Editorials: The Applied Anthropologist—Informant or Professional?
In the course of intermittent discussions about the responsibilities of the applied anthropologist, anxieties about the place of "pure" science are sure to come up. In the Society's formal statement of its purposes, and numerous times in this journal, it has been stated that our conception of the field is that it involves the scientific investigation of change in human relations. These statements seem to have had only sporadic impact, however. In general, the question of definitions gets inextricably tangled with the "practical" and the "pure" or what is called euphoniously, "the anthropological problem." Evans-Pritchard, some years ago, even went so far as to state that when an anthropologist investigates practical problems "he must realize that he is no longer acting in the anthropological field but in the non-scientific field of administration." (Our italics).