scholarly journals Fatores de risco adicionais à Escala de Braden: um risco para úlceras de pressão

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 222-225
Author(s):  
Marisa Hans ◽  
Júlia Valéria De Oliveira Vargas Bitencourt ◽  
Flaviana Pinheiro

Estudo quantitativo que tem por objetivo analisar a presença de fatores de risco de úlceras de pressão (UPs), adicionais à Braden, com 134 clientes internados no CTI do Hospital Mãe de Deus, em maio/ junho de 2010 com aprovação dos comitês institucionais: 39/2010; 353/10. Realizou-se coleta de informações do prontuário dos clientes, com instrumento estruturado. Dos 134 clientes, 43 desenvolveram UP, com fator de risco adicional à Braden: infecção, sepse, corticoides, noradrenalina, ventilação mecânica, edema, diabetes mellitus, insuficiência respiratória aguda, doenças inflamatórias, respectivamente com um p <0,001 e neoplasias e doenças imunossupressoras com p <0,05, assim, com significância estatística. Entretanto, sem possibilidade de comparação significativa, considerando o reduzido quantitativo de estudos, tratando da problemática. Portanto, na avaliação do risco das UPs devem ser agregados outros fatores, visando a otimização das medidas de prevenção e qualificação assistencial, além de haver mais estudos permitindo a comparação.Descritores: Úlcera de Pressão, Escala de Braden, Prevenção.Additional risk factors related to Braden Scale: a risk for pressure ulcersThis is a quantitative study that aims to analyze the presence of risk factors for pressure ulcers (UPs), in addition to Braden, with 134 clients admitted to the ICU of the Mother of God Hospital in May / June 2010 with the approval of institutional committees: 39 / 2010, 353/10. We carried out data collection from medical records of clients with structured instrument. Of the 134 clients, 43 developed UP, with the additional risk factor Braden: infection, sepsis, corticosteroids, noradrenaline, mechanical ventilation, edema, diabetes mellitus, acute respiratory failure, inflammatory diseases, respectively with p <0.001 and immunosuppressive diseases and cancers p <0.05, thus statistically significant. However, without the possibility of meaningful comparison, considering the small quantity of studies, dealing with the problem. Therefore, the risk assessment of UPs must be added other factors in optimizing the prevention and care skills, and be more studies allowing the comparison.Descriptors: Pressure Ulcers, Braden Scale, Prevention.Factores de riesgo adicionales a la escala Braden: un riesgo para las úlceras por presiónSe trata de um estudio cuantitativo que tiene por objectivo analizar la presencia de factores de riesgo de úlceras por presión (UP), además de Braden, con 134 pacientes admitidos a la UCI del Hospital de la Madre de Dios en mayo / junio de 2010 con la aprobación de los comités institucionales: 39 / 2010, 353/10. Se llevó a cabo la recopilación de datos de los registros médicos de los clientes con instrumentos estructurados. De los 134 clientes, 43 desarrollaron UP, con la Braden factores de riesgo adicionales: infección, sepsis, los corticosteroides, la noradrenalina, la ventilación mecánica, edema, diabetes mellitus, insuficiencia respiratoria aguda, enfermedades inflamatorias, respectivamente, con p enfermedades <0,001 e inmunosupresores y cánceres p <0,05, por lo tanto estadísticamente significativa. Sin embargo, sin la posibilidad de comparación significativa, considerando la pequeña cantidad de estudios, para tratar el problema. Por lo tanto, la evaluación del riesgo de UPS hay que añadir otros factores en la optimización de la prevención y técnicas de atención y ser más estudios que permitan la comparación.Descriptores: Las úlceras por Presión, Escala de Braden, La Prevención.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T.J Jernberg ◽  
E.O Omerovic ◽  
E.H Hamilton ◽  
K.L Lindmark ◽  
L.D Desta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular dysfunction after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with poor outcome. The PARADISE-MI trial is examining whether an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HF) in this population. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and prognosis of different subsets of post-MI patients in a real-world setting. Additionally, the prognostic importance of some common risk factors used as risk enrichment criteria in the PARADISE-MI trial were specifically examined. Methods In a nationwide myocardial infarction registry (SWEDEHEART), including 87 177 patients with type 1 MI between 2011–2018, 3 subsets of patients were identified in the overall MI cohort (where patients with previous HF were excluded); population 1 (n=27 568 (32%)) with signs of acute HF or an ejection fraction (EF) &lt;50%, population 2 (n=13 038 (15%)) with signs of acute HF or an EF &lt;40%, and population 3 (PARADISE-MI like) (n=11 175 (13%)) with signs of acute HF or an EF &lt;40% and at least one risk factor (Age ≥70, eGFR &lt;60, diabetes mellitus, prior MI, atrial fibrillation, EF &lt;30%, Killip III-IV and STEMI without reperfusion therapy). Results When all MIs, population 1 (HF or EF &lt;50%), 2 (HF or EF &lt;40%) and 3 (HF or EF &lt;40% + additional risk factor (PARADISE-MI like)) were compared, the median (IQR) age increased from 70 (61–79) to 77 (70–84). Also, the proportion of diabetes (22% to 33%), STEMI (38% to 50%), atrial fibrillation (10% to 24%) and Killip-class &gt;2 (1% to 7%) increased. After 3 years of follow-up, the cumulative probability of death or readmission because of heart failure in the overall MI population and in population 1 to 3 was 17.4%, 26.9%, 37.6% and 41.8%, respectively. In population 2, all risk factors were independently associated with death or readmission because of HF (Age ≥70 (HR (95% CI): 1.80 (1.66–1.95)), eGFR &lt;60 (1.62 (1.52–1.74)), diabetes mellitus (1.35 (1.26–1.44)), prior MI (1.16 (1.07–1.25)), atrial fibrillation (1.35 (1.26–1.45)), EF &lt;30% (1.69 (1.58–1.81)), Killip III-IV (1.34 (1.19–1.51)) and STEMI without reperfusion therapy (1.34 (1.21–1.48))) in a multivariable Cox regression analysis. The risk increased with increasing number of risk factors (Figure 1). Conclusion Depending on definition, post MI HF is present in 13–32% of all MI patients and is associated with a high risk of subsequent death or readmission because of HF. The risk increases significantly with every additional risk factor. There is a need to optimize management and improve outcomes for this high risk population. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Vitória De Barros Siqueira ◽  
Flávia Bezerra De Souza Melo ◽  
Rachel Mola De Mattos ◽  
Luana Da Silva Santos ◽  
Laise Vale Kazahaya ◽  
...  

Objective: To identify risk factors for the formation of UP and analyze the main characteristics of patients suffering from such injuries Internal Medicine (CM) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Method: The sample consisted of patients older than 18 years admitted to the CM and the ICU of a hospital Pernambuco interior. They were evaluated by EB patients without PU; in patients with UP installed was applied semi-structured questionnaire containing questions about the risk factors and complications related to UP; The records were analyzed to complement the information. Results: We submitted to EB 573 patients, most presented low risk (51.5%). Among patients at high risk, most belonged to the older age than 60 years (44.0%), which are also prevalent among patients with UP already installed (63.3%). The ICU patients had a higher risk compared to the CM. Of the 30 patients with PU installed, UP 7% acquired in extra-hospital and 93% in-hospital, among the underlying diseases of the vascular origin had a higher incidence. The sacral region was the most affected (53%). Of the 46 injuries installed 36% were stage II. Descriptors: Pressure Úlcers. Risk Factors. Health of the Elderly.


1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
MK Jiricka ◽  
P Ryan ◽  
MA Carvalho ◽  
J Bukvich

BACKGROUND: Although it is well known that pressure ulcers are associated with negative patient outcomes and increased hospital cost, there is little research related to pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit population. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative contribution of risk factors in the development of pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients. METHOD: In an exploratory descriptive design, a convenience sample of 85 adults was used. Patients were enrolled in the study within 24 hours of admission to the intensive care unit; data were collected every other day until discharge from the intensive care unit. Instruments included a demographic data form, Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk, Skin Assessment Tool, and Decubitus Ulcer Potential Analyzer. RESULTS: The most common reasons for admission to the intensive care unit included multiple trauma from motor vehicle accidents, gunshot and stab wounds, and gastrointestinal bleeding. A pressure ulcer developed in 48 subjects. There were no significant differences in age, gender, history of diabetes or smoking, or medical diagnoses between patients in whom a pressure ulcer developed and those in whom it did not. Data analysis indicated that a Braden Scale score of 11, rather than the recommended score of 16, was statistically significant for predicting pressure ulcer risk. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a cut-off score on the Braden Scale could be specific to an intensive care unit trauma population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dirmesropian ◽  
B. Liu ◽  
J. G. Wood ◽  
C. R. MacIntyre ◽  
P. McIntyre ◽  
...  

AbstractCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) results in substantial numbers of hospitalisations and deaths in older adults. There are known lifestyle and medical risk factors for pneumococcal disease but the magnitude of the additional risk is not well quantified in Australia. We used a large population-based prospective cohort study of older adults in the state of New South Wales (45 and Up Study) linked to cause-specific hospitalisations, disease notifications and death registrations from 2006 to 2015. We estimated the age-specific incidence of CAP hospitalisation (ICD-10 J12-18), invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) notification and presumptive non-invasive pneumococcal CAP hospitalisation (J13 + J18.1, excluding IPD), comparing those with at least one risk factor to those with no risk factors. The hospitalised case-fatality rate (CFR) included deaths in a 30-day window after hospitalisation. Among 266 951 participants followed for 1 850 000 person-years there were 8747 first hospitalisations for CAP, 157 IPD notifications and 305 non-invasive pneumococcal CAP hospitalisations. In persons 65–84 years, 54.7% had at least one identified risk factor, increasing to 57.0% in those ⩾85 years. The incidence of CAP hospitalisation in those ⩾65 years with at least one risk factor was twofold higher than in those without risk factors, 1091/100 000 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1060–1122) compared with 522/100 000 (95% CI 501–545) and IPD in equivalent groups was almost threefold higher (18.40/100 000 (95% CI 14.61–22.87) vs. 6.82/100 000 (95% CI 4.56–9.79)). The CFR increased with age but there were limited difference by risk status, except in those aged 45 to 64 years. Adults ⩾65 years with at least one risk factor have much higher rates of CAP and IPD suggesting that additional risk factor-based vaccination strategies may be cost-effective.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Fernanda Furman ◽  
Aline Franco da Rocha ◽  
Maria Helena Dantas de Menezes Guariente ◽  
Silvana Kelie Souza de Almeida Barros ◽  
Mitiko Morooka ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjective: to identify the incidence of pressure ulcer (PU) and its risk factors in hospitalized patients in the medical-surgical units of a university hospital. Methodology: this is about a descriptive and quantitative study whose data were collected from November 2008 to February 2009 using a instrument containing demographic and clinical data, characterization of PU and Braden Scale after approved by the Ethics Committee of the State University of Londrina with protocol number 170/08. The results were organized in the database Epi info and analyzed using descriptive statistics Results: among 36 patients studied, the incidence of PU was 2.77%, nineteen patients were included already with PU, these were more frequent in the sacral region (50%) and stage III (37%). Hypertension was a statistically significant variable for the development of PU, as well as the patients with longer length of stay. Conclusion: for prevention of UP, it is the function of the nurse to know the possible risk factors, track changes and implement a clinical protocol and all available measures in health care practice. Descriptors: pressure ulcer; risk factors; incidence.RESUMOObjetivo: identificar a incidência de UP e seus fatores de risco em pacientes internados nas Unidades médico-cirúrgicas de um hospital escola. Metodologia: trata-se de estudo descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, realizado com aprovação do Comitê de Ética da Universidade Estadual de Londrina (número de protocolo 170/08), cujos dados foram coletados de novembro de 2008 a janeiro de 2009 por meio de um instrumento com dados demográficos, clínicos, caracterização das UP e Escala de Braden. Os resultados foram armazenados no Epi-info e analisados segundo a estatística descritiva. Resultados: entre os 36 pacientes incluídos na amostra, a incidência de UP foi de 2,77%. Dezenove pacientes já apresentavam UP na inclusão do estudo, sendo estas mais frequentes na região sacral (50%) e no estágio III (37%). Em relação aos fatores de risco, a hipertensão foi uma variável estatisticamente significativa para o desenvolvimento de UP, assim como o tempo de internação mais prolongado. Conclusão: para a prevenção de UP cabe ao enfermeiro conhecer os possíveis fatores de risco, acompanhar as alterações clinicas e aplicar um protocolo e todas as medidas disponíveis na pratica assistencial. Descritores: úlcera por pressão; fatores de risco; incidência.RESUMENObjetivo: conocer la incidencia de la ulcera por presión (UP) y sus factores de riesgo en los pacientes internado en clínica médico-quirúrgica de un hospital universitario. Metodología: estudio descriptivo con abordaje cuantitativo. Después de la aprobación por el Comité de Ética de la Universidad Estadual de Londrina (número de protocolo 170/08), los datos fueron recolectados entre noviembre de 2008 y enero de 2009 a través de un instrumento con datos demográficos, la caracterización clínica de la UP y la Escala de Braden. Los resultados se almacenan en la base de datos Epi Info y analizados según la estadística descriptiva. Resultados: los 36 pacientes incluidos en la muestra, la incidencia de la UP fue del 2,77%. Diecinueve pacientes que ya tenía úlceras por presión durante la inclusión del estudio, más frecuentes en la región sacra (50%) y estadio III (37%). En relación con los factores de riesgo, la hipertensión fue una variable estadísticamente significativa para el desarrollo de la UP, así como el tiempo prolongado de admisión. Conclusión: para la prevención de la UP es la enfermera de conocer los factores de riesgo posible, cambios clínicos, aplicar un protocolo clínico y de todas las medidas posibles en la assistência práctica. Descriptores: úlcera por presión; factores de riesgo; incidencia.  


Author(s):  
Cristiane Ribeiro da Costa ◽  
Laís Moreira da Costa ◽  
Daniela Maria Nantes Boução

As úlceras por pressão (UP) são definidas como lesões cutâneas ou de partes moles, superficiais ou profundas, que ocorrem devido à falta de oxigênio e/ou nutrientes em uma área para preencher as necessidades dos tecidos. A partir da prática na Fundação de Clinicas Gaspar Viana (FHCGV), foi possível observar o impacto na qualidade de vida dos pacientes que foram acometidos no decorrer da internação por úlcera de pressão. É de extrema relevância qualificar a equipe de enfermagem quanto à utilização dos instrumentos e dos recursos. A partir disto compreende-se a utilização de uma escala preditiva (Braden). Através da aplicação desta é possível avaliar o grau de risco de cada paciente, bem como a aplicação da mesma na prevenção de úlcera de pressão em pacientes em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. O objetivo deste trabalho foi identificar o perfil dos pacientes na unidade de terapia intensiva que evoluíram com úlcera de pressão segundo o risco preditivo.Descritores: Enfermagem, Úlcera por Pressão, Fatores de Risco. Braden scale: the importance of evaluation of pressure ulcer risk in patients in an intensive care unitAbstract: Pressure ulcers (PU) are defined as skin injuries or soft tissue, superficial or underlying injuries, that occur due to lack of oxygen and/or nutrients in an area to meet the needs of the tissues. From the practice In the Clinicas Gaspar Viana Foundation (FHCGV), it was possible to observe the impact on the quality of life of the patients that were affected in the course of hopitalization by pressure ulcer.  It is extremely relevant to qualify the nursing staff on the use of instruments and resources. From this comprises the use of a predictive scale (Braden). By applying that, it is possible to assess the degree of risk of each patient, as well as evaluate the application of the later in pressure ulcer prevention in patients at an intensive care unit. The goal of this work is to identify the profile of patients in the intensive care unit that developed pressure ulcers according to the predictive risk.Descriptors: Nursing, Pressure Ulcer, Risk Factors. Escala de Braden: la importancia de la evaluación de riesgo de úlcera de presión en pacientes en una unidad de cuidados intensivosResumen: Las úlceras por presión (UP) se definen como lesiones en la piel o en el tejido blando, superficial o profundo, que ocurren debido a la falta de oxígeno y/o nutriente en un area para satisfacer las necesidades de los tejidos. Partiendo de la práctica en la Fundación de Clínicas Gaspar Viana (FHCGV), fue posible observar el impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes que fueron afectados a lo largo de la hospitalización por la úlcera por presión. Es de gran importancia calificar el equipo de enfermería cuanto a la utilización de las herramientas y de los recursos. Partiendo de ahí se puede comprender la utilización de una escala predictiva (Braden). A través de la aplicación de la misma es posible evaluar el grado de riesgo de cada paciente, así como la aplicabilidad de la misma en la prevención de úlceras de presión en pacientes en unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). El objetivo de este trabajo fue identificar el perfil de los pacientes en la UCI que evolucionaron con úlceras de presión según el riesgo predictivo.Descriptores: Enfermería, Úlceras por Presión, Factores de Riesgo.


Author(s):  
Cristiane Ribeiro da Costa ◽  
Laís Moreira da Costa ◽  
Daniela Maria Nantes Boução

As úlceras por pressão (UP) são definidas como lesões cutâneas ou de partes moles, superficiais ou profundas, que ocorrem devido à falta de oxigênio e/ou nutrientes em uma área para preencher as necessidades dos tecidos. A partir da prática na Fundação de Clinicas Gaspar Viana (FHCGV), foi possível observar o impacto na qualidade de vida dos pacientes que foram acometidos no decorrer da internação por úlcera de pressão. É de extrema relevância qualificar a equipe de enfermagem quanto à utilização dos instrumentos e dos recursos. A partir disto compreende-se a utilização de uma escala preditiva (Braden). Através da aplicação desta é possível avaliar o grau de risco de cada paciente, bem como a aplicação da mesma na prevenção de úlcera de pressão em pacientes em uma unidade de terapia intensiva. O objetivo deste trabalho foi identificar o perfil dos pacientes na unidade de terapia intensiva que evoluíram com úlcera de pressão segundo o risco preditivo.Descritores: Enfermagem, Úlcera por Pressão, Fatores de Risco. Braden scale: the importance of evaluation of pressure ulcer risk in patients in an intensive care unitAbstract: Pressure ulcers (PU) are defined as skin injuries or soft tissue, superficial or underlying injuries, that occur due to lack of oxygen and/or nutrients in an area to meet the needs of the tissues. From the practice In the Clinicas Gaspar Viana Foundation (FHCGV), it was possible to observe the impact on the quality of life of the patients that were affected in the course of hopitalization by pressure ulcer.  It is extremely relevant to qualify the nursing staff on the use of instruments and resources. From this comprises the use of a predictive scale (Braden). By applying that, it is possible to assess the degree of risk of each patient, as well as evaluate the application of the later in pressure ulcer prevention in patients at an intensive care unit. The goal of this work is to identify the profile of patients in the intensive care unit that developed pressure ulcers according to the predictive risk.Descriptors: Nursing, Pressure Ulcer, Risk Factors. Escala de Braden: la importancia de la evaluación de riesgo de úlcera de presión en pacientes en una unidad de cuidados intensivosResumen: Las úlceras por presión (UP) se definen como lesiones en la piel o en el tejido blando, superficial o profundo, que ocurren debido a la falta de oxígeno y/o nutriente en un area para satisfacer las necesidades de los tejidos. Partiendo de la práctica en la Fundación de Clínicas Gaspar Viana (FHCGV), fue posible observar el impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes que fueron afectados a lo largo de la hospitalización por la úlcera por presión. Es de gran importancia calificar el equipo de enfermería cuanto a la utilización de las herramientas y de los recursos. Partiendo de ahí se puede comprender la utilización de una escala predictiva (Braden). A través de la aplicación de la misma es posible evaluar el grado de riesgo de cada paciente, así como la aplicabilidad de la misma en la prevención de úlceras de presión en pacientes en unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). El objetivo de este trabajo fue identificar el perfil de los pacientes en la UCI que evolucionaron con úlceras de presión según el riesgo predictivo.Descriptores: Enfermería, Úlceras por Presión, Factores de Riesgo.


Author(s):  
Pedro Gabriel Rivero Martínez ◽  
Wilfredo Hernández Pedroso ◽  
Aliusha Rittoles Navarro ◽  
Raúl Hernández Pérez ◽  
Mileidis Molina Borges ◽  
...  

  Para determinar el comportamiento de los pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio y su asociación con la diabetes mellitus se realizó un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo en pacientes ingresados en el Hospital Militar Dr. Luis Díaz Soto de La Habana con diagnóstico de infarto, de enero a diciembre del 2014. Universo de 153 pacientes, conformándose dos grupos según la presencia o no de diabetes mellitus (88 diabéticos y 65 no diabéticos). Se utilizaron técnicas estadísticas de distribución de frecuencia absoluta y valor porcentual. El infarto agudo del miocardio fue más frecuente en pacientes diabéticos de mayor edad, con predominio del sexo masculino. Los factores de riesgo más representados fueron la hipertensión arterial, la obesidad y el tabaquismo. Se identificaron con elevada frecuencia en los diabéticos, el infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST (IMCEST) y su localización inferior.   Palabras clave: factores de riesgo; supradesnivel del ST; localización inferior,cardiología, infarto.     Abstract   In order to determine the behaviour of the patients with myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) and its association with the diabetes mellitus came true a descriptive and retrospective study in patients affiliated in the Military Hospital Dr. Luis Díaz Soto of Havana with diagnosis of Heart Attack, from January to December 2014. Universe of 153 patients, divided in two groups according to the presence or no of diabetes mellitus (88 diabetics and 65 not diabetics). Statistical techniques of absolute frequency distribution and percentage value were used. The intense infarct of the myocardium was more frequent in elderly patient diabetics of legal age, with a predominance of men. The most risk factors represented were a high blood pressure, the obesity and tobacco addiction. They identified with lofty frequency in the diabetics, the IMCEST and your inferior location.   Key words: risk factors; Supraslope of the ST; inferior location, cardiology, heart attack.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 849
Author(s):  
Maria Evani Souza Borges ◽  
Jefferson De Sousa Melo ◽  
Luiza Chayanne Da Silva Soares ◽  
Adélia Dalva Da Silva Oliveira ◽  
Adriana Sávia De Souza Araújo ◽  
...  

RESUMOObjetivo: identificar os fatores de risco para a hipertensão arterial sistêmica e diabetes mellitus em vigilantes. Método: estudo quantitativo, descritivo, transversal, realizado com 23 vigilantes, por meio de um questionário analisado pelo software SPSS e apresentado em tabelas. Resultados: predominou os que praticam atividade física; não fumam; não consomem bebida alcóolica; consomem vegetais, frutas, legumes ou grãos; consomem frituras, salgados ou carnes gordas; têm antecedentes pessoais e familiares de hipertensão e diabetes, com maior ocorrência de hipertensão. A maioria obteve pressão arterial ótima e risco aumentado e muito aumentado para obesidade abdominal. Conclusão: apesar da atividade exercida ser considerada fator predisponente para a hipertensão arterial sistêmica e diabetes mellitus, os pesquisados demonstraram hábitos de vida saudáveis e níveis pressóricos dentro do padrão de normalidade. Descritores: Saúde Pública; Diabetes Mellitus; Hipertensão; Trabalho em Turnos; Fatores de Risco; Enfermagem.                                                                                                                    ABSTRACT Objective: to identify the risk factors for systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus in vigilantes. Method: quantitative, descriptive, cross - sectional study with 23 vigilantes, through a questionnaire analyzed by SPSS software and presented in tables. Results: predominantly those who practice physical activity; do not smoke; do not consume alcoholic beverage; consume vegetables, fruits, vegetables or grains; eat fried foods, salty foods or fatty meats; have a personal and family history of hypertension and diabetes, with a higher occurrence of hypertension. Most had optimal blood pressure and increased and greatly increased risk for abdominal obesity. Conclusion: although the activity was considered a predisposing factor for systemic arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus, the subjects showed healthy habits and blood pressure levels within the normal range. Descritores: Public Health; Diabetes Mellitus; Hypertension; Shift Work; Risk Factors; Nursing. RESUMEN Objetivo: identificar los factores de riesgo para la hipertensión arterial sistémica y la diabetes mellitus en vigilantes. Método: estudio cuantitativo, descriptivo, transversal, realizado con 23 vigilantes, por medio de un cuestionario analizados por el software SPSS y presentados en tablas. Resultados: predominó los que practican actividad física; no fuman; no consumen bebida alcohólica; consumen vegetales, frutas, legumbres o granos; consumen frituras, salados o carnes gordas; tiene antecedentes personales y familiares de hipertensión y diabetes, con mayor ocurrencia de hipertensión. La mayoría obtuvo una presión arterial óptima y un riesgo aumentado y muy aumentado para la obesidad abdominal.  Conclusión: a pesar de la actividad ejercida como factor predisponente para la hipertensión arterial sistémica y diabetes mellitus, los encuestados demostraron hábitos de vida saludables y niveles de presión dentro del patrón de normalidad. Descritores: Salud Pública; Diabetes Mellitus; Hipertensión; Trabajo en Turnos; Factores de Riesgo; Enfermería.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document