods of extension and three subsidence phases. The complex nature of facies relationships across the basin is attributed to the mostly terrestrial setting of the basin until the Middle Eocene, multiple phases of extension, strong compartmentalisation of the basin due to underlying basement fabric, and differential subsidence during extension and early subsidence phases. The Bass Basin formed through upper crustal extension associated with three main regional events:rifting in the Southern Margin Rift System;rifting associated with the formation of the Tasman Basin; and,prolonged separation, fragmentation and clearance between the Australian and Antarctic plates along the western margin of Tasmania.The final stage of extension was the result of far-field stresses that were likely to be oblique in orientation. The late Early Eocene to Middle Eocene was a time of rifttransition and early subsidence as the effects of intra-plate stresses progressively waned from east to west. Most of the coaly source rocks now typed to liquid hydrocarbon generation were deposited during this rift-transition phase. Biostratigraphic studies have identified three major lacustrine episodes during the Late Cretaceous to Middle Eocene. The lacustrine shales are likely to be more important as seal facies, while coals deposited fringing the lakes are the principal source rocks in the basin.

THE STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF PALAEOZOIC SOURCE ROCKS IN THE ADAVALE BASIN REGION

1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 393 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. L. Passmore ◽  
M. J. Sexton
Keyword(s):  
Middle Devonian ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Geochemical Data ◽  
Mature Stage ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Structural Development ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Basin Region

The Adavale Basin of southwestern Queensland consists of a main depression and several isolated synclinal extensions, traditionally referred to as troughs. The depressions and troughs are erosional remnants of a once more extensive Devonian depositional basin, and are now completely buried by sediments of the overlying Cooper, Galilee and Eromanga Basins. Geophysical and drilling investigations undertaken since 1959 are the only source of information on the Adavale Basin. A single sub-economic discovery of dry gas at Gilmore and a few shows of oil and gas are the only hydrocarbons located in the basin to date.In 1980, the Bureau of Mineral Resources in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Queensland commenced a major, multidisciplinary investigation of the basins in southwestern Queensland. Four long (> 200 km) seismic lines from this study over the Adavale Basin region and geochemical data from 20 wells were used to interpret the Adavale Basin's development and its present hydrocarbon potential.The new seismic reflection data allow the well-explored main depression to be correlated with the detached troughs, some of which have little or no well information. The BMR seismic data show that these troughs were previously part of one large depositional basin in the Devonian, the depocentre of which lay east of a north-trending hingeline. Structural features and Devonian depositional limits and patterns have been modified from earlier interpretations as a result of the new seismic coverage. The maximum sediment thickness is re-interpreted to be 8500 m, considerably thicker than previous interpretation.recognised. The first one, a diachronous Middle Devonian unconformity, is the most extensive, and reflects the mobility of the basement during the basin's early history. The second unconformity within the Late Devonian Buckabie Formation reveals that there were two phases of deformation of the basin sediments.The geochemical results reported in this study show that most of the Adavale Basin sediments have very low concentrations of organic carbon and hydrocarbon fractions. Maturity profiles indicate that the best source rocks of the basin are now in the mature stage for hydrocarbon generation. However, at Gilmore and in the Cooladdi Trough, they have reached the dry gas stage. The maturity data provide additional evidence for the marked break in deposition and significant erosion during the Middle Devonian recognised on the seismic records, and extend the limits of this sedimentary break into the northern part of the main depression.Hydrocarbon potential of the Adavale Basin is fair to poor. In the eastern part of the basin, where most of the data are available, the prospects are better for gas than oil. Oil prospectivity may be improved in any exinite-rich areas that exist farther west, where palaeo-temperatures were lower.

The transformation effect of source rock-derived acidic fluid on carbonate reservoir from simulation experiments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Ding ◽  
Zhiliang He ◽  
Dongya Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Source Rock ◽  
Carbonate Reservoir ◽  
Carbonate Reservoirs ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Simulation Experiments ◽  
Deep Layers

&lt;p&gt;Deep and ultra-deep carbonate reservoir is an important area of petroleum exploration. However, the prerequisite for predicting high quality deep ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs lays on the mechanism of carbonate dissolution/precipitation. It is optimal to perform hydrocarbon generation-dissolution simulation experiments to clarify if burial dissolution could improve the physical properties of carbonate reservoirs, while quantitatively and qualitatively describe the co-evolution process of source rock and carbonate reservoirs in deep layers. In this study, a series of experiments were conducted with the limestone from the Ordovician Yingshan Formation in the Tarim Basin, and the low maturity source rock from Yunnan Luquan, with a self-designed hydrocarbon generation-dissolution simulation equipment. The controlling factors accounted for the alteration of carbonate reservoirs and dissolution modification process by hydrocarbon cracking fluid under deep burial environments were investigated by petrographic and geochemical analytical methods. In the meantime, the transformation mechanism of surrounding rocks in carbonate reservoirs during hydrocarbon generation process of source rock was explored. The results showed that: in the burial stage, organic acid, CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and other acidic fluids associated with thermal evolution of deep source rocks could dissolve carbonate reservoirs, expand pore space, and improve porosity. Dissolution would decrease with the increasing burial depth. Whether the fluid could improve reservoir physical properties largely depends on calcium carbonate saturation, fluid velocity, water/rock ratio, original pore structure etc. This study could further contribute to the prediction of high-quality carbonate reservoirs in deep and ultra-deep layers.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Inversion tectonics: a brief petroleum industry perspective

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gábor Tari ◽  
Didier Arbouille ◽  
Zsolt Schléder ◽  
Tamás Tóth
Keyword(s):  
Petroleum Industry ◽  
Structural Complexity ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Seismic Reflection Data ◽  
Reflection Seismic ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Well Data

Abstract. The concept of structural inversion was introduced in the early 1980s. By definition, an inversion structure forms when a pre-existing extensional (or transtensional) fault controlling a hangingwall basin containing a syn-rift or passive fill sequence subsequently undergoes compression (or transpression) producing partial (or total) extrusion of the basin fill. Inverted structures provide traps for petroleum exploration, typically four-way structural closures. As to the degree of inversion, based on large number of worldwide examples seen in various basins, the most preferred petroleum exploration targets are mild to moderate inversional structures, defined by the location of the null-points. In these instances, the closures have a relatively small vertical amplitude, but simple in a map-view sense and well imaged on seismic reflection data. Also, the closures typically cluster above the extensional depocentres which tend to contain source rocks providing petroleum charge during and after the inversion. Cases for strong or total inversion are generally not that common and typically are not considered as ideal exploration prospects, mostly due to breaching and seismic imaging challenges associated with the trap(s) formed early on in the process of inversion. Also, migration may become tortuous due to the structural complexity or the source rock units may be uplifted above the hydrocarbon generation window effectively terminating the charge once the inversion occurred. For any particular structure the evidence for inversion is typically provided by subsurface data sets such as reflection seismic and well data. However, in many cases the deeper segments of the structure are either poorly imaged by the seismic data and/or have not been penetrated by exploration wells. In these cases the interpretation of any given structure in terms of inversion has to rely on the regional understanding of the basin evolution with evidence for an early phase of substantial crustal extension by normal faulting.

scholarly journals 3D-Basin Modelling of the Lishui Sag: Research of Hydrocarbon Potential, Petroleum Generation and Migration

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinliang Zhang ◽  
Jiaqi Guo ◽  
Jinshui Liu ◽  
Wenlong Shen ◽  
Na Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Thermal Evolution ◽  
Vitrinite Reflectance ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Hydrocarbon Accumulation ◽  
Southeastern Part ◽  
Petroleum Generation

The Lishui Sag is located in the southeastern part of the Taibei Depression, in the East China Sea basin, where the sag is the major hydrocarbon accumulation zone. A three dimensional modelling approach was used to estimate the mass of petroleum generation and accumulated during the evolution of the basin. Calibration of the model, based on measured maturity (vitrinite reflectance) and borehole temperatures, took into consideration two main periods of erosion events: a late Cretaceous to early Paleocene event, and an Oligocene erosion event. The maturation histories of the main source rock formations were reconstructed and show that the peak maturities have been reached in the west central part of the basin. Our study included source rock analysis, measurement of fluid inclusion homogenization temperatures, and basin history modelling to define the source rock properties, the thermal evolution and hydrocarbon generation history, and possible hydrocarbon accumulation processes in the Lishui Sag. The study found that the main hydrocarbon source for the Lishui Sag are argillaceous source rocks in the Yueguifeng Formation. The hydrocarbon generation period lasted from 58 Ma to 32 Ma. The first period of hydrocarbon accumulation lasted from 51.8 Ma to 32 Ma, and the second period lasted from 23 Ma to the present. The accumulation zones mainly located in the structural high and lithologic-fault screened reservoir filling with the hydrocarbon migrated from the deep sag in the south west direction.

A HYDROCARBON GENERATION MODEL FOR THE COOPER AND EROMANGA BASINS

2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 433 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Deighton ◽  
J.J. Draper ◽  
A.J. Hill ◽  
C.J. Boreham
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Generation Model ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Control Points ◽  
Seismic Structure ◽  
Dynamic Topography ◽  
Late Tertiary ◽  
Petroleum Generation ◽  
Eromanga Basin

The aim of the National Geoscience Mapping Accord Cooper-Eromanga Basins Project was to develop a quantitative petroleum generation model for the Cooper and Eromanga Basins by delineating basin fill, thermal history and generation potential of key stratigraphic intervals. Bio- and lithostratigraphic frameworks were developed that were uniform across state boundaries. Similarly cross-border seismic horizon maps were prepared for the C horizon (top Cadna-owie Formation), P horizon (top Patchawarra Formation) and Z horizon (base Eromanga/Cooper Basins). Derivative maps, such as isopach maps, were prepared from the seismic horizon maps.Burial geohistory plots were constructed using standard decompaction techniques, a fluctuating sea level and palaeo-waterdepths. Using terrestrial compaction and a palaeo-elevation for the Winton Formation, tectonic subsidence during the Winton Formation deposition and erosion is the same as the background Eromanga Basin trend—this differs significantly from previous studies which attributed apparently rapid deposition of the Winton Formation to basement subsidence. A dynamic topography model explains many of the features of basin history during the Cretaceous. Palaeo-temperature modelling showed a high heatflow peak from 90–85 Ma. The origin of this peak is unknown. There is also a peak over the last two–five million years.Expulsion maps were prepared for the source rock units studied. In preparing these maps the following assumptions were made:expulsion is proportional to maturity and source rock richness;maturity is proportional to peak temperature; andpeak temperature is proportional to palaeo-heatflow and palaeo-burial.The geohistory modelling involved 111 control points. The major expulsion is in the mid-Cretaceous with minor amounts in the late Tertiary. Maturity maps were prepared by draping seismic structure over maturity values at control points. Draping of maturity maps over expulsion values at the control points was used to produce expulsion maps. Hydrocarbon generation was calculated using a composite kerogen kinetic model. Volumes generated are theoretically large, up to 120 BBL m2 of kitchen area at Tirrawarra North. Maps were prepared for the Patchawarra and Toolachee Formations in the Cooper Basin and the Birkhead and Poolowanna Formations in the Eromanga Basins. In addition, maps were prepared for Tertiary expulsion. The Permian units represent the dominant source as Jurassic source rocks have only generated in the deepest parts of the Eromanga Basin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document