scholarly journals The Implementation of Constructivism Learning Models to Improve The Comprehending of Physics Concepts on Vibration And Wave Materials on Students of Seventh Grade At Second Semester in MTSN 2 Wolowaru

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Kuran Mbadhi ◽  
Melkyanus B.U. Kaleka ◽  
An Nisaa Al Mumin Liu

The problem statement of the research was: does the implementation of the constructivism learning model improve the comprehending of physics concepts in the vibration and wave material of students in seventh-grade of MTS Negeri Wolowaru? The research aimed to determine the implementation of the constructivism learning model in improving the comprehending of the physics concept in the vibration and wave material of students in seventh-grade of MTS Negeri Wolowaru. The research used a quantitative approach. The population of the study was 60 students of seventh-grade of MTS Negeri Wolowaru. Meanwhile, the sample was 20 students selected through a random sampling technique. The data were the test results of the vibration and wave material. Data analysis was performed by the t-test. Based on data analysis and discussion, it concluded that the implementation of the constructivism learning model improved the students' comprehending of physics concepts on vibration and wave material. This conclusion was proved by the results of data analysis, namely tcalculate> ttable = 4.395> 1.729 at the significant level = 0.05 and dk = 19.

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Maskuroh Maskuroh

The low learning outcomes of mathematics are not appropriate thought of learning models in the classroom. Therefore, the NHT and TPS learning models can be applied to improve the learning of outcomes of the student. This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes using the NHT learning model with the TPS learning model. The sampling technique is used as a random sampling cluster with 2 groups of experiments for the first experimental group  (classroom view of TPS model) and the second experimental group (classes of NHT modeling). The instrument of this research uses the test of mathematics learning result. The hypothesis test is used  T-Test. The conclusion of research that are differences in the outcomes of the two learning models (NHT and TPS) on learning outcomes, based on the marginal mean of the TPS learning model is better learning outcomes than the NHT learning model. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Utin Desy Susiaty ◽  
Hodiyanto Hodiyanto

<p>The aims of this study is to find out: (1) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional; (2) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence; (3) better learning outcomes between students with high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence on each learning model; (4) a better learning model between contextual, realistic or conventional at each level of interpersonal intelligence. This research is using the experimental method. The sampling technique is cluster random sampling. Data collection tools used were questionnaires and tests. The data analysis technique used is the analysis of three-way variance with unequal cells. The results showed that: (1) contextual learning models are better than realistic but provide the same learning outcomes as conventional, while realistic and conventional learning outcomes are equally good; (2) students who have high, medium or low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (3) In each learning model, students with high, medium and low interpersonal intelligence have the same learning outcomes; (4) At each level of interpersonal intelligence, the contextual learning model is better than realistic and conventional.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Sri Utami ◽  
Lalu Sucipto

Abstrak - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Salafiyah Darul Falah Mataram yang berjumlah 153 siswa. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas VIII B dengan jumlah 28 siswa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif, dengan desain pre-eksperimen (One Group Pretest Postest Design). Teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu menggunakan teknik cluster  random sampling . Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji-t test Sampel Related. Hasil perhitungan uji-t tes Sampel Related  didapatkan  sebesar dan sebesar dengan taraf signifikan . Karena , maka menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) efektif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa.Abstract: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Teachers Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model for students' math problem solving skills. The population in this study is the students of grade VIII SMP Salafiyah Darul Falah Mataram, amounting to 153 students. The sample in this research is class VIII B with the number of 28 students. The type of research used is quantitative research, with pre-experiment design (One Group Pretest Postest Design). The sampling technique is using cluster random sampling technique. Technique of data analysis using test-t test Sampel Related. The result of t-test calculation of Sample Related test obtained t_hitung equal to 19,01 and t_table equal to 2,052 with significant level 5%. Because t_hitung≥t_tabel, then show that Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model effective to student's math problem solving ability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dewi Mutia Anggraeni ◽  
Paridjo . ◽  
Eleonora Dwi W

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan : (1) Untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dan model pembelajaran Ekspositori.(2) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik dari pada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi.(3) Untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembeljaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Brebes tahun pelajaran 2016/2017. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Sampel yang diambil sebanyak 2 kelas eksperimen, 2 kelas kontrol, dan 1 kelas ujicoba. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah tes, angket, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dengan menetapkan taraf signifikansi 5% adalah uji Anava dengan Rancangan Acak Kelompok, uji-t satu pihak kanan, dan uji-t satu pihak kiri, yang sebelumnya telah dilakukan uji prasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan uji homogenitas. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Ada perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika antara peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry dengan model pembelajaran Ekspositori. (2) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry lebih baik daripada yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar tinggi. (3) Prestasi belajar matematika peserta didik yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Think Pair and Share melalui Pendekatan Inquiry tidak lebih baik atau sama dengan yang diajar menggunakan model pembelajaran Ekspositori ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar rendah. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out whether there are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students taught by using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach and Expository learning models. (2) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievements of students taught by the model Think Pair and Share learning through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) To find out whether the mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is not better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learning independence. The population in this study were students of class VII of SMP Negeri 3 Brebes academic year 2016/2017. Sampling uses cluster random sampling technique. Samples taken were 2 experimental classes, 2 control classes, and 1 trial class. Data collection techniques used were tests, questionnaires, and documentation. The data analysis technique used by setting the 5% significance level is the Anova test with the Randomized Group Design, the right-hand t-test, and the left-hand t-test, which has previously been carried out prerequisite tests namely normality test and homogeneity test. From the results of the study it can be concluded that: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning achievement between students who are taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach with the Expository learning model. (2) Mathematics learning achievement of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach is better than those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of high learning independence. (3) Mathematics learning achievements of students taught using Think Pair and Share learning models through the Inquiry Approach are not better or the same as those taught using the Expository learning model in terms of low learningindependence. Keywords: ThinkPairandShare, InquiryApproach, Learning Independence, Mathematics Learning Achievement.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Sari’ah Sari’ah ◽  
Saiful Prayogi ◽  
Sukainil Ahzan

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation type against scince generic skills of students. This research was a quasi-experimental. The population in the study was a grade VIII MTS Nurul Falah NW Lajut with 36 students. Sampling was derived by random sampling where the 16 students of VIII A as on experimental class and VIII B as a control class with 20 students.Based on pretest data analysis, obtained an average value of 31,25 experimental class and control class was 42,2.Posttest analysis showed an average grade of 65,75 experimental and control class was 61,6.  The data analysis technique was t-test. It show t- test= 5,80 and t-table = 1,67. Because of  t-count is greater than the  t- table, it can be concluded that there were the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation generic against science skills of student.


2019 ◽  
pp. 103-121
Author(s):  
Mispa Adelistra Br Ginting ◽  
Anitha Paulina Tinambunan

This study aims to test and analyze the influence of socioeconomic factors and work motivation on the work performance of the CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Cooperative Karo District employees. The sampling technique used is Proportional Random Sampling. The data analysis technique is multiple linear regression. From the results of data processing, socioeconomic factors were found to have a positive and significant effect on the work performance of the CU Cinta Kasih Tigapanah Cooperative employees in Karo District. T test results show that the socio-economic variable variable 2,819> t table 1,668 and with a significant level of 0.009 t table 1,668.


Kappa Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108
Author(s):  
Fartina Fartina ◽  
◽  
Khaerus Syahidi ◽  
Laxmi Zahara ◽  
Zaotul Wardi ◽  
...  

This study aims to determine the differences in student achievement who are taught using interactive multimedia drills model with students who are taught using science comic media. This type of research is experimental research. The population in this study is all students of class VII MTs. The State of Selong Model and the sampling was determined by using cluster random sampling technique to select the class and simple random sampling to select the students in that class. The second sampling technique is random sampling by drawing lots, cluster random sampling, namely the class is divided into experimental class I, namely the class that is taught using interactive multimedia drills model (class VII-E) and the experimental class II, namely the class that is taught using comic media. science (class VII-F), each of which consists of 36 students. And simple random sampling, where students are drawn after data collection to reduce the sample to 30 students to facilitate hypothesis testing. The data collection technique used post-test while the data analysis technique to test the hypothesis was the t-test. The results of data analysis using t-test showed that there were differences in student achievement who were taught using interactive multimedia drills model with students who were taught using science comic media. This can be seen in the post-test results where t-count > t-table is 2.206 > 2.002. Thus H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. This means that there are differences in student achievement who are taught using interactive multimedia drills model with students who are taught using science comics


Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Margareta Widi Trisna Putri ◽  
Novisita Ratu

Abstrak: Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif yang bertujuan menganalisis tingkat kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 8 Salatiga. Subjek penelitian terdiri 3 siswa yang dipilih berdasarkan hasil tes untuk mewakili tingkat kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Teknik pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cara purposive. Penelitian dilakukan dengan cara tes dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, dapat disimpulkan bahwa: (1) subjek yang termasuk dalam TKBK 4 (sangat kreatif), (2) subjek yang termasuk TKBK 3 (kreatif), (3) subjek yang termasuk TKBK 2 (cukup kreatif), (4) subjek yang termasuk dalam TKBK 1 (kurang kreatif), (5) subjek yang termasuk dalam TKBK 0 (tidak kreatif).Abstract:  The type of this research is done by qualitative descriptive that aims to analyze the level of creative thinking ability of the seventh grade students in SMP Negeri 8 Salatiga. The research subject is consisted of 3 students that are selected based on test results to represent the level of creative thinking ability. The sampling technique is done by purposive method. The research is done by test and interview. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that: (1) subjects that includes TKBK 4 (very creative), (2) subjects that includes TKBK 3 (creative), (3) that subjects includes TKBK 2 (creative enough), (4) subjects that includes TKBK 1 (less creative), (5) subjects that includes in TKBK 0 (not creative).


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trioki Ningsih ◽  
Puji Prastowo

This research aimed to determine the differences between student’s learning outcomes that were taught by used discovery learning and problem based learning models on topic of environmental pollution in grade x SMA Negeri 1 Sunggal in academic year 2014/2015, The population of all of the students at grade X, that consisted of 4 classes and total of the students were 156 students. The samples were taken at random sampling of two classes, with details class X2 used discovery learning model and X1 used problem based learning model and each class numbered 39 students, so the number of samples in this study were 78 students. Type of research was experimental. The results showed that the learning outcomes of students who were taught by using discovery learning model was 82,05 ± 8,25, while the learning outcomes of students who were taught by using the problem based learning model was 76,41 ± 8,15. The result from the t-test at α = 0,05 with th 3,044; tt  1,995; and dk 76 refer that there was significant different from student’s learning outcomes who were taught using discovery learning model with problem based learning model on topic of environmental pollution in grade X SMA Negeri 1 Sunggal in academic year 2014/2015.Keywords : discovery learning, learning model, learning outcomes, problem based learning


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document