The impact of adjuvant delayed radiotheraphy (RT) on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinomas.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15168-e15168
Author(s):  
Suayib Yalcin ◽  
Neyran Kertmen ◽  
Deniz Yuce ◽  
Ferah Yildiz ◽  
Erhan Hamaloglu
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Ampullary Carcinoma ◽  
Periampullary Cancer ◽  
Periampullary Tumor ◽  
Complete Surgical Resection ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

e15168 Background: Postoperative prognosis for ampullary carcinoma (AC) is superior to that of pancreatic cancer (PC), the former exhibiting higher complete surgical resection, lower recurrence and longer survival rates (1). Despite all the major recent advances in surgery, chemotherapy (CT) and RT, PC is still one of the most lethal malignancies, overall survival (OS) rates being as low as 5% at 5 years (2). This study was intended to evaluate survival in patients with resected periampullary cancer treated with adjuvant Gemcitabine (Gem) and cisplatin (Cis) with or without delayed RT (with Gem). Methods: This retrospective study involved 91 patients diagnosed and treated with periampullary cancer. Patients with adenocarcinoma of periampullary region with gross total tumor resection and lymph node dissection (R0 and R1 resections only) were included. Of 59 patients with PC, 38 received Gem and Cis for 3 cycles (3 months) before CRT. When delivered after Gem /RT, Gem and Cis were usually given for another 1-3 cycles. Twenty-seven patients received Gem and Cis alone over 6 cycles. Of 32 patients with non-pancreatic periampullary 23 received CT+CRT and 9 patients received CT alone. Results: Patients with non-pancreatic periampullary cancer had better OS (p:0.017) and disease free survival (DFS) ( p<0.001 ) compared to patients with PC. Median OS of patients with PC was 21 months. Both OS and DFS were superior in the RT arm compared to nonRT arm (p: 0.043 and p <0.001). In non-pancreatic periampullary cancer patients OS was 31 months in RT group and 51 months in non-RT group (p: 0.709). DFS was 29 months and 49.8 months respectively, p:0.504). Conclusions: The prognosis of PC was worse than non–pancreatic periampullary tumor. In PC adjuvant delayed RT improved patient outcome. Although OS and DFS were better in patients receiving CT alone, the difference was not statistically significant in non–pancreatic periampullary tumors.

scholarly journals Impact of Pancreatic Resection on Survival in Locally Advanced Resectable Gastric Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1289
Author(s):  
Shih-Chun Chang ◽  
Chi-Ming Tang ◽  
Puo-Hsien Le ◽  
Chia-Jung Kuo ◽  
Tsung-Hsing Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lymph Node Yield ◽  
Whipple’S Operation ◽  
Whipple's Operation ◽  
The Impact

Whether gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) patients with adjacent organ invasion (T4b) benefit from aggressive surgery involving pancreatic resection (PR) remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the impact of PR on survival in patients with locally advanced resectable GC. Between 1995 and 2017, patients with locally advanced GC undergoing radical-intent gastrectomy with and without PR were enrolled and stratified into four groups: group 1 (G1), pT4b without pancreatic resection (PR); group 2 (G2), pT4b with PR; group 3 (G3), positive duodenal margins without Whipple’s operation; and group 4 (G4), cT4b with Whipple’s operation. Demographics, clinicopathological features, and outcomes were compared between G1 and G2 and G3 and G4. G2 patients were more likely to have perineural invasion than G1 patients (80.6% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). G4 patients had higher lymph node yield (40.8 vs. 31.3, p = 0.002), lower nodal status (p = 0.029), lower lymph node ratios (0.20 vs. 0.48, p < 0.0001) and higher complication rates (45.2% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.047) than G3 patients. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly longer in G1 than in G2 (28.1% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.003; 32% vs. 13%, p = 0.004, respectively). The 5-year survival rates did not differ between G4 and G3 (DFS: 14% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.384; OS: 12.6% vs. 16.4%, p = 0.321, respectively). In conclusion, patients with T4b lesion who underwent PR had poorer survival than those who underwent resection of other adjacent organs. Further Whipple’s operation did not improve survival in pT3–pT4 GC with positive duodenal margins.

scholarly journals Impact of Palliative Gastrectomy in Patients with Incurable Gastric Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Park ◽  
Byunghyuk Yu ◽  
Ki Bum Park ◽  
Oh Kyoung Kwon ◽  
Seung Soo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Palliative Resection ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Palliative Intent ◽  
Palliative Gastrectomy ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background and Objectives: The prognosis of metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer is dismal, and the benefits of the palliative resection of primary tumors with noncurative intent remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of palliative gastrectomy (PG) on overall survival in gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: One hundred forty-eight gastric cancer patients who underwent PG or a nonresection (NR) procedure between January 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed to select and analyze clinicopathological factors that affected prognosis. Results: Fifty-five patients underwent primary tumor resection with palliative intent, and 93 underwent NR procedures owing to the presence of metastatic or unresectable disease. The PG group was younger and more female dominant. In the PG group, R1 and R2 resection were performed in two patients (3.6%) and 53 patients (96.4%), respectively. The PG group had a significantly longer median overall survival than the NR group (28.4 vs. 7.7 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the overall survival was significantly better after palliative resection (hazard ratio (HR), 0.169; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.088–0.324; p < 0.001) in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) scores ≤1 (HR, 0.506; 95% CI, 0.291–0.878; p = 0.015) and those who received postoperative chemotherapy (HR, 0.487; 95% CI, 0.296–0.799; p = 0.004). Among the patients undergoing palliative resection, the presence of <15 positive lymph nodes was the only significant predictor of better overall survival (HR, 0.329; 95% CI, 0.121–0.895; p = 0.030). Conclusions: PG might lead to the prolonged survival of certain patients with incurable gastric cancer, particularly those with less-extensive lymph-node metastasis.

Analysis of the Impact of Personalized Nursing Service and Hospice Care on the Quality of Life of Elderly Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-473
Author(s):  
Ting Fang ◽  
Nian Wang ◽  
Meng Chen ◽  
Hongmei Ma
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Objective Explore the impact of personalized nursing services and hospice care on the quality of life of elderly patients with advanced cancer. Method We selected 80 elderly cancer patients admitted to our hospital from September 2020 to May 2021, and divided these patients into a study group and a control group using a random number table method. The patients in the control group used conventional nursing methods to treat and care for the patients, and the patients in the study group used hospice care measures and combined personalized nursing measures. The quality of life and pain treatment effects of the two groups of patients before and after treatment were compared. Result Before treatment, the quality-of-life scores of the two groups of patients were low, and there was no statistical difference (P>0.05); After treatment, the quality of life of the two groups of patients improved, but compared with the control group, the improvement was more obvious in the study group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In terms of pain treatment effect, the total effective rate of pain treatment in the study group was 87.5%, which was significantly better than the 62.5% in the control group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Personalized nursing services and hospice care are conducive to improving the survival and treatment of elderly patients with advanced cancer, and can be used as a clinical application program for the care of advanced cancer patients.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID 19 pandemic on pattern of cancer mortality in Najran, Saudi Arabia: a single-cancer center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M Badheeb ◽  
Mohamed A Badheeb ◽  
Hamdi A Alhakimi
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The aim of this paper is to compare the patterns and determinants of cancer mortality in Najran region before and after the COVID-19 epidemics. The association between cancer mortality and each of age, sex, site of cancer, stage, and the 30-days survival rate after the last dose of chemotherapy were assessed.Materials & Methods: Adult cancer patients who died of cancer in King Khalid Hospital in Najran Saudi Arabia, were included in this retrospective observational study. We compared mortality patterns in a period of 6 months in 2020 (March to August) with the corresponding period of 2019.Results: 50 dead adult cancer patients were included, 24 in 2019 and 26 in 2020. Among them, 21% vs 42% were younger than 65 years of age; 61% vs 62% were males, for the years 2019 & 2020 respectively. The top three killers in 2019 were colorectal, gastro-esophageal cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma, while in 2020 were colorectal, hepatocellular carcinoma, and lymphomas. About 16.7% of patients died within 30 days of receiving anti-cancer treatment in 2019 in comparison with 7.7% in 2020. The difference in the 30-days mortality after receiving anti-cancer treatment was not statistically significant between 2019 and 2020 (p = 0.329).Conclusion: The Year 2020, the time of the COVID-19pandemic, was not associated with a significant increase in short-term mortality among patients with malignancy in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Our results generally reflect the crucial role of strict preventive national measures in saving lives and warrants further exploration.

Young Age is not an Ominous Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer Patients

1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Muscolino ◽  
Corrado Villani ◽  
Amedeo Vittorio Bedini ◽  
Alberto Luini ◽  
Bruno Salvadori
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Young Age ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Analysis of a series of 137 women 20–30 years of age, operated for breast carcinoma, excluding patients pregnant, lactating or with inflammatory cancer, showed that disease-free survival rates were similar and not lower than those reported for a large series of 716 breast cancer patients of all ages, treated and followed at the same Institute. Ten-year disease-free survival rates for the two series of 137 young women and 716 patients of all ages were 43.7% and 47.1% respectively. Even when considering the subgroups of patients with and without nodal axillary involvement, the corresponding figures for the two series considered were 72.6% vs. 72.1% (N−) and 25.1% vs. 24.5% (N+). It can be concluded that young age cannot be considered as an unfavorable prognostic factor.

scholarly journals Association of mismatch repair status with survival and response to neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in rectal cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Biao Ye ◽  
Yi-Kan Cheng ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Yi-Feng Zou ◽  
Ping Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Radio Therapy ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Prior reports have indicated that defective mismatch repair (MMR) has a favorable impact on outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with surgery, immunotherapy, or adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the impact of MMR status on response to neoadjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer is not well understood. Here we report that dMMR was associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.034) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Patients with dMMR tumors who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) achieved significantly worse DFS (P = 0.026) than those treated with NCT. Conversely, NCRT improved DFS (P = 0.043) in patients with pMMR tumors, especially for stage III disease with improved DFS (P = 0.02). The presence of dMMR was associated with better prognosis in rectal cancer patients treated with NCT. NCT benefited patients with dMMR tumors; while NCRT benefited patients with stage III disease and pMMR tumors. Patients stratified by MMR status may provide a more tailored approach to rectal cancer neoadjuvant therapy.

scholarly journals The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Gkika ◽  
Maria A. Hawkins ◽  
Anca-Ligia Grosu ◽  
Thomas B. Brunner
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Complete Surgical Resection ◽  
One Year

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.

Effect of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes after surgical resection and adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer patients.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 185-185
Author(s):  
M. R. Khawaja ◽  
N. Zyromski ◽  
M. Yu ◽  
H. R. Cardenes ◽  
C. M. Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

185 Background: Obesity is one of the factors commonly associated with pancreatic cancer risk, but its prognostic role for survival is debatable. This study aimed to determine the role of BMI in treatment outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients (pts) undergoing surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 165 consecutive pts with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at Indiana University Hospital between 2004 and 2008. Fifty-three pts who received adjuvant treatment [gemcitabine alone (C-group): n=19; gemcitabine + radiotherapy (CRT-group): n=34] at our institution were included in the analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS); log-rank test was used to compare these outcomes between BMI groups (normal 18.5-24.99 kg/m2 vs. overweight/obese ≥ 25 kg/m2). Results: The sample comprised 53 pts (28 males; median age 62 yrs) with a median follow-up of 18.6 months (mos). Thirty pts (56.6%) had their BMIs recorded before the date of surgery, and 23 pts prior to starting adjuvant therapy. Two (3.8%) pts were underweight, 21 (39.6%) had a normal BMI and 30 (56.6%) were overweight/obese. There was no statistically significant difference in the median DFS of obese/overweight and normal BMI pts irrespective of adjuvant therapy (C or CRT) (14.47 vs. 11.80 mos; p= 0.111). Obese/overweight pts had a better median OS [25.2 vs. 14.6 mos; p=0.045 overall (25.7 vs. 16.9 mos; p= 0.143 for the CRT-group and 17.3 vs. 13.4 mos; p= 0.050 for the C-group)], 1-year survival [96.7% vs. 61.9%; p < 0.0001 overall (95% vs. 64.3%; p= 0.001 for the CRT-group, and 90% vs. 57.1%; p=0.016 with C)], and 2-year survival [52.6% vs. 25.4%; p < 0.0001 overall (60.0% vs. 30.0%; p=0.0001 for the CRT-group and 37.5% vs. 14.3%; p=0.0002 for the C-group)] than patients with normal BMI. Conclusions: In our experience, overweight/obese pts undergoing surgery followed by adjuvant therapy have better survival rates than patients with normal BMI. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11532-e11532
Author(s):  
Hee-Chul Shin ◽  
Wonshik Han ◽  
Hyeong-Gon Moon ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Breast Cancer

e11532 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is a reasonable option for operable breast cancer in terms of downsizing large tumor and increasing the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, BCS in patients with large breast tumors down-staged by NCT remains still controversial because of the possibility of residual tumor and resistance to NCT. Aims of this study were to evaluate the long-term survival results of patients who received NCT and BCS compared to patients who received BCS first and to compare recurrence and survival rates between patients who received preplanned BCS and those who received down-staged BCS among patients who underwent NCT. Methods: Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who received BCS after NCT (NCT group) and 72 patients with clinical stage III breast cancer who underwent BCS first (Surgery group) were retrospectively reviewed. Among 70 patients received NCT, 45 patients (64.3%) received preplanned BCS (preplanned BCS group) and 25 patients (35.7%) received down-staged BCS (down-staged BCS group). The long-term results including ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease recurrence and survival rates were compared with groups. Results: There was no significant difference in IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival rates, disease-free survival and overall survival rates between the NCT and the Surgery group (p=0.971, p=0.294, p=0.863 and p=0.933, respectively). Among patients who received NCT, IBTR-free survival, LRR-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival rates was not also different between the preplanned BCS group and the down-staged BCS group (p=0.278, p=0.501, p=0.776 and p=0.412, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that patients who received BCS after NCT showed similar long-term resutls compared to patients who received BCS first in clinical stage III breast cancer patients. Also, down-staged BCS shows is oncologically as safe as preplanned BCS in clinical stage III breast cancer patients in terms of recurrence and survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document