scholarly journals KUALITAS SOAL UJIAN DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAERAH FPBS UPI TAHUN AKADEMIK 2016/2017

LOKABASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Haris Santosa Nugraha

Penelitian  ini dilatarbelakangi dari belum disusunnya tolak ukur penyusunan alat evaluasi mata kuliah berdasarkan uji kelayakan soal-soal ujian di Departemen Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah FPBS UPI. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan kualitas soal ujian mata kuliah Departemen Pendidikan Bahasa Daerah FPBS UPI tahun akademik 2016/2017 di yang dikaji berdasarkan uji validitas, reliabilitas, tingkat kesukaran, dan daya beda sebagai dasar penentuan kelayakan soal-soal ujian. Penelitian ini didesain menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif-analisis. Sumber data diabil secara purposive pada soal-soal mata kuliah kategori pembelajaran, kebahasaan, kesastraan, dan kebudayaan yang menggunakan jenis soal pilihan ganda dengan jumlah 160 item soal. Teknik yang digunakan dalam mengumpulkan data yaitu teknik studi dokumentasi. Teknik pengolahan data dilakukan dengan cara kompilasi, tabulasi, skoring, dan interpretasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah, 1) tingkat validitas soal yang diuji sebanyak 59% valid serta 41% sisanya tidak valid; 2) tingkat reliabilitas soal yang diuji berada dalam kategori sedang; 3) tingkat kesukaran soal 58% sedang, 20% mudah, 14% sukar, 7% sangat mudah, dan 2% sisanya sangat sukar; 4) daya pembeda soal 43% cukup baik, 39% buruk, 10% baik, 6% sangat buruk, dan 2 % sisanya sangat baik; serta 5) tingkat kelayakan soal ujian yang dianalisis yakni 67% layak, 12% harus direvisi, dan 21% harus diganti. AbstractThis research was motivated by the fact that the benchmarking for subjects evaluation device has not been compiled based on test item feasibility in the Sundanese Education Department of FPBS UPI. The purpose of this study was to describe the quality of test items in the Department of Sundanese Language Education FPBS UPI in 2016/2017 academic year, which were examined based on tests of validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and power of the different on the basis for determining the feasibility of exam question items. This study employed a quantitative approach with descriptive-analysis methods. Data sources were chosen purposively on test items of learning, language, literature, and culture subjects’ categories and used multiple-choice question type consisted of 160 exam question items. The technique used in collecting the data was document study technique. Data processing techniques were done by compiling, tabulating, scoring, and interpreting. The results of this study were:1) questions validity is 59% and the remaining 41% is not valid; 2) the questions reliability is mediocre; 3) question level of difficulty are distributed as it follows: 58% is moderate, 20% is easy, 14% is difficult, 7% is very easy, and the remaining 2% is very difficult; 4) the differentiating question 43% is good enough, 39% is poor, 10% is good, 6% is very poor, and the remaining 2% is very good; and 5) the question items feasibility split in 67% is feasible, 12% must be revised, and 21% must be replaced. 

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Nadya Khairiyah Syafti ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu ◽  
Ganda Hijrah Selaras ◽  
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal

Researcher conducted a study with the aim to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis: 1) reliability, 2) the validity of the content and empirical, 3) distinguishing features, 4) level of difficulty, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects: 1)reliability packet A and B, belong to the category high,2)the validity of the content packet A & B, not fulfilling all criteriaand then validity empirically package A, 57.5% are invalid matter and packet B,65% are invalid matte, 3) the level of difficulty package A, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category while package B, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category. 4) different power packet A, obtained with different power values, namely 35 questions (87,5%) including good categories and 5 questions (12,5) which do not belong to the good category while package B, 29 questions (72,5%) is included in category and 11 questions (27,5%) which do not belong to category, 5) function options packet A, for options that are not qualified is 37% and the quality is 63% and packet B,for options that are not qualified is 31% and the quality is 69%. It can be concluded that the end of the semester exam subjects biology grade XI of the school year 2017/2018 in the se-kecamatan IV Jurai not meet both criteria.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riduan Yusuf

This study aims to determine the level of difficulty, differentiation, and effectiveness of Deception Options of the National Examination Mathematics Subject for Junior High School/MTs Academic Year 2017/2018. This research is a quantitative study with descriptive analysis method. The population in this study is student class IX of two schools, namely: SMP MMA UISU and MTs Al Manar totaling 144 people and the sample in this study was 57 multiple choice answer sheets. Data collection method was the method of observation and tests. This research instrument was in the form of a multiple choice package of National Examination Mathematics Subject for Junior High School/MTs Academic Year 2017/2018along with the answer key lessons covered by 40 questions. Analysis conducted using the Anates 4.0.9.The result of this study is obtained the quality of the items namely (1) at SMP MMA UISU, 20 items of good quality, 12 items of good enough quality, 8 items of bad quality (2) at MTs Al Manar, 26 items of good quality, 7 items of good enough quality, 7 items of bad quality.


Author(s):  
Fadhilah Samhabib

Competence is skills that are closely related to the effectiveness of person’s performance in a particular field. Similarly in education, competence is the key to student success, and also the great competence of the majors chosen by the students will lead to increased quality of majors. Arabic Language Education Department in IAIN Kendari is a department that prepares students to become educators and scientists in Arabic language which has competence in Arabic were nice and had a high competitiveness. This research uses descriptive analysis method with qualitative approach based on case study design. The data collection is done by in-depth interviews, observation, documentation, and open questionnaire. The results showed (1) a strategy to increase student competence in Arabic language on Arabic language education department at IAIN Kendari still ineffective that was described by least of activities that support the increased student’s competence in Arabic language and also its lack of consistency in implementing additional programs for students of Arabic language education department (2) the helping and resistoring factors to increase student’s competence contained on lecturer’s performance in the classroom, facilities of language learning, and student’s motivation. lecturer’s performance in the classroom has given many help to increase student’s competence in Arabic, facilities to assist in learning the Arabic language still needs to be cared and activated again or making the new and interesting activities, and student’s motivation in the study of Arabic is still lacking is due to the absence of another place for practicing the Arabic language competencies that they have acquired, and also the lack of student’s interest in attention of learning at the classroom caused by the bored atmosphere of the class (3) the problem solving by formulating a strategy based on suggestions and feedback from lecturers and students in Arabic language education department is a path that can be taken by Arabic language education department in IAIN Kendari to improve student’s competence in Arabic language.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Sri Astuti ◽  
Acep Kusdiwelirawan ◽  
Siti Dahlia

This research is to analyse the quality of test for midterm examination Academic Year 2016-2017 of FKIP UHAMKA lectures. The aims of the research were to identify the quality of the test on compulsory institutional courses academic year 2016-2017 and to analyse the weakness point of the lectures in the making of quality test based on the analysis of the test for midterm examination academic year 2016-2017. The method that used in this research was descriptive analysis method through documentation as a data collection technique. Subjects of this research were semester plan document (RPS) and items test were arranged by lectures. The data that will be analysed are consist of 6 courses, including essay and multiple choice questions. The object of the research was the quality of the items test considered by a few aspects that were learning achievement of RPS, substance of items test, items test structure, and culture/grammar. The instrument for data collection were rubric and researcher which were as human instrument. Overall, the result of this research was the items test have quality with level moderate to good. Furthermore, the majority of items test have weakness related to the making of items test which were the decription of indicators: the learning achievements (such as attitude, general and particular skills) and score list on the items test.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 256
Author(s):  
Sayit Abdul Karim ◽  
Suryo Sudiro ◽  
Syarifah Sakinah

Apart from teaching, English language teachers need to assess their students by giving a test to know the students� achievements. In general, teachers are barely conducting item analysis on their tests. As a result, they have no idea about the quality of their test distributed to the students. The present study attempts to figure out the levels of difficulty (LD) and the discriminating power (DP) of the multiple-choice (MC) test item constructed by an English teacher in the reading comprehension test utilizing test item analysis. This study employs a qualitative approach. For this purpose, a test of 50-MC test items of reading comprehension was obtained from the students� test results. Thirty-five students of grade eight took part in the MC test try-out. They are both male (15) and female (20) students of junior high school 2 Kempo, in West Nusa Tenggara Province. The findings revealed that16 items out of 50 test items were rejected due to the poor and worst quality level of difficulty and discriminating index. Meanwhile, 12 items need to be reviewed due to their mediocre quality, and 11 items are claimed to have good quality items. Besides, 11 items out of 50 test items were considered as the excellent quality as their DP scores reached around 0.44 through 0.78. The implications of the present study will shed light on the quality of teacher-made test items, especially for the MC test.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
I Wy. Dirgeyasa

The obejectives of this research are to know the improvement  of the students’ achievement in poetry mastery and their perception regarding to the semiotic method in teaching and learning poetry in  English Education Department, Languages and Art Faculty of State University of Medan. The research method used is the Classroom Action Research (CAR). The subjects of the research are the fifth semester of 37 students of 2013/2014 academic year. The data are collected by test in order to know the students’ achievment in poetry mastery. The students’ perception toward the implementation of the semiotic method for teaching and learning poetry is collected by questionaire. The data are analyzed by descriptive analysis. The result of research shows that (1) the average score of the students’ achievement of poetry mastery is (71.75) or it increases (11,59) point from pre-test (60.16) and (2) in general, the students’ perception toward the semiotic method for teaching and learning poetry are good and positive.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-212
Author(s):  
Santi Pratiwi T Utami ◽  
Imas Juidah ◽  
Eko Muharudin ◽  
Suhendi Syam ◽  
Ramadhan Kusuma Yuda ◽  
...  

This study aims to describe the quality of the odd semester final exam items for the Introduction to Editing course for the 2020/2021 academic year at the Indonesian Literature Program, Universitas Negeri Semarang. This research is a quantitative research with descriptive method. The research subjects were 60 students. Data collection techniques were carried out by documenting. Quantitative data analysis based on level of difficulty, discriminating power, quality of distractors, validity, and reliability with 100 questions. The results of the analysis show that the quality of the odd semester final exam items in the Introduction to Editing course has a moderate level of difficulty, sufficient discriminating power, and very good distracting qualities. In addition, there are 68 valid items and 0.78 reliability in the high category. The conclusion of the study is that the odd semester final exam items for the Introduction to Editing subject need to be revised to improve the quality of the items.


Author(s):  
Hardi Tambunan

The quality mapping of educational unit program is important issue in education in Indonesia today in an effort to improve the quality of education. The objective of this study is to make a mathematical model to find out the map of students’ capability in mathematics. It has been made a mathematical model to be used in the mapping of students’ capability. Demonstration of the use of models performed in accordance with the data of the results from the math test given to 147 students in grade XII, state senior high school, science program, and academic year 2015-2016. The map of students’ capability can be known that 48 test items are derived from 16 sub topics of three cognitive domain, only 19 test items are achieved. The achieved map lies in 8 sub topics for knowledge domain and 6 sub topics for comprehension domain and application domain has 5 sub topics. So that sub topic and cognitive domain which can not be achieved can be done further corrective action to obtain the maximum results. This paper demonstrates how operational research techniques can be applied for problem solving in education.


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Wahyu Arta S ◽  
Abdul Asib ◽  
Dewi Sri Wahyuni

The objective of this study is to identify the quality of the test items<strong> </strong>used as a final test in the second semester for the eleventh grade students in SMA N in Magetan. This research used descriptive method. In collecting the data the writer used document (English final test items, syllabus, and students‟ answer sheets) as data sources. The data were analyzed by using the formula given by Ahmann and Glock. The results of this study shows that 57.5% of the total items have a good level in discriminating index, 45% of the items have fulfilled satisfactory criteria in difficulty level, 11 items had possessed the effective distracter, while the item‟s indicator 92.5 % of the items are compatible with the learning indicator mentioned in the syllabus, and in the construction aspect, 75% of the total items possess a good stem and 82.5% of the total items are able to fulfill all the aspects of good alternatives. In short, the items used as final test have good quality in constructing aspects, and its compatibility with the syllabus. However, some items are less effective viewed from its level of difficulty and the effectiveness of the disctracter aspect.


Author(s):  
Kadek Eva Krishna Adnyani ◽  
Desak Made Sri Mardani ◽  
Ni Nyoman Murniasih ◽  
I Wayan Adnyana

This research aims to know: (1) what form of schoology appropriate for the dokkai chukyu learning course in Japanese language education department UNDIKSHA is, and (2) how the quality of schoology for the dokkai chukyu learning course in Japanese language education department UNDIKSHA is? This is Research and Development (R&D) using the development model of ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The data collection methods were observation and questionnaire while the instruments used were in the forms of questionnaire and observation sheets. Assessment of the quality of the product was performed by one expert in material, one expert of learning media, and 10 learners of the dokkai chukyu language course in Japanese language education department. Based on the assessment results of experts of material and media, schoology was determined as very good and could be used with revision. Stages of the evaluation were conducted using questionnaires to fill out by 10 students of the dokkai chukyu course. The student response on schoology was predominately positive, i.e. agree and strongly agree.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document