scholarly journals Peran Dan Kedudukan Ombusman Sebagai Lembaga Perlindungan Rakyat Dalam Mewujudkan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Cholidah Utama
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
State Administration

The inclusion of the Ombudsman in the Amendment to the 1945 Constitution will place the existence of the Ombudsman's recommendations philosophically (as well as politically) with high value. So that even though it is not legally binding, it is still obeyed by the State Administration. The position of the Ombudsman is a state institution that is independent and does not have an organic relationship with state institutions and other government agencies, and in carrying out its duties and authority free from interference from other powers.

scholarly journals TINJAUAN MENGENAI PERAN DAN FUNGSI DPR DALAM UUD NKRI TAHUN 1945 PASCA AMANDEMEN BERDASARKAN MEKANISME CHECK AND BALANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yokotani Yokotani
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Executive Power ◽  
Administration System ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
State Administration

Reforms in Indonesia has led to many changes, one change in the state administration system in Indonesia. Post authoritarian era, hopes to form a power ideally through the constitution amendment to be the only way to improve the existing system by step abolish one by one to the authority of the executive power into shades executive heavy, in order to power the institution country to be more balanced with a pattern of horizontal separation between state institutions

scholarly journals Transformasi Kewenangan DPD Dalam Ius Constitutum Ke Arah Ius Constituendum Demi Kesetaraan Dalam Bikameral

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-92
Author(s):  
Hariyanto Sofyan Benyal
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Analysis ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
The Third ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Reformation ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

After the reformation a change has occurs, a significant one, especially in the state administration as seen in the amendment, the 1945 constitution amendment, strengthening on the legislature in order to lift the power of checks and balances among the institutions, government agencies. On the third amendments in 2001 new institution, an institution of legislation appears in the Regional Representative Board (DPD to be the regional representation and later become a second chamber (bicameral) parliament which believed has made the legislation tasks such as, budgeting, and monitoring implemented optimally. But in reality, the duties and powers of the second chamber is still very limited compared to the first chamber which is the DPR, hence the transformation effort to ius consitutendum, the desirous law, appeared in strengthening the DPD constitutionally through MPR with Pancasila as the foundation. The method used is a normative juridical, by referring to the laws and principles exist. The analysis used in this research is descriptive qualitative analysis. The results shows that there is an inequality authorization in the, DPR and DPD, parliament. It gives a signal that the system we have adopted is a soft bicameral. By constant check and balance with Pancasila as the foundation DPD should be strengthen.

scholarly journals OMBUDSMAN: STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN DENMARK

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sultoni Fikri ◽  
Syofyan Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Method ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Comparison Method ◽  
The State ◽  
State System ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Republic

The Ombudsman as a state institution has the duty to oversee the administration of the state, particularly in public services in order to realize good governance. Therefore the institution is demanded to be independent and impartial to other state institutions. In addition, the presence of the Ombudsman becomes a manifestation of legal protection for the community in the event of maladmnistration conducted by the apparatus/state officials in using their authority. The birth of the Ombudsman is inseparable from history in Scandinavian countries, including in Denmark. The Danish Ombudsman, known as the Folketingets Ombudsmand, has become one of the most important institutions in the state system there. While in Indonesia, its position has received less attention. This difference makes the writer interested to compare it. The approach used in this paper uses a micro-type body of norm approach, which is a legal comparison that uses the Act as the basis for comparison, which is used is Act Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia compared to the Danish Ombudsman Act. Whereas the legal comparison method uses analytical method. The result of this research is to reconstruct the law in Law Number 37 Year 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia by adopting from what is in the Danish Ombudsman Act. the hope is that the existence of ORI is so respected and recommendations from ORI are not merely morally binding but are legally binding.Ombudsman sebagai lembaga negara yang memiliki tugas untuk mengawasi dari penyelenggaraan negara, khususnya pada pelayanan publik agar terwujudnya good governence. Oleh karena itu lembaga tersebut dituntut untuk bersifat independen dan tidak memihak kepada lembaga negara lainnya. Selain itu hadirnya Ombudsman menjadi suatu perwujudan perlindungan hukum bagi masyarakat apabila terjadi maladmnistrasi yang dilakukan oleh aparatur/pejabat negara dalam menggunakan kewenangannya. Lahirnya Ombudsman tidak lepas dari sejarah di negara Skandinavia, termasuk di Denmark. Kedudukan Ombudsman Denmark atau dikenal sebagai Folketingets Ombudsmand, lembaga tersebut menjadi salah satu lembaga penting dalam sistem ketatanegaraan disana. Sedangkan di Indonesia keududukannya kurang mendapat perhatian. Perbedaan inilah yang membuat penulis tertarik untuk membandingkannya. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan mikro jenis bodies of norm, yaitu perbandingan hukum yang menggunakan Undang-Undang sebagai dasar untuk melakukan perbandingan, yang dipakai adalah Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dibandingkan dengan The Ombudsman Act Denmark. Sedangkan untuk metode perbandingan hukum menggunakan analytical method. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah untuk dilakukan rekonstruksi hukum pada Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dengan mengadopsi dari apa yang ada di The Ombudsman Act Denmark. harapannya adalah eksistensi ORI begitu disegani dan rekomendasi dari ORI tidak sekadar mengikat secara moral melainkan mengikat secara hukum.

scholarly journals Legal Certainty Against Not Reporting Assets of State Administrators in Selection of Corruption Eradication Commission Chairmanship Candidates

Corruptio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Wilson Gunawan Salim
Keyword(s):  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Candidate Selection ◽  
Selection Committee ◽  
State Official ◽  
State Administration ◽  
State Administrators ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
First Time ◽  
Selection Of

Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is a state institution that in carrying out its duties and authority is independent and free from the influence of any power. The Report of State Official Assets (LHKPN) is a list of all the assets of the State Administrators as outlined in the LHKPN form determined by the Corruption Eradication Commission. Selection Candidates for the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission are not required to submit a Report on the Wealth of State Administrators (LHKPN), the statement was said by the Chairman of the Selection Committee Yenti Garnasih. how the consequences of not considering the LHKPN (Report on the Assets of State Assets) by the KPK leadership candidate selection committee in terms of Article 29 of Law Number 30 Year 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission Jo. Article 5 of Law Number 28 of 1999 concerning State Administration that is Clean and Free of Corruption, Collusion and Nepotism relating in announcing the assets of prospective KPK leaders. The State Administrators are obliged to be willing to inspect their assets before, during and after taking office, report their assets at the first time in office, transfer, promote and retire, and to announce their assets. The purpose of making LHKPN is as part of the authority possessed by the KPK, which is to carry out steps or efforts to prevent the occurrence of other forms of corruption by registering and examining LHKPN. The report on the assets of state administrators should be enforced prior to the completion of the selection of candidates for the leadership of the Corruption Eradication Commission because this is intended as an effort to open the candidates for KPK leaders and as an effort to prevent corruption.

scholarly journals Legal Reconstruction of State Institutionalities of State Commissions to Suppress the Potential of Institutional Authority Dispute

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 1006-1011
Author(s):  
Lukman Hakim ◽  
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Popular Sovereignty ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
Structural Mechanism ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Know How ◽  
Institutional Authority ◽  
State Administration ◽  
Democratic System ◽  
Constitutional System

The main problem of this research triggers by the fact that Indonesia fundamental constitutional system changed into the 1945 Constitution. The changes affected the structure and structural mechanism of state institutions. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the philosophical question of the basic root formed in the 1945 Constitution as a new constitution of Indonesia. Regarding the organization and institution of the state can be started by questioning the essence of power that is institutionalized or organized into the state. The results showed that it is also important to know how the principle of popular sovereignty is reflected in the structure and mechanisms of state and government institutions that guarantee the establishment of the legal system and the functioning of the democratic system. At the theory level in terms of state institutions, with the various state commissions, how the principle of popular sovereignty is organized into institutional functions can be patterned into state institutions that are equal and mutually balanced in forms of checks and balances. From a normative perspective, the sources of state institutional authority can be used as a reference in the structuring of state institutions by considering shifts and the development of state administration, especially with the state commissions that occurred after changes to the 1945 Constitution.

scholarly journals Expansion of the Objects of State Administrative Disputes after the Enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration and Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019 Concerning Guidelines for the Resolution and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by Government Agencies or Officials (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad / OOD)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Sonyendah Retnaningsih ◽  
Disriani Latifah Soroinda Nasution ◽  
Heryna Oktaviani ◽  
Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Government Action ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government

Historically, State Administrative Court (PTUN) has existed since 1986, with the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court which currently has been amended by Law Number 9 of 2004 concerning Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court and amended again by Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. The role of the Administrative Court according to the explanation of the law, the PTUN functions as a control or supervisory agency thus legal actions from government officials do not deviate, in addition to protecting the rights of citizens from the actions of officials who abuse their authority or act arbitrarily. Currently, the object of dispute and can be sued at the State Administrative Court is only a State Administration decision reduced by the exceptions stipulated in Article 2 and Article 49 of the PTUN Law. The provisions of Article 3 of the Administrative Court Law No. 5 of 1986 on negative fictitious could potentially no longer be enforced since the enactment of Article 53 of the AP Law which stipulates positive fictitious. Since the promulgation of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (hereinafter referred to as AP Law) on 17 October 2014, there has been a change in the legal criteria from the government written stipulation (beschikkingen) which was initially restrictive and can be sued to the PTUN, yet it has recently become extensive (which was originally mere beschkking, currently it almost covers all variations of besluiten). With the enactment of the AP Law, there will be an expansion of absolute competence and objects of state administration disputes, as stipulated in Article 87 of the AP Law which includes: first, Government Administration Decrees, as stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of the AP Law; second, Government Administration Actions Based on Article 1 point 8 of the AP Law. Furthermore, with the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Government Action Dispute Resolution and the Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by Government Agencies and/or Officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad / OOD), the judicial power shall transfer from the General Court to the State Administrative Court. This crucial matter continues to be the groundwork and reason for conducting the current research entitled the expansion of the state administration dispute object after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and the supreme court regulation (Perma) Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Government Action Dispute Resolution and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by the Government Agencies and/or Officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad / OOD). Conducted through normative juridical research method, this research-based paper examined the interviews through judges at PTUN Jakarta and Bandung and the main data source within this qualitative analysis serves as the secondary data or literature data.

Challenges of State Institutions in Environmental Protection: A Case of Taraba State, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 22-27
Author(s):  
E.D Oruonye ◽  
◽  
Wilson-Osigwe Menwo Ukechi ◽  
Babanyaya Mohammed Bashir
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Capacity Development ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
Political Commitment ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Qualified Personnel ◽  
Year 2000 ◽  
Budgetary Allocation

This study examined the challenges of state institutions in environmental protection in Nigeria using the case of Taraba state. The institution theory was used as a theoretical framework for the study. The study adopted a descriptive design method using desktop review of secondary materials. Content analysis was used in analyzing the data. The findings of the study revealed that some of the challenges of the state environmental protection institutions include lack of political will, inadequate funding, inadequate qualified personnel, inadequate environmental protection infrastructures, poor condition of environmental protection laboratory, lack of office buildings for staff and poor capacity development. The study also revealed that since the creation of the Ministry of Environment in year 2000 in Taraba state, it is only in 2001, 2013 and 2014 that the ministry received up to 4% of the budgetary allocation of the state. The myriad of challenges have greatly constrained the capacity of the state institution to effectively achieve its mandate of environmental protection. Based on the findings, the study recommends the need for more political commitment to the issues of environmental protection through increased funding, employment of qualified personnel, establishment of environmental protection laboratories and increased capacity development. Environmental protection, institutional framework, Ministry of environment, State Institution and Taraba state.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PUTUSAN DEWAN KEHORMATAN PENYELENGGARA PEMILIHAN UMUM TERHADAP HASIL PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR LAMPUNG 2014

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 777
Author(s):  
Aryo Fadlian
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Implementation Process ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
State Institution ◽  
The State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Gubernatorial Election ◽  
Ethics Council

AbstractThe implementation process of the election of Governor of Lampung in 2014was still a lot of controversy with the process so complicated that ultimatelyresulted elected leaders, after the long process, sprang DKPP decisionrelating to the election of the Governor of Lampung in 2014. The verdict ofDKPP generates convicted and fired Lampung Provincial ElectionSupervisory Board The purpose of this research was to determine andanalyze the strength of decision DKPP Lampung gubernatorial election in2014. In this study the authors discussed the use of theory and concepts;theory of legislation, the concept of the State institutions, the concept of anindependent State institution using normative juridical research method, i.e.obtaining secondary data obtained from the study of literature, books, andlegislation. Results of research and discussion show that many violations inthe elections in 2014 that resulted in the governor of Lampung in 2014resulted in the termination of the Election Supervisory Board membersLampung province because it violates the code of ethics. Strength HonorCouncil Election decision final and binding give lessons to the electionorganizer Lampung Province.Keywords: Verdict Strength, Election Organizer Ethics Council, ElectionViolationsAbstrakProses pelaksanaan pemilihan Gubernur Lampung tahun 2014 masih banyakkontroversi dengan prosesnya yang begitu rumit sehingga akhirnyamenghasilkan pemimpin terpilih, setelah proses yang panjang, munculkeputusan DKPP terkait pemilihan Gubernur Lampung tahun 2014. Putusantersebut DKPP menghasilkan terbukti dan dipecat Badan Pengawas PemiluProvinsi Lampung. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui danmenganalisis kekuatan keputusan pemilihan gubernur DKPP Lampung padatahun 2014. Dalam penelitian ini penulis membahas penggunaan teori dankonsep; Teori perundang-undangan, konsep lembaga negara, konseplembaga negara merdeka yang menggunakan metode penelitian yuridisnormatif, yaitu memperoleh data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi literatur,buku dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian dan pembahasanmenunjukkan bahwa banyak pelanggaran dalam Pemilu 2014 yangmengakibatkan Gubernur Lampung pada tahun 2014 mengakibatkanpenghentian anggota Badan Pengawas Pemilu Provinsi Lampung karenamelanggar kode etik. Keputusan Kehormatan Dewan Kehormatan keputusanfinal dan mengikat memberi pelajaran kepada penyelenggara pemiluProvinsi Lampung.Kata Kunci: Kekuatan Putusan, Dewan Kehormatan PenyelenggaraPemilihan Umum, Pelanggaran Pemilu

scholarly journals EVALUASI LAPORAN KINERJA INSTITUSI PADA BADAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DAERAH (BAPPEDA) PROVINSI SULAWESI UTARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 376
Author(s):  
Lucyana Aprillya Simanjuntak ◽  
Hendrik Manossoh ◽  
Sintje Rondonuwu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Future ◽  
Performance Report ◽  
Performance Reports ◽  
The Right ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

The performance report of government agencies performance is a form of accountability in presenting, reporting and disclosing the mission of the agency in the form of activities and activities that are the responsibility of the stakeholders who have the right and authority to request such accountability. Performance Reports presented in accordance with applicable regulations can be utilized to make a decision and steps to be taken in the future in improving agency performance. This study aims to determine the performance report of BAPPEDA has been presented in accordance with the regulations and assess the work achievements of BAPPEDA. The analytical method used is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that the BAPPEDA performance report is in accordance with the guidelines of the State administration agency (LAN) and the BAPPEDA performance achievements are in good class so that the BAPPEDA performance report can be used for decision making.

scholarly journals Politik Hukum Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Penyelenggaraan Negara

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Political Dynamics ◽  
Democratic State ◽  
State Administration ◽  
State And Society ◽  
System Review ◽  
The Law ◽  
Constitutional System

Legislation or commonly called the law is a  political  product.  Politics  is  a field in the society which relate to public goals, and the law as one of the fields in society is always linked to the goals of society. Because of being associated with these objectives, the law has its own dynamics side. In its socio-political dynamics there is always a message that wants to be heard, known, understood, and then executed by the addressee, which is the organizer of state power, political power holders. In the perspective of constitutional law that  message  then  becomes  a  goal in organizing the state and then organized into a political structure as the procedures in the administration of the state in order to reach the goal of the state. The meaning of a more democratic state administration and based on law as a goal in the amendment of the 1945 Constitution was to provide a constitutional basis, (i) equal relationship between state and society based on rights and obligations in reciprocal nature; (ii) the equal relationship between state institutions based on checks and balances system; (iii) strengthening the independence and impartiality of judicial authority to guard the running of the legal and constitutional system. Review of egal products in state administration through judicial mechanism aims to provide a guarantee for the implementation of these relationships and the running of the legal and constitutional system in accordance with the 1945 Constitution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document